CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01586559Updated Apr 27, 2012

Evaluation of the Long-term Stability of Sheath Plication Using Absorbable Sutures in Patients With Diastasis of the Recti Muscles: an Ultrasonography Study

An observational study in Diastasis Recti, sponsored by Bulovka Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Czech Republic. Open to female participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-04-27.

Sponsored by Bulovka Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
65
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

A comparative prospective study assessing the outcomes of recti muscle diastasis correction with absorbable suture.

Read the detailed description

Background: Rectus sheath plication within abdominoplasty is a standard treatment for diastasis of the recti muscles. Previous studies assessing the efficacy and endurance of the correction of recti diastasis have mostly been performed with small groups of patients, short follow-up periods and/or with questionable methodology

Methods: A comparative prospective study assessing the outcomes of recti muscle diastasis correction with absorbable suture. The investigators assess the outcomes by physical and ultrasonographic examinations and a patient questionnaire, which asks about the number of pregnancies and the types of deliveries, other abdominal surgeries before or after the abdominoplasty, the interval of time required to return to full activity, postoperative pain, and the overall satisfaction with the final result. During the examination, the inter-recti distances are measured at 3 levels: halfway between the xyphoid and umbilicus, just above the umbilicus and halfway between the umbilicus and pubis. The same examination is done on a control group of nulliparous women.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diastasis Recti
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Bulovka Hospital is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with interval after rectus sheath plication

Inclusion criteria

Women after rectus sheath plication for diastasis recti

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Abdominal wall defect other then umbilical hernia

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Control group

    Nulliparous women

  • Diastasis

    Patients after rectus sheath plication due to diastasis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the long-term stability of sheath plication using absorbable sutures in patients with diastasis of the recti muscles

    Time frame: 12-41 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bulovka Hospital
    Prague 8, 18 00, Czech Republic
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01586559
Lead sponsor
Bulovka Hospital
Responsible party
Ondrej Mestak M.D. (Ondrej Mestak M.D., Bulovka Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 27, 2012
Start date
Oct 2010
Primary completion
Jan 2011
Completion
Apr 2012
Last update
Apr 27, 2012
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion