CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01798290INAMEDIUpdated Apr 21, 2014

Impact of Narrative Medicine (Workshop Reading Diaries)

An interventional study of narrative medicine: reading workshop and critical reading in Empathy, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-04-21.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the impact of an educational program of Narrative Medicine "workshop reading diaries" dedicated to medical students on their empathy.

Design: Randomized Controlled Trial in 2 arms. Participants: Medical students (4th years) of the University Paris Descartes. Methods: participants will be randomized in 2 groups. The allocation of participants will be done by a computerized randomization list, the sequence will be created by an independent statistician. Participants will be blinded of the study hypothesis. Allocation concealment will be provided because only the statistician will have access to the randomization list.

A program of Narrative Medicine with lesson in small group of "workshop reading patients' diaries " vs "workshop reading literature".

Outcome: The primary endpoint will be a first measure of the empathy of the medical students. The secondary endpoints will be a second measure of the empathy of the medical student; satisfaction of the student relative to the educational program .

Potential interests: We believe that the workshop "reading patients' diaries" can develop the thinking of the student with respect to his behavior with the patient, and so the relation between student and patient.

Sample size expected: 200 participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Empathy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • All students in the fourth year of medical

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refuse to participate
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Behavioral: narrative medicine: reading workshop

    Students allocated to the active comparator arm will follow 5 sessions in Class-led instruction of reading patients' diaries or nurses'diaries. They will be divided into eight subgroups of 12 students. The first and fifth sessions will be presential, and 2nd 3rd and 4th sessions will be homework to do on internet.

    Behavioral: narrative medicine: reading workshop

  • Active comparator
    Behavioral: critical reading

    Students allocated to the active comparator arm will follow 5 sessions in Class-led instruction of reading literature. They will be divided into eight subgroups of 12 students. The first and fifth sessions will be presential, and 2nd 3rd and 4th sessions will be homework to do on internet.

    Behavioral: critical reading

Interventions

  • Behavioralnarrative medicine: reading workshop
  • Behavioralcritical reading
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy

    self-administered questionnaire consisting of 20 items scored by a Likert-type scale (strongly agree = 7, strongly disagree = 1): 10 items are rated positively, others 10 items are rated negatively. The total score ranges from 20 to 140.

    Time frame: 5 months after randomization (i.e. 1 month after the end of the intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Interpersonal Reactivity Index

    self-administered questionnaire with 4 subscales (Perspective Taking, Empathic Concern, Fantasy, Personal Distress) each containing seven items (a total of 28 items). The items are scored by a Likert scale (0 = Does not describe me well to 4 = Describes me very well).

    Time frame: 5 months after randomization (i.e. 1 month after the end of the intervention)

  2. students' satisfaction

    measure on a numeric scale from 0 (without interest) to 10 (very interesting)

    Time frame: 4 months after randomization (i.e. 1 month after the end of the intervention)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre d'épidémiologie clinique, Hôtel Dieu
    Paris, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01798290
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 25, 2013
Start date
Dec 2012
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Last update
Apr 21, 2014

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion