CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01809535Updated Mar 12, 2013

Monthly Versus Biweekly Endoscopic Variceal Ligation for the Prevention of Esophageal Variceal Rebleeding

An interventional study of Wilson-Cook four shooter saeed multi-band ligator and Wilson-Cook four shooter saeed multi-band ligator in Variceal Bleeding, Endoscopic Variceal Ligation, sponsored by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-03-12.

Sponsored by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) has proved to be effective in the prevention of esophageal variceal rebleeding. However, the optimal interval of EVL remains unclear. Our previous studies demonstrated that repeating EVL every 3-4 weeks could achieve an appreciable low incidence of variceal rebleeding and mortality. In our own opinion, many shallow post-EVL ulcers may hamper the performance of variceal ligation if EVL is performed at intervals of 1-2 weeks. So far the optimal treatment interval remained unknown. The investigators hypothesis the Monthly EVL is superior to the Biweekly EVL in the prevention of esophageal variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients.

Read the detailed description

Esophageal varices are the most important portosystemic collaterals owing to their rupture results in variceal hemorrhage, which is a devastating event of portal hypertension. Cirrhotic patients surviving a first episode of variceal rupture have a risk of over 60% of suffering from recurrent bleeding within 1 year and mortality from each rebleeding episode is about 20%. Except for patients with a terminal illness, the secondary preventive measures are required to reduce variceal rebleeding to improve patient survival and clinical outcome. Endoscopic and pharmacological therapies are 2 main methods of intervention used to achieve the treatment goals. Endoscopic therapy contains endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) or endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), which would obliterate varices by causing thrombosis and fibrosis formation. However, EVL has currently replaced EIS as the endoscopic therapy of choice because it is safer, more effective, and has lower morbidity rate.

Many experts and scholars suggest to repeat EVL every 1-2 weeks until obliteration of esophageal varices to prevent variceal rebleeding, whereas, there are insufficient data to support the concept that EVL at intervals of 1-2 week is appropriate. Our previous studies demonstrated that repeating EVL every 3-4 weeks could achieve an appreciable low incidence of variceal rebleeding and mortality. In our own opinion, many shallow post-EVL ulcers may hamper the performance of variceal ligation if EVL is performed at intervals of 1-2 weeks. A randomized controlled trial from Japan showed that EVL performed at a bimonthly interval obtained a higher variceal obliteration rate, lower variceal recurrence rate and fewer additional treatments. Bimonthly EVL in the secondary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage may be theoretically improper because post-EVL variceal rebleeding could only be significantly reduced in whom variceal obliteration was achieved within a short treatment course. The other retrospective investigation from the United States demonstrated the principal technical aspects of EVL in the prevention of variceal rebleeding, suggesting the benefit of intersession intervals > 3 weeks compared with intervals \< 3 weeks.

This randomized controlled study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness and safety of EVL with two different intersession intervals (bimonthly vs. biweekly). In addition, the risk factors that were associated with variceal rebleeding and mortality were analyzed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Variceal Bleeding, Endoscopic Variceal Ligation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • endoscopic variceal ligation
  • post-EVL ulcer
  • variceal bleeding
03

In context

Hemorrhage

3,000 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhage; 474 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is below the median of 100 across 1,985 interventional studies indexed under Hemorrhage.

Browse Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. is the lead sponsor of 102 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • active or recent hemorrhage from esophageal varices;
  • portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age > 80 or \<20 years old
  • association with hepatocellular carcinoma or other neoplasms;
  • association with cerebral vascular accident, uremia, acute coronary syndrome or other severe illnesses;
  • history of gastric variceal bleeding;
  • a history of undergoing EIS, EVL, cyanoacrylate injection or prior use of beta blocker;
  • a history of prior shunt operation or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS);
  • deep jaundice (serum bilirubin > 10 mg/dL);
  • encephalopathy equal to or greater than stage II;
  • failure in control of index variceal bleeding;
  • death within 48 h of admission; or
  • refusal to participate in the trial.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    The Monthly EVL

    Patients in the Monthly group were received EVL at 28-day treatment intervals.

    Device: Wilson-Cook four shooter saeed multi-band ligator

  • Active comparator
    The Biweekly EVL

    Patients in the Biweekly group received repeating EVL every 2 weeks.

    Device: Wilson-Cook four shooter saeed multi-band ligator

Interventions

  • DeviceWilson-Cook four shooter saeed multi-band ligator

    Patients in the Monthly group were received EVL at 28-day treatment intervals.Orally 20 mg of rabeprazole (Pariet®) once a day for 2 weeks was given to hasten post-EVL ulcer healing in each treatment session. Once esophageal varices were obliterated, surveillance endoscopy was done every 3 months for one year, then every 6 months to check for recurrent varices.

  • DeviceWilson-Cook four shooter saeed multi-band ligator

    Patients in the Biweekly group were received EVL at 14-day treatment intervals.Orally 20 mg of rabeprazole (Pariet®) once a day for 2 weeks was given to hasten post-EVL ulcer healing in each treatment session. Once esophageal varices were obliterated, surveillance endoscopy was done every 3 months for one year, then every 6 months to check for recurrent varices.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rebleeding

    Rebleeding from esophageal varices was defined as the presence of hematemesis, melena or both and the bleeding source was identified to be esophageal varices by an emergency endoscopy. Only those who had a clinically significant bleeding, including hematemesis/melena, \> 100 ml of fresh blood drained from nasogastric tube, decrease 3 g hemoglobin if no transfusion is given and transfusion requirement \> 2 units of blood in the first 24 hours of admission, were considered rebleeding from portal hypertensive sources.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented rebleeding, or date of death from any cause, or date of study closure, whichever came first, assessed up to 46 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Variceal recurrence

    After success in variceal obliteration, recurrence of varices was defined as reappearance of esophageal varices or enlargement of previous residual small varices could be injected or ligated at endoscopy. Variceal recurrence was repeatedly treated by EVL using the same protocol in each study cohort.

    Time frame: From date of variceal obliteration until the date of first documented variceal recurrence, or date of death from any cause, or date of study closure, whichever came first, assessed up to 46 months

  2. All-cause death

    Causes of mortality included variceal bleeding, non-variceal bleeding or other causes rather than bleeding.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, or date of study closure, whichever came first, assessed up to 46 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital
    Kaohsiung, 81362, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wang HM, Lo GH, Chen WC, Chan HH, Tsai WL, Yu HC, Tsay FW, Hsu PI. Randomized controlled trial of monthly versus biweekly endoscopic variceal ligation for the prevention of esophageal variceal rebleeding. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jun;29(6):1229-36. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12538. PubMed 24955452 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01809535
Lead sponsor
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Collaborators
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC, National Yang-Ming University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC
Responsible party
Huay-Min Wang (Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 12, 2013
Start date
Jan 2009
Primary completion
Oct 2012
Completion
Oct 2012
Last update
Mar 12, 2013

Study contacts

Huay-Min Wang, MD
principal investigator · Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Ping-I Hsu, MD
study director · Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Gin-Ho Lo, MD
study director · E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion