CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01656902N3DUpdated Nov 24, 2023

Phase III Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of NOVOCART 3D Plus vs. Microfracture in Knee Cartilage Defects

A Phase 3 interventional study of NOVOCART® 3D plus and Microfracture in Traumatic Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee Joint, sponsored by Tetec AG. Completed at 35 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-24.

Sponsored by Tetec AG · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
263
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this phase 3 clinical trial, a second generation ACI (autologous chondrocyte implantation technique) is compared to standard of care therapy (microfracture) to treat traumatic cartilage defects of the knee for efficacy and safety. The investigated study treatment NOVOCART 3D plus is a biphasic biological scaffold which contains cultivated chondrocytes derived from the patient in a previous tissue harvest procedure. Allocation to the study treatment is done by randomization in a ration of 2:1 in favor to ACI (investigational product). Follow-up data for efficacy is collected for 2 years: follow-up visits are performed 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months after treatment; additional data for safety will be collected for up to 5 years: 36, 48, and 60 months after treatment. The study involves knee surgery (by arthroscopy, or mini-arthrotomically for implantation surgery), and blood withdrawal for safety within the first year after treatment. Initial imaging is required at baseline. Optional MRI imaging and biomarker collection is done as substudy at specific sites only.

Read the detailed description

For the cartilage cell product NOVOCART® 3D plus, which is used in the study described here, the company TETEC AG obtained an expanded production authorization from the medication monitoring authorities in compliance with Section 13, Para. 1 of the Medicinal Products Act in 2003. This entitles TETEC AG to produce the pharmaceutical product and already distribute it. More than 6000 patients were already successfully treated with NOVOCART® 3D in Europe since 2003. In order to obtain a general market authorization for NOVOCART® 3D plus, this control group study is conducted, in which the superiority of the safety and effectiveness of carrier-bound Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation with NOVOCART® 3D plus compared to the standard of care microfracture surgery needs to be proven. This study further aims at developing and validating known and new biologic markers for the quality and clinical efficacy of the product as requested in the context of identity, purity and potency characteristics of the medicinal/investigational product.

The patients will receive one of the therapeutic procedures in the study. The treatment procedure which will be used will be decided by a previously specified randomization process. This type of study meets the high quality requirements of the statutorily specified safety and quality regulations which are also referred to as "Good Clinical Practice" (GCP). The probability of the patient being allocated to one of the two treatments is 2:1; that is, an approx. 67% probability of therapy with NOVOCART® 3D plus and an approx. 33% probability of therapy with microfracture. Neither the patient, nor the investigator will be able to influence the treatment assignment.

Patients will be screened for eligibility at the Screening Visit. Each patient will remain in the study for 24 months post-implant for the effectiveness assessments, and then an additional three years to complete the planned post-market phase. Each patient will be in the study for up to five years.

Cells and tissues collected from this study will be used in other in vitro-controlled experiments aimed at developing and validating known and novel biologic markers to quantify cell quality in the context of identity, purity and potency. Prognostic values of these biologic markers will be examined by correlating them with clinical data collected in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee Joint

Keywords

  • Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation
  • NOVOCART 3D plus
  • knee joint pain
  • safety
  • efficacy
  • treatment
  • TETEC
  • cartilage
  • ACT
  • cartilage repair
  • tissue
  • MOCART
03

In context

Cartilage Diseases

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Cartilage Diseases; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 263 is above the median of 47 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Cartilage Diseases.

Browse Cartilage Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Tetec AG is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient is between 18 and 65 years old at screening OR (in selected countries only) is a pediatric patient (14-17 years old) with closed epiphyseal growth plate (confirmation of closure of epiphyseal growth plate of the index knee by x-ray or MRI required).
  2. Patient has a localized articular cartilage defect of the femoral condyle or the trochlea of the knee. 2 localized cartilage defects are accepted if the total defect size is ≤ 6 cm2 and the size of each individual lesion is ≥ 2 cm2, both cartilage defects are located at the femoral condyle and/or the trochlea and both cartilage defects are to be treated with NOVOCART 3D plus or microfracture.
  3. Patient has a defect size is between 2 and 6 cm2. Note: defect size can be estimated by MRI at visit 1 if no data is available from medical history.
  4. Patient has an intact articulating joint surface (not higher than Grade 2 International Cartilage Repair Society classification, no kissing lesions). Note: ICRS classification can be estimated by MRI at visit 1 if no data is available from medical history.
  5. Patient has an intact meniscus; a maximum of 50% resection is allowed. Note: status of meniscus can be estimated at visit 1 if no data is available from medical history.
  6. Patient has a stable knee joint or sufficiently reconstructed ligaments. If not, ligament repair must be done before, during or within 6 weeks after cartilage treatment (ACT/microfracture).
  7. Patient has free range of motion of the affected knee joint or ≤ 10° of extension and flexion loss.
  8. Patient has a defect-grade of III or IV according to the ICRS classification. Note: ICRS classification can be estimated by MRI at visit 1 if not data is available from medical history.
  9. Patient has a baseline score of 60/100 on the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation.
  10. Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent to participate in the study and to comply with all study requirements, including attending all follow-up visits and assessments and postoperative rehabilitation regimen.
  11. Mandatory for France only: Patient benefits of a health insurance regimen.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria (pre-operative):

  1. Patient is the investigator or any subinvestigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, other staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the study.
  2. Patient is unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  3. Patient has prior surgical treatment of the target knee using mosaicplasty, autologous chondrocyte transplantation and/or microfracture. Note: prior diagnostic arthroscopies with debridement and lavage are acceptable. Ligament repair is accepted, if performed before, during or within 6 weeks after cartilage treatment (ACT/microfracture).
  4. Patient has radiologically apparent degenerative joint disease in the target knee as determined by Kellgren and Lawrence grade > 2 (see Appendix A).
  5. Patient has chronic inflammatory arthritis and/or infectious arthritis.
  6. Patient has joint space narrowing > 1/3 in the target knee when compared to the other knee or smaller than 3 mm joint space measured on x-ray.
  7. Patient has malalignment (valgus- or varus-deformity) in the target knee. Note: In suspected cases, the mechanical axis must be established radiographically by complete leg imaging in standing position and in a.p. or rather p.a. projection. The Mikulicz line is not allowed to deviate more than 5 mm of the eminentia intercondylaris. If alignment is necessary, surgery has to be performed before, during or within 6 weeks after cartilage treatment (ACT/microfracture).
  8. Patient has prior surgical treatment of clinical relevance of the target knee.
  9. Patient has an osteochondral defect.
  10. Patient has bilateral lower limb pain or low back pain.
  11. Patient has a known systemic connective tissue disease.
  12. Patient has a current uncontrolled diabetes.
  13. Patient has a known history of autoimmune disease.
  14. Patient has a known history of immunological suppressive disorder or is taking immunosuppressants.
  15. Patient is currently systemically or intra-articularly taking steroids and/or has used steroids within the last 30 days prior to screening visit 1.
  16. The patient has a history of HIV/AIDS.
  17. The patient has a history of syphilis (Treponema pallidum).
  18. The patient has an active hepatitis B or C infection with verified antigens. Note: Patients with a cured hepatitis B or C infection and/or verified antibodies are not excluded.
  19. The patient has at the site of surgery an active systemic or local microbial infection, eczematization or inflammable skin alterations (including protozoonosis: Babesiosis, Trypanosomiasis (e.g. Chagas-Disease), Leishmaniasis, persistent bacterial infections, like Brucellosis, spotted and typhus fever, other Rickettsiosis, Leprosy, Recurrent Fever, Melioidosis or Tularaemia).
  20. Patient has a known history of cancer within the past 5 years.
  21. Patient has a known history of osteoporosis; also patients with primary hyperparathyroidism or hyperthyroidism without satisfactory treatment, chronic renal failure or patients with prior pathological fractures independent of the genesis are excluded.
  22. Patient has any degenerative muscular or neurological condition that would interfere with evaluation of outcome measures including but not limited to Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), or multiple sclerosis (MS).
  23. Patient has a body mass index (BMI) higher than 35 kg/m2.
  24. Patient is a woman who is pregnant or lactating. Note: contraception is indicated for female patients of childbearing potential until the day of cartilage treatment. Female patients who are unwilling to practice a medically acceptable method of birth control until the day of cartilage treatment cannot be included.
  25. Patient is currently participating, or has participated in any other clinical study within 3 months prior to the screening visit.
  26. Patient has known current or recent history of illicit drug or alcohol abuse or dependence
  27. Patient has psychiatric or cognitive impairment that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the study requirements, e.g., Alzheimer's disease.
  28. Patient has any other condition, which, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for the study.
  29. Patient has a history of HTLV.

Intra-operative Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is not pregnant as confirmed by urine pregnancy test before arthroscopy.
  2. Patient has a localized articular cartilage defect of the femoral condyle or the trochlea of the knee. 2 localized cartilage defects are accepted if the total defect size is up to 6 cm2 and the size of each individual lesion is at least 2 cm2, both cartilage defects are located at the femoral condyle and/or the trochlea and both cartilage defects are to be treated with NOVOCART 3D plus or microfracture.
  3. Patient has a defect size of 2 to 6 cm2 post-debridement.
  4. Patient has an intact articulating joint surface (at least (or higher) Grade 2 International Cartilage Repair Society classification) no kissing lesions).
  5. Patient has an intact meniscus; a maximum of 50% resection is allowed (no indication for concurrent meniscus transplant).
  6. Patient has a stable knee joint or sufficiently reconstructed ligaments. If not, ligament repair must be done during or within 6 weeks after cartilage treatment (ACT/microfracture).
  7. Patient has a defect grade of III or IV according to the ICRS classification.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
263 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    N3D plus

    NOVOCART® 3D plus (Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation System)

    Drug: NOVOCART® 3D plus

  • Active comparator
    Microfracture

    Microfracture is the standard care surgery.

    Procedure: Microfracture

Interventions

  • DrugNOVOCART® 3D plus

    Two-Step intervention: 1) cartilage cells are collected from the patient during arthroscopy 2) collected cartilage cells are cultivated in a sterile environment, seeded in an organic matrix scaffold and implanted into the defect location (knee, femur)

    Also known as: Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation

  • ProcedureMicrofracture

    single-step treatment: defect location (knee, femur) is debrided, then bone plate is drilled mechanically to allow cells from the bone marrow to move to the defect location and to develop a scar tissue

    Also known as: Microfracture according to Steadman

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Subjective IKDC score

    The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in the "2000 International Knee Documentation Committee" (IKDC) subjective score to 24-month visit. The IKDC will be recorded for NOVOCART® 3D plus and microfracture patients at baseline visit 1 and at the 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48,- and 60-month follow-up assessments.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment to 24-month follow-up assessment

Secondary outcomes

  1. IKDC objective physician score

    The IKDC objective physician score will be recorded for both arms at baseline visit 1 and at the 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48,- and 60-month follow-up assessments. A sequentially rejecting, hierarchical test procedure will be employed to test these secondary endpoints in the a-priori defined order given here after the test primary efficacy variable was passed. The change from baseline to the 24-month visit in the IKDC objective physician score and from baseline to the 24-month visit will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment to 24-month follow-up assessment

  2. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    The KOOS will be recorded for both arms at baseline visit 1 and at the 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48,- and 60-month follow-up assessments. A sequentially rejecting, hierarchical test procedure will be employed to test these secondary endpoints in the a-priori defined order given here after the test primary efficacy variable was passed. The change from baseline to 24-month visit in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and from baseline to 24-month visit will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment to 24-month follow-up assessment

  3. MOCART Score (MRI)

    Another secondary efficacy endpoint is the in vivo performance (grading on quality of cartilage fill) measured by the change from baseline to the 36-month assessment of the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. These assessments will be performed on a subset of patients (64 in NOVOCART and 32 in microfracture arm). The MRI will be recorded at 3, 12, 24 and 60 months follow-up visit.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment to the 24-month assessment

  4. Health-related quality of life as measured by the SF-36 survey

    Another secondary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline to the 24-month visit in the SF-36 to measure clinical utility and summarize health-related quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness. The SF-36 will be recorded for NOVOCART® 3D plus and microfracture patients at baseline visit 1 and at the 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48,- and 60-month follow-up assessments.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment to 24-month follow-up assessment

  5. Surgical time (cut-to-suture time)

    The surgical time will be measured in minutes and recorded for NOVOCART® 3D plus patients at arthroscopy (\>= 1 day after screening) and transplantation (24 +-5 days post-arthroscopy); for microfracture patients surgical time will be measured in minutes and recorded at arthroscopy (\>= 1 day after screening).

    Time frame: Transplantation (24 +-5 days post-arthroscopy) and/or arthroscopy (>= 1 day after screening), depending on the study arm

  6. Length of incision

    The length of incision will be measured in cm and recorded for NOVOCART® 3D plus patients at transplantation (24 +-5 days post-arthroscopy)

    Time frame: Only for verum group at transplantation (24 +-5 days post-arthroscopy)

  7. Any unanticipated adverse event

    Event descriptions, onset, resolution dates, relationship to the IP and procedures of any AEs will be recorded. Each event will be categorized by seriousness and intensity to facilitate complete safety reporting throughout the trial. While comparisons between treatment groups can be made for each class of AE, there is no statistical hypothesis governing acceptance of this endpoint at the end of the clinical study because of the different AE profiles associated with the two treatment arms.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment up to 60-months follow-up assessment

  8. Treatment Failure

    Any event related to a diagnosed failure of the study treatment

    Time frame: From completion of study treatment until 60-months follow-up assessment

07

Study locations

35 sites
  • Privatklinik Doebling
    Vienna, 1190, Austria
  • Fakultni nemocnice Brno - Ortopedicka klinika
    Brno, 62500, Czechia
  • Urazova nemocnice v Brne - Traumatologie
    Brno, 66250, Czechia
  • NH Hospital, a.s., Ortopedicke oddeleni nemocnice Horovice
    Horovice, 26831, Czechia
  • Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove - Ortopedicka klinika
    Hradec Kralove, 50005, Czechia
  • Pardubicka nemocnice
    Pardubice, 53203, Czechia
  • Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
    Praha, 15006, Czechia
  • UVN - Vojenska fakultni nemocnice Praha
    Praha, 16902, Czechia
  • Hôpital Ambroise Paré - Service de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologie
    Boulogne Billancourt, 92104, France
  • Polyclinique Saint-Roch
    Montpellier, 34075, France
  • Clinique V - Clinique du Sport
    Paris, 75005, France
  • CHU de Saint-Etienne Hôpital Nord - Service orthopedie et traumatologie
    Saint-Priest-En-Jarez, 42270, France
  • Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg - Klinik fuer Orthopaedie
    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106, Germany
  • Theresienkrankenhaus
    Mannheim, 68165, Germany
  • Orthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik der LMU München
    Muenchen, 81377, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
    Regensburg, 93042, Germany
  • Uzsoki utcai Kórház
    Budapest, 1145, Hungary
  • Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház
    Győr, 9024, Hungary
  • B-A-Z Megyei Központi Kórház és Egyetemi Oktatókórház
    Miskolc, 3526, Hungary
  • Markusovszky Egyetemi Oktatókórház
    Szombathely, 9700, Hungary
  • Kastélypark Klinika
    Tata, 2890, Hungary
  • Hospital of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Trauma Department
    Riga, 1005, Latvia
  • Orto Clinic
    Riga, 1005, Latvia
  • Kaunas clinical hospital
    Kaunas, 44320, Lithuania
  • Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics
    Kaunas, 50009, Lithuania
  • Klaipeda university hospital
    Klaipėda, 92288, Lithuania
  • JSC "Kardiolita"
    Vilnius, 05263, Lithuania
  • JSC "SK Impeks Medicinos Diagnostikos Centras"
    Vilnius, 10318, Lithuania
  • Szpital sw. Lukasza BGL Sp z o.o. S.K.A.
    Bielsko Biala, 43309, Poland
  • Samozdzielny Publiczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Miejskiego Szpitala Zespolonego
    Czestochowa, 42200, Poland
  • Szpital Angelius
    Katowice, 40611, Poland
  • Samozdzielny Publiczny Wojewodzki Szpital Chirurgii Urazowej
    Piekary Slaskie, 41940, Poland
  • Centrum Medycyny Sportowej
    Warszawa, 02034, Poland
  • Universitätsklinikum Basel
    Basel, 4031, Switzerland
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
    Exeter, EX2 5DW, United Kingdom
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01656902
Lead sponsor
Tetec AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 3, 2012
Start date
May 2013
Primary completion
Mar 6, 2020
Completion
Feb 28, 2023
Last update
Nov 24, 2023

Study contacts

Peter Angele, Prof.
principal investigator · Universitätsklinikum Regensburg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion