An interventional study of Enhanced one piece drainable pouch with Type A mouldable adhesive and Enhanced one piece drainable pouch with Type B mouldable adhesive in Ileostomy, sponsored by ConvaTec Inc.. Terminated at 5 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-07-03.
Sponsored by ConvaTec Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Certain research and innovation projects require an assessment of the adhesive properties of adhesives, which cannot be established from in-vitro testing. The most valuable data for assessments of this type comes from adhesion and wear time studies involving application to living human skin on volunteers. The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and performance of an enhanced one piece drainable pouch with a mouldable skin barrier wafer in a group of subjects with an ileostomy.
ConvaTec Inc. is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Enhanced one piece drainable pouch with Type A mouldable adhesive for Stage 1 and 2 followed by pouch with Type B mouldable adhesive for Stage 3
Device: Enhanced one piece drainable pouch with Type A mouldable adhesive · Device: Enhanced one piece drainable pouch with Type B mouldable adhesive
Enhanced one piece drainable pouch with Type B mouldable adhesive for Stage 1 and 2 followed by pouch with Type A mouldable adhesive for Stage 3
Device: Enhanced one piece drainable pouch with Type A mouldable adhesive · Device: Enhanced one piece drainable pouch with Type B mouldable adhesive
Safety - evaluated by the nature and frequency of adverse events including stomal and peristomal skin condition and lesions
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of the enhanced one piece drainable pouch with a mouldable skin barrier wafer and two alternate adhesives in subjects with an ileostomy.
Time frame: 59 days
Performance
Performance will be evaluated by comparing the following categories to the subject's usual pouching system Wear time Adhesion Ease of Use Mouldability Comfort and flexibility Security Skin protection Wafer seal integrity Undermining Filter performance Accessory usage At the end of the study a comparative assessment of the subject's usual pouching system and the study pouch will be made.
Time frame: 59 days
This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
ConvaTec Inc.