CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01720277Updated May 23, 2018Results posted

High Dose Influenza Vaccine in Nursing Home - Pilot Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of HD Fluzone Vaccine and SD Fluzone Vaccine in Influenza, sponsored by Insight Therapeutics, LLC. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-23.

Sponsored by Insight Therapeutics, LLC · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,957
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this pilot evaluation is to help determine the feasibility and power needed to prospectively evaluate relative effectiveness of high-dose influenza vaccine in preventing influenza mortality and hospitalization in a nursing home population in the U.S., compared to the standard-dose influenza vaccine.

Read the detailed description

Influenza remains the most common preventable respiratory viral infection of older adults. Older adults incur more than 90% of the disease burden, and those residing in nursing homes are the most affected subset given their immune senescence, multi-morbidity, and close living quarters. Each year, the majority of influenza-related hospitalizations occur during the period with the greatest influenza activity.

Influenza vaccination has been associated with reduced hospitalization, strokes, heart attacks and death in non-institutional older adult populations, but the benefit of influenza vaccine for the oldest population has been questioned. The new high-dose influenza vaccine is considerably more immunogenic in older adults, and has recently been approved for use in individuals aged 65 years and older. No clinical data yet confirm whether the improved immunogenicity translates into added clinical benefit, such as further reduction in hospitalization or death. Estimating the benefit of influenza vaccination among older adults in long-term care settings using randomized controlled trials requires extensive effort and is costly. Instead, a pragmatic RCT in a nursing home population has several advantages as a model for comparing therapeutic approaches.

This clinical trial aims to test the feasibility of our protocol for a subsequent larger study. We aim to demonstrate that we can recruit and enroll facilities; randomly assign and coordinate vaccine delivery; collect data; conduct site audits for data validation; create outcomes using multiple data sources; and conduct analyses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Influenza

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Influenza
  • Influenza vaccine
  • Flu Vaccine
  • Fluzone
  • HD Fluzone
  • Nursing Homes
  • Hospitalization
  • Mortality
  • Health Care worker vaccination
  • ADL decline
  • Pilot
  • Effectiveness
03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,214 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 163 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,957 is above the median of 238 across 1,853 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

Insight Therapeutics, LLC is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Long-term care facilities in one of the 122 cities that serve as Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) surveillance sites

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Facilities already systematically administering HD vaccine to their residents
  • Facilities for whom over half the residents are on Medicare (short-stay)
  • Facilities in which over half the residents are on Medicare Part A (SNF)
  • Facilities having fewer than 50 long-stay residents
  • Hospital-based facilities
  • Facilities with more than 20% of the population under age 65
  • Facilities with mandated (employment-dependent) seasonal influenza vaccination
  • Facilities not submitting MDS data
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,957 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HD Fluzone Vaccine

    NH facilities randomized to receive high dose trivalent influenza vaccine (HD Fluzone) for the residents.

    Biological: HD Fluzone Vaccine

  • Active comparator
    SD Fluzone Vaccine

    NH facilities randomized to standard dose trivalent influenza vaccine (SD Fluzone) for the residents.

    Biological: SD Fluzone Vaccine

Interventions

  • BiologicalHD Fluzone Vaccine

    Nursing home residents over 65 years are allocated to receive high dose trivalent vaccine. Residents under 65 years are provided standard dose trivalent vaccine (TIV).

    Also known as: Fluzone High Dose influenza vaccine

  • BiologicalSD Fluzone Vaccine

    Nursing home residents are allocated to receive standard trivalent vaccine (TIV).

    Also known as: Fluzone influenza vaccine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total All-cause Hospitalizations

    The primary outcome will establish our methodology for measuring all-cause hospitalizations using the Minimum Data Set (MDS).

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Residents' Functional Status

    The secondary outcome will establish our methodology for measuring change in functional status of nursing home residents using Activities of Daily Living (ADL) data in the Minimum Data Set (MDS). A change in functional status is defined as a decline in physical functioning by at least 4 points on the 28-point ADL scale.

    Time frame: 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Recruit, Enroll, and Randomize Nursing Homes Per Calculated Sample Size

    This outcome evaluates our ability to recruit and enroll nursing facilities that meet our inclusion and exclusion criteria, and ensure nursing home residents receive either high-dose or standard-dose influenza vaccine

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted Apr 18, 2018

Participant flow

Cluster--We included nursing homes (NHs) within 50 miles of a CDC surveillance. We identified and contacted individual facilities and organizations. Each recruited NH completed a site feasibility form and was notified of its eligibility based on the exclusion criteria. Subject--Eligible nursing home residents in each participating facility.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHigh-Dose Vaccine for ResidentsStandard-dose for Residents
Started14611496
Completed958938
Not completed503558

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal All-cause Hospitalizations

The primary outcome will establish our methodology for measuring all-cause hospitalizations using the Minimum Data Set (MDS).

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · events
Total All-cause Hospitalizations
eventsHigh-Dose Vaccine for ResidentsStandard-dose for Residents
Total All-cause Hospitalizations197301
SecondaryChange in Residents' Functional Status

The secondary outcome will establish our methodology for measuring change in functional status of nursing home residents using Activities of Daily Living (ADL) data in the Minimum Data Set (MDS). A change in functional status is defined as a decline in physical functioning by at least 4 points on the 28-point ADL scale.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Residents' Functional Status
ParticipantsHD Fluzone VaccineSD Fluzone Vaccine
Change in Residents' Functional Status196206
Other pre-specifiedRecruit, Enroll, and Randomize Nursing Homes Per Calculated Sample Size

This outcome evaluates our ability to recruit and enroll nursing facilities that meet our inclusion and exclusion criteria, and ensure nursing home residents receive either high-dose or standard-dose influenza vaccine

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · Nursing Homes
Recruit, Enroll, and Randomize Nursing Homes Per Calculated Sample Size
Nursing HomesHD Fluzone VaccineSD Fluzone Vaccine
Recruit, Enroll, and Randomize Nursing Homes Per Calculated Sample Size2019

Adverse events

Collected over The study did not collect adverse events.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
High-Dose Vaccine for Residents249/1,461 (17%)——
Standard-dose for Residents274/1,496 (18.3%)——

Baseline characteristics

Characteristics of participating facilities that met our inclusion criteria and were randomized. Residents in each participating facility were offered influenza vaccine according to the randomization.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)High-Dose Vaccine for ResidentsStandard-dose for ResidentsTotal
Average age84.5 ± 8.483.4 ± 8.784.0 ± 8.6
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)High-Dose Vaccine for ResidentsStandard-dose for ResidentsTotal
Percent of female nursing home residents109411132207
Number of residents per nursing home
Number of residents per nursing home(participants)High-Dose Vaccine for ResidentsStandard-dose for ResidentsTotal
Mean108 ± 49124 ± 54116 ± 51
Percent of residents who are long-stay
Percent of residents who are long-stay(percent)High-Dose Vaccine for ResidentsStandard-dose for ResidentsTotal
Mean88.0 ± 6.586.5 ± 12.187.2 ± 9.7
Number of long-stay residents who are over 65 years of age
Number of long-stay residents who are over 65 years of age(participants)High-Dose Vaccine for ResidentsStandard-dose for ResidentsTotal
Mean78 ± 3778 ± 4478 ± 40
Percent of residents with Medicaid as payer
Percent of residents with Medicaid as payer(percent)High-Dose Vaccine for ResidentsStandard-dose for ResidentsTotal
Mean62.5 ± 12.862.9 ± 17.462.7 ± 15.0
Percent of residents in for-profit nursing facilities
Percent of residents in for-profit nursing facilities(percent)High-Dose Vaccine for ResidentsStandard-dose for ResidentsTotal
Mean70.0 ± 47.073.6 ± 45.271.8 ± 45.6
Number of nursing facilities that are part of a chain
Number of nursing facilities that are part of a chain(nursing homes)High-Dose Vaccine for ResidentsStandard-dose for ResidentsTotal
Number10616
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Brown Univeristy
    Providence, Rhode Island 02903, United States
  • Insight Therapeutics
    Norfolk, Virginia 23510, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Cox N, Anderson LJ, Fukuda K. Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA. 2003 Jan 8;289(2):179-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.2.179. PubMed 12517228 ↗
  • Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Bridges CB, Cox NJ, Fukuda K. Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. JAMA. 2004 Sep 15;292(11):1333-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.11.1333. PubMed 15367555 ↗
  • Hayward AC, Harling R, Wetten S, Johnson AM, Munro S, Smedley J, Murad S, Watson JM. Effectiveness of an influenza vaccine programme for care home staff to prevent death, morbidity, and health service use among residents: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2006 Dec 16;333(7581):1241. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39010.581354.55. Epub 2006 Dec 1. PubMed 17142257 ↗
  • Deguchi Y, Nishimura K. Efficacy of Influenza Vaccine in Elderly Persons in Welfare Nursing Homes: Reduction in Risks of Mortality and Morbidity During an Influenza A (H3N2) Epidemic. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Jun;56(6):M391-4. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.6.m391. PubMed 11382801 ↗
  • Gozalo PL, Pop-Vicas A, Feng Z, Gravenstein S, Mor V. Effect of influenza on functional decline. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jul;60(7):1260-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04048.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21. PubMed 22724499 ↗
  • Barker WH, Borisute H, Cox C. A study of the impact of influenza on the functional status of frail older people. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23;158(6):645-50. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.6.645. PubMed 9521230 ↗
  • Jackson LA, Jackson ML, Nelson JC, Neuzil KM, Weiss NS. Evidence of bias in estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in seniors. Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;35(2):337-44. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi274. Epub 2005 Dec 20. PubMed 16368725 ↗
  • Simonsen L, Viboud C, Taylor R. Influenza vaccination in elderly people. Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2086. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67884-1. No abstract available. PubMed 16360785 ↗
  • Fiore AE, Shay DK, Haber P, Iskander JK, Uyeki TM, Mootrey G, Bresee JS, Cox NJ; Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention and control of influenza. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2007. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007 Jul 13;56(RR-6):1-54. PubMed 17625497 ↗
  • Kingston BJ, Wright CV Jr. Influenza in the nursing home. Am Fam Physician. 2002 Jan 1;65(1):75-8, 72. PubMed 11804444 ↗
  • Menec VH, Black C, MacWilliam L, Aoki FY. The impact of influenza-associated respiratory illnesses on hospitalizations, physician visits, emergency room visits, and mortality. Can J Public Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;94(1):59-63. doi: 10.1007/BF03405054. PubMed 12583681 ↗
  • Mor V, Intrator O, Unruh MA, Cai S. Temporal and Geographic variation in the validity and internal consistency of the Nursing Home Resident Assessment Minimum Data Set 2.0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr 15;11:78. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-78. PubMed 21496257 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 23, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01720277
Lead sponsor
Insight Therapeutics, LLC
Collaborators
Brown University
Responsible party
Stefan Gravenstein, MD, MPH (Professor, Brown University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2012
Start date
Sep 2012
Primary completion
May 2013
Completion
May 2016
Results posted
Apr 18, 2018
Last update
May 23, 2018

Study contacts

Stefan Gravenstein, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Case Western Reserve University
Ed Davidson, PharmD, MPH
principal investigator · Insight Therapeutics, LLC
Vincent Mor, PhD
principal investigator · Brown University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion