CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01621958Updated Nov 6, 2019

Motor Training for Fall Prevention

An interventional study of Repeated perturbation training and Minimal perturbation training in Fall Prevention, sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-06.

Sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
212
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Slip-related falls often cause injury; these often have catastrophic consequences, even among the healthiest older persons. Establishing a retainable preventive training regimen against slip-related falls would, without doubt, have major public health implications. In this study, investigators will demonstrate that older adults can significantly reduce their near-term risk of backward balance loss and falls through motor training with multiple protected slip exposure, and such adaptive improvements from such prophylactic training regimen can be retained over the course of a year.

Read the detailed description

Slip-related falls often cause catastrophic injury for both frail and healthy older persons. Investigators have shown that, with motor training by repeated exposure to slips during walking, young adults are able to traverse a potential slipping hazard without losing their balance, regardless of whether a slip actually occurs or not. It is highly unlikely that these effects could be attributed to education or heightened awareness of the slipping threat alone. Furthermore, investigators have demonstrated that these improved motor skills acquired from a single session can be retained 4-6 months or longer upon re-testing, making such intervention highly attractive. Of greater interest, however, is the extent to which older adults can acquire and retain similar protective skills upon such training. This has not been tested to date. Also unknown is how potential confounding factors such as an older adult's functional status might interact with the training. These issues are of importance in that establishing a retainable preventive training regimen against slip-related falls would, without doubt, have major public health implications.

In this study, investigators will demonstrate that older adults can significantly reduce their near-term risk of backward balance loss and falls through motor training by repeated exposure to simulated slips interspersed with no-slip trials. Investigators will verify that awareness or observational learning alone cannot substitute for motor training through an awareness-control group. Investigators will then determine the extent to which adaptive improvements are retained over the course of a year. Finally, investigators will verify that although a single slip exposure may yield some retainable effect, this intensity control group will exhibit significantly less favorable long-term effect on the control of center of mass stability, body weight support, balance loss and fall upon slipping than the motor training group with repeated slips. In addition, investigator expect that the intensity-control group will also have a higher self-reported incidence of falls during the 12-month period than the motor training group with multiple slip exposure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fall Prevention

Keywords

  • balance loss
  • dynamic stability
  • motor learning
  • plasticity
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Chicago is the lead sponsor of 515 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with no known history of musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiovascular, or pulmonary impairment that may affect their ability to perform the testing procedures will be included.
  • Subjects in the balance-impaired group will specifically include subjects with unilateral or bilateral vestibular disorders and individuals with balance deterioration due to aging.
  • Subjects in this group must be able ambulate independently for at least 5 meters and score 48/56 on the Berg Balance Scale, and must have no Central Nervous System disorders beyond vestibular disorders and no central/peripheral motor impairments.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The exclusion criteria include the following:

  1. using any sedative of any type,
  2. having known history of osteoporosis,
  3. having any clinically significant functional impairment related to a specific musculoskeletal, neurological, or cardiopulmonary disease,
  4. ultrasound calcaneus bone mineral density T score \< -1 (osteoporosis )
  5. Mini-Mental State exam score \< 25 (impaired cognition),
  6. timed up-and-go > 13.5 sec (impaired mobility).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
212 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Motor training

    Behavioral: Repeated perturbation training

  • Placebo comparator
    Intensity control

    Behavioral: Minimal perturbation training

Interventions

  • BehavioralRepeated perturbation training

    One session consisting of 24 slips total interspersed with 16 nonslip trials (1 block of 8 slips, 3 non-slips, 2nd block of 8 slips, 3 non-slips, a mixed block consisting of 8 slips and 10 non-slips). Retest consisting of one slip exposure at either 6 months, 9 months or 12 months.

    Also known as: Repeated slip training

  • BehavioralMinimal perturbation training

    One session consisting of a single slip exposure. Retest consisting of one slip exposure at either 6 months, 9 months or 12 months.

    Also known as: Single slip exposure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fall incidence

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dynamic stability

    The dynamic stability will be evaluated based on the dynamic relationship of motion state (i.e., the combination of position and velocity) between the center of mass and the base of support. It will be calculated as the shortest distance from the instantaneous motion state of the center of mass to the threshold against backward fall. It is a dimensionless variable.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinical Gait and Movement Analysis Laboratory
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 6, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01621958
Lead sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Tanvi Bhatt (Associate Professor, University of Illinois at Chicago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 18, 2012
Start date
Sep 2008
Primary completion
Apr 2012
Completion
Apr 2012
Last update
Nov 6, 2019

Study contacts

Yi-Chung Pai, PhD
principal investigator · University of Illinois at Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion