CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01668056Updated Sep 10, 2013

Synchronization of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization With Follicular Wave Emergence

An interventional study of Ovulation induction with choriogonadotropin alfa and Aspiration of the dominant follicle in Infertility, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-09-10.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2013), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Ovarian stimulation is an important phase of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments. The harvest of a larger number of viable eggs per cycle compensate eventual laboratory difficulties and allow for the selection of embryos with higher implantation potential. In the current protocols, based on the most prevailing theory of ovarian follicular development, stimulation drugs are usually started on the second or third day after the beginning of menses. The follicular phase of the menstrual cycle is believed to be the only favorable moment for follicular development.

In the early 2000's a new model of human ovarian follicular development (follicular waves) has been proposed based on frequent transvaginal ultrasound observations between two ovulations. It has been shown that ovarian antral follicles develop in synchronous groups, two to three times in a cycle. In fact the follicular wave phenomenon has been initially described in the 80's on domestic animals, like the mare and the cow. Moreover, studies in these animals have shown that synchronizing the start of the ovarian stimulation drugs with the beginning of a follicular wave yields better results for assisted reproductive treatments. Consequently in ovarian stimulation protocols for animal assisted reproduction it is important to control the initiation of a follicular wave.

Current protocols of ovarian stimulation for IVF in women do not consider the start of a follicular wave to begin drug administration. Therefore the purpose of this study is to evaluate two methods to control the emergence of a follicular wave (ovulation induction and dominant follicle aspiration) and to investigate the effects of synchronizing ovarian stimulation for IVF with follicular wave emergence in women compared to one of the current stimulation protocols (flexible GnRH protocol).

02

Conditions studied

  • Infertility

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • in vitro fertilization
  • ovarian stimulation
  • follicular waves
  • luteal phase
03

In context

Infertility

2,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility; 407 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 120 across 1,698 interventional studies indexed under Infertility.

Browse Infertility studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 595 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age \< 35 years old
  • body mass index: 19-30 kg/m2
  • tubal or male factor infertility with indication of in vitro fertilization
  • antral follicle count: 10-20
  • normal uterus in transvaginal ultrasound scan
  • FSH on the third day of the menstrual cycle below 12mUI/mL and estradiol below 80pg/mL
  • male partner with at least 5 million motile sperm and 1% normal strict morphology on semen analyses

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ovarian factor infertility
  • non identification of one or both ovaries in the transvaginal ultrasound scan
  • non treated endocrine disorders
  • smoking habit
  • endometriosis stage III -IV
  • severe male factor infertility (less than one million sperm per mL of semen)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Patients will be stimulated according to the conventional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF. Alfa follitropin (150IU a day) will be started on the third day of the menstrual cycle. Treatment monitoring will be done with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum determinations of estradiol and progesterone 5 days after the start of gonadotropins and every each day thereafter. Once the leading follicle reaches 13 mm in mean diameter 0,25mg of cetrorelix acetate will be administered daily. Once at least two follicles reach 18mm or more in mean diameter 250 micrograms of choriogonadotropin alfa will be administered and 36 hours latter patients will undergo follicle aspiration for IVF. Embryos will be cryopreserved (vitrification) on the third or fifth day of development. Two months after women will undergo uterine preparation for embryo transfer.

    Other: Control

  • Experimental
    Ovulation induction

    Patients will be monitored with daily transvaginal ultrasound scans from the tenth day of the menstrual cycle on. When the dominant follicle reaches a mean diameter of 16mm or more, patients will receive 250 micrograms of choriogonadotropin alfa subcutaneously. Daily transvaginal ultrasound scans will be done starting two days after the administration of the medication until a cohort of ovarian follicles between 4-6 mm is seen (follicular wave emergence). From this point on patients will undergo the same stimulation protocol as Controls, i.e., flexible GnRH antagonist protocol.

    Drug: Ovulation induction with choriogonadotropin alfa

  • Experimental
    Dominant follicle aspiration

    Patients will be monitored with daily transvaginal ultrasound scans from the tenth day of the menstrual cycle on. When the dominant follicle reaches a mean diameter of 16mm or more, patients will then undergo aspiration of the dominant and all follicles greater than 10mm in mean diameter. aspiration will be transvaginal ultrasound guided and under sedation, as for oocyte retrieval. Oocytes eventually obtained at this first aspiration will not be used for IVF. Daily transvaginal ultrasound scans will be done starting the day after the follicular aspiration until a cohort of follicles between 4-6 mm is seen (follicular wave emergence). From this point on patients will undergo the same stimulation protocol as Controls, i.e., flexible GnRH antagonist protocol.

    Procedure: Aspiration of the dominant follicle

Interventions

  • DrugOvulation induction with choriogonadotropin alfa

    Administration of 250 micrograms of choriogonadotropin alfa subcutaneously when the dominant follicle of a natural menstrual cycle reaches 16mm or more of mean diameter. Verify if this intervention is able to induce follicular wave emergence and synchronize the start of the flexible GnRH antagonist protocol of ovarian stimulation with the start of a follicular wave.

  • ProcedureAspiration of the dominant follicle

    Aspiration of all follicles greater than 10mm in mean diameter when the dominant follicle of a natural menstrual cycle reaches 16mm or more of mean diameter. Aspiration will be guided by transvaginal ultrasound. Verify if this intervention is able to induce follicular wave emergence and synchronize the start of the flexible GnRH antagonist protocol of ovarian stimulation with the start of a follicular wave.

  • OtherControl

    Conventional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization, with gonadotropin star at the third day of a natural menstrual cycle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Emergence of an ovarian follicular wave after dominant follicle aspiration or hCG administration

    Evaluate if the aspiration of the dominant follicle is able to induce a follicular wave to emerge. Evaluate if administration of hCG is able to induce ovulation of a dominant follicle larger than 16mm and to induce a follicular wave to emerge. A follicular wave emergence is defined as an increase in the number of ovarian follicles smaller than 10mm seen at the transvaginal ultrasound scan after the interventions

    Time frame: One year

  2. Follicular growth pattern on ultrasound scan

    Evaluate with periodic transvaginal ultrasound scan the size (mm), number and growth rate (mm/day) of ovarian follicles in each of the three groups

    Time frame: One year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Estradiol and progesterone levels during ovarian stimulation

    Evaluate blood levels of estradiol (pg/mL) and progesterone (ng/mL) during ovarian stimulation in each of the three groups at each visit to evaluate the progress of treatment.

    Time frame: One year

  2. Number of mature oocytes retrieved

    Evaluate the number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved in each of the three groups

    Time frame: One year

  3. Total dose of gonadotrophins used

    Total dose of gonadotrophins (in international units) necessary to stimulate the ovaries (from the first day of stimulation until the last dose of recombinant FSH administered before the oocyte retrieval)

    Time frame: One year

  4. Fertilization rate

    Number of embryos formed in relation with the number of oocytes inseminated

    Time frame: One year

  5. Pregnancy rate

    Positive beta hCG determination on blood 10 days after embryo transfer

    Time frame: One year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
    Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. A new model for ovarian follicular development during the human menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 2003 Jul;80(1):116-22. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00544-2. PubMed 12849812 ↗
  • Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. Characterization of ovarian follicular wave dynamics in women. Biol Reprod. 2003 Sep;69(3):1023-31. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.017772. Epub 2003 May 14. PubMed 12748128 ↗
  • Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. Ovarian antral folliculogenesis during the human menstrual cycle: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):73-91. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr039. Epub 2011 Nov 8. PubMed 22068695 ↗
  • Adams GP, Singh J, Baerwald AR. Large animal models for the study of ovarian follicular dynamics in women. Theriogenology. 2012 Nov;78(8):1733-48. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 May 22. PubMed 22626769 ↗
  • de Mello Bianchi PH, Serafini P, Monteiro da Rocha A, Assad Hassun P, Alves da Motta EL, Sampaio Baruselli P, Chada Baracat E. Review: follicular waves in the human ovary: a new physiological paradigm for novel ovarian stimulation protocols. Reprod Sci. 2010 Dec;17(12):1067-76. doi: 10.1177/1933719110366483. Epub 2010 May 3. PubMed 20439948 ↗
  • Bianchi PH, Viera LM, Gouveia GR, Rocha AM, Baruselli PS, Baracat EC, Serafini PC. Study of two strategies to induce follicular wave emergence for assisted reproductive treatments (ART)-a preliminary trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Apr;32(4):543-9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0432-3. Epub 2015 Feb 21. PubMed 25701140 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01668056
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 17, 2012
Start date
Jan 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2014 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2014 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2013

Study contacts

Paulo HM Bianchi, MD
Contact
paulobianchi35@gmail.com
Edmund c Baracat, PhD
study chair · University of Sao Paulo Medical School
Paulo C Serafini, PhD
study director · University of Sao Paulo Medical School
Paulo HM Bianchi, MD
principal investigator · University of Sao Paulo Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion