CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01688895Updated Apr 17, 2020Results posted

Erythropoietic Protoporphyrias: Studies of the Natural History, Genotype-Phenotype Correlations, and Psychosocial Impact

An observational study in Erythropoietic Protoporphyria, EPP and X-Linked Protoporphyria, sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Completed at 6 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-17.

Sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
150
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The initial objective of this protocol is to assemble a well-documented group of patients with confirmed diagnoses of the erythropoietic protoporphyrias, including autosomal recessive Erythropoietic Protoporphyria (EPP) and X-Linked Protoporphyria (XLP) for clinical, biochemical, and genetic studies. The long-term objectives are (1) to conduct a longitudinal investigation of the natural history, complications, and therapeutic outcomes in people with erythropoietic protoporphyria, (2) to systematically investigate the psychological effects of the erythropoietic protoporphyrias on children and adults, and (3) to investigate the correlation between the identified genotypes and the resulting clinical presentation, also determining the possible interaction of other genetic markers.

Read the detailed description

The porphyrias are a group of rare metabolic diseases that may present in childhood or adult life and are due to deficiencies of enzymes in the heme biosynthetic pathway. The most common manifestations are related to accumulation of intermediates in the pathway and usually occur as acute neurological attacks (as in the acute or hepatic porphyrias), or cutaneous photosensitivity (as in the cutaneous porphyrias, including the erythropoietic protoporphyrias). Multiple mutations have been identified in each of the porphyrias. The risk of disability or death from these disorders is significant, in part because diagnosis is often delayed due to lack of adoption of diagnostic testing in clinical practice. Moreover, the natural history of these disorders is not well described and it is not known what determines differences in outcomes. New therapies are needed. For existing therapies, high-quality evidence on short and long term efficacy and safety is generally lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this study of a large group of patients with EPP and XLP is to provide a better understanding of the natural history of these disorders, as affected by available therapies, and to aid in developing new forms of treatment. Much of the data collected on subjects as participants in the Longitudinal Study of the Porphyrias will be accessed for this study specific to the investigation of the erythropoietic protoporphyrias. To maximize the information that can be informative in our objectives, additional data will be collected, including additional biochemical findings and EPP-specific psychosocial parameters.

The Office of Rare Diseases (ORD) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) established a Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) in collaboration with other NIH Institutes and currently has funded 19 rare diseases clinical research consortia and one Data Management and Coordinating Center. The Porphyrias Consortium was created as part of the RDCRN, to study the human porphyrias. The Porphyrias Consortium is a consortium of the academic institutions listed in the participating institutions table. All Centers in the Porphyrias Consortium are participating in this study. Additional centers may be added if funding is available.

02

Conditions studied

  • Erythropoietic Protoporphyria
  • EPP
  • X-Linked Protoporphyria
  • XLP
  • XLPP
  • X-Linked Dominant Erythropoietic Protoporphyria
  • XLEPP
  • XLDP

Keywords

  • erythropoietic
  • protoporphyria
  • cutaneous
  • porphyria
03

In context

Protoporphyria, Erythropoietic

29 studies on the registry are indexed under Protoporphyria, Erythropoietic; 5 are open to participants now.

Browse Protoporphyria, Erythropoietic studies →

Lead sponsor

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is the lead sponsor of 764 studies on the registry; 181 are open to participants now.

Of its 121 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 82 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Subjects will be recruited from the following resources:

  1. Patients followed by one of the Investigators
  2. The American Porphyria Foundation (APF)
  3. The Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Contact Registry
  4. Non-study Physician referrals
  5. Self-referrals, including family members of individuals diagnosed with Porphyria (proband) and other individuals who may have heard about the study from other subjects or prospective subjects.
  6. Medical Records Review

Inclusion criteria

  • All subjects must also be enrolled in the Longitudinal Study of the Porphyrias.
  • Willing to sign informed consent form
  • Biochemical findings - A marked increase in erythrocyte protoporphyrin [total erythrocyte protoporphyrin >200 ug/dL, or more than 1.5-fold increase (relative to ULN of 80 ug/dL)], with a predominance of free protoporphyrin (85-100% in EPP and 50-85% in XLP).
  • Molecular findings - one of the following:

    1. A disease causing FECH mutation trans to the IVS3-48C>T low expression FECH allele
    2. Two disease-causing FECH mutations
    3. A gain-of-function ALAS-2 C-terminal deletion/exon 11 mutation (in XLP). If no mutation is found and subjects fulfill criteria 1-3 they are eligible for enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cases with elevations of porphyrins in urine, plasma or erythrocytes due to other diseases (i.e. secondary porphyrinuria or porphyrinemia), such as liver and bone marrow diseases [Gibson 2000].
  • patients with a prior diagnosis of porphyria that cannot be documented by review of existing medical records or repeat biochemical or DNA testing.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Participants with Protoporphyrias

    Individuals with a documented diagnosis of Erythropoietic Protoporphyria (EPP) or X-Linked Protoporphyria (XLP)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Questionnaire with 7 items for anxiety and 7 items for depression, each item is scored on a 4 point response 0 - 3, subscales 0-21, with full range from 0 to 42, with higher score indicating more severe anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: 1 weeks

  2. Illness Perception Questionnaire Revised (IPQR)

    Each item is scored on a likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Items within each domain were totaled for final domain scores. Seven domains - Timeline (score 5-25), Consequences (score 6-30), Personal Control (score 6-30), Treatment Control (score 3-15), Illness Coherence (score 5-25), Timeline-Cyclical (score 4-20), and Emotional Representations (score 6-30). A modified version without the identity component was used as it was not applicable in EPP. Higher scores domains indicate overall strong beliefs that the disease is chronic and has a negative impact.

    Time frame: 1 week

  3. EPP-Specific Tool

    Each item was scored from 0-3 on a Likert scale. There are 2 domains: S=disease severity and Q=QoL. Total scale for each domain transferred to 0-100 scale. Higher scores for the S domain reflect lower severity, and higher satisfaction/QoL for the Q domain. Total Score from 0-100, with higher score indicating higher quality of life.

    Time frame: 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sleep Disturbance PROMIS Scores

    Sleep Subscales: Pain Interference, Depression, Physical Function, Fatigue, Anxiety, Sleep Disturbance, Satisfaction with Social Roles, each subscale scored from 0-100 with higher score indicating more symptoms affecting sleep.

    Time frame: baseline

07

Results

Posted Apr 17, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAdult Patients With EPP/XLP
Started150
Completed150
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Questionnaire with 7 items for anxiety and 7 items for depression, each item is scored on a 4 point response 0 - 3, subscales 0-21, with full range from 0 to 42, with higher score indicating more severe anxiety or depression.

Time frame:
1 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
score on a scaleAdult Patients With EPP/XLP
Anxiety4.6 ± 4.1
Depression1.9 ± 2.1
PrimaryIllness Perception Questionnaire Revised (IPQR)

Each item is scored on a likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Items within each domain were totaled for final domain scores. Seven domains - Timeline (score 5-25), Consequences (score 6-30), Personal Control (score 6-30), Treatment Control (score 3-15), Illness Coherence (score 5-25), Timeline-Cyclical (score 4-20), and Emotional Representations (score 6-30). A modified version without the identity component was used as it was not applicable in EPP. Higher scores domains indicate overall strong beliefs that the disease is chronic and has a negative impact.

Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Illness Perception Questionnaire Revised (IPQR)
score on a scaleAdult Patients With EPP/XLP
Timeline23.4 ± 2.2
Consequences23.2 ± 4.3
Personal Control19.0 ± 4.9
Treatment Control9.2 ± 2.8
Illness Coherence19.0 ± 4.2
Timeline - Cyclical10.5 ± 3.8
Emotional Representations18.8 ± 5.5
PrimaryEPP-Specific Tool

Each item was scored from 0-3 on a Likert scale. There are 2 domains: S=disease severity and Q=QoL. Total scale for each domain transferred to 0-100 scale. Higher scores for the S domain reflect lower severity, and higher satisfaction/QoL for the Q domain. Total Score from 0-100, with higher score indicating higher quality of life.

Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
EPP-Specific Tool
units on a scaleAdult Patients With EPP/XLP
S Domain58.9 ± 30.8
Q Domain30.8 ± 27.4
Total Score54.3 ± 30.0
SecondarySleep Disturbance PROMIS Scores

Sleep Subscales: Pain Interference, Depression, Physical Function, Fatigue, Anxiety, Sleep Disturbance, Satisfaction with Social Roles, each subscale scored from 0-100 with higher score indicating more symptoms affecting sleep.

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Sleep Disturbance PROMIS Scores
score on a scaleAdult Patients With EPP/XLP
Pain Interference49.1 ± 9.7
Depression44.1 ± 8.4
Physical Function52.5 ± 7.8
Fatigue46.6 ± 10.6
Anxiety47.3 ± 10.0
Sleep Disturbance48.7 ± 8.9
Satisfaction with Social Roles54.9 ± 9.3

Adverse events

Collected over 1 week. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Adult Patients With EPP/XLP0/150 (0%)0/150 (0%)0/150 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Adult Patients With EPP/XLP
Mean40.9 ± 14.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Adult Patients With EPP/XLP
Female66
Male84
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Adult Patients With EPP/XLP
Hispanic or Latino4
Not Hispanic or Latino144
Unknown or Not Reported2
Protoporphyria Type
Protoporphyria Type(Participants)Adult Patients With EPP/XLP
Erythropoietic Protoporphyria - EPP143
X-Linked Protoporphyria - XLP6
Unknown type1
Age at Onset of Symptoms
Age at Onset of Symptoms(years)Adult Patients With EPP/XLP
Mean4.2 ± 4.5
08

Study locations

6 sites
  • University of Alabama, Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0012, United States
  • University of California, San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106, United States
  • University of Texas Medical Branch
    Galveston, Texas 77555, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 26, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01688895
Lead sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Collaborators
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network, Office of Rare Diseases (ORD), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 20, 2012
Start date
Jul 2012
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2019
Completion
Jul 1, 2019
Results posted
Apr 17, 2020
Last update
Apr 17, 2020

Study contacts

Manisha Balwani, MD
principal investigator · Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion