CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01744717ESCID-MQUpdated Sep 19, 2016

Validation of "Escala de Conductas Indicadoras de Dolor" ESCID Scale for Measuring Pain in Critically Ill Patients

An observational study in Pain, sponsored by Puerta de Hierro University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-19.

Sponsored by Puerta de Hierro University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
286
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pain is an unpleasant and important stress factor, and a potentially harmful experience for critically ill patients. Pain is harder to evaluate in non-communicative patients, who can´t report their own pain. Behavioral indicators have been proved as useful and reliable for detecting and measuring pain in these patients, and have been the basis for constructing scales for measuring pain, such as the Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS), the Critical Care Observation Tool (CPOT) and the Scale of Behaviors Indicating Pain (ESCID) .

The BPS and ESCID were tested in a study with a sample of 42 critically ill patients in Spain, showing good validity and reliability.

The objective of this Spanish multicentre study is to test the validity and reliability of the ESCID scale in a large sample of critically ill patients with medical and postsurgical pathology for the detection and measurement of pain.

Read the detailed description

The specific Aims for the study are :

To determine the validity and reliability of the ESCID scale to assess pain in non-communicative critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation, in a large sample of critically ill medical and surgical patients.

To assess the relationship between the application of a common and painful procedure, usual in daily practice, and its associated changes in physiological indicators of pain: variation of heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, sweating.

To assess the degree of pain when applying two painful procedures documented as common in the usual care of critically ill patients, and one non-painful procedure, using two pain scales: ESCID and BPS.

To assess the differences in the employment of the pain scales in patients with medical and surgical pathology.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Keywords

  • Pain
  • mechanical ventilation
  • uncommunicative
  • Adult ICU patients pain
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Puerta de Hierro University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

ICU patients who are uncommunictive, receiving mechanical ventilation and undergoing any of the study procedures. Consent to participate will be requested to the family of the patient. Adults age 18 and over will be eligible for the study if they meet study inclusion criteria and don't meet any exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient must be 18 years of age or older
  • Patient's primary language spanish where the evaluation is performed
  • Patient meets IRB/Central EC requirements of the institution/ country where the evaluation is performed
  • Patient is receiving the study's procedures as part of standard care, excepting the non painful procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's condition is very unstable at the time of measurement of pain
  • Patient is receiving neuromuscular blocking medications at the time of measurement of pain
  • Patient´s probable or diagnosed delirium
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
286 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Critically ill uncommunicative patients

    Critically ill non-communicative patients, on mechanical ventilation

    Other: Pain measurement

Interventions

  • OtherPain measurement

    Pain intensity will be measured using 2 scales based on behaviour items, the Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) and the ESCID scale (Escala de Conductas Indicadoras de Dolor), by two independent observers , when applying two procedures registered as painful (PD) and common in clinical practice, and a non-painful procedure (PND). The measurement will be performed once per each patient and procedure. The procedures to be studied are the following: * TURNING / POSITIONING (moving side to side or up or down in bed) * ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (insertion of suction catheter into the endotracheal tube or tracheostomy in order to aspirate secretions) * NON PAINFUL PROCEDURE (Soft friction with gauze cloth on a healthy skin tissue portion, in the outer arm, forearm or anterior tibial area)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity will be measured through the use of 2 scales based on behaviour items, the Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) and the ''Scale of Behavioral Indicators of Pain'' (ESCID-Escala de Conductas Indicadoras de Dolor), by two independent observers with blind result among them, when the application of two procedures registered as painful (PD) and common in clinical practice, mobilization and tracheal suctioning, and one non-painful procedure (PND). The measurement will be performed once per each patient and procedure. The measurement of pain will be carried out in 3 stages: 5 minutes before the PD/PND, during PD/PND and 15 minutes after PD/PND.

    Time frame: 20 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital. Intensive Care Unit.
    Majadahonda, Madrid, Madrid 28222, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Latorre-Marco I, Solis-Munoz M, Acevedo-Nuevo M, Hernandez-Sanchez ML, Lopez-Lopez C, Sanchez-Sanchez Mdel M, Wojtysiak-Wojcicka M, De las Pozas-Abril J. Validation of the Behavioural Indicators of Pain Scale ESCID for pain assessment in non-communicative and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a research protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Jan;72(1):205-16. doi: 10.1111/jan.12808. Epub 2015 Sep 11. PubMed 26358885 ↗
  • Latorre-Marco I, Acevedo-Nuevo M, Solis-Munoz M, Hernandez-Sanchez L, Lopez-Lopez C, Sanchez-Sanchez MM, Wojtysiak-Wojcicka M, de Las Pozas-Abril J, Robleda-Font G, Frade-Mera MJ, De Blas-Garcia R, Gorgolas-Ortiz C, De la Figuera-Bayon J, Cavia-Garcia C. Psychometric validation of the behavioral indicators of pain scale for the assessment of pain in mechanically ventilated and unable to self-report critical care patients. Med Intensiva. 2016 Nov;40(8):463-473. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Aug 31. English, Spanish. PubMed 27590592 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01744717
Lead sponsor
Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
Collaborators
Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Hospital Universitario Getafe, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Hospital San Carlos, Madrid, Hospital De la Santa Creu y Sant Pau, Quirón Madrid University Hospital, Hospital de Cruces, Hospital de Basurto, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
Responsible party
Ignacio Latorre Marco (Nurse Degree, Intensive Care Unit nurse staff, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 7, 2012
Start date
Nov 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Jun 2016
Last update
Sep 19, 2016

Study contacts

Ignacio Latorre, RN
principal investigator · Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital. Medical ICU. Spain.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion