ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01743508Updated Aug 18, 2017

Misoprostol Treatment of Incomplete Abortion by Midwives and Physicians in Uganda

An interventional study of Misoprostol treatment by midwife in Incomplete Abortion, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Completed at 1 site in Uganda. Open to female participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-18.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
731
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Uganda is one of the countries with highest fertility rate in the world, 6.7 children per women. It is estimated that 56 percent of all pregnancies are unintended and the contraceptive prevalence rate in Uganda is 23 percent. Unwanted pregnancy is common and induced abortion is illegal. Unsafe abortion is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality among women in Uganda. Almost 40% of admissions to emergency obstetric care units in Uganda due to unsafe abortion is reported and considered high in international comparison. Studies have revealed that trained midlevel providers can deliver safe post abortion care for incomplete abortion and use manual vacuum aspiration. The prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol has been shown to be an effective tool in the treatment of incomplete abortions. This option is so far under-used in developing countries, especially outside the larger hospitals and private clinics. One significant limiting factor in providing safe post abortion care is the lack of providers. So far technical training has been mainly limited to physicians. Training of midlevel providers in misoprostol treatment of incomplete abortion will support task shifting in places where doctors are costly and scarce. By evaluating the effectiveness of mid-level providers (midwives); conducting MVA and administering misoprostol treatment of incomplete abortion the project is attempting to contribute to the reduction of maternal mortality and morbidity and safeguard high quality of post-abortion care.

Women with incomplete abortion will be randomly allocated to undergo a clinical assessment and treatment (MVA or misoprostol) either by physician or midwife with safety and efficacy as main outcomes in a RCT carried out in hospital setting in Uganda. Our hypothesis is that there are no significant differences in effectiveness and safety between manual vacuum aspiration and misoprostol treatment of incomplete abortion provided by physicians and midwife.

The involvement of midlevel providers in treatment of incomplete abortion has previously not been systematically evaluated in African health care setting.

Read the detailed description

The project concerns a randomised controlled trial (RCT) aiming to determine whether midwives and physicians can perform medical treatment for incomplete abortion equally safely at primary care level. All patients included are women admitted due to incomplete abortion and will undergo clinical examinations and treatment in accordance with standard procedures (Bluhm et al., 2007, WHO, 2010). A total of 880 women seeking with symptoms of incomplete abortion will be included after giving their informed consent and randomised to diagnosis and care provided by either midwives or physicians. The study will be conducted at the National referral hospital (Mulago in Kampala). A coordinating centre will be established at the Mulago Hospital in Kampala in order to monitor the study. Included in the coordinating team physicians will be involved and have the ultimate responsibility for the medical care provided within the study. The coordinating physicians will evaluate and monitor the midwives and physicians performance to safeguard that the care provided is safe and thus do not put women at risk or the health care provider in any legal inconvenience. All health care providers at the study site included will be provided training that follows the structure of Ipas who have updated standardized training modules within abortion and post abortion care which is used internationally. Dr Charles Kiggundu, one of the principal investigators is currently involved in training for providers at national level in Uganda and thus has adequate competence and experience. The health care provider's attitude and communications skill is one core component in the training. The importance of the study and the study procedure will be another important aspect of the training in order to motivate health care providers involved in the care at the selected study sites.

02

Conditions studied

  • Incomplete Abortion

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • incomplete abortion
  • misoprostol treatment
  • midwife
  • uganda
03

In context

Abortion, Incomplete

24 studies on the registry are indexed under Abortion, Incomplete; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 731 is above the median of 311 across 21 interventional studies indexed under Abortion, Incomplete.

Browse Abortion, Incomplete studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,148 studies on the registry; 276 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Bleeding
  • Contractions during pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to misoprostol
  • Uterine size more than 12 weeks of gestation
  • Suspected ectopic pregnancy
  • Unstable hemodynamic status and chock
  • Signs of pelvic infection and/or sepsis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
731 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Misoprostol by physician

    Misoprostol treatment by midwife

    Procedure: Misoprostol treatment by midwife

  • Experimental
    Misoprostol by midwife

    Misoprostol treatment by midwife

    Procedure: Misoprostol treatment by midwife

Interventions

  • ProcedureMisoprostol treatment by midwife

    Misoprostol treatment by midwife

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. complete abortion

    Time frame: 14-28 days post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. bleeding

    Time frame: 14-28 days post treatment

  2. pain

    Time frame: 14-28 days post treatment

  3. women's experiences of the method and care provided

    Time frame: 14-28 days post treatment

  4. un-scheduled visits

    Time frame: 14-28 days post treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mulago Hospital
    Kampala, Uganda
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2012, a primary completion of Aug 2017 and a completion of Aug 2017. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 29, 2012
First posted
Dec 6, 2012
Start
Apr 2012
Primary completionActual
Aug 2017
CompletionActual
Aug 2017
Last update
Aug 18, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01743508
Responsible party
Marie Klingberg-Allvin (Researcher, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 6, 2012
Start date
Apr 2012
Primary completion
Aug 2017
Completion
Aug 2017
Last update
Aug 18, 2017

Study contacts

Elisabeth Faxelid, Professor
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet
Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Professor
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion