CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01705288Updated Feb 17, 2020Results posted

Implementation of a Rapid Recovery Program in Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: A Pilot Study

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Laparotomy and intravenous narcotics in Cervical Cancer, Uterine Endometrial Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, sponsored by Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-17.

Sponsored by Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
103
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Over 600,000 hysterectomies are performed annually in the United States. Despite increasing use of less invasive approaches, the majority of hysterectomies are still performed via traditional laparotomy, which can be associated with generally slower recovery and longer lengths of post-operative hospitalization. Rapid Recovery Protocols (RRP) seek to optimize post-surgical morbidity outcomes by returning a patient to normal physiology as quickly as possible following surgery.

Read the detailed description

Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Rapid recovery protocol (regional anesthesia, pain control options with emphasis on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) over narcotic pain medications, early ambulation, and early enteral feeding) or standard of care (traditional laparatomy and supportive care).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Cancer
  • Uterine Endometrial Cancer
  • Ovarian Cancer

Keywords

  • laparotomy
  • hysterectomy
03

In context

Endometrial Neoplasms

1,325 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms; 447 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 103 is above the median of 70 across 941 interventional studies indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms.

Browse Endometrial Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Of its 39 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 28 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Women who are being seen at the Women's Health Center by the Gynecologic Oncology group at the University of Minnesota if planned surgery includes an exploratory laparotomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \< 19 years old
  • Pregnant
  • Undergoing a procedure other than laparotomy
  • Scheduled to be discharged the same day of surgery
  • Chronic narcotic pain medication user
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of > or = 3
  • Any condition that would exclude women from undergoing regional anesthesia
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
103 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Group (Standard Laparotomy)

    Patients undergoing standard anesthesia and standard exploratory laparotomy. Treatment will be per your surgeon's routine standards.

    Procedure: Laparotomy · Drug: intravenous narcotics · Drug: standard anesthesia

  • Experimental
    Rapid Recovery Group

    Protocol for "rapid recovery laparotomy" procedure involves pre-operative counseling, the use of regional anesthesia (spinal or epidural pain management rather than intravenous narcotics), post-operative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, early eating after surgery, early walking, and certain goals for discharge from the hospital.

    Procedure: Laparotomy · Drug: regional anesthesia · Drug: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparotomy

    Exploratory surgery for gynecologic diagnosis.Involves pre-operative counseling, the use of regional anesthesia (spinal or epidural pain management rather than intravenous narcotics), early eating after surgery, early walking, and certain goals for discharge from the hospital

  • Drugintravenous narcotics

    given for pain management after surgery per physician orders

    Also known as: morphine

  • Drugstandard anesthesia

    inhalant or intravenous during surgery

    Also known as: general anesthesia

  • Drugregional anesthesia

    given by spinal or epidural infusion

    Also known as: local anesthesia

  • DrugNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

    given for pain management after surgery

    Also known as: NSAIDs

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hospital Stay

    Length of hospital stay for patients undergoing laparotomy on the gynecologic oncology service measured as whole days from the day of surgery until discharge

    Time frame: 1 Month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Medications Used

    Total daily narcotic pain medication used by patients. Narcotic use was standardized by conversion to morphine equivalents using the methods of Korff et al.

    Time frame: Post operative - day 2

  2. Pain Assessment

    Secondary outcome is to determine if rapid recovery can improve Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain assessment. VAS scales are a horizontal line 100 mm in length with the left end labeled 'No pain' and the right end labeled 'Very severe pain'. The subject marks a point on the line that represents their perception of their current state. VAS score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) from the left end of the line to the point on the line marked by the subject. The range of possible values for this pain score is 0 to 100 mm.

    Time frame: Day 0

07

Results

Posted Feb 17, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl Group (Standard Laparotomy)Rapid Recovery Group
Started5251
Completed5251
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryHospital Stay

Length of hospital stay for patients undergoing laparotomy on the gynecologic oncology service measured as whole days from the day of surgery until discharge

Time frame:
1 Month
Reported as:
Median · Days
Hospital Stay
DaysControl Group (Standard Laparotomy)Rapid Recovery Group
Hospital Stay3.0 (2.0 to 3.0)3.0 (2.0 to 3.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group (Standard Laparotomy) vs Rapid Recovery Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.36
SecondaryPain Medications Used

Total daily narcotic pain medication used by patients. Narcotic use was standardized by conversion to morphine equivalents using the methods of Korff et al.

Time frame:
Post operative - day 2
Reported as:
Median · Morphine equivalents
Pain Medications Used
Morphine equivalentsControl Group (Standard Laparotomy)Rapid Recovery Group
Pain Medications Used10.0 (8.3 to 12.3)7.5 (3.3 to 10.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group (Standard Laparotomy) vs Rapid Recovery Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.05
SecondaryPain Assessment

Secondary outcome is to determine if rapid recovery can improve Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain assessment. VAS scales are a horizontal line 100 mm in length with the left end labeled 'No pain' and the right end labeled 'Very severe pain'. The subject marks a point on the line that represents their perception of their current state. VAS score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) from the left end of the line to the point on the line marked by the subject. The range of possible values for this pain score is 0 to 100 mm.

Time frame:
Day 0
Reported as:
Median · Score on a scale
Pain Assessment
Score on a scaleControl Group (Standard Laparotomy)Rapid Recovery Group
Pain Assessment4.33 (3.0 to 6.25)3.13 (2.30 to 4.40)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group (Standard Laparotomy) vs Rapid Recovery Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.18

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control Group (Standard Laparotomy)—1/52 (1.9%)4/52 (7.7%)
Rapid Recovery Group—4/51 (7.8%)7/51 (13.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventControl Group (Standard Laparotomy)Rapid Recovery Group
ICU admissionGeneral disorders1/523/51
HemorrhageBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/521/51
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventControl Group (Standard Laparotomy)Rapid Recovery Group
Individual adverse events breakup not knownGeneral disorders4/527/51

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Control Group (Standard Laparotomy)Rapid Recovery GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years5251103
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Control Group (Standard Laparotomy)Rapid Recovery GroupTotal
Median56.0 (52.8 to 59.2)55.4 (52.3 to 58.5)55.65 (52.8 to 58.5)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control Group (Standard Laparotomy)Rapid Recovery GroupTotal
Female5251103
Male000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Control Group (Standard Laparotomy)Rapid Recovery GroupTotal
United States5251103
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Chau JPC, Liu X, Lo SHS, Chien WT, Hui SK, Choi KC, Zhao J. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 15;3(3):CD008239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub5. PubMed 35289396 ↗
  • Dickson EL, Stockwell E, Geller MA, Vogel RI, Mullany SA, Ghebre R, Witherhoff BJ, Downs LS Jr, Carson LF, Teoh D, Glasgow M, Gerber M, Rivard C, Erickson BK, Hutchins J, Argenta PA. Enhanced Recovery Program and Length of Stay After Laparotomy on a Gynecologic Oncology Service: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;129(2):355-362. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001838. PubMed 28079776 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01705288
Lead sponsor
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 12, 2012
Start date
Jan 1, 2013
Primary completion
Aug 24, 2016
Completion
Aug 24, 2016
Results posted
Feb 17, 2020
Last update
Feb 17, 2020

Study contacts

Peter Argenta, M.D.
principal investigator · Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion