CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01744704NGF0112Updated Apr 19, 2024Results posted

Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of rhNGF Eye Drops in Healthy Volunteers

A Phase 1 interventional study of rhNGF 0.5 µg/mL Sentinel and rhNGF 5 µg/mL Sentinel in Healthy, sponsored by Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-19.

Sponsored by Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A · Phase 1, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of single and multiple ascending doses of rhNGF when administered as eye drops in healthy subjects.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase I, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled eye drops administration study of rh-NGF in healthy male and female subjects.

This study consists of a single ascending dose part (part 0 one drop single application). Then single ascending dose part (part A; one drop three times a day) and a multiple ascending dose part (part B; one drop three times a day for five days). All parts of the study will consist of 3 ascending dose levels.

In order to support the dose escalation MAD phase from Covance, Basel to Covance, Leeds, an additional cohort (0M) will be conducted at Covance, Leeds at the same dose level as cohort 1M to ensure a degree of consistency between the two sites, i.e. that no dose escalation stopping criteria were met at either site.

In Part 0, each ascending dose cohort will include 3 subjects treated with one dose of rh-NGF.

In part A, each ascending dose cohort will include 6 subjects treated with rh-NGF and 2 with placebo.

In part B, each ascending dose cohort will include 9 subjects treated with rh-NGF drug and 3 with placebo, in addition to cohort 0M, which will include 3 subjects treated with rh-NGF and 1 with placebo

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy

Keywords

  • Nerve Growth Factor
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Eye Drops
  • rh-NGF
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects, aged between 18 and 60 years, inclusive.
  • Subject has to be able to communicate well with the investigator, understands and complies with the requirements of the study, and understands and signs the written volunteer informed consent form.
  • Subject's systemic and ocular medical history must be considered normal in the opinion of the investigator at the Screening and Baseline visits.
  • Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score ≤ 0.00 LogMAR (≥83 ETDRS letters, 20/20 Snellen or 1.0 decimal fraction) in each eye at the Screening and Baseline visits.
  • Normal anterior segment on external and slit lamp examination in both eyes at the Screening and Baseline visits.
  • Normal posterior segment on fundus ophthalmoscopic examination in both eyes at the Screening and Baseline visits.
  • Subject must be considered in good systemic health in the opinion of the investigator at the Screening and Baseline visits, as determined by:

    1. Subject's body mass index is between 18.5 and 30.4 kg/m2 inclusive
    2. A pre-study physical examination with no clinically significant abnormalities.
    3. Vital signs within clinically acceptable ranges for the purposes of the study (sitting systolic blood pressure [BP] ≥ 90 mmHg and ≤ 150 mmHg; diastolic BP ≥ 50 mmHg and ≤ 95 mmHg; heart rate (pulse rate) ≥ 40 and ≤ 100 beats per minute; oral body temperature ≥ 35.5°C and ≤ 37.5°C).
    4. An ECG with no clinically significant abnormalities, in the opinion of the Investigator.
    5. Pre-study clinical laboratory findings within normal range or not deemed clinically significant in the opinion of the investigator if outside of the normal range
  • Female subjects will be:

    • either post menopausal where post menopause is defined as the period following peri-menopause, i.e. postmenopausal after 12 months without a menstrual period and with a serum FSH value within the reference range for postmenopausal females at Screening
    • or permanently sterilised (e.g. tubal occlusion, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy)
    • or be using 2 different forms of highly effective contraception throughout the study.

Male subjects with female partners of child-bearing potential must use 2 different forms of highly effective contraception throughout the study and for a further 3 months after the follow-up visit and all male subjects must be willing to avoid donating sperm during this time.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has had a clinically significant illness in the 6 weeks before screening in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Subject is not suitable to participate in the study in the opinion of the investigator
  • Subject has participated in any clinical study with an investigational drug/device within 3 months prior to the first day of dosing.
  • Subject has had a serious adverse reaction or significant hypersensitivity to any drug or chemically related compounds or has a clinically significant allergy to drugs, foods or other materials (in the opinion of the investigator).
  • Administration of any topical ocular (prescription or over the counter including artificial tears) or systemic medication including herbal product or fish oil preparations within 14 days before the first dose of study drug. Vitamins and mineral supplements not containing other substances are allowed until 96 hours before each dose if considered by the Investigator unlikely to interfere with the study results. Paracetamol at doses of at most 2 grams per day and ibuprofen at doses of at most 1200 mg per day for no more than 3 consecutive days or 6 non-consecutive days are allowed. Oral, injectable and implantable hormonal contraceptives are allowed without restrictions for female subjects. Longer exclusion periods apply for:

    1. amiodarone and hydroxychloroquine (210 days),
    2. monoclonal antibodies/ immunoglobulins/ other therapeutic proteins (120 days)
    3. Experimental drugs with a half life known to the Study Unit: Five half lives plus 2 weeks
    4. Experimental drugs with a half life unknown to the Study Unit: 120 days
    5. chloroquine and flunarizine (100 days)
    6. fluoxetine (75 days),
    7. benzodiazepines different from midazolam, lorazepam and triazolam, chlorpromazine, mephenytoin, nortryptyline, phenobarbital, primidone, carbamazepine, phenytoin and phenprocoumon (35 days).
  • Subject has a significant history of drug/solvent abuse (within the last 2 years) or a positive drugs of abuse test at any time during the study.
  • Subject has a history of alcohol abuse (within the last 2 years) or currently drinks in excess of 28 units per week or has a positive alcohol breath test at any time during the study.
  • Subject is a smoker or has smoked in the 6 months prior to dosing.
  • Subject who has a positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screen, hepatitis B screen or hepatitis C screen.
  • Subject has donated blood or blood products (e.g., plasma or platelets) within the 3 months prior to screening.
  • Subject has a partner who will be pregnant or breastfeeding during the study
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding female or those with a positive pregnancy test or who will not use a medically acceptable contraceptive method from selection and during the study
  • Subject having used any glucocorticosteroid by any route in the last 30 days whichever the route of administration, or any medication by ocular or nasal administration route from 30 days before screening.
  • Subjects currently diagnosed with any active ocular disease, even if mild, other than refractive error.
  • Subject with history of ocular surgery, including laser refractive surgery
  • Subject using a contact lens within 7 days prior administration of the first dose
  • Intraocular pressure (IOP) >= 22 mmHg in either eye
  • Presence of any corneal opacity or corneal fluorescein staining >0.5 grade using the modified Oxford scale
  • Schirmer's test without anesthesia \<= 9 mm/5 minutes
  • Tear film break up time \< 8 seconds
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
74 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    rhNGF 0.5 µg/mL Sentinel

    1 x 35 µL drop 3 subjects

    Drug: rhNGF 0.5 µg/mL Sentinel

  • Experimental
    rhNGF 5 µg/mL Sentinel

    1 x 35 µL drop 3 subjects

    Drug: rhNGF 5 µg/mL Sentinel

  • Experimental
    rhNGF 60 µg/mL Part A

    3 x 35 µL drops applied at 4 h intervals 6 subjects

    Drug: rhNGF 60 µg/mL Part A

  • Experimental
    rhNGF 20 µg/mL Sentinel

    1 x 35 µL drop 3 subjects

    Drug: rhNGF 20 µg/mL Sentinel

  • Experimental
    rhNGF 20 µg/mL Part A

    3 x 35 µL drops applied at 4 h intervals 6 subjects

    Drug: rhNGF 20 µg/mL Part A

  • Experimental
    rhNGF 180 µg/mL Part A

    3 x 35 µL drops applied at 4 h intervals 6 subjects

    Drug: rhNGF 180 µg/mL Part A

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Part A

    3 x 35 µL drops applied at 4 h intervals 6 subjects

    Drug: Placebo Part A

  • Experimental
    rhNGF 20 µg/mL Part B

    3 x 35 µL drops applied at 4 h intervals per day during 5 consecutive days 12 subjects

    Drug: rhNGF 20 µg/mL Part B

  • Experimental
    rhNGF 60 µg/mL Part B

    3 x 35 µL drops applied at 4 h intervals per day during 5 consecutive days 9 subjects

    Drug: rhNGF 60 µg/mL Part B

  • Experimental
    rhNGF 180 µg/mL Part B

    3 x 35 µL drops applied at 4 h intervals per day during 5 consecutive days 9 subjects

    Drug: rhNGF 180 µg/mL Part B

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Part B

    3 x 35 µL drops applied at 4 h intervals per day during 5 consecutive days 10 subjects

    Drug: Placebo Part B

Interventions

  • DrugrhNGF 0.5 µg/mL Sentinel

    In Part 0, all subjects received one 35-μL drop of rh-NGF at an appropriate concentration in the study eye (right or left) according to the randomisation list to achieve the required dose level

    Also known as: Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor

  • DrugrhNGF 5 µg/mL Sentinel

    Part 0 represented a sentinel group.

    Also known as: Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor

  • DrugrhNGF 20 µg/mL Sentinel

    In Part 0, all subjects received one 35-μL drop of rh-NGF at an appropriate concentration in the study eye (right or left) according to the randomisation list to achieve the required dose level

    Also known as: Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor

  • DrugrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part A

    In Part A, all subjects received one 35-μL drop of rh-NGF at an appropriate concentration or placebo in their study eye (right or left) according to the randomisation list (and 1 drop of placebo in the non-study eye). This occurred q4h on Day 1 to achieve the required fractionated single dose level.

    Also known as: Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor

  • DrugrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part A

    In Part A, all subjects received one 35-μL drop of rh-NGF at an appropriate concentration or placebo in their study eye (right or left) according to the randomisation list (and 1 drop of placebo in the non-study eye). This occurred q4h on Day 1 to achieve the required fractionated single dose level.

    Also known as: Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor

  • DrugrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part A

    In Part A, all subjects received one 35-μL drop of rh-NGF at an appropriate concentration or placebo in their study eye (right or left) according to the randomisation list (and 1 drop of placebo in the non-study eye). This occurred q4h on Day 1 to achieve the required fractionated single dose level.

    Also known as: Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor

  • DrugrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part B

    In Part B, as planned 3 dose levels of rh-NGF or placebo eye drops were studied in a total of 40 healthy subjects.

    Also known as: Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor

  • DrugrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part B

    In Part B, all subjects received one 35-μL drop of rh-NGF at an appropriate concentration or placebo in their study eye (right or left) according to the randomisation list (and 1 drop of placebo in the non-study eye). This occurred q4h for 5 days to achieve the required multiple fractionated dose level.

    Also known as: Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor

  • DrugrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part B

    In Part B, all subjects received one 35-μL drop of rh-NGF at an appropriate concentration or placebo in their study eye (right or left) according to the randomisation list (and 1 drop of placebo in the non-study eye). This occurred q4h for 5 days to achieve the required multiple fractionated dose level.

    Also known as: Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor

  • DrugPlacebo Part A

    In Part A, all subjects received one 35-μL drop of rh-NGF at an appropriate concentration or placebo in their study eye (right or left) according to the randomisation list (and 1 drop of placebo in the non-study eye). This occurred q4h on Day 1 to achieve the required fractionated single dose level.

    Also known as: Vehicle

  • DrugPlacebo Part B

    In Part B, all subjects received one 35-μL drop of rh-NGF at an appropriate concentration or placebo in their study eye (right or left) according to the randomisation list (and 1 drop of placebo in the non-study eye). This occurred q4h for 5 days to achieve the required multiple fractionated dose level.

    Also known as: Vehicle

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in VAS Ocular Tolerability

    A global ocular discomfort score was determined using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) on which 0 means no symptoms and 100 means the worst possible discomfort. This evaluation was performed before any ophthalmic assessment at a given study visit. Specific ocular symptoms to be assessed with the VAS included: foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision, photophobia. Part 0: VAS evaluated on days -1, 1, 3, 10 (FU) Part A: VAS evaluated on days -1, 1, 3, 10 (FU) Part B: VAS evaluated on days -1, 1, 5, 15 (FU) Follow up (FU) refers to participants' last available assessment. The Outcome Measure Time Points and Data Table refers to Part B.

    Time frame: Day -1, Day 1, Day 5, Day 15 (FU)

  2. Change in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)

    Best corrected distance visual acuity measured using the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) score. In this population, the scores range from -6 (worse visus) to 3 (best visus). The study includes Part 0, Part A and Part B. In Part B BCDVA was evaluated on days -1, 1, 5, 15 (FU). Follow up (FU) refers to participants' last available assessment.

    Time frame: Day -1, Day 1, Day 5, Day 15 (FU)

  3. Change in Mean Tear Film Break up Time (TFBUT)

    Tear film break-up time was assessed by slit lamp examination (SLE). The shorter is the tear film break-up time, the worse is the dry eye symptom severity. The study includes Part 0, Part A and Part B. In Part B this endpoint was evaluated on days -1, 1, 5, 15 (FU). Follow up (FU) refers to participants' last available assessment.

    Time frame: Day -1, Day 1, Day 5, Day 15 (FU)

  4. Change in Mean Corneal Fluorescein Staining

    Slit lamp examination was used to assess the eyelid margin, conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber, iris and lens with the instillation of fluorescein to evaluate corneal fluorescein staining (modified Oxford scale). This is 7-point ordinal scale that scores 0, 0.5, and 1 to 5. On this scale the score 0 corresponds to no staining dots (complete corneal clearing) and the score 0.5 corresponds to three or less staining dots. The higher is the number of dots, the higher and worse is the score. The study includes Part 0, Part A and Part B. In Part B the endpoint was evaluated on days -1, 1, 5, 15 (FU).

    Time frame: Day -1, Day 1, Day 5, Day 15 (FU)

  5. Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

    Intraocular pressure was determined using Goldmann applanation tonometry. The study includes Part 0, Part A and Part B. In Part B this endpoint was evaluated at screening and on days 7, 15 (FU). Follow up (FU) refers to participants' last available assessment.

    Time frame: Screening, Day 7, Day 15 (FU)

  6. Percentage of Abnormal Findings in Dilated Fundus Ophthalmoscopy

    Dilated fundus ophthalmoscopy (DFO) is used to view the eye's interior, allowing assessment of the retina/macula/choroid, optic nerve head, blood vessels, and other features. The outcome can be normal or abnormal. The study includes Part 0, Part A and Part B. In Part B this endpoint was evaluated on day 7.

    Time frame: Part B - Day 7

07

Results

Posted Sep 9, 2019
Limitations and caveats
No limitations and caveats area defined.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonerhNGF 0.5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 180 µg/mL Part APlacebo Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part B Cohort 0MrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part BPlacebo Part B
Started3336676939910
Completed3336676939910
Not completed000000000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryChanges in VAS Ocular Tolerability

A global ocular discomfort score was determined using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) on which 0 means no symptoms and 100 means the worst possible discomfort. This evaluation was performed before any ophthalmic assessment at a given study visit. Specific ocular symptoms to be assessed with the VAS included: foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision, photophobia. Part 0: VAS evaluated on days -1, 1, 3, 10 (FU) Part A: VAS evaluated on days -1, 1, 3, 10 (FU) Part B: VAS evaluated on days -1, 1, 5, 15 (FU) Follow up (FU) refers to participants' last available assessment. The Outcome Measure Time Points and Data Table refers to Part B.

Time frame:
Day -1, Day 1, Day 5, Day 15 (FU)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Changes in VAS Ocular Tolerability
units on a scalerhNGF 0.5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 60 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 180 µg/mL Part APlacebo Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part BPlacebo Part B
Foreign body sensation - Day 1 (8h) vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 03 ± 7.30 ± 00 ± 00.4 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.50 ± 0.50 ± 0.8
Foreign body sensation - Day 5 vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 01 ± 2.60 ± 0.50 ± 0.70 ± 0.7
Foreign body sensation - FU vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 0.60 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.50 ± 0.40 ± 0.6
Burning/Stinging - Day 1 (8h) vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 0.62 ± 4.90 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.30 ± 0.50 ± 0.60 ± 0.3
Burning/Stinging - Day 5 vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 01 ± 3.50 ± 0.40 ± 0.50 ± 0.4
Burning/Stinging - FU vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.30 ± 0.50 ± 0.40 ± 0.6
Itching - Day 1 (8h) vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.40 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.40 ± 0.30 ± 0.30 ± 0.70 ± 0.4
Itching - Day 5 vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 0.60 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.40 ± 0.30 ± 0.30 ± 0.40 ± 0.5
Itching - FU vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.30 ± 0.70 ± 0.60 ± 0
Pain - Day 1 (8h) vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.40 ± 0.30 ± 0.70 ± 0.70 ± 0.8
Pain - Day 5 vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.40 ± 0.31 ± 3.54 ± 6.50 ± 1.1
Pain - FU vs Day -1-1 ± 1.20 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.40 ± 0.30 ± 0.70 ± 0.40 ± 0.7
Sticky feeling - Day 1 (8h) vs Day -1-1 ± 1.70 ± 0-3 ± 4.6-1 ± 1.60 ± 0.80 ± 01 ± 2.40 ± 00 ± 0.73 ± 7.60 ± 0.4
Sticky feeling - Day 5 vs Day -1-1 ± 1.70 ± 0-2 ± 4.9-1 ± 1.60 ± 0.80 ± 00 ± 0.40 ± 0.30 ± 0.51 ± 3.60 ± 0.6
Sticky feeling - FU vs Day -1-1 ± 1.70 ± 0-3 ± 4.6-1 ± 1.60 ± 0.80 ± 00 ± 0.40 ± 0.30 ± 0.50 ± 0.40 ± 0.3
Blurred vision - Day 1 (8h) vs Day -1-2 ± 1.50 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.40 ± 00 ± 0.50 ± 0.30 ± 0.5
Blurred vision - Day 5 vs Day -1-2 ± 1.50 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.30 ± 0.5
Blurred vision - FU vs Day -1-2 ± 1.50 ± 00 ± 0.60 ± 0.40 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.40 ± 00 ± 0.31 ± 0.50 ± 0.5
Photophobia - Day 1 (8h) vs Day -1-1 ± 1.70 ± 00 ± 01 ± 3.31 ± 1.60 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.50 ± 0.60 ± 0.5
Photophobia - Day 5 vs Day -1-1 ± 1.70 ± 00 ± 0.60 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.81 ± 2.00 ± 0.50 ± 0.70 ± 0.5
Photophobia - FU vs Day -1-1 ± 1.70 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0.80 ± 00 ± 0.40 ± 00 ± 0.70 ± 0.70 ± 0.5
PrimaryChange in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)

Best corrected distance visual acuity measured using the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) score. In this population, the scores range from -6 (worse visus) to 3 (best visus). The study includes Part 0, Part A and Part B. In Part B BCDVA was evaluated on days -1, 1, 5, 15 (FU). Follow up (FU) refers to participants' last available assessment.

Time frame:
Day -1, Day 1, Day 5, Day 15 (FU)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)
units on a scalerhNGF 0.5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 60 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 180 µg/mL Part APlacebo Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part BPlacebo Part B
Day 1 vs Day-11 ± 0.63 ± 0.6-6 ± 3.13 ± 1.60 ± 0.4-0 ± 1.41 ± 1.61 ± 2.70 ± 3.70 ± 3.60 ± 3.1
Day 5 vs Day-11 ± 2.30.0 ± 4.71 ± 2.11 ± 2.61 ± 2.50 ± 2.8-1 ± 2.01 ± 2.71 ± 2.90 ± 3.30 ± 3.8
Day 15 (FU) vs Day-12 ± 2.52 ± 1.0-1 ± 2.92 ± 4.02 ± 1.90 ± 2.30 ± 3.21 ± 2.41 ± 2.42 ± 3.70 ± 2.1
PrimaryChange in Mean Tear Film Break up Time (TFBUT)

Tear film break-up time was assessed by slit lamp examination (SLE). The shorter is the tear film break-up time, the worse is the dry eye symptom severity. The study includes Part 0, Part A and Part B. In Part B this endpoint was evaluated on days -1, 1, 5, 15 (FU). Follow up (FU) refers to participants' last available assessment.

Time frame:
Day -1, Day 1, Day 5, Day 15 (FU)
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Change in Mean Tear Film Break up Time (TFBUT)
secondsrhNGF 0.5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 60 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 180 µg/mL Part APlacebo Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part BPlacebo Part B
Day 1 vs Day -11.7 ± 1.890.0 ± 0.5-2.6 ± 2.950.4 ± 0.86-0.5 ± 0.64-0.4 ± 1.930.0 ± 0.670.5 ± 1.140.4 ± 0.960.1 ± 1.110.2 ± 0.79
Day 5 vs Day -1-1.2 ± 1.62-0.3 ± 1.040.9 ± 1.210.1 ± 0.69-0.1 ± 0.850.0 ± 1.64-0.7 ± 1.53-0.2 ± 1.76-0.4 ± 1.520.2 ± 2.03-0.2 ± 1.03
Day 15 (FU) vs Day -1-1.4 ± 1.650.2 ± 0.29-0.9 ± 1.4-0.1 ± 1.320.4 ± 0.77-0.6 ± 0.691.0 ± 1.220.1 ± 1.07-0.4 ± 1.83-0 ± 1.480.0 ± 1.08
PrimaryChange in Mean Corneal Fluorescein Staining

Slit lamp examination was used to assess the eyelid margin, conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber, iris and lens with the instillation of fluorescein to evaluate corneal fluorescein staining (modified Oxford scale). This is 7-point ordinal scale that scores 0, 0.5, and 1 to 5. On this scale the score 0 corresponds to no staining dots (complete corneal clearing) and the score 0.5 corresponds to three or less staining dots. The higher is the number of dots, the higher and worse is the score. The study includes Part 0, Part A and Part B. In Part B the endpoint was evaluated on days -1, 1, 5, 15 (FU).

Time frame:
Day -1, Day 1, Day 5, Day 15 (FU)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change in Mean Corneal Fluorescein Staining
Units on a scalerhNGF 0.5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part AhNGF 60 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 180 µg/mL Part APlacebo Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part BPlacebo Part B
Day 1 vs Day -11.7 ± 1.890.0 ± 0.50-2.6 ± 2.950.4 ± 0.86-0.5 ± 0.64-0.4 ± 1.930.0 ± 0.670.2 ± 1.140.4 ± 0.960.1 ± 1.110.2 ± 0.79
Day 5 vs Day -1-1.2 ± 1.62-0.3 ± 1.04-0.9 ± 1.210.1 ± 0.69-0.1 ± 0.850.0 ± 1.64-0.7 ± 1.53-0.2 ± 1.76-0.4 ± 1.52-0.2 ± 2.03-0.2 ± 1.03
Day 15 (FU) vs Day -1-1.4 ± 1.650.2 ± 0.29-0.9 ± 1.40-0.1 ± 1.320.4 ± 0.77-0.6 ± 0.691.0 ± 1.220.1 ± 1.07-0.4 ± 1.83-0.0 ± 1.480.0 ± 1.08
PrimaryChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

Intraocular pressure was determined using Goldmann applanation tonometry. The study includes Part 0, Part A and Part B. In Part B this endpoint was evaluated at screening and on days 7, 15 (FU). Follow up (FU) refers to participants' last available assessment.

Time frame:
Screening, Day 7, Day 15 (FU)
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
mmHgrhNGF 0.5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 60 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 180 µg/mL Part APlacebo Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part BPlacebo Part B
Day 7 vs screening1 ± 2.0-1 ± 1.5-1 ± 2.61 ± 1.81 ± 3.91 ± 1.6-2 ± 1.8-1 ± 2.00 ± 3-2 ± 3.7-2 ± 2.8
Day 15 (FU) vs screening-1 ± 2.51 ± 0.6-1 ± 1.01 ± 2.7-1 ± 3.31 ± 3.2-2 ± 2.80 ± 5.3-1 ± 3.3-1 ± 3.1-3 ± 3.4
PrimaryPercentage of Abnormal Findings in Dilated Fundus Ophthalmoscopy

Dilated fundus ophthalmoscopy (DFO) is used to view the eye's interior, allowing assessment of the retina/macula/choroid, optic nerve head, blood vessels, and other features. The outcome can be normal or abnormal. The study includes Part 0, Part A and Part B. In Part B this endpoint was evaluated on day 7.

Time frame:
Part B - Day 7
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of abnormal findings
Percentage of Abnormal Findings in Dilated Fundus Ophthalmoscopy
percentage of abnormal findingsrhNGF 0.5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 180 µg/mL Part APlacebo Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part BPlacebo Part B
Percentage of Abnormal Findings in Dilated Fundus Ophthalmoscopy0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
rhNGF 0.5 µg/mL Sentinel—0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)
rhNGF 5 µg/mL Sentinel—0/3 (0%)1/3 (33.3%)
rhNGF 20 µg/mL Sentinel—0/3 (0%)1/3 (33.3%)
rhNGF 20 µg/mL Part A—0/6 (0%)1/6 (16.7%)
rhNGF 60 µg/mL Part A—0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)
rhNGF 180 µg/mL Part A—0/7 (0%)2/7 (28.6%)
Placebo Part A—0/6 (0%)3/6 (50%)
rhNGF 20 µg/mL Part B—0/12 (0%)8/12 (66.7%)
rhNGF 60 µg/mL Part B—0/9 (0%)6/9 (66.7%)
rhNGF 180 µg/mL Part B—0/9 (0%)7/9 (77.8%)
Placebo Part B—0/10 (0%)6/10 (60%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 31
Most frequent other events
EventrhNGF 0.5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 60 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 180 µg/mL Part APlacebo Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part BPlacebo Part B
Eye painEye disorders0/30/30/30/60/60/70/60/122/95/91/10
Abnormals sensation in eyeEye disorders0/31/31/31/60/60/70/61/60/71/90/10
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations0/30/31/30/60/60/70/61/120/91/91/10
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/30/30/30/60/60/72/62/120/90/90/10
Vision BlurredEye disorders0/30/30/31/60/60/71/60/120/91/90/10
ConjunctivitisEye disorders0/30/30/31/60/60/70/60/120/90/90/10
Eyelid irritationEye disorders0/30/30/30/60/60/71/60/120/90/90/10
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/30/30/30/60/60/71/60/120/90/90/10
Corneal stainingInvestigations0/30/30/31/60/60/70/60/120/90/90/10
DepressionPsychiatric disorders0/30/30/30/60/60/71/60/120/90/90/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)rhNGF 0.5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 60 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 180 µg/mL Part APlacebo Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part BPlacebo Part BTotal
Mean30 ± 747 ± 9.229 ± 11.946 ± 1036 ± 9.442 ± 17.842 ± 941 ± 12.136 ± 14.729 ± 10.336 ± 12.640.2 ± 11.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)rhNGF 0.5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 60 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 180 µg/mL Part APlacebo Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part BPlacebo Part BTotal
Female2211132451224
Male1125544848850
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)rhNGF 0.5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 5 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL SentinelrhNGF 20 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 60 µg/mL Part ArhNGF 180 µg/mL Part APlacebo Part ArhNGF 20 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 60 µg/mL Part BrhNGF 180 µg/mL Part BPlacebo Part BTotal
United Kingdom0000000399829
Switzerland3336676900245
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Covance Basel Research Unit AG - Lettenweg 118 -
    Allschwil, CH - 4123, Switzerland
  • COVANCE CLINICAL RESEARCH UNIT Ltd - Springfield House - Hyde Street
    Leeds, LS2 9LH, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Apfel SC, Kessler JA, Adornato BT, Litchy WJ, Sanders C, Rask CA. Recombinant human nerve growth factor in the treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy. NGF Study Group. Neurology. 1998 Sep;51(3):695-702. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.3.695. PubMed 9748012 ↗
  • Apfel SC, Schwartz S, Adornato BT, Freeman R, Biton V, Rendell M, Vinik A, Giuliani M, Stevens JC, Barbano R, Dyck PJ. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human nerve growth factor in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy: A randomized controlled trial. rhNGF Clinical Investigator Group. JAMA. 2000 Nov 1;284(17):2215-21. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.17.2215. PubMed 11056593 ↗
  • Bonini S, Lambiase A, Rama P, Caprioglio G, Aloe L. Topical treatment with nerve growth factor for neurotrophic keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2000 Jul;107(7):1347-51; discussion 1351-2. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00163-9. PubMed 10889110 ↗
  • Lambiase A, Rama P, Bonini S, Caprioglio G, Aloe L. Topical treatment with nerve growth factor for corneal neurotrophic ulcers. N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 23;338(17):1174-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804233381702. PubMed 9554857 ↗
  • Liu Q, McDermott AM, Miller WL. Elevated nerve growth factor in dry eye associated with established contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2009 Sep;35(5):232-7. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181b3e87f. PubMed 19672199 ↗
  • Petty BG, Cornblath DR, Adornato BT, Chaudhry V, Flexner C, Wachsman M, Sinicropi D, Burton LE, Peroutka SJ. The effect of systemically administered recombinant human nerve growth factor in healthy human subjects. Ann Neurol. 1994 Aug;36(2):244-6. doi: 10.1002/ana.410360221. PubMed 8053664 ↗
  • Qi H, Li DQ, Shine HD, Chen Z, Yoon KC, Jones DB, Pflugfelder SC. Nerve growth factor and its receptor TrkA serve as potential markers for human corneal epithelial progenitor cells. Exp Eye Res. 2008 Jan;86(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Sep 15. PubMed 17980361 ↗
  • Schifitto G, Yiannoutsos C, Simpson DM, Adornato BT, Singer EJ, Hollander H, Marra CM, Rubin M, Cohen BA, Tucker T, Koralnik IJ, Katzenstein D, Haidich B, Smith ME, Shriver S, Millar L, Clifford DB, McArthur JC; AIDS Clinical Trials Group Team 291. Long-term treatment with recombinant nerve growth factor for HIV-associated sensory neuropathy. Neurology. 2001 Oct 9;57(7):1313-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.7.1313. PubMed 11591856 ↗
  • Ferrari MP, Mantelli F, Sacchetti M, Antonangeli MI, Cattani F, D'Anniballe G, Sinigaglia F, Ruffini PA, Lambiase A. Safety and pharmacokinetics of escalating doses of human recombinant nerve growth factor eye drops in a double-masked, randomized clinical trial. BioDrugs. 2014 Jun;28(3):275-83. doi: 10.1007/s40259-013-0079-5. PubMed 24327173 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01744704
Lead sponsor
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
Collaborators
Covance
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 7, 2012
Start date
Jul 2012
Primary completion
Feb 2013
Completion
Mar 2013
Results posted
Sep 9, 2019
Last update
Apr 19, 2024

Study contacts

Thierry Kamtchoua, MD
principal investigator · Covance Basel Research Unit AG
Ashley Brooks, MBChB
principal investigator · Covance
Pier Adelchi Ruffini, MD
study director · Dompé s.p.a.Via San Martino, 12 - 20122 Milan, Italy
Mauro P Ferrari, PharmD
study director · Dompé s.p.a. - Via San Martino, 12 - 20122 Milan, Italy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion