An interventional study of Morphology and GemART assay in Infertility, sponsored by Gema Diagnostics. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 39 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-14.
Sponsored by Gema Diagnostics · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to determine the performance of a genetic assay, GemART, in cumulus cells predictive of embryo viability, and pregnancy success in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Performance is defined as success rate per embryo transferred, as measured by the implantation rate of embryos transferred.
2,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility; 407 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 133 is above the median of 120 across 1,698 interventional studies indexed under Infertility.
Browse Infertility studies →This is the only study on the registry with Gema Diagnostics as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Embryos selected for transfer will be based on morphology alone.
Other: Morphology
Embryos selected for transfer will be based upon morphology and GemART assay.
Other: GemART assay
Embryos selected for transfer will be based upon morphology alone.
Embryos selected for transfer will be based upon morphology and GemART assay.
Clinical pregnancy rate
Clinical pregnancy, recorded as either positive or negative, will be determined using vaginal ultrasound during post-transfer week 4-9. Clinical Pregnancy rate for embryos selected using the GemART assay in conjunction with morphology will be compared with clinical pregnancy rate for embryos selected using morphology alone.
Time frame: Recorded at post-transfer week 4-9
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.