ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01719107Updated Feb 23, 2016

Efficacy of Dietary Supplementation With Lactobacilllus Reuteri DSM 17938 on Functional Abdominal Pain (FAP) in Children

An interventional study of L. reuteri DSM 17938 chewable tablets and Placebo chewable tablets in Functional Abdominal Pain (FAP) in Children, sponsored by Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital of Athens. Completed at 3 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-23.

Sponsored by Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital of Athens · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of L. reuteri DSM 17938 on pain frequency and severity in children of 5-16 years old and with diagnosis of FAP.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Subjects between of 5-16 years of age with FAP as defined in the Rome III criteria and with pain severity of at least 40 mm on a 100 mm VAS scale and pain frequency of at least 1 episode per week over the preceding 8 weeks will be recruited. In accordance to the specific Rome III criteria for inclusion, FAP is defined as a variable combination of chronic or recurrent gastrointestinal symptoms not explained by structural or biochemical abnormalities.

A study questionnaire to record pain and other gastrointestinal symptoms will be used.

One-hundred and six (106) Subjects will be randomized to receive either dietary supplementation with L. reuteri DSM 17938 (2 chewable tablets with breakfast), or the same number of comparable placebo tablets, for 4 weeks. Supplementation will be stopped after 4 weeks, and the subjects will be followed up for an additional 4 weeks. The subjects will complete a diary to record frequency and intensity of pain, use of medication, deviation from the usual diet, physical activities, and absence from school and other activities. Gastrointestinal symptoms are assessed by the GSRS (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Score).

Subjects/caregivers will be instructed to maintain the usual diet throughout the study, but not to consume other probiotics (foods or supplements) during the entire study period.

The symptoms diary will be completed daily by the parents and will report information on the frequency of pain episodes, location of pain, presence or absence of associated symptoms, need to take medication for pain and interference with normal activities. The intensity of the symptoms will be assessed by using the Wong-Baker Faces scale.

02

Conditions studied

  • Functional Abdominal Pain (FAP) in Children

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Functional abdominal pain
  • Probiotics
  • Lactobacilus reuteri
03

In context

Abdominal Pain

387 studies on the registry are indexed under Abdominal Pain; 58 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is below the median of 70 across 290 interventional studies indexed under Abdominal Pain.

Browse Abdominal Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital of Athens is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Subjects will be recruited according to the following inclusion criteria:

  • FAP (Functional Abdominal Pain) according to Rome III criteria for Child/Adolescent; 1 or more abdominal pain episodes per week over the past 8 weeks
  • by study participant and at least one parent/legal guardian;
  • Age of 5-16 years;
  • Pain severity at study entry must be at least 40 mm on a 100 mm VAS scale;
  • Pain frequency of at least 1 or more episodes per week over the preceding 8 weeks;
  • Ability to understand and comply with the requirements of the trial;
  • Stated availability throughout the study period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects presenting with one or more of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in the study:

  • Chronic illness;
  • Surgery of gastrointestinal tract
  • Any symptoms/signs of organic disease and/or any abnormal results of laboratory assays (total blood count, serum glucose, urea, electrolytes, amylase, , SGPT, anti tTG antibodies, breath H2 test, suggesting disease other than FAP;
  • Weight loss of 5% or more in body weight over the preceding 3 months;
  • Exposure to any drugs for FAP in the past 2 weeks.
  • Exposure to probiotics or antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to study; subjects can be included following a of 4 weeks.
  • Participation in other interventional clinical trials in the past 3 months;
  • Subjects with special dietary needs
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Washout period

A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    L. reuteri DSM 17938 chewable tablets

    The active study product consists of a citrus flavored 450 mg chewable tablet containing freeze-dried L. reuteri DSM 17938. The study product is a convex tablet 10.3 mm in diameter, plain on both sides and with faint spots. It is composed of freeze-dried L. reuteri, isomalt, xylitol, sucrose distearate, hydrogenated palm oil, lemon-lime flavoring and anhydrous citric acid. The total viable count of L. reuteri DSM 17938 is 1x108 live bacteria (CFU)/tablet.

    Dietary Supplement: L. reuteri DSM 17938 chewable tablets

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo chewable tablets

    The placebo study product consists of an identical formulation in all respects except that the live bacteria are excluded.

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo chewable tablets

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementL. reuteri DSM 17938 chewable tablets

    2 chewable tablets with breakfast for 4 weeks

  • Dietary supplementPlacebo chewable tablets

    2 chewable tablets with breakfast for 4 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Abdominal pain frequency and severity over the 4-week treatment period.

    Reduction in pain frequency measured by a subject diary, in the L. reuteri DSM 17938 group and the placebo group, expressed as area under the pain-frequency curve and comparing L. reuteri DSM 17938 vs placebo over the treatment period. Reduction in pain severity is assessed using the face score system of Wong-Baker at day 14 and at the end of treatment (day 28)vs. baseline. Area under the pain-intensity curve will be assessed for Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 1-2

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reduction in pain frequency and intensity over the 8-week study period

    Reduction in pain frequency measured by a subject diary in the L. reuteri group expressed as area under the L. reuteri pain-frequency curve compared to placebo over the initial 2 weeks of the treatment period as well as over the whole study period. Reduction in pain intensity, measured by the face score system of Wong-Baker at day 14, end of treatment (day 28), and end of follow-up period (day 56) vs baseline. Area under the pain-intensity curve for Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 1-2 will be compared.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Reduction in other GI symptoms over the whole study period

    Reduction in other GI symptoms as measured by Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scoring system. Time points: baseline, day 14, end of treatment and end of follow-up, in the L. reuteri group vs. placebo.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Days of absence from school and other activities due to abdominal pain over the whole study period

    The number of days of absence from school and other activities due to abdominal pain will be compared between the L. reuteri group vs placebo.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Reduction in absence from work by parents over the whole study period

    he number of days of absence from work by parents due to abdominal pain of the child will be compared between the L. reuteri group vs placebo.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  5. Safety outcome over the whole study period

    The number of adverse events will be observed and recorded during the entire study period

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Athens Children's Hospital "AGIA SOPHIA"
    Athens, Attica 11527, Greece
  • University of Warsaw, Department of Pediatrics
    Warsaw, Poland
  • University of Ljubljana, Children's Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology
    Ljubljana, Slovenia
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2012, a primary completion of Dec 2015 and a completion of Dec 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 28, 2012
First posted
Nov 1, 2012
Start
Nov 2012
Primary completionActual
Dec 2015
CompletionActual
Dec 2015
Last update
Feb 23, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01719107
Lead sponsor
Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital of Athens
Collaborators
BioGaia AB
Responsible party
Alexandra Papadopoulou (Consultant in Pediatrics, Honorary Professor Dr. med., Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital of Athens) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 1, 2012
Start date
Nov 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Last update
Feb 23, 2016

Study contacts

Alexandra Papadopoulou, Hon. Prof. Dr. med.
principal investigator · Athens Interconnected Children's Hospitals "AGIA SOPHIA" and "P & A KYRIAKOU"
Hania Szajewska, Prof
principal investigator · Warsaw University
Rok Orel, Ass. Prof.
principal investigator · Ljubljana University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion