CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01828801Updated Sep 26, 2016

Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal 522 Post-Market Surveillance Study

An observational study in Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal, Revised Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal and Adverse Local Tissue Reaction, sponsored by DePuy Orthopaedics. Completed at 8 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-26.

Sponsored by DePuy Orthopaedics · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
276
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate blood metal ion levels as a function of time of implantation for the Pinnacle Acetabular MoM system.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal
  • Revised Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal
  • Adverse Local Tissue Reaction
  • Metal Ions
  • Total Hip Arthroplasty

Keywords

  • Adverse Local Tissue Reaction
  • Metal Ions
  • Serum
  • Whole Blood
  • Metal-on-Metal
  • Total Hip Arthroplasty
03

In context

Lead sponsor

DePuy Orthopaedics is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients that have undergone a total hip arthroplasty with the Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal device within the past 8 years.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Able to (or capable of) provide written, voluntary consent to participate in the clinical investigation
  2. Is willing and able to return for all protocol defined clinic visits
  3. Subject has a combination of the following implants in the study hip (unless in pre-op cohort):

    1. Pinnacle acetabular shell with or without Gription TM porous coating
    2. M-specification cobalt-chrome femoral head or aSphere M-specification cobalt-chrome femoral head
    3. Ultamet metal insert
    4. One of the following stems

    i. S-ROM ii. Corail iii. Tri-Lock iv. AML v. Summit vi. Prodigy vii. C-Stem

  4. Subject has high quality films available for review that were taken within 12 months of the primary surgery of the following views:

    1. Standing AP-Pelvis
    2. Standing AP-Proximal Femur (if this view is not available but the AP-Pelvis shows the entire implant and greater trochanter, that is also acceptable)
    3. Lauenstein Lateral Proximal Femur (Lateral-Femur)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject refuses to allow their medical records to be inspected by the Sponsor, representatives of the Sponsor, the medical office staff and/or representatives from FDA
  2. The implanted hip components in the study hip (exclusive of cement), are not all DePuy components (unless in pre-op cohort)
  3. The primary procedure occurred greater than 8 (eight) years ago (unless in pre-op cohort)
  4. FOR PRE-OPERATIVE COHORT ONLY: the subject has a MoM contralateral hip
  5. FOR PRE-OPERATIVE COHORT ONLY: the subject is undergoing a revision of the Ipsilateral hip
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
276 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Pre-Op

    Pre-operative patients who will undergo a total hip replacement.

  • 1 year post-op

    Patients that underwent a Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) and at the time of enrollment, based on their date of surgery, were 1 year post-operative . Alternatively these are patients who have had their Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal hip revised but if they were not revised, would have fallen into this time point.

    Device: Pinnacle Metal-on Metal

  • 2 year post-op

    Patients that underwent a Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) and at the time of enrollment, based on their date of surgery, were 2 years post-operative . Alternatively these are patients who have had their Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal hip revised but if they were not revised, would have fallen into this time point.

    Device: Pinnacle Metal-on Metal

  • 3 year post-op

    Patients that underwent a Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) and at the time of enrollment, based on their date of surgery, were 3 years post-operative . Alternatively these are patients who have had their Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal hip revised but if they were not revised, would have fallen into this time point.

    Device: Pinnacle Metal-on Metal

  • 4 year post-op

    Patients that underwent a Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) and at the time of enrollment, based on their date of surgery, were 4 years post-operative . Alternatively these are patients who have had their Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal hip revised but if they were not revised, would have fallen into this time point.

    Device: Pinnacle Metal-on Metal

  • 5 year post-op

    Patients that underwent a Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) and at the time of enrollment, based on their date of surgery, were 5 years post-operative . Alternatively these are patients who have had their Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal hip revised but if they were not revised, would have fallen into this time point.

    Device: Pinnacle Metal-on Metal

  • 6 year post-op

    Patients that underwent a Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) and at the time of enrollment, based on their date of surgery, were 6 years post-operative . Alternatively these are patients who have had their Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal hip revised but if they were not revised, would have fallen into this time point.

    Device: Pinnacle Metal-on Metal

  • 7 year post-op

    Patients that underwent a Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) and at the time of enrollment, based on their date of surgery, were 7 years post-operative . Alternatively these are patients who have had their Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal hip revised but if they were not revised, would have fallen into this time point.

    Device: Pinnacle Metal-on Metal

  • 8 year post-op

    Patients that underwent a Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) and at the time of enrollment, based on their date of surgery, were 8 years post-operative . Alternatively these are patients who have had their Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal hip revised but if they were not revised, would have fallen into this time point.

    Device: Pinnacle Metal-on Metal

Interventions

  • DevicePinnacle Metal-on Metal

    All patients that are post-operative will have undergone total hip arthroplasty with the Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal device

    Also known as: Pinnacle MoM, Ultamet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Chromium serum ion level across time intervals

    To compare the chromium serum ion levels in the patient population from pre-operatively through 8 years post-operatively in a 1-way ANOVA. This is a cross-sectional study so each time interval (pre-operatively through 8 years post-operatively) will be a different cohort of patients.

    Time frame: Pre-operatively through 8 years

  2. Change in Chromium whole blood ion level across time intervals

    To compare the chromium whole blood ion levels in the patient population from pre-operatively through 8 years post-operatively in a 1-way ANOVA. This is a cross-sectional study so each time interval (pre-operatively through 8 years post-operatively) will be a different cohort of patients.

    Time frame: Pre-operatively through 8 years

  3. Change in Cobalt serum ion level across time intervals

    To compare the cobalt serum ion levels in the patient population from pre-operatively through 8 years post-operatively in a 1-way ANOVA. This is a cross-sectional study so each time interval (pre-operatively through 8 years post-operatively) will be a different cohort of patients.

    Time frame: Pre-operatively through 8 years

  4. Change in Cobalt whole blood ion level across time intervals

    To compare the cobalt whole blood ion levels in the patient population from pre-operatively through 8 years post-operatively in a 1-way ANOVA. This is a cross-sectional study so each time interval (pre-operatively through 8 years post-operatively) will be a different cohort of patients.

    Time frame: Pre-operatively through 8 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Poolability of data across stem types

    Within each of the primary analyses, the poolability of data across stem types will be confirmed with a 2-way ANOVA model in which both time interval and stem type are independent variables.

    Time frame: Pre-operatively through 8 years post-operatively

  2. Incidence of adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR)

    To determine trends in the incidence of ALTR over time.

    Time frame: Pre-operatively through 8 years post-operatively

  3. Implant survivorship

    To determine implant survivorship, where an implant is considered to be surviving when none of the total hip replacement (THR) system components have been removed or replaced, so that the original system with metal-on-metal (MoM) articulating surfaces remains intact. Implant survivorship will be analyzed in two ways: 1) for all revisions (for any reason) and 2) for revisions due to ALTR.

    Time frame: Through 8 years post-operatively

  4. To identify the incidence of ALTR among unrevised subjects

    To identify the incidence of ALTR among unrevised subjects through physical examination and imaging.

    Time frame: Through 8 years post-operatively

  5. Ion levels among revised subjects

    To compare cobalt and chromium ion level (prior to revision) vs. baseline for subjects who are revised.

    Time frame: Pre-operatively through 8 years post-operatively

  6. Harris Hip and HOOS analysis for pain, function and total score

    To identify the incidence of pain or functional symptoms among unrevised subjects with a Harris Hip and HOOS evaluation. To compare cobalt and chromium ion levels for unrevised subject who are exhibiting pain or functional symptoms vs. unrevised subjects who are not exhibiting pain or functional symptoms.

    Time frame: Though 8 years post-operatively

  7. To determine the association of adverse events with elevated ion levels

    To investigate the association of adverse events with elevated cobalt and chromium ion levels. For each respective adverse event, to compare cobalt and chromium ion levels for subjects who have vs. subjects who have not exhibited the adverse event. For each respective adverse event category, to present summary statistics of cobalt and chromium ion levels for subjects who have vs. subjects who have not exhibited the adverse event, stratified by post-op time cohort.

    Time frame: Through 8 years post-operatively

  8. Trending

    Trends (over time since initial implant) will be evaluated for: 1) revisions (survivorship), 2) adverse events, 3) pain or functional symptoms (via Harris Hip and HOOS evaluations), 4) incidence of ALTR in unrevised subjects

    Time frame: Through 8 years post-operatively

  9. Patient history and demographics and association with outcomes

    Patient demographic and subject history will be evaluated for association with: 1) higher metal ion levels and 2) risk of revision.

    Time frame: Throughout 8 years post-operatively

  10. Modes and causes of implant failure

    To evaluate modes and causes of implant failure based on an analysis of reasonably available explanted retrieved devices.

    Time frame: Through 8 years post-operatively

  11. Metal ion levels and association with reason for revision

    To compare cobalt and chromium levels across the different reasons for revision.

    Time frame: Through 8 years post-operatively

  12. Comparison of metal ion levels across subjects with vs. without ALTR

    Cobalt and Chromium ion levels will be compared for unrevised subjects who were not diagnosed with an ALTR vs. unrevised subject who were diagnosed with an ALTR.

    Time frame: Through 8 years post-operatively

  13. Ion level vs. baseline for ALTR subjects

    To compare cobalt and chromium ion level vs. baseline for subject who are diagnosed with ALTR.

    Time frame: Through 8 years post-operatively

  14. Ion level change from first measurement for ALTR subjects

    Cobalt and chromium ion levels will be compared from first measurement to the time of revision (prior to revision) or the time of last follow-up visit in the study, whichever comes first, for subjects who are diagnosed with an ALTR.

    Time frame: Through 8 years post-operatively

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Orange, California, United States
  • Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
  • Lone Tree, Colorado, United States
  • Syracuse, New York, United States
  • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
  • Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Cincinnatti, Ohio, United States
  • Austin, Texas, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 26, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01828801
Lead sponsor
DePuy Orthopaedics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 11, 2013
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
Nov 2015
Completion
Aug 2016
Last update
Sep 26, 2016

Study contacts

Mary F Panozzo, BS
study director · DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion