CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01624194Updated Jul 15, 2019Results posted

Intranasal Oxytocin Treatment for Social Deficits in Children With Autism

A Phase 2 interventional study of Oxytocin nasal spray and Placebo in Autism, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-15.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Autism is a pervasive developmental disorder characterized by core deficits in social behavior and communication, and the presence of repetitive or stereotyped behaviors. It is one of three recognized disorders in the autism spectrum which affects an estimated 1 in 88 children in the United States. At present, pharmacotherapies target only associated features of autism, with no effective drug treatments for the social impairments. Several lines of evidence now suggest that the neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) may be an effective treatment for the core social deficits in autism. Here we will test the effects of twice daily intranasal OT (24 IU) over a 4-week period for enhancing social deficits in male and female children aged 6-12 years with autism. This research has high potential to lead to the development of more effective treatments and earlier interventions for children with autism.

Read the detailed description

In recent years, the neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) has been implicated in a wide range of social behaviors including attachment bonds, emotion recognition, eye gaze to social cues, and memory for social information. Social impairments represent one of the most intractable features of autism, and evidence now suggests that OT biology is dysregulated in individuals with this disorder. The central aim of the research outlined here is to test whether OT administration to children with autism increases their quality and quantity of social interactions and enhances their ability to process emotional and social information. Findings from initial single-dose OT administration studies in teenaged and adult males with autism have shown improvement in some aspects of social functioning, but replication and extension to well-controlled treatment trials with younger male and female subjects is necessary to evaluate effectiveness. We therefore aim to investigate the effect of intranasal OT on social cognition and behavior immediately following a single-dose (24IU) and following a 4-week period of OT (24IU BID) administration in a sample of 50 subjects with autism aged 6 to 12 years. The primary outcome for this study is change in social behavior, as determined by parent ratings on the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) after the 4-week treatment period. Secondary outcomes are changes in functioning on laboratory-based measures of social behavior and cognition following single-dose and 4-week OT administration. Research in a small study sample (N=13) also identified treatment responders and non-responders to a single-dose of OT. Thus, we also aim to identify biological and cognitive and behavioral variables (i.e., pretreatment levels of social functioning and pretreatment plasma hormone levels) that may influence treatment response efficacy in our larger study sample. On completion of the 4-week treatment period all subjects will have the option of participating in another 4-week double-blind trial in which they will be switched to the alternate nasal spray to that which they previously received. They will then undergo a fourth and final assessment time-point using the same testing procedures as outlined above on completion of the 4-week dosing. By providing subjects with the option of participating in a second 4-week treatment trial, all subjects will have an opportunity to receive the active oxytocin nasal spray. We also will be able to examine any ongoing effects of oxytocin treatment in the group receiving placebo during the second 4-week administration period. Subjects not willing to take part in the second trial will exit the study and will be referred to their treating physician.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autism

Browse trials for

03

In context

Autistic Disorder

1,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 334 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is above the median of 45 across 1,044 interventional studies indexed under Autistic Disorder.

Browse Autistic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.

Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Medically healthy outpatients between 6 and 12 years of age (cut off 12 years and 11 months)
  • Intelligence Quotient > 40
  • Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder based on the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, and DSM-IV criteria
  • Clinical Global Impression severity rating of 4 or higher
  • Care provider who can reliably bring subject to clinic visits, provide trustworthy ratings, and interacts with the subject on a regular basis
  • Stable medications for at least 4 weeks
  • No planned changes in psychosocial interventions during the trial
  • Willingness to provide blood samples.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnostics and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or psychotic disorder
  • Regular nasal obstruction or nosebleeds
  • Active medical problems: unstable seizures, significant physical illness (e.g., serious liver, renal, or cardiac pathology)
  • Sensitivity to preservatives (in particular E 216, E 218, and chlorobutanol hemihydrate)
  • A genetic abnormality (e.g., Fragile X Syndrome)
  • Significant hearing or vision impairments
  • Habitually drinks large volumes of water
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or child birth within the last 6 months
  • Sexually active females not using a reliable method of contraception.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Oxytocin nasal spray

    Prior to randomization, all subjects will participate in a 1-week open-label placebo lead-in trial. Each subject will be administered the placebo nasal spray at Stanford University and then their parent will continue administering the nasal spray to the subject for 1 week at home. Each subject will then be randomly assigned either to the active group or to the placebo (stratified by gender) and will be given the appropriate nasal spray bottle and their parents will be responsible for administering 3 puffs per nostril (4 IU/puff) to their child for a total dose of 24 IU oxytocin or placebo twice daily (BID; morning and evening) for 4-weeks. On completion of this 4-week treatment trial subjects will have the option of participating in a second double-blind trial in which they will be assigned to the alternate nasal spray, to that which they received during the first 4-week trial, for an additional 4-week period.

    Drug: Oxytocin nasal spray

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo nasal spray

    The placebo nasal spray bottles will be prepared by adding all of the ingredients used in the Syntocinon nasal sprays with the exception of the concentrated oxytocin solution.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugOxytocin nasal spray

    24IU BID (3 x 0.1 mL \[4IU\] sprays per nostril twice daily for 4-weeks.

    Also known as: Syntocinon® Nasal Spray

  • DrugPlacebo

    3 x 0.1 mL sprays per nostril twice daily for 4-weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) Scores During Treatment.

    Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) raw scores measure social abilities with lower raw scores meaning better social abilities. (Raw Score Range: 0 - 195)

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Side Effects Assessed Using Parent Rated Dosage Record Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (DOTES) Scores During Treatment

    Dosage Record Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (DOTES) side effects reported by parents during 4-weeks of treatment. Participant Counts are used.

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 4

  2. Change From Baseline in Height.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 4

  3. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 4

    This outcome is reported as the count of participants in each CGI-I rating category at the week 4 visit, assessing change over the 4-week period. CGI-I rating of 1=Very Much Improved, 2=Much Improved, 3=Minimally Improved, 4=No Change, 5=Minimally Worse, 6=Much Worse, and 7=Very Much Worse.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

  4. Parent Rated Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Scores at Baseline and Week 4

    Higher scores indicate more symptoms, lower scores indicate fewer symptoms. Irritability scores can range from 0-45. Lethargy scores can range from 0-48. Stereotypy scores can range from 0-21. Hyperactivity scores can range from 0-48. Inappropriate speech scores can from 0-12.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 4

  5. Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS) During Treatment.

    Scale measuring severity of anxiety symptoms. Higher scores mean higher levels of anxiety, lower scores mean lower levels of anxiety. (Raw Score Range: 0 - 114)

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 4

  6. Change From Baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition - Social and Communication Subscales During Treatment.

    Higher Social Standard Score means better social skills, lower Social Standard Score means worse social skills. Higher Communication Standard Score means better communication skills, lower Communication Standard Score means worse communication skills. Standard Scores can range from 20 to 160.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 4

  7. Change From Baseline in Laboratory Based Facial Emotion Recognition Abilities During Treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks

  8. Change From Baseline in Laboratory Based Eye-gaze to Social Cues During Treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 4

  9. Change From Baseline in Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, Child Version (RMET-child) Scores During Treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks

  10. Change From Baseline in Laboratory Based Social Mimicry Abilities During Treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks

  11. Change From Baseline in Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY-II) Affect Recognition Scores During Treatment.

    Higher Affect Recognition scores mean better affect recognition abilities, lower Affect Recognition scores mean worse affect recognition abilities. Scores can range from 1 to 19.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 4

  12. Change From Baseline in Plasma Oxytocin Levels During Treatment.

    This outcome originally specified that oxytocin, vasopressin, and cortisol levels would be assessed; however, data on vasopressin and cortisol levels were not collected during the study. There are no clinical laboratory tests that establish a normative range for oxytocin. Measurements prior to and following treatment were intended to evaluate oxytocin level as a predictor of response.

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks

  13. Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Repetitive Behavior Scale- Revised (RBS-R) Scores During Treatment.

    Higher scores on the Repetitive Behavior Scale- Revised mean higher levels of repetitive and restricted behaviors. (Raw Score Total Range: 0 - 129)

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 4

  14. Change From Baseline in Weight

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 4

  15. Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 4

  16. Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 4

07

Results

Posted Jun 6, 2018
Limitations and caveats
The final sample was 84% male and was not powered to detect sex differences in treatment response. Participants were permitted to take other medications during the intervention. Many of our outcome measures relied on parent report.

Participant flow

This study was conducted in the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Clinic in the Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at Stanford University. Recruitment began in June 2012 and ended in April 2016. Participants were recruited through the Stanford Autism Research Registry, flyers posted in the community, posted online and special events.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Started1618
Completed1418
Not completed20
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Parent Rated Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) Scores During Treatment.

Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) raw scores measure social abilities with lower raw scores meaning better social abilities. (Raw Score Range: 0 - 195)

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) Scores During Treatment.
units on a scaleOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) Scores During Treatment.9.73 ± 2.643.18 ± 2.18
Statistical analysis
  • Oxytocin Nasal Spray vs Placebo Nasal Spray · General Linear Model (GLM) · p = 0.0275
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Side Effects Assessed Using Parent Rated Dosage Record Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (DOTES) Scores During Treatment

Dosage Record Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (DOTES) side effects reported by parents during 4-weeks of treatment. Participant Counts are used.

Time frame:
Baseline through Week 4
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Side Effects Assessed Using Parent Rated Dosage Record Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (DOTES) Scores During Treatment
participantsOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Cold Symptoms01
Fever01
Cough10
Headache10
Insomnia11
Excitement/Agitation12
Depressive Affect01
Labile Mood11
Silly Behavior10
More Distractible10
Nasal Congestion30
Epistaxis10
Sneezing01
Mouth Pain01
Intranasal Swelling10
Runny Nose10
Blinking Eyes01
Earache01
Nasal Discomfort01
Loose Stool10
Constipation10
Stomach Discomfort01
Skin Cut02
Statistical analysis
  • Oxytocin Nasal Spray vs Placebo Nasal Spray · Fisher Exact · p = >0.05 (Fisher's Exact Test was used to test for differences in adverse events between oxytocin-treated and placebo-treated individuals. A p-value of ≤0.05 would have been statistically significant.)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Height.
Time frame:
Baseline; Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · cm
Change From Baseline in Height.
cmOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Baseline134 (126 to 141)129 (122 to 135)
Week 4134 (127 to 142)129 (122 to 136)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxytocin Nasal Spray vs Placebo Nasal Spray · Mixed Models Analysis · p = >0.05A mixed-models analysis was used to compare between groups, and between baseline and Week 4.
SecondaryClinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 4

This outcome is reported as the count of participants in each CGI-I rating category at the week 4 visit, assessing change over the 4-week period. CGI-I rating of 1=Very Much Improved, 2=Much Improved, 3=Minimally Improved, 4=No Change, 5=Minimally Worse, 6=Much Worse, and 7=Very Much Worse.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 4
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 4
ParticipantsOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Very Much Improved00
Much Improved33
Minimally Improved25
No Change910
Minimally Worse00
Much Worse00
Very Much Worse00
SecondaryParent Rated Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Scores at Baseline and Week 4

Higher scores indicate more symptoms, lower scores indicate fewer symptoms. Irritability scores can range from 0-45. Lethargy scores can range from 0-48. Stereotypy scores can range from 0-21. Hyperactivity scores can range from 0-48. Inappropriate speech scores can from 0-12.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Parent Rated Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Scores at Baseline and Week 4
units on a scaleOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Baseline Irritablity13.20 ± 11.9113.94 ± 8.71
Week 4 Irritability8.86 ± 8.8711.78 ± 8.11
Baseline Lethargy14.13 ± 8.7011.7 ± 8.34
Week 4 Lethargy10.6 ± 4.077.33 ± 6.30
Baseline Stereotypy5.69 ± 6.205.61 ± 4.55
Week 4 Stereotypy4.86 ± 5.075.50 ± 4.85
Baseline Hyperactivity15.00 ± 13.7423.28 ± 10.74
Week 4 Hyperactivity10.50 ± 10.1719.11 ± 9.68
Baseline Inappropriate Speech3.94 ± 3.285.44 ± 3.99
Week 4 Inappropriate Speech2.86 ± 3.234.17 ± 3.31
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Parent Rated Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS) During Treatment.

Scale measuring severity of anxiety symptoms. Higher scores mean higher levels of anxiety, lower scores mean lower levels of anxiety. (Raw Score Range: 0 - 114)

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS) During Treatment.
units on a scaleOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS) During Treatment.1.66 ± 3.054.53 ± 2.21
Statistical analysis
  • Oxytocin Nasal Spray vs Placebo Nasal Spray · General Linear Model (GLM) · p = 0.3395
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition - Social and Communication Subscales During Treatment.

Higher Social Standard Score means better social skills, lower Social Standard Score means worse social skills. Higher Communication Standard Score means better communication skills, lower Communication Standard Score means worse communication skills. Standard Scores can range from 20 to 160.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition - Social and Communication Subscales During Treatment.
units on a scaleOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Baseline Social Standard Score61.4 ± 12.8267.75 ± 12.45
Week 4 Social Standard Score66.11 ± 16.0370.92 ± 14.23
Baseline Communication Standard Scores66.91 ± 19.6071.80 ± 17.85
Week 4 Communication Standard Scores71.33 ± 11.4378.29 ± 19.12
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Laboratory Based Facial Emotion Recognition Abilities During Treatment.
Time frame:
Up to 4 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in Laboratory Based Eye-gaze to Social Cues During Treatment.
Time frame:
Baseline; Week 4

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, Child Version (RMET-child) Scores During Treatment.
Time frame:
Up to 4 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in Laboratory Based Social Mimicry Abilities During Treatment.
Time frame:
Up to 4 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY-II) Affect Recognition Scores During Treatment.

Higher Affect Recognition scores mean better affect recognition abilities, lower Affect Recognition scores mean worse affect recognition abilities. Scores can range from 1 to 19.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY-II) Affect Recognition Scores During Treatment.
units on a scaleOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Baseline Affect Recognition Score10 ± 1.899.43 ± 3.78
Week 4 Affect Recognition Score8.75 ± 1.56.43 ± 4.08
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Plasma Oxytocin Levels During Treatment.

This outcome originally specified that oxytocin, vasopressin, and cortisol levels would be assessed; however, data on vasopressin and cortisol levels were not collected during the study. There are no clinical laboratory tests that establish a normative range for oxytocin. Measurements prior to and following treatment were intended to evaluate oxytocin level as a predictor of response.

Time frame:
Up to 4 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Change From Baseline in Plasma Oxytocin Levels During Treatment.
pg/mLOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Baseline8.82 ± 4.678.66 ± 3.85
Week 410.36 ± 3.578.40 ± 3.57
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Parent Rated Repetitive Behavior Scale- Revised (RBS-R) Scores During Treatment.

Higher scores on the Repetitive Behavior Scale- Revised mean higher levels of repetitive and restricted behaviors. (Raw Score Total Range: 0 - 129)

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Repetitive Behavior Scale- Revised (RBS-R) Scores During Treatment.
units on a scaleOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Repetitive Behavior Scale- Revised (RBS-R) Scores During Treatment.5.68 ± 3.325.79 ± 2.78
Statistical analysis
  • Oxytocin Nasal Spray vs Placebo Nasal Spray · General Linear Model (GLM) · p = 0.9757
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Weight
Time frame:
Baseline; Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kilograms
Change From Baseline in Weight
kilogramsOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Baseline32.7 (27.0 to 39.5)28.0 (23.5 to 33.2)
Week 433.5 (27.7 to 40.4)28.4 (23.9 to 33.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxytocin Nasal Spray vs Placebo Nasal Spray · Mixed Models Analysis · p = >0.05A mixed-models analysis was used to compare between groups, and between baseline and Week 4.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Heart Rate
Time frame:
Baseline; Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · beats per minute
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
beats per minuteOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Baseline Sitting Heart Rate92.5 (83.0 to 101.9)92.7 (83.6 to 101.8)
Post 4 -Week Sitting Heart Rate97.1 (87.7 to 106.5)101.6 (92.5 to 110.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxytocin Nasal Spray vs Placebo Nasal Spray · Mixed Models Analysis · p = >0.05
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure
Time frame:
Baseline; Week 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure
mmHgOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure, Sitting104.2 (98.7 to 109.8)101.0 (95.6 to 106.4)
Post 4 -Week Systolic Blood Pressure, Sitting111.1 (105.5 to 116.6)110.9 (105.6 to 116.3)
Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure, Sitting64.3 (59.0 to 69.6)64.6 (59.4 to 69.7)
Post 4 -Week Diastolic Blood Pressure, Sitting71.4 (66.1 to 76.7)68.9 (63.8 to 74.1)
Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure, Standing101.6 (95.2 to 108.1)107.7 (101.5 to 113.9)
Post 4 -Week Systolic Blood Pressure, Standing111.6 (105.2 to 118.1)105.6 (99.4 to 111.9)
Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure, Standing63.3 (58.0 to 68.6)68.2 (63.1 to 73.3)
Post 4 -Week Diastolic Blood Pressure, Standing70.9 (65.6 to 76.2)69.8 (64.7 to 74.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxytocin Nasal Spray vs Placebo Nasal Spray · Mixed Models Analysis · p = >0.05 (For all blood pressure analyses.)

Adverse events

Collected over 4 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Oxytocin Nasal Spray0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)11/14 (78.6%)
Placebo Nasal Spray0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)12/18 (66.7%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 23
Most frequent other events
EventOxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal Spray
Nasal CongestionGeneral disorders3/140/18
Excitement/AgitationPsychiatric disorders1/142/18
Skin CutSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/142/18
CoughGeneral disorders1/140/18
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/140/18
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders1/141/18
Labile MoodPsychiatric disorders1/141/18
Silly BehaviorPsychiatric disorders1/140/18
More DistractiblePsychiatric disorders1/140/18
EpistaxisGeneral disorders1/140/18

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Oxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal SprayTotal
<=18 years161834
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Oxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal SprayTotal
Female246
Male141428
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Oxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal SprayTotal
Caucasian6814
Asian459
Other6511
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Oxytocin Nasal SprayPlacebo Nasal SprayTotal
United States161834
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Parker KJ, Oztan O, Libove RA, Sumiyoshi RD, Jackson LP, Karhson DS, Summers JE, Hinman KE, Motonaga KS, Phillips JM, Carson DS, Garner JP, Hardan AY. Intranasal oxytocin treatment for social deficits and biomarkers of response in children with autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):8119-8124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705521114. Epub 2017 Jul 10. PubMed 28696286 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01624194
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Responsible party
Antonio Hardan (Associate Professor of Child Psychiatry, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 20, 2012
Start date
Jun 2012
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
May 2016
Results posted
Jun 6, 2018
Last update
Jul 15, 2019

Study contacts

Antonio Y Hardan, MD
principal investigator · Stanford University
Karen J Parker, PhD
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion