An interventional study of Supervision Practices of TF-CBT in Post Traumatic Stress, Overall Functioning and Clinician Fidelity, sponsored by University of Washington. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-01.
Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
The primary goal of this study is to examine the impact of varying supervision strategies on clinician fidelity and client outcomes in a community-based setting. Prior research has established that training approaches that do not include a period of intervention-specific supervision or consultation are ineffective and that implementation efforts that include only an initial period of supervision show an eventual attenuation of gains in knowledge and fidelity in practice. Ongoing supervision may be required for effective and sustained implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in community-based settings. However, supervision is one of the least investigated aspects of training. "Gold standard" elements of supervision from efficacy trials include review of sessions, standardized procedures for monitoring client outcomes and model fidelity, and ongoing skill-building (e.g., behavioral rehearsal). The degree (e.g., frequency, intensity) to which these strategies are used in community-based settings is unknown.
There are a growing number of national and statewide efforts to increase the reach of EBPs through dissemination and implementation initiatives. There are 18 statewide initiatives to implement Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), an EBP for child trauma exposure and sequelae. Many of the community based TF-CBT implementation efforts, and those for other EBPs, include a specific focus on supervisors. However, the limited scientific literature provides very little guidance for these efforts. Aims of the current trial include 1) studying supervision with existing implementation supports; particularly presence of gold standard elements; 2) evaluating the effects of varying supervision strategies on fidelity and client outcomes; and 3) testing the mediating effect of treatment fidelity on the relationship between supervision type and client outcomes. We propose a two-phased, within-subjects and between subjects design. In Phase I (9 months), we examined supervision with implementation support. In Phase II (30 months), we will examine two specific supervision conditions, each including varying EBP supervision elements.
University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,397 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.
Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 132 (86%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Half of the study clinicians will be randomized to this supervision condition of TF-CBT.
Behavioral: Supervision Practices of TF-CBT
Half of the study clinicians will be randomized to this supervision condition of TF-CBT.
Behavioral: Supervision Practices of TF-CBT
Supervisors will be trained in one of two supervision strategies: Symptom and Fidelity Monitoring (SFM) or Symptom and Fidelity Monitoring + Behavioral Rehearsal (SFM + BR)
Coding Therapy Sessions to Assess Clinician Fidelity to TF-CBT Strategy.
Evidence-Based Practices such as Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) usually include ongoing supervision to assess how true (e.g. fidelity) clinicians stay to their training in the specific treatment. We will be coding therapy audio recordings using an adapted TF-CBT Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Children (TF-CBT TPOCS-S) scoring manual. We will also use clinician self-report of fidelity using the Washington State Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Toolkit, and supervisor-report of fidelity in the EBP Toolkit. We will ultimately be assessing how fidelity serves as a mediator for the relationship between supervision condition and client outcomes.
Time frame: 2 years
Client outcomes for Post-Traumatic Stress and overall functioning
We will complete phone interviews with children and guardians to assess the client outcomes at baseline, 3 months post-baseline, and 6 months post-baseline. We will use the UCLA Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index (PTSD RI) to assess trauma exposure and post-traumatic stress symptoms. We will use the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), a short behavioral screening survey, to assess overall functioning.
Time frame: 6 months
This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Washington