CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01679626Updated Sep 7, 2012

Airway Manoeuvers - Implications for Airway Management?

An observational study in Airway Management, sponsored by Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-09-07.

Sponsored by Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven · Observational

Study type
Observational
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In anesthesia, intubation is a technique used to secure an airway. This technique is not always straightforward. Sometimes it is difficult to place an endotracheal tube. There are two manners of giving pressure to the patients neck, to improve view and facilitate intubation.

The investigators hypothesize that by giving this pressure the effective work area is likely to be smaller. The investigators would like to quantify this effect by measuring the effective work area, using a specially designed computer program.

Read the detailed description

Cricoid pressure (CP) and the backward-upward-rightward pressure (BURP) manoeuver, are extralaryngeal manoeuvers which are widely applied during endotracheal intubation, respectively offering potential protection against passive gastric regurgitation and improved laryngeal view in emergency airway management.

Their validity in achieving an improvement of the laryngeal view has been questioned.

The objective of this study is to measure the change in mean anterior-posterior rima glottidis (APRIMA) distance and mean area under the vocal cords after backward upward rightward pressure (BURP) and cricoid pressure (CP).

The investigators will measure the APRIMA distances and areas under the vocal cords, using a specially created module in the program DeVIDE. The measurements assessed during BURP and CP will be expressed relative to the measurements when no external pressure is applied.

02

Conditions studied

  • Airway Management

Keywords

  • cricoid pressure (CP)
  • backward upward rightward pressure (BURP)
  • AP-rima distances
  • Glottic area
  • Extralaryngeal manoeuvres
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven is the lead sponsor of 80 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

200 consecutive adult patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 200 consecutive adult patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 35 kg.m-2);
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
  • history of difficult intubation;
  • mouth opening \< 3 cm;
  • inadequate neck mobility;
  • history of oropharyngeal pathology.
05

Study design

Enrollment
200 participants (actual)
06

Study locations

1 site
  • Catharina Hospital
    Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, Netherlands
07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 7, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01679626
Lead sponsor
Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
Responsible party
Ralph Maassen (MD, principal investigator, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 6, 2012
Start date
Jun 2011
Primary completion
Jul 2011
Completion
Jul 2011
Last update
Sep 7, 2012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion