CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01591603Updated Jul 20, 2015

Comparison of Perineural Catheter Depth for the Continuous Popliteal Nerve Block Using Ultrasound Guidance and Dermabond

An interventional study of 1 cm and 5 cm in Neuromuscular Inhibition, sponsored by Vanderbilt University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-20.

Sponsored by Vanderbilt University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
83
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will investigate the difference in success rate between popliteal peripheral nerve catheters placed at 1 centimeter compared to 5 centimeters past the tip of a Tuohy needle.

Read the detailed description

Traditionally for the lower extremity, peripheral nerve catheters have been threaded greater than or equal to 5 centimeters past the tip of the Tuohy needle. The major rational for this practice is to reduce dislodgement. However, the greater the distance that a catheter is advanced, the greater the risk of contacting undesired structures, kinking, looping and knotting. For the continuous popliteal nerve block, the catheter is threaded perpendicular to the course of the nerve. This could result in the tip of the catheter being a significant distance from the targeted nerve which may lead to a decrease in the success rate or efficacy of the block.

Greater efficacy may be seen if the needle is closer to its target. This may be quantified by documenting a faster onset of motor and sensory changes and/or a lower catheter infusion rate required to maintain pain control. The study will investigate the difference in success rate between popliteal peripheral nerve catheters placed at 1 centimeter compared to 5 centimeters past the tip of a Tuohy needle.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuromuscular Inhibition
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University is the lead sponsor of 508 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Will be having a popliteal nerve blocks
  • Do not meet any of the exclusion criteria listed below.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \< 18 years old
  • BMI > 35
  • Pregnant patients
  • Diabetes mellitus or patients with known neuropathy
  • Amputations \& polytrauma patients
  • Patients allergic to local anesthetics
  • Chronic Pain patients
  • Patients in whom communication is a problem
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1

    Procedure: 1 cm

  • Experimental
    Group 2

    Procedure: 5 cm

Interventions

  • Procedure1 cm

    A Tuohy needle will be advanced in-plane with the bevel cephalad to a point that lies between the tibial and common peroneal branches of the sciatic nerve. The catheter will be advanced 1 cm past the tip of the Tuohy

    Also known as: 18 gauge 100mm Contiplex Tuohy needle, 20-gauge non-stimulating catheter

  • Procedure5 cm

    A Tuohy needle will be advanced in-plane with the bevel cephalad to a point that lies between the tibial and common peroneal branches of the sciatic nerve. The catheter will be advanced 5 cm past the tip of the Tuohy

    Also known as: 18 gauge 100mm Contiplex Tuohy needle, 20-gauge non-stimulating catheter

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Peripheral block score (PBS).

    The extent of popliteal nerve blockade will be captured with four sensory groups (sural, superficial peroneal, tibial, and deep peroneal) and three motor groups (superficial peroneal, tibial, and deep peroneal). For each group, a score of 0, 1, or 2 will be assigned based on complete, partial, or no blockade, respectively. The peripheral block score (PBS) outcome variable will be based on the sum of these values and will range from 0 to 14.

    Time frame: 10, 20, and 30 minutes after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain score

    The investigators will examine the difference in the pain scores (0-10 numeric rating scale) between the two groups.

    Time frame: Arrival to PACU (Immediately after surgery, approximately 3-5 hours after intervention)

  2. Analgesia failure rate

    The investigators will examine the difference in analgesia failure rates in the PACU. Analgesia failure is defined as the failure of a rescue bolus (to treat patient pain).

    Time frame: Arrival to PACU (Immediately after surgery, approximately 3-5 hours after intervention)

  3. Catheter dislodgement rates

    The investigators will examine the difference in the catheter dislodgement rates.

    Time frame: Arrival to PACU (Immediately after surgery, approximately 3-5 hours after intervention)

  4. Difference in total opioid usage

    The investigators will examine the difference in the total opioid usage. We will compare medications separately and in total equivalent units (using an opioid conversion table).

    Time frame: Length of Stay In PACU (Approximately 5-7 hours after intervention)

  5. Degree of Doppler color agitation

    The investigators will examine the relationship between the degree of Doppler color agitation (evaluated at the time the catheter is placed) and block success (i.e., the outcome in the primary analysis). Degree of agitation color will be defined as the percentage of nerve covered during the color agitation.

    Time frame: Immediately after intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bowens C Jr, Badiola IJ, Allen BFS, Canlas CL, Gupta RK, Jaeger LM, Briggs ER, Corey JM, Shi Y, Schildcrout JS, Malchow RJ. Color Doppler ultrasonography of an agitated solution is predictive of accurate catheter placement for a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block. Perioper Med (Lond). 2021 Dec 15;10(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00229-w. PubMed 34906248 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01591603
Lead sponsor
Vanderbilt University
Responsible party
Clifford Bowens (Assistant Professor, Vanderbilt University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 4, 2012
Start date
May 2012
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Jul 2015
Last update
Jul 20, 2015

Study contacts

Clifford Bowens, M.D.
principal investigator · Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion