CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01621126Updated May 23, 2016Results posted

Neuromonitoring During the Latarjet Procedure

An interventional study of Intra-operative neuromonitoring (XLTEK/NATUS EP Protektor) in Shoulder Instability and Iatrogenic Nerve Injury, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 14 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-23.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
14 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In a study performed by the Harvard Shoulder Service, it has been documented that there is a significant incidence of neurologic complications of the Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability. 5 out of 52 patients had neurologic complaints post-operatively. 3 of these nerve palsies were transient, however 2 had not yet recovered fully at time of latest follow-up and returned to the operating room for exploration and neurolysis of the axillary nerve and brachial plexus.

By using intra-operative neuromonitoring to determine exactly when there is a potential nerve injury during the procedure, the investigators will be able to modify what the investigators do at that step of the procedure, in order to decrease or possibly even eliminate the risk of neurologic injury.

Read the detailed description

The investigators propose to study the intra-operative events which put nerves at risk during the Latarjet procedure. By using neuromonitoring to determine exactly when there is a potential nerve injury during the procedure, the investigators will be able to modify what the investigators do at that step of the procedure, in order to decrease or possibly even eliminate the risk of neurologic injury. Modifications to our surgical technique in response to events observed on neuromonitoring would include repositioning the operative shoulder and upper extremity, and repositioning or removing retractors. The investigators believe this would lead to a significant decrease in the incidence of neurologic complications post-operatively. Since this operation is usually performed on young, active patients, the benefits of reducing or eliminating these complications would have a far-reaching impact both for the individual and for society. Above all, the investigators feel that this is an important patient safety initiative.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shoulder Instability
  • Iatrogenic Nerve Injury

Keywords

  • Shoulder instability
  • Latarjet procedure
  • Nerve injury
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,536 studies on the registry; 446 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 161 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients of the two senior surgeons who will undergo the Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability will be considered for inclusion in the study.
  • Our patients who have received prior approval from their insurance carrier to cover neuromonitoring during the surgical procedure will be enrolled.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Relative contraindications to transcranial electrical stimulation include: history of seizures, significant brain trauma, cerebral edema with mass effect, recent CVA, intracerebral devices (e.g., shunts, aneurysmal clips), skull defect and cardiac pacemaker. Patients with there conditions will be included in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intra-op neuromonitoring

    Device: Intra-operative neuromonitoring (XLTEK/NATUS EP Protektor)

Interventions

  • DeviceIntra-operative neuromonitoring (XLTEK/NATUS EP Protektor)

    Device: Intra-operative neuromonitoring A XLTEK/NATUS EP Protektor machine (at MGH) or a Cadwell Cascade Elite neuromonitoring machine (at BWH), both FDA approved for intra-operative neuromonitoring, will deliver the electrical stimulus applied transcranially to stimulate the motor cortex, while motor evoked responses will be recorded from different myotomes from both upper limbs. Also the same equipment will deliver electrical stimulus to stimulate peripherally the median and ulnar nerves at the wrists, with recording of the thalamocortical potentials in the scalp channels.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neurologic Complication Rate After Latarjet Procedure

    Nerve palsy of any nerve(s) in the operative upper extremity.

    Time frame: up to 24 weeks after the procedure

07

Results

Posted May 23, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntra-op Neuromonitoring
Started40
Completed34
Not completed6
Withdrew: Physician decision6

Outcome measures

PrimaryNeurologic Complication Rate After Latarjet Procedure

Nerve palsy of any nerve(s) in the operative upper extremity.

Time frame:
up to 24 weeks after the procedure
Reported as:
Number · participants
Neurologic Complication Rate After Latarjet Procedure
participantsIntra-op Neuromonitoring
Neurologic Complication Rate After Latarjet Procedure7

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intra-op Neuromonitoring—0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

40 subjects were enrolled; however, there were some subjects that were excluded for reasons that are explained in the published paper that resulted from this study. The total number of subjects excluded was 6, leaving 34 participants to be analyzed.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Intra-op Neuromonitoring
<=18 years3
Between 18 and 65 years30
>=65 years1
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intra-op Neuromonitoring
Mean28.4 (15 to 66)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intra-op Neuromonitoring
Female6
Male28
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Massachussetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shah AA, Butler RB, Romanowski J, Goel D, Karadagli D, Warner JJ. Short-term complications of the Latarjet procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 21;94(6):495-501. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01830. PubMed 22318222 ↗
  • Nagda SH, Rogers KJ, Sestokas AK, Getz CL, Ramsey ML, Glaser DL, Williams GR Jr. Neer Award 2005: Peripheral nerve function during shoulder arthroplasty using intraoperative nerve monitoring. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 May-Jun;16(3 Suppl):S2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.01.016. Epub 2006 Jul 26. PubMed 17493556 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 23, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01621126
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Responsible party
Jon JP Warner (Chief, MGH Shoulder Service, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 18, 2012
Start date
Jun 2011
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Oct 2014
Results posted
May 23, 2016
Last update
May 23, 2016

Study contacts

Jon JP Warner, MD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion