ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01694745EUROPAINsurveyUpdated Jan 23, 2014

EUROpean Pain Audit In Neonates

An observational study in Pain, Analgesia and Sedation, sponsored by Hôpital Armand Trousseau. Completed at 242 sites in 18 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 45 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-01-23.

Sponsored by Hôpital Armand Trousseau · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
6,489
Ages
Up to 45 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

EUROPAIN Survey is an epidemiological study aimed at assessing current clinical practices regarding the use of sedative and analgesic drugs in newborns admitted to NICUs or PICUs in different countries in Europe. This study is conducted as part of the NeoOpiod study.

The main objective of this study is to determine the current clinical practices regarding the use of sedative and analgesic drugs in newborns in intensive units in different countries in Europe. The principal criteria are: the frequency of ventilated neonates receiving sedation and analgesia, the medications used for sedation and analgesia in ventilated neonates, the length of use of medications administered for sedation and analgesia in ventilated neonates and similarities and differences in sedation and analgesia practices among European countries.

The secondary objectives are: a) to determine the proportion of neonatal units that have developed and implemented local written guidelines to provide continuous sedation and analgesia in ventilated newborn infants as well as to prevent and treat procedural pain, b) to document the published guidelines for neonatal analgesia and sedation in different European countries and develop consensus for common European standards that can be applied in all medical settings, c) to determine the frequency of use of pain assessment tools in ventilated newborn infants and evaluate their impact on pain management practices and d) to determine practices to assess and prevent withdrawal syndromes.

The EUROPAIN STUDY is observational and therefore it will not interfere with routine practices of participating units. No changes in diagnostic, therapeutic or any managing strategy of patients are imposed by the participation in this study. This epidemiological study will only collect data on clinical practices in each unit. It will include all neonates up to a corrected age of 44 weeks post conception.

The maximum duration of data collection for every included infant is 28 days. Data collection will stop before 28 days if the infant leaves the unit (discharge, death, transfer to another hospital). Data will be entered on a secure web-based questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

1.1 Background and rationale The alleviation of pain is a basic and human right regardless of age. Neonates do feel pain and it has been shown that preterm infants are even more vulnerable to pain than older infants. The more vulnerable preterm neonates are precisely those that are more exposed to pain. Neonates admitted to intensive care units, both neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), undergo dozens or even hundreds of painful procedures during their stay. These painful procedures include, for many of the ICU neonates, a tracheal intubation followed by mechanical ventilation. The pain and stress that are induced by mechanical ventilation as well as by repetitive procedures or painful diseases has led medical staff to use sedation and analgesia in neonates admitted to intensive care units. The subjectivity and difficulty inherent to pain measurement in neonates have probably contributed to a wide variety of neonatal sedation and analgesia practices. To date, these practices have been rarely studied.

Why would sedation and analgesia be necessary? Mechanical ventilation is a potentially painful intervention. Adults often describe mechanical ventilation as a painful and anxiety-provoking experience. The main objectives of sedation and analgesia are: reduction of pain, stress and irritability, promotion of blood pressure stability, promotion of ventilator synchrony and improvement of oxygenation. In the long term, reduced stress, as well as reduced fluctuations in oxygenation and blood pressure is believed to minimize the risks of neurological injury and death. However, the use of sedation and analgesia is only conceivable in the respect of the principle that must accompany all medical actions: first, do no harm.

Pain and stress undergone during the neonatal period can have deleterious short-term and long-term consequences. Some of these consequences have been reduced with adequate analgesic treatment. Current data show the necessity to give adequate sedation and analgesia to ventilated neonates.

Statements promoting the use of sedation and analgesia The increased awareness that neonates feel pain, the ethical obligation to treat this pain with analgesics, the growing body of evidence demonstrating that untreated neonatal pain can lead to altered reactivity to pain that persists throughout infancy and childhood as well as the need for a humane management of neonates have lead to the development of International and National Guidelines promoting the use of analgesics in the neonatal population. These Guidelines state that units that provide neonatal care should develop and implement guidelines concerning neonatal pain. However, the existing literature is still conflicting regarding the use of sedation and analgesia for ventilated neonates. Current data indicate that there is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of opioids in mechanically ventilated newborns and that opioids should be used selectively. Sedation and analgesia in non ventilated babies is extremely rare.

Practices across Europe and USA Data on sedation and analgesia practices in ventilated neonates are very rare. In 1995 the SOPAIN study carried out in the United States showed that factors predicting the use of on-going analgesia and sedation in neonates included: mechanical ventilation, higher gestational age, and male gender. In 2005, the French EPIPPAIN study showed that the rate of continuous sedation and analgesia was 69.6% in ventilated neonates with large variations among centers (16.7% to 90.9%). The most frequently used drugs were midazolam and morphine.

To date, there are no data permitting the comparison of neonatal pain management within the European countries. The availability of these data will enable comparison of practices with state-of-the-art knowledge.

Study Hypothesis

The EUROPAIN study is an epidemiological study that is based on the following hypothesis:

  • Most newborn ventilated infants receive continuous sedation and analgesia.
  • Non ventilated babies are not sedated.
  • Morphine, fentanyl and midazolam are the most frequently drugs used in this setting.
  • Infrequent use of validated pain assessment tools to monitor sedation and analgesia occurs in ventilated newborn infants.
  • Most units have developed written local guidelines for sedation and analgesia in ventilated neonates, but huge variability exists among practitioners in the same unit, across different units in the same country, and across different countries in Europe.
  • Development, dissemination, and regular updates of common European standards will improve the care and clinical outcomes of ventilated newborn infants.

1.2 Main objective • To determine the current clinical practices regarding the use of sedative and analgesic drugs for ventilated newborns in different countries in Europe.

1.3 Principal criteria

  • The frequency of ventilated neonates receiving sedation and analgesia in different European units
  • The medications used for sedation and analgesia in ventilated neonates across Europe.
  • The length of use of medications administered for sedation and analgesia in ventilated neonates
  • Similarities and differences in sedation and analgesia practices among European countries

1.4 Secondary objectives and criteria

  • To determine the proportion of neonatal units that have developed and implemented local written guidelines to provide continuous sedation and analgesia in ventilated newborn infants as well as to prevent and treat procedural pain.
  • To document the published guidelines for neonatal analgesia and sedation in different European countries and develop consensus for common European standards that can be applied in all medical settings.
  • To determine the frequency of use of pain assessment tools in ventilated newborn infants and evaluate their impact on pain management practices.
  • To determine practices to assess and prevent withdrawal syndromes. Secondary criteria
  • Variations across European countries of the proportions of units that have developed and implemented local written guidelines for sedation and analgesia in ventilated neonates
  • Identification and description of national guidelines for sedation and analgesia in neonates in all participating countries. Identification of recommended drugs.

1.5 Type of study

  • Epidemiological observational study.

1.6 Study plan The EUROPAIN STUDY is observational and therefore it will not interfere with routine practices of participating units. No changes in diagnostic, therapeutic or any managing strategy of patients are imposed by the participation in this study. This epidemiological study will only collect data on clinical practices in each unit.

The inclusion criteria are:

  • All neonates up to a corrected age of 44 weeks post conception. That means, for example, that a baby of 40 weeks gestational age can be included up to 28 days (4 weeks) of post natal age or that a baby of 32 weeks gestational age can be included up to 12 weeks of post natal age.

At the unit level

  • No modifications of current managing protocols or strategies are required by the participation in the EUROPAIN STUDY. The unit coordinators will only provide data on local protocols to manage procedural pain and sedation and analgesia in neonates as well as on general statistics of the unit. All treatments are authorized for included neonates since this study does not include any intervention
  • A nurse and physician coordinator as well as a data quality manager will be designated for each unit.

At the national level

  • The country coordinator will provide data on national guidelines to treat or prevent procedural or continuous pain in neonates.

Data collection

  • The duration of data collection for every included infant is 28 days. However, data collection will stop before 28 days if the infant leaves the unit (discharge, death, transfer to another hospital).
  • Data will be collected on individual data collection forms. These forms include demographic data, modes of respiration, continuous or intermittent sedative, analgesic or neuro-blocking drugs, pain assessment and drug withdrawal practices.
  • Paper patient data collection forms are written in English with a subtitled translation in the country language. The web-based databases display questionnaires in the country language.
  • The data collection forms will be completed by the unit nurse or physician coordinator or the person that they will designate.
  • For each center, the duration of the inclusion period will be one month.
  • Data will be entered on a secure web-based questionnaire.

1.7 Justification of number of patients Regarding the number of neonates to include in order to show possible differences in sedation and analgesia practices among the participating European countries, we have considered a scenario where differences are small. Thus, we have chosen an effect size (W) of 0.1. We have also assumed that 15 countries will participate. Using NCSS-PASS 2008 software, we have found that a total sample size of 2303 neonates will achieve 90% power to detect an effect size (W) of 0.1 using a 14 degrees (15 centers) of freedom Chi-Square test with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05. Therefore, we aim at including an average of 154 neonates per participating country.

1.8 Main Actions carried out during the study

  • In each country, the National Principal Investigators (NPI) will send invitations to join the study to all level 3 neonatal units of the country. The NPI will then communicate the names, emails and telephone numbers of the units that accept to participate to the EUROPAIN STUDY principal investigators
  • The NPI is responsible for the coordination of all units in the country and ensures communication with the EUROPAIN STUDY principal investigators
  • The NPI will collect demographic data about the participating country.
  • A nurse and physician coordinator as well as a data quality manager will be designated for each unit. The nurse and physician coordinator are responsible for informing all the unit staff about the study.
  • The EUROPAIN STUDY principal investigators have prepared a specifically designed web-based database to enter data. Data can be entered directly from the patient's file. A paper copy of this database will be distributed to allow centers that prefer to perform a preliminary entry on paper forms before entering data on the web-based database. The medical coordinator or a person that he (she) will choose will enter the data into these specifically designed databases.
  • The physician coordinator will report general statistics of the unit such as number of beds, number of admission, year ventilator-days etc to the Europain study principal investigators.
  • Every unit will also report existing local guidelines on sedation and analgesia in ventilated infants, including routines for withdrawal and on the use of pain assessment tools.
  • MONITORING PANEL. A monitoring panel will be created to monitor the progress of the study. This panel will ensure communication with all the participating units. This monitoring panel will be constituted by two persons working full-time during the study period. They will be stationed in Paris and working under the responsibility of EUROPAIN STUDY principal investigators.
02

Conditions studied

  • Pain
  • Analgesia
  • Sedation
  • Intesive Care
  • Intratracheal Ventilation

Keywords

  • Newborns
  • Premature
  • Pain
  • Pain assessment
  • Endotracheal Intubation
  • Analgesia
  • Sedation
  • Longterm effects of pain
  • Epidemiology
03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6,489 is above the median of 100 across 1,252 observational studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Hôpital Armand Trousseau is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 45 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  • All neonates up to a corrected age of 44 weeks post conception. That means, for example, that a baby of 40 weeks gestational age can be included up to 28 days (4 weeks) of post natal age or that a baby of 32 weeks gestational age can be included up to 12 weeks of post natal age.
  • The aim of including all neonates is to both ensure a generalization of the findings to all ventilated and non ventilated neonates admitted to intensive care units and to obtain a clear description of practices across Europe.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • All neonates up to a corrected age of 44 weeks post conceptional. That means, for example, that an infant born at 40 weeks gestational age can be included up to 28 days (4 weeks) of post natal age or that a baby of 32 weeks gestational age can be included up to 12 weeks of post natal age.

NOTE: Since this is an observational epidemiological study, all eligible infants of the unit during the study period should be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • The only exclusion criteria of this observational study is the participation of the neonate in a research study including a randomization for the use of sedative or analgesic drugs in ventilated neonates.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
6,489 participants (actual)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The frequency of ventilated neonates receiving sedation and analgesia in different European units

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. The medications used for sedation and analgesia in ventilated neonates across Europe

    Time frame: one year

  2. The length of use of medications administered for sedation and analgesia in ventilated neonates

    Time frame: one year

  3. Similarities and differences in sedation and analgesia practices among European countries

    Time frame: one year

Other outcomes

  1. Variations across European countries of the proportions of units that have developed and implemented local written guidelines for sedation and analgesia in ventilated neonates

    Time frame: one year

  2. Identification and description of national guidelines for sedation and analgesia in neonates in all participating countries. Identification of recommended drugs

    Time frame: one year

07

Study locations

242 sites
  • Universitäts-klinik für Kinder- und Jugendheilkunde Innsbruck
    Innsbruck, Austria
  • Landeskran- kenhaus Leoben
    Leoben, Austria
  • Universitäts-klinik für Kinder und Jugendheilkunde Salzburg
    Salzburg, Austria
  • Universitäts klinik für Kinder-und Jugenheilkunde Wien
    Wien, Austria
  • Universitaire Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
    Antwerpen, Belgium
  • Hôpital Erasme ULB,
    Bruxelles, Belgium
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Tivoli
    La Louvière, Belgium
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle
    Liège, Belgium
  • Neonatal Intensiv Care Unit, Arch. Makarios Hospital
    Nicosia, Cyprus
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tallinn Children's Hospital
    Tallinn, Estonia
  • Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tartu University Clinics
    Tartu, Estonia
  • Helsinki University Hospital
    Helsinki, Finland
  • Kuopio University Hospital
    Kuopio, Finland
  • Oulu University Hospital
    Oulu, Finland
  • Tampere University Hospital
    Tampere, Finland
  • Turku University Hospital
    Turku, Finland
  • CHR Félix Guyon
    Saint Denis, La Réunion, France
  • CHU Amiens
    Amiens, France
  • CHU Angers
    Angers, France
  • CH Arras
    Arras, France
  • CH Côte Basque
    Bayonne, France
  • CHU Besançon
    Besançon, France
  • CHU Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, France
  • CHU de Brest
    Brest, France
  • CHU Caen
    Caen, France
  • CH Chambéry
    Chambéry, France
  • CH Cherbourg
    Cherbourg, France
  • CHU Clermont Ferrand
    Clermont Ferrand, France
  • CHU Dijon
    Dijon, France
  • CH Le Havre
    Le Havre, France
  • CH Le Mans
    Le Mans, France
  • CHU Lyon Croix Rousse
    Lyon, France
  • Hôpital Femme,Mère, enfant
    Lyon, France
  • Hôpital de la conception - APHM
    Marseille, France
  • CHU de Montpellier
    Montpellier, France
  • CHU Nancy
    Nancy, France
  • CHU Nice
    Nice, France
  • CHU de Nîmes
    Nîmes, France
  • CHR Orléans
    Orléans, France
  • CHU Pau
    Pau, France
  • CHU Poitiers
    Poitiers, France
  • CHU Reims
    Reims, France
  • CHU Rennes
    Rennes, France
  • CH Rouen
    Rouen, France
  • Ch Saint Etienne
    Saint-Etienne, France
  • CHRU de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, France
  • CHU Toulouse
    Toulouse, France
  • CHU Tours
    Tours, France
  • CH Troyes
    Troyes, France
  • CH Bretagne Atlantique
    Vannes, France
  • Klinik fUr Kinder und Jugendliche Sozialstiftung Bamberg
    Bamberg, Germany
  • Klinikum Coburg
    Coburg, Germany
  • Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine University Hospital Erlangen
    Erlangen, Germany
  • Cnopf'sche Kinderklinik
    Nuremberg, Germany
  • "Gaia" Maternity Hospital
    Athens, Greece
  • "Lito" Maternity Hospital
    Athens, Greece
  • "Mitera" General Maternity and Pediatric Clinic
    Athens, Greece
  • "Rea" Maternity Hospital
    Athens, Greece
  • Alexandras Hospital general
    Athens, Greece
  • Children's Hospital "Agia Sophia"
    Athens, Greece
  • Helena Venilezoy Maternit y Hospital
    Athens, Greece
  • University Hospital of Heraklion
    Heraklion, Greece
  • University of Ioannina
    Ioannina, Greece
  • University of Patras
    Patras, Greece
  • 1st Dept of Neonatalogy, Aristole University of Thessaloniki
    Thessaloniki, Greece
  • 2nd Dept of Neonatalogy, Aristole University of Thessaloniki
    Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Menn Esy, Hippokratio General Hospital
    Thessaloniki, Greece
  • TIN Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio
    Agrigento, Italy
  • UO TIN Neonatologia AOU Sant'Orsola Malpighi
    Bologna, Italy
  • TIN Bolzano
    Bolzano, Italy
  • UO TIN e Patologia Neonatale
    Camposampiero, Italy
  • TIN Como Valduce
    Como, Italy
  • U.O. di Neonatologia e PatNeo con T.I. - Istituti Ospitalieri
    Cremona, Italy
  • Ospedale Careggi
    Firenze, Italy
  • Patologia Neonatale Lodi
    Lodi, Italy
  • IN Ospedale Macedonio Melloni Milano-AO Fatebenefratellied Oftalmico
    Milano, Italy
  • TIN Centro IRCSS Ca Granda-Policlinico Osp.Maggiore Mangiagalli LI
    Milano, Italy
  • TIN Modena
    Modena, Italy
  • TIN/Neonatologia- fondazione MBBM- H San Gerardo
    Monza, Italy
  • TIN E Patologia Neonatale Dip. di Salute della donna e del bambino- Università di Padova
    Padova, Italy
  • UTIN Perugia
    Perugia, Italy
  • UO Neonatologia Santa Chiara
    Pisa, Italy
  • TIN A.O.Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli
    Reggio Calabria, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, Reggio Emilia
    Reggio Emilia, Italy
  • NICU Rimini
    Rimini, Italy
  • TIN Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù
    Roma, Italy
  • TIN Ospedale San Pietro FBF
    Roma, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari
    Sassari, Italy
  • Ospedale Maria Vittoria, Torino
    Torino, Italy
  • UO Neonatologia e TIN Ospedale Santa Chiara
    Trento, Italy
  • UO TIN e Patologia Neonatale
    Treviso, Italy
  • Patologia Neonatale Ospedale S.M.Misericordia
    Udine, Italy
  • Terapia Intensiva Neonatale e Pediatrica
    Verona, Italy
  • U.O.Patologia e Terapia Intensiva Neonatale AOUI Borgo Roma
    Verona, Italy
  • TIN Ospedale San Bortolo
    Vicenza, Italy
  • Department of Neonatology Lithuanian University of Health Sciences,
    Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Mater Dei Hospital, Triq Dun Karm
    Msida, Malta
  • Academic medical Center Amsterdam - Emma Children's Hospital
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • ErasmusMC - Sophia Childrens Hospital
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • University Hospital Utrecht - Wilhelmina Children's Hospital
    Utrecht, Netherlands

Showing the first 100 of 242 sites across 18 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lago P, Frigo AC, Baraldi E, Pozzato R, Courtois E, Rambaud J, Anand KJ, Carbajal R. Sedation and analgesia practices at Italian neonatal intensive care units: results from the EUROPAIN study. Ital J Pediatr. 2017 Mar 7;43(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13052-017-0343-2. PubMed 28270167 ↗
  • Carbajal R, Eriksson M, Courtois E, Boyle E, Avila-Alvarez A, Andersen RD, Sarafidis K, Polkki T, Matos C, Lago P, Papadouri T, Montalto SA, Ilmoja ML, Simons S, Tameliene R, van Overmeire B, Berger A, Dobrzanska A, Schroth M, Bergqvist L, Lagercrantz H, Anand KJ; EUROPAIN Survey Working Group. Sedation and analgesia practices in neonatal intensive care units (EUROPAIN): results from a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Oct;3(10):796-812. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00331-8. Epub 2015 Sep 24. Erratum In: Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Dec;3(12):e44. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00482-8. PubMed 26420017 ↗

Related links

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2012, a primary completion of Jun 2013 and a completion of Jun 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 25, 2012
First posted
Sep 27, 2012
Start
Oct 2012
Primary completionActual
Jun 2013
CompletionActual
Jun 2013
Last update
Jan 23, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 23, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01694745
Lead sponsor
Hôpital Armand Trousseau
Responsible party
CARBAJAL (Professor, Hôpital Armand Trousseau) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 27, 2012
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Jun 2013
Last update
Jan 23, 2014

Study contacts

Ricardo Carbajal, MD PhD
principal investigator · Armand Trousseau

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion