CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01600885GuaKetUpdated Aug 21, 2017Results posted

The Effects of Ketamine and Guanfacine on Working Memory in Healthy Subjects

An interventional study of Guanfacine and Placebo in NMDA Receptor Function, sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-21.

Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is

  1. To establish the feasibility of fMRI studies of the interaction of guanfacine and ketamine.
  2. To explore the possibility that guanfacine can ameliorate the negative effects of ketamine on task-related prefrontal activation.
  3. To assess the strength of any interaction between guanfacine and ketamine.
Read the detailed description

Potential subjects will be interviewed over the phone and, if appropriate, will be scheduled for a screening session. Participants who meet study criteria will participate in two study sessions separated by at least two weeks. The sessions will be identical except on one day they will receive guanfacine and on the other, they will receive a placebo.

This study was initially completed in 2014. Upon analysis of the collected data, it was decided to add additional subjects and gather additional data to verify results seen in the collected data. The study was reopened and new data was added beginning in September 2016. Information about the study beginning in 2016 is available in a separate record.

02

Conditions studied

  • NMDA Receptor Function

Keywords

  • Guanfacine
  • Ketamine
  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Prefrontal Cortex Activity
  • Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
  • Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2
  • Memory, Short-Term
  • Schizophrenia
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,724 studies on the registry; 298 are open to participants now.

Of its 210 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 126 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 21 and 45, inclusive
  • Right-handed
  • Have at least a 12th grade education level or equivalent
  • Able to read and write English as a primary language
  • Willing to refrain from caffeine and alcohol use for one week prior to each MRI session.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abnormality on physical examination
  • A 12 lead ECG at screening has clinically significant abnormalities as determined by the physician reading the ECG
  • A positive pre-study urine drug screen or, at the study physicians' discretion on any drug screens given before the scans
  • Abnormality on clinical chemistry or hematology examination at the pre-study medical screening.
  • History of positive HIV or Hepatitis B.
  • Has received either prescribed or over-the-counter (OTC) centrally active medicine or herbal supplements within the week prior to the MRI scan.
  • History of any substance abuse disorder meeting DSM-IV criteria with the exception of nicotine
  • Any history of DSM-IV Axis I psychiatric disorders,
  • Any history of major medical or neurological disorders
  • Any history indicating learning disability, mental retardation, or attention deficit disorder.
  • First-degree relative with Axis I DSM-IV disorder including substance abuse or dependence.
  • Any clinically significant abnormalities on screening electrocardiogram
  • Any history of head injury
  • Any evidence of psychosis-like symptoms, as indicated by elevated scores on the Perceptual Aberration-Magical Ideation (Chapman, Chapman et al. 1978; Eckblad, Chapman et al. 1983) and the revised Social Anhedonia scales(Eckblad, Chapman et al. unpublished)
  • A positive urine toxicology screen for illicit substance use or positive alcohol breathalyzer test conducted at screening interview and prior to each MRI session
  • Known sensitivity to ketamine.
  • Body circumference of 52 inches or greater.
  • History of claustrophobia
  • Any clinically significant impairment of color vision or visual acuity after correction available in the scanner.
  • Presence of cardiac pacemaker or other electronic device or ferromagnetic metal foreign bodies in vulnerable positions as assessed by a standard pre-MRI screening questionnaire
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding would exclude potential participants and all female subjects will receive a urine pregnancy test at screening and before each MRI scan.
  • Donation of blood in excess of 500 mL within 56 days prior to dosing.
  • History of sensitivity to heparin or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
  • Blood pressure must be higher than 90/70. Pulse must be greater than 40 unless the participant is cleared by a study physician
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Guanfacine then Placebo

    During the first study session, the participant will receive guanfacine before undergoing a ketamine-infusion fMRI. During the second study session, at least two weeks later, the participant will receive a placebo before undergoing a ketamine-infusion fMRI.

    Drug: Guanfacine · Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Placebo then Guanfacine

    During the first study session, the participant will receive a placebo before undergoing a ketamine-infusion fMRI. During the second study session, at least two weeks later, the participant will receive guanfacine before undergoing a ketamine-infusion fMRI.

    Drug: Guanfacine · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugGuanfacine

    Subjects will be given 3mg of guanfacine before the fMRI scan. Then when in the scanner, a bolus of ketamine (0.23mg/kg over 1 min) will be given during the visual fixation scan. Immediately after completion of the 1 min bolus, the participant will receive a steady state ketamine infusion of 0.58 mg/kg/hour and brain activation will be measured during a spatial working memory task. The entire scan will last approximately two and a half hours and the ketamine infusion will be up to one hour and 15 minutes.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Subjects will be given a placebo before the fMRI scan. Then when in the scanner, a bolus of ketamine (0.23mg/kg over 1 min) will be given during the visual fixation scan. Immediately after completion of the 1 min bolus, the participant will receive a steady state ketamine infusion of 0.58 mg/kg/hour and brain activation will be measured during a spatial working memory task. The entire scan will last approximately two and a half hours and the ketamine infusion will be up to one hour and 15 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Inferior Parietal Lobule

    Scans will be analyzed for task-related prefrontal activation Difference Score: Percent Signal Change in Regions of Interest (ketamine - saline)

    Time frame: Within 4 hours of dose administration, after up to 1.25 hours of ketamine infusion

  2. Percent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Middle Frontal Gyrus

    Difference Score: Percent Signal Change in Regions of Interest (ketamine - saline)

    Time frame: Within 4 hours of dose administration, after up to 1.25 hours of ketamine infusion

  3. Percent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Superior Frontal Gyrus

    Difference Score: Percent Signal Change in Regions of Interest (ketamine - saline)

    Time frame: Within 4 hours of dose administration, after up to 1.25 hours of ketamine infusion

07

Results

Posted Oct 28, 2014

Participant flow

First Period
Participant flow — First Period
MilestoneGuanfacine Then PlaceboPlacebo Then Guanfacine
Started109
Completed88
Not completed21
Withdrew: Adverse event11
Withdrew: Moved out of area10
Wash Out Period
Participant flow — Wash Out Period
MilestoneGuanfacine Then PlaceboPlacebo Then Guanfacine
Started88
Completed88
Not completed00
Second Period
Participant flow — Second Period
MilestoneGuanfacine Then PlaceboPlacebo Then Guanfacine
Started88
Completed88
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Inferior Parietal Lobule

Scans will be analyzed for task-related prefrontal activation Difference Score: Percent Signal Change in Regions of Interest (ketamine - saline)

Time frame:
Within 4 hours of dose administration, after up to 1.25 hours of ketamine infusion
Reported as:
Mean · percent change in saline signal
Percent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Inferior Parietal Lobule
percent change in saline signalGuanfacinePlacebo
Percent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Inferior Parietal Lobule-0.17 ± 0.046-0.094 ± 0.054
PrimaryPercent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Middle Frontal Gyrus

Difference Score: Percent Signal Change in Regions of Interest (ketamine - saline)

Time frame:
Within 4 hours of dose administration, after up to 1.25 hours of ketamine infusion
Reported as:
Mean · percent change in saline signal
Percent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Middle Frontal Gyrus
percent change in saline signalGuanfacinePlacebo
Percent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Middle Frontal Gyrus-0.1 ± 0.0520.052 ± 0.0652
PrimaryPercent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Superior Frontal Gyrus

Difference Score: Percent Signal Change in Regions of Interest (ketamine - saline)

Time frame:
Within 4 hours of dose administration, after up to 1.25 hours of ketamine infusion
Reported as:
Mean · percent change in saline signal
Percent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Superior Frontal Gyrus
percent change in saline signalGuanfacinePlacebo
Percent Change in Amelioration of Ketamine-related Task Activation as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Superior Frontal Gyrus-0.134 ± 0.0413-0.086 ± 0.0365

Adverse events

Collected over Throughout the length of the study (Aproximately 3 years). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Guanfacine0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)
Placebo0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Baseline population is the number of participants who started the study

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Overall Study
Mean30 ± 6.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Overall Study
Female9
Male10
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Overall Study
Hispanic or Latino2
Not Hispanic or Latino17
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Overall Study
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American3
White13
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported2
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Connecticut Mental Health Center
    New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States
  • Yale Magnetic Resonance Research Center
    New Haven, Connecticut 06520, United States
  • Veterans Affairs Hospital
    West Haven, Connecticut 06516, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Arnsten AF, Cai JX. Postsynaptic alpha-2 receptor stimulation improves memory in aged monkeys: indirect effects of yohimbine versus direct effects of clonidine. Neurobiol Aging. 1993 Nov-Dec;14(6):597-603. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(93)90044-c. PubMed 7905189 ↗
  • Bjarnadottir M, Misner DL, Haverfield-Gross S, Bruun S, Helgason VG, Stefansson H, Sigmundsson A, Firth DR, Nielsen B, Stefansdottir R, Novak TJ, Stefansson K, Gurney ME, Andresson T. Neuregulin1 (NRG1) signaling through Fyn modulates NMDA receptor phosphorylation: differential synaptic function in NRG1+/- knock-outs compared with wild-type mice. J Neurosci. 2007 Apr 25;27(17):4519-29. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4314-06.2007. PubMed 17460065 ↗
  • Brandt, J. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test: development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms The Clinical Neuropsychologist 125-142, 1991
  • Buccafusco JJ. Neuropharmacologic and behavioral actions of clonidine: interactions with central neurotransmitters. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1992;33:55-107. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60691-1. No abstract available. PubMed 1350577 ↗
  • Chapman LJ, Chapman JP, Raulin ML. Body-image aberration in Schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol. 1978 Aug;87(4):399-407. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.87.4.399. No abstract available. PubMed 681612 ↗
  • Cho HS, D'Souza DC, Gueorguieva R, Perry EB, Madonick S, Karper LP, Abi-Dargham A, Belger A, Abi-Saab W, Lipschitz D, Bennet A, Seibyl JP, Krystal JH. Absence of behavioral sensitization in healthy human subjects following repeated exposure to ketamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Apr;179(1):136-43. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2066-5. Epub 2005 Jan 29. PubMed 15682309 ↗
  • da Silva TL, Pianca TG, Roman T, Hutz MH, Faraone SV, Schmitz M, Rohde LA. Adrenergic alpha2A receptor gene and response to methylphenidate in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-predominantly inattentive type. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2008;115(2):341-5. doi: 10.1007/s00702-007-0835-0. Epub 2008 Jan 16. PubMed 18200436 ↗
  • Driesen NR, Leung HC, Calhoun VD, Constable RT, Gueorguieva R, Hoffman R, Skudlarski P, Goldman-Rakic PS, Krystal JH. Impairment of working memory maintenance and response in schizophrenia: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Dec 15;64(12):1026-34. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.07.029. Epub 2008 Sep 27. PubMed 18823880 ↗
  • Eckblad M, Chapman LJ. Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Apr;51(2):215-25. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.2.215. No abstract available. PubMed 6841765 ↗
  • Friedman JI, Adler DN, Temporini HD, Kemether E, Harvey PD, White L, Parrella M, Davis KL. Guanfacine treatment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001 Sep;25(3):402-9. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00249-4. PubMed 11522468 ↗
  • Glantz LA, Lewis DA. Dendritic spine density in schizophrenia and depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;58(2):203. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.2.203. No abstract available. PubMed 11177126 ↗
  • Glantz LA, Lewis DA. Decreased dendritic spine density on prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 Jan;57(1):65-73. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.1.65. PubMed 10632234 ↗
  • Hahn CG, Wang HY, Cho DS, Talbot K, Gur RE, Berrettini WH, Bakshi K, Kamins J, Borgmann-Winter KE, Siegel SJ, Gallop RJ, Arnold SE. Altered neuregulin 1-erbB4 signaling contributes to NMDA receptor hypofunction in schizophrenia. Nat Med. 2006 Jul;12(7):824-8. doi: 10.1038/nm1418. Epub 2006 Jun 11. PubMed 16767099 ↗
  • Hunt RD, Arnsten AF, Asbell MD. An open trial of guanfacine in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995 Jan;34(1):50-4. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199501000-00013. PubMed 7860456 ↗
  • Jakala P, Riekkinen M, Sirvio J, Koivisto E, Kejonen K, Vanhanen M, Riekkinen P Jr. Guanfacine, but not clonidine, improves planning and working memory performance in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999 May;20(5):460-70. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(98)00127-4. PubMed 10192826 ↗
  • Kaye, S., L. Opler, et al. (1986) Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Toronto, Ontario. Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
  • Kirkpatrick B, Xu L, Cascella N, Ozeki Y, Sawa A, Roberts RC. DISC1 immunoreactivity at the light and ultrastructural level in the human neocortex. J Comp Neurol. 2006 Jul 20;497(3):436-50. doi: 10.1002/cne.21007. PubMed 16736468 ↗
  • Krystal JH, Perry EB Jr, Gueorguieva R, Belger A, Madonick SH, Abi-Dargham A, Cooper TB, Macdougall L, Abi-Saab W, D'Souza DC. Comparative and interactive human psychopharmacologic effects of ketamine and amphetamine: implications for glutamatergic and dopaminergic model psychoses and cognitive function. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;62(9):985-94. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.985. PubMed 16143730 ↗
  • Leung HC, Gore JC, Goldman-Rakic PS. Sustained mnemonic response in the human middle frontal gyrus during on-line storage of spatial memoranda. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 May 15;14(4):659-71. doi: 10.1162/08989290260045882. PubMed 12126506 ↗
  • Ma CL, Arnsten AF, Li BM. Locomotor hyperactivity induced by blockade of prefrontal cortical alpha2-adrenoceptors in monkeys. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan 15;57(2):192-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.004. PubMed 15652880 ↗
  • McClure MM, Barch DM, Romero MJ, Minzenberg MJ, Triebwasser J, Harvey PD, Siever LJ. The effects of guanfacine on context processing abnormalities in schizotypal personality disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 May 15;61(10):1157-60. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.034. Epub 2006 Sep 1. PubMed 16950221 ↗
  • Newcomer, J., N. Farber, et al. (1999).
  • Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. No abstract available. PubMed 5146491 ↗
  • Polanczyk G, Zeni C, Genro JP, Guimaraes AP, Roman T, Hutz MH, Rohde LA. Association of the adrenergic alpha2A receptor gene with methylphenidate improvement of inattentive symptoms in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;64(2):218-24. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.2.218. PubMed 17283289 ↗
  • Small KM, Brown KM, Seman CA, Theiss CT, Liggett SB. Complex haplotypes derived from noncoding polymorphisms of the intronless alpha2A-adrenergic gene diversify receptor expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 4;103(14):5472-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601345103. Epub 2006 Mar 27. PubMed 16567612 ↗
  • Swartz BE, Kovalik E, Thomas K, Torgersen D, Mandelkern MA. The effects of an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, guanfacine, on rCBF in human cortex in normal controls and subjects with focal epilepsy. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2000 Sep;23(3):263-75. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00101-9. PubMed 10942850 ↗
  • Szabo B. Imidazoline antihypertensive drugs: a critical review on their mechanism of action. Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Jan;93(1):1-35. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(01)00170-x. PubMed 11916539 ↗
  • Wang M, Ramos BP, Paspalas CD, Shu Y, Simen A, Duque A, Vijayraghavan S, Brennan A, Dudley A, Nou E, Mazer JA, McCormick DA, Arnsten AF. Alpha2A-adrenoceptors strengthen working memory networks by inhibiting cAMP-HCN channel signaling in prefrontal cortex. Cell. 2007 Apr 20;129(2):397-410. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.015. PubMed 17448997 ↗
  • Wang Q, Jaaro-Peled H, Sawa A, Brandon NJ. How has DISC1 enabled drug discovery? Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008 Feb;37(2):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.10.006. Epub 2007 Oct 23. PubMed 18055216 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01600885
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 17, 2012
Start date
Aug 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Results posted
Oct 28, 2014
Last update
Aug 21, 2017

Study contacts

John H Krystal, M.D.
principal investigator · Yale University
Naomi R Driesen, Ph.D.
study director · Yale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion