CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01689506Updated Jun 26, 2014

Fluid Resuscitation in Patients Suffering From Burns Injury

A Phase 4 interventional study of Volulyte and Human Serum Albumin in Burns, sponsored by Fresenius Kabi. Terminated at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-26.

Sponsored by Fresenius Kabi · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Study stopped due to low recruitment
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical study compares two fluid resuscitation treatments in patients suffering from burns injury. The treatments are Volulyte® and Human Serum Albumin (HSA) which will be administered as infusion solutions. It will be evaluated whether Volulyte® is effective and safe, and provides any benefit.

Read the detailed description

Severe burns injury presents a unique resuscitation problem due to simultaneous loss of electrolyte and protein-rich exudate from the burn wound itself and leakage of fluid and protein from the circulation into the interstitial compartment. In the post shock phase of burn resuscitation, patients frequently suffer oedema of unburned tissues and organs and a positive fluid balance of many litres. This pilot study will compare two burns fluid resuscitation regimes (supplementation with 6% HES 130/0.4 in an isotonic electrolyte solution, Volulyte 6%, versus supplementation with Human Serum Albumin, HSA 50g/L) on patient outcome with particular regard to fluid balance at 24 hours after burns injury (primary variable).

02

Conditions studied

  • Burns

Browse trials for

03

In context

Burns

719 studies on the registry are indexed under Burns; 145 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 40 across 524 interventional studies indexed under Burns.

Browse Burns studies →

Lead sponsor

Fresenius Kabi is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients ≥18 years of age
  • 15%≥ Burn Total Body Surface Area Injury ≤60%
  • Signed written informed consent from patient or legal representative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient age >80 years
  • Delay of patient randomisation >8 hours post-burn
  • Known pregnancy
  • Known renal failure with oliguria or anuria not related to hypovolaemia (e.g. patients receiving dialysis treatment)
  • High voltage electrical conduction injury
  • Known severe liver disease
  • Known fluid overload (hyperhydration), especially in cases of pulmonary oedema and congestive cardiac failure
  • Intracranial bleeding (known active or suspicion of intracranial bleeding)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Volulyte

    Volulyte 6%-supplemented arm: 6 % hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in an isotonic electrolyte solution (solution for infusion)

    Drug: Volulyte

  • Active comparator
    Human Serum Albumin

    5% Albumin-supplemented arm: Human Serum Albumin (HSA 50g/L, solution for infusion)

    Drug: Human Serum Albumin

Interventions

  • DrugVolulyte

    6 % hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in an isotonic electrolyte solution will be intravenously infused in order to achieve and maintain predefined hemodynamics goals and may be given up to a total daily dose of 50 mL/kg body weight/day.

    Also known as: 6 % hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in an isotonic electrolyte solution

  • DrugHuman Serum Albumin

    5% Human Serum Albumin will be intravenously infused in order to achieve and maintain predefined hemodynamics goals with no daily dose limit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative fluid balance (input-output)

    Time frame: at 24 hours after burns injury

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cumulative fluid balance (input-output)

    Time frame: at 8 hours after burns injury, at 24 hours after randomisation, and until day 7 after burns injury

  2. Oedema monitoring: patient's weight, circumference measurement of unburned limb

    Time frame: once daily until day 7 after burns injury

  3. Urine output

    Time frame: hourly until 24 hours after burns injury, at 24 hours after randomization and, thereafter, once daily until day 7 after burns injury

  4. Haemodynamics

    Time frame: hourly until 24 hours after burns injury, at 24 hours after randomization and, thereafter, 4 times daily until day 7 after burns injury

  5. Bladder pressure

    Time frame: once daily until day 7 after burns injury

  6. Use of vasoactive and inotropic drugs

    Time frame: until 24 hours after randomisation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre
    Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01689506
Lead sponsor
Fresenius Kabi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 21, 2012
Start date
Dec 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2013
Completion
Sep 2013
Last update
Jun 26, 2014

Study contacts

Naiem Moiemen, PhD MD
principal investigator · Plastic and Burns Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion