ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01767506ASANTEUpdated Oct 9, 2017Results posted

A Surveillance and Azithromycin Treatment for Newcomers and Travelers Evaluation: The ASANTE Trial

An interventional study of Surveillance and treatment with azithromycin of newcomer and traveler families and Usual care in Trachoma, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-09.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Infection with C. Trachomatis has decreased substantially in trachoma endemic areas following repeated annual mass drug administration (MDA) with azithromycin, although not as rapidly as anticipated. The investigators propose to conduct a clinical trial in 52 communities in Kongwa, Tanzania that on average have trachoma infection at 3.5%. The investigators plan that all communities would have annual rounds of MDA if infection is greater than 1% or follicular trachoma (TF) is 5% or more, but half would be randomized to a surveillance and treatment program to identify and treat new families and families who travel after mass treatment. Communities will have MDA stopped if infection is 1% or less, or TF is less than 5%. MDA will be reinstated if infection re-emerges to 6% or more. The proportion of communities that are able to stop mass treatment will be compared in the group of communities randomized to mass treatment plus the newcomer/traveler treatment program compared to the communities randomized to mass treatment alone after 24 months.

At the recommendation of the Data Safety and Monitoring Committee in March 2015, thirty eight (38) of the 52 communities identified as being at risk of trachoma re-emergence at 18 months will be surveyed at 30 months. At risk of trachoma re-infection communities have C. trachomatis infection rates less than or equal to 1% or TF \< 5% at the time of the 18 month survey. Surveillance of communities for families that meet the newcomer or traveler status will extend 6 months beyond the 24 month survey to 30 months in the intervention communities only. A survey of sentinel children in the intervention and control communities at 30 months will be conducted to assess the level of trachoma and infection in all 38 communities at risk of trachoma re-emergence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trachoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Trachoma
  • Azithromycin
  • Mass treatment
03

In context

Trachoma

39 studies on the registry are indexed under Trachoma; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 52 is below the median of 1,300 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Trachoma.

Browse Trachoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,815 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Census and Mass Drug Administration (MDA): All persons residing in the 52 study communities will be eligible for both the census and the annual mass azithromycin administrations.

Intervention: In the 26 intervention communities, active surveillance for new families and returning travelers will be undertaken, and those meeting the criteria below will be eligible for family treatment with azithromycin if:

Families are "newcomers" and

  • They have children under 10 years of age
  • They have moved into a new house in the community or into an existing household
  • They plan to reside for at least 1 month in the study community and
  • They have moved from a community that has not had an MDA in the last year

Families are classified as having traveled and

  • They have children under 10 years of age
  • They participated in a previous census in the same community
  • They left the community for at least 8 weeks (2 months) for an area that has not received MDA in the past year and at least one child has returned and
  • They have returned to reside in the community for at least 2 months

Sentinel Children: In all 52 communities, samples of 135 children will be selected from the community census lists every six months for survey and examination.

These children:

  • must be between 1 year and 9.9 years of age,
  • must be a resident in the community and not a short-term (less than 2 months) visitor,
  • must not have an ocular condition that would preclude grading trachoma or taking an ocular specimen,
  • must be willing to have a swab taken as part of being a sentinel child (this is critical, as each swab result counts towards the criteria for stopping MDA), and
  • must have an identifiable guardian capable of providing consent to participate.

Adult Women: In all 52 communities, samples of 100 women will be selected from the baseline community census list.

These women:

  • must be aged 15 years and over
  • must be a resident in the community and not a short term (less than 2 months) visitor
  • must not have an ocular condition that precludes grading of scarring on upper conjunctiva
  • must be able to provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
52 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Communities will receive usual care, including annual mass drug administration with azithromycin if trachoma infection level is greater than 1% or TF is 5% or more. Communities will have MDA stopped if infection is 1% or less, or TF is less than 5%. MDA will be reinstated if infection re-emerges to 6% or more. In addition, surveillance and treatment with azithromycin of newcomer and traveler families within 2 weeks of arrival to or return to the community.

    Other: Surveillance and treatment with azithromycin of newcomer and traveler families · Other: Usual care

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Communities will receive usual care, including annual mass drug administration with azithromycin if trachoma infection level is greater than 1% or TF is 5% or more. Communities will have MDA stopped if infection is 1% or less, or TF is less than 5%. MDA will be reinstated if infection re-emerges to 6% or more.

    Other: Usual care

Interventions

  • OtherSurveillance and treatment with azithromycin of newcomer and traveler families

    The intervention is a surveillance for newcomers and travelers in communities, and provision of azithromycin to them at the time of arrival, in advance of scheduled mass drug administration

    Also known as: Zithromax

  • OtherUsual care

    Scheduled mass drug administration (MDA) of azithromycin if trachoma infection level is greater than 1% or TF is 5% or more. Communities will have MDA stopped if infection is 1% or less, or TF is less than 5%. MDA will be reinstated if infection re-emerges to 6% or more.

    Also known as: Zithromax

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Proportion of Communities With C. Trachomatis Infection Prevalence of 1% or Below

    The proportion of communities with C. trachomatis infection prevalence at 1% or below in children ages 1 to 9 years at the 24-month survey, comparing the intervention arm to the usual practice arm

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Proportion of Communities With Clinical Trachoma Prevalence of 5% or Below

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. The Mean of the Prevalence of Active Trachoma (TF) in Communities in Both Arms.

    Model the risk of active trachoma in intervention and control communities. We used the mean % and 95 % confidence interval as they present for a variable to describe the center of the population the sample represents and the precision of the estimate of that center. If the variable is normally distributed in the population, the probability is 95% that the true mean falls in the 95% confidence interval.

    Time frame: Baseline only

07

Results

Posted Oct 9, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInterventionUsual Care
StartedNANA
CompletedNANA
Not completedNANA

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Proportion of Communities With C. Trachomatis Infection Prevalence of 1% or Below

The proportion of communities with C. trachomatis infection prevalence at 1% or below in children ages 1 to 9 years at the 24-month survey, comparing the intervention arm to the usual practice arm

Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Count of units · community
The Proportion of Communities With C. Trachomatis Infection Prevalence of 1% or Below
communityInterventionUsual Care
The Proportion of Communities With C. Trachomatis Infection Prevalence of 1% or Below74
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Usual Care · Regression, Logistic · p = >0.05 · Odds ratio (or): 2.6 · 95% CI 0.56 to 11.9
SecondaryThe Proportion of Communities With Clinical Trachoma Prevalence of 5% or Below
Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Count of units · community
The Proportion of Communities With Clinical Trachoma Prevalence of 5% or Below
communityInterventionUsual Care
The Proportion of Communities With Clinical Trachoma Prevalence of 5% or Below2120
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Usual Care · Fisher Exact · p = 1 · Mean difference (final values): 3.9
SecondaryThe Mean of the Prevalence of Active Trachoma (TF) in Communities in Both Arms.

Model the risk of active trachoma in intervention and control communities. We used the mean % and 95 % confidence interval as they present for a variable to describe the center of the population the sample represents and the precision of the estimate of that center. If the variable is normally distributed in the population, the probability is 95% that the true mean falls in the 95% confidence interval.

Time frame:
Baseline only
Reported as:
Mean · community
The Mean of the Prevalence of Active Trachoma (TF) in Communities in Both Arms.
communityInterventionUsual Care
The Mean of the Prevalence of Active Trachoma (TF) in Communities in Both Arms.5.2 (3.7 to 6.6)4.9 (3.2 to 6.5)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected for 24 months. The Community Health Workers collected data on adverse events after each newcomer and traveler family was identified and treated.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)
Usual Care0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

We collected and analyzed data on community level. Age and sex were not part of final analysis.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(community)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Age not analyzed at community levelNANANA
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(community)InterventionUsual CareTotal
FemaleNANANA
MaleNANANA
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(community)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Tanzania262652
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • West SK, Munoz B, Mkocha H, Dize L, Gaydos CA, Swenor B, Ervin AM, Quinn TC. Treating village newcomers and travelers for trachoma: Results from ASANTE cluster randomized trial. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0178595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178595. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28662043 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2013, a primary completion of Dec 2015 and a completion of Feb 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Oct 2017, 1 year 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 9, 2013
First posted
Jan 14, 2013
Start
Jan 2013
Primary completionActual
Dec 2015
CompletionActual
Feb 2016
Results first posted
Oct 9, 2017
Last update
Oct 9, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01767506
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 14, 2013
Start date
Jan 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Feb 2016
Results posted
Oct 9, 2017
Last update
Oct 9, 2017

Study contacts

Sheila K West, PhD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion