CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01619800ABSOLVE CIUpdated Apr 18, 2017Results posted

The Effect of Blended Sensor Efficiency on Relieving the Heart's Inability to Increase Its Rate During Exercise

An interventional study of Blended Sensor Optimization (BSO) and Accelerometer Alone (AA) in Chronotropic Incompetence, sponsored by Vivek Reddy. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-18.

Sponsored by Vivek Reddy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Why this study was terminated
The study was terminated due to poor enrollment.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this trial is to test the effect/benefit of a FDA approved blended pacemaker sensor which responds only by comparing physical activity, heart rate, and breathing rate; compared to the accelerometer pacemaker sensor which respond only by comparing physical activity and the heart rate in patients whose heart is unable increase its heart rate according to increase physical activity or demand (Chronotropic Incompetence). Only one pacemaker family will be used in this clinical trial whereas the "out of box" configuration is the blended sensor which can also be made to act only as an accelerometer.

Read the detailed description

Objective: The goal of this trial is to test the impact of individualized blended sensor optimization on chronotropic response, compared with accelerometer use alone, in patients with chronotropic incompetence who are planned to undergo permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.

Study Population: The study population will consist of patients who suffer from the heart's inability to increase its heart rate according to increased physical activity or demand (chronotropic incompetence). These patients are planned to undergo permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Improvement in chronotropic competence as defined as an increase in age-predicted maximum heart rate (APMHR) which is defined as 220 beats per minute (bpm) minus patient's age in years. Age-predicted heart rate reserve (APMHR) defined as APMHR minus patient's heart rate at rest. Observe the maximal heart rate during exercise test with decrease in oxygen consumption at each stage and also at peak effort.

SECONDARY ENDPOINT:

  1. Quality of life.
  2. Procedural safety as defined by the number of complications within 1week associated with the procedure.
02

Conditions studied

  • Chronotropic Incompetence

Keywords

  • Chronotropic Incompetence
  • Pacemaker
  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Vivek Reddy is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (57%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Evidence of chronotropic incompetence on exercise or pharmacological stress test defined as the inability to achieve 85% or greater of Age-predicted heart rate reserve (APMHR)
  • Legal status to give informed consent specific to state and national law.
  • Planned for PPM implantation and meets current guidelines for PPM therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Inability to comply with the follow-up visit schedule.
  • Unable to participate in stress testing (exercise or pharmacological).
  • Previous PPM implantation
  • A life expectancy of less than 12 months per physician discretion
  • Enrolled in any concurrent study, without Boston Scientific written approval.
  • Pregnancy
  • Unstable chest pain
  • Stroke within 30 days
  • Heart attack within 90 days
  • Stress Test Exclusion Criteria: No evidence of Chronotropic incompetence on exercise or pharmacological stress test, defined as the ability to achieve 85% or greater of APMHR.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
2 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Blended Sensor Optimization (BSO)

    Patients in this arm will undergo pacemaker placement and will have blended sensor optimization. Minute Ventilation will be optimized/activated

    Device: Blended Sensor Optimization (BSO)

  • Sham comparator
    Accelerometer Alone (AA)

    Patients in this arm will undergo pacemaker implantation but will not have Minute Ventilation Sensor activated. Only accelerometer will remain active

    Device: Accelerometer Alone (AA)

Interventions

  • DeviceBlended Sensor Optimization (BSO)

    At wound check (POD#1 and 1 Week F/U), histograms from device interrogation obtained from patients in the BSO group are assessed, and these patients undergo optimization. A hall walk and stair climbing exercise will be performed and MV optimized using trending data to hit the following targets: HR at Rest: 60 HR upon slow walking: 100 HR upon brisk walking: 115-120 HR upon climbing stairs: 130-135 Patients will undergo optimization, and be instructed that their device may have been optimized.

  • DeviceAccelerometer Alone (AA)

    Patients in the AA group will also undergo device interrogation, and will perform a hall walk and stair climbing exercise. Afterwards, these patients will undergo a sham optimization by placing the PPM interrogation laptop device over there pacemaker, and instructing the patients that their device may have been optimized.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changed in Stress Test at 6 Months as Compared to Baseline

    An Exercise or Dobumatime Stress Test to be performed to assess primary outcome measure.

    Time frame: baseline and 6 months

07

Results

Posted Mar 2, 2015
Limitations and caveats
2 subjects enrolled, unable to meet goal of 38 enrollments. Data not analyzed.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBlended Sensor Optimization (BSO)Accelerometer Alone (AA)
Started20
Completed00
Not completed20
Withdrew: Study terminated20

Outcome measures

PrimaryChanged in Stress Test at 6 Months as Compared to Baseline

An Exercise or Dobumatime Stress Test to be performed to assess primary outcome measure.

Time frame:
baseline and 6 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Blended Sensor Optimization (BSO)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)
Accelerometer Alone (AA)———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Blended Sensor Optimization (BSO)Accelerometer Alone (AA)Total
<=18 years0—0
Between 18 and 65 years1—1
>=65 years1—1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Blended Sensor Optimization (BSO)Accelerometer Alone (AA)Total
Female2—2
Male0—0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01619800
Lead sponsor
Vivek Reddy
Collaborators
Boston Scientific Corporation
Responsible party
Vivek Reddy (Director Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Professor Of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 14, 2012
Start date
Mar 2012
Primary completion
Oct 2013
Completion
Oct 2013
Results posted
Mar 2, 2015
Last update
Apr 18, 2017

Study contacts

Vivek Reddy, MD
principal investigator · Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion