CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01546753WOITUpdated May 12, 2023Results posted

Walnut Oral Immunotherapy for Tree Nut Allergy

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Walnut Protein Powder and Oat Powder (placebo) in Tree Nut Allergy, sponsored by University of Arkansas. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-12.

Sponsored by University of Arkansas · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if walnut oral immunotherapy can be used in participants allergic to tree nuts to reduce tree nut allergy and induce changes in the participant's immune system.

Read the detailed description

Randomized, placebo controlled, Phase 1-2 study conducted at Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI) in tree nut allergic participants, ages 6-45 years with randomization following a 2:1 (active:placebo) format. The overall objectives were to evaluate the efficacy of walnut oral immunotherapy (WOIT) for induction of desensitization to walnut (secondary outcome) and a test tree nut (primary outcome) when compared to placebo after 38 weeks of treatment as assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) to walnut and a test tree nut in tree nut allergic participants (defined by allergic reaction to \</= 2 grams of walnut and test tree nut proteins during DBPCFC at study entry). Placebo participants were crossed-over to active therapy after unblinding at week 38. Participants were followed long-term (up to 6 years) on open-label WOIT treatment and assessed at yearly intervals based on pre-specified criteria for clinical outcomes of desensitization to walnut and a test tree nut (defined as safely consuming 5 grams of walnut and test tree nut protein during DBPCFC while on daily WOIT) and sustained unresponsiveness to walnut and a test tree nut (defined as safely consuming 5 grams of walnut and test tree nut protein during DBPCFC and 10 grams during an open feeding while off therapy for 4-6 weeks). Secondary outcomes were evaluated including safety and immune mechanistic parameters.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tree Nut Allergy

Keywords

  • Walnut allergy
  • Tree nut allergy
  • Oral immunotherapy
  • Food allergy
  • Desensitization
  • Sustained unresponsiveness
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 6 to 45 years, either sex, any race, any ethnicity with a convincing clinical history of walnut or another tree nut allergy and either a positive prick skin test (≥ 3mm) or serologic evidence of allergic sensitization (defined as specific IgE > 0.35 kU/L) to walnut and at least one other tree nut.
  • A positive 2000 mg oral food challenge at enrollment to walnut and to one other tree nut.
  • Written informed consent from participant and/or parent/guardian
  • Written assent from all subjects as appropriate
  • All females of child bearing age must be using appropriate birth control

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe anaphylaxis to walnut or other tree nuts, defined as symptoms associated with hypoxia, hypotension or neurologic compromise (cyanosis or SpO2 \< 92% at any stage, hypotension, confusion, collapse, loss of consciousness; or incontinence).
  • Known allergy to oat
  • Chronic disease (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis) requiring therapy or other respiratory or medical conditions deemed by the investigator to put the subject at increased risk of anaphylaxis or poor outcomes from receiving OIT or undergoing food challenge.
  • Poor control or persistent activation of atopic dermatitis
  • Active eosinophilic or other inflammatory (e.g., celiac) gastrointestinal disease in the past 2 years.
  • Participation in any interventional study for food allergy in the past 6 months
  • Participant is on "build-up phase" of immunotherapy (i.e., has not reached maintenance dosing).
  • Severe asthma (2007 NHLBI Criteria Steps 5 or 6, see Appendix 2) or poorly controlled mild or moderate asthma
  • Inability to discontinue antihistamines for initial day escalation, skin testing or OFC
  • Use of omalizumab or other non-traditional forms of allergen immunotherapy (e.g., oral or sublingual) or immunomodulator therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy within the past year
  • Use of beta-blockers (oral), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) or calcium channel blockers
  • Pregnancy or lactation
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Walnut Protein Powder

    38 weeks on active walnut powder on blinded treatment phase

    Drug: Walnut Protein Powder

  • Placebo comparator
    Oat Powder

    38 weeks on placebo (oat) powder during blinded treatment phase

    Drug: Oat Powder (placebo)

  • Other
    Open-label Walnut Protein Powder

    Open-label treatment with walnut protein powder up to week 298 of total treatment

    Drug: Open-label Walnut Protein Powder

Interventions

  • DrugWalnut Protein Powder

    Blinded study product dosing begins with a 1-day oral desensitization protocol to walnut for subjects in the active arm. Starting at 0.1 mg protein and increasing to a maximum of 6 mg or until allergic symptoms develop. Subjects continue daily dosing of blinded OIT (walnut) with build-up every 2 weeks to a maximum daily dose of 1500mg at week 34, followed by 4 weeks of daily maintenance dosing. OFC to walnut and second tree nut occurs at week 38 then treatment is unblinded and open-label maintenance dosing occurs.

    Also known as: WOIT

  • DrugOat Powder (placebo)

    Blinded study product dosing begins with a one-day oral desensitization protocol with placebo (oat) powder. Subjects in the placebo group will undergo the same protocol as those in the active group with placebo OIT dosing. Unblinding to treatment assignment will occur after the 38 week oral food challenge. Placebo subjects will cross-over to active, open-label treatment with walnut powder after the 38 week oral food challenge. beginning with initial escalation day, through build-up and maintenance dosing per the same protocol sequence as noted for active, walnut powder. Subjects will complete an oral food challenge to walnut and the second tree nut at week 38 then will continue on long-term, open-label maintenance dosing until the end of study using same protocol design.

    Also known as: Oat flour

  • DrugOpen-label Walnut Protein Powder

    Open-label treatment phase begins after the 38 week oral food challenge with unblinding of treatment assignment. For those on active treatment, daily maintenance dosing occurs for up to a total of 298 weeks. For those on placebo treatment, cross-over to active, open-label treatment occurs using the same active treatment protocol. Placebo-crossover subjects will complete an oral food challenge to walnut and the second tree nut at week 38 of active therapy then continue on long-term, open-label maintenance dosing until the end of study using same protocol design. All subjects may reach a qualifying IgE to walnut/second tree nut early and will undergo an OFCs on and 4 weeks off OIT. All subjects will have OFCs on and 4 weeks off OIT at week 142 and at week 298, unless both walnut/second tree nut OFCs are passed at previous OFC prompting addition of these foods into the diet.

    Also known as: Open-label treatment

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness of Walnut OIT on Clinical Desensitization to Test Tree Nut as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 at Oral Food Challenge

    Determine in tree nut allergic subjects the effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy on clinical desensitization to a second tree nut ("test tree nut") causing allergy when compared to placebo treatment, as measured by the change in cumulative dose from baseline oral food challenge (OFC) to the OFC to the test tree nut at approximately 38 weeks on therapy.

    Time frame: 38 weeks of therapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of Desensitization to Walnut Protein as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 Oral Food Challenge

    Determine in tree nut allergic subjects the effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy on clinical desensitization to walnut causing allergy when compared to placebo treatment, as measured by the change in cumulative dose from baseline oral food challenge (OFC) to the OFC to the walnut at approximately 38 weeks on therapy.

    Time frame: 38 weeks

  2. Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Walnut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38

    The percentage of subjects reaching a cumulative protein dose of 2000mg at the desensitization oral food challenge to walnut at week 38

    Time frame: 38 weeks

  3. Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Test Tree Nut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38

    Comparison of the number and percentage of subjects in each treatment arm reaching a cumulative protein dose of 2000mg at the week 38 (desensitization) oral food challenge to test tree nut

    Time frame: 38 weeks

  4. Number (Percentage) of Subjects Attaining Sustained Unresponsiveness to Walnut and Test Tree Nut Proteins at Week 298 Oral Food Challenge

    The percentage of subjects demonstrating sustained unresponsiveness to walnut and to the test tree nut by end of study. Analysis group combines both active and placebo-crossover participants during open-label extension arm through the end of study at week 298. Subjects were able to exit the study at assessment timepoints earlier than week 298 if they are able to pass the sustained unresponsiveness oral food challenge, thus the analysis included all subjects through week 298..

    Time frame: up to 298 weeks on active treatment

  5. Change in Skin Prick Test Wheal Size From Baseline to Week 142 in Active and Placebo Cross-over Subjects Receiving Active Walnut OIT

    Evaluation of walnut OIT on the mast cell responses as measured through change in skin prick testing to walnut in participants who were treated with walnut OIT to week 142. Analysis group combines both active and placebo-crossover participants from baseline through open-label treatment phase until the end of study.

    Time frame: 142 weeks

  6. Serious Adverse Events Related to Walnut OIT Treatment

    Incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events during the study

    Time frame: 298 weeks active treatment

06

Results

Posted May 12, 2023
Limitations and caveats
Small sample size High screen failure rate High level of oropharyngeal symptoms Anxiety resulting in early termination Dosing fatigue with daily dosing Requirement for multiple food challenges in multi-tree nut assessment

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from allergy clinics, research databases and advertisement. Study recruitment occurred from April 2012 through September 2014.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneWalnut Protein PowderOat Powder
Started104
Completed83
Not completed21
Withdrew: Anxiety11
Withdrew: Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis10

Outcome measures

PrimaryEffectiveness of Walnut OIT on Clinical Desensitization to Test Tree Nut as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 at Oral Food Challenge

Determine in tree nut allergic subjects the effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy on clinical desensitization to a second tree nut ("test tree nut") causing allergy when compared to placebo treatment, as measured by the change in cumulative dose from baseline oral food challenge (OFC) to the OFC to the test tree nut at approximately 38 weeks on therapy.

Time frame:
38 weeks of therapy
Reported as:
Median · grams
Effectiveness of Walnut OIT on Clinical Desensitization to Test Tree Nut as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 at Oral Food Challenge
gramsWalnut Protein PowderOat Powder
Effectiveness of Walnut OIT on Clinical Desensitization to Test Tree Nut as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 at Oral Food Challenge2.6 (1.55 to 3.54)0.05 (-0.47 to 0.17)
Statistical analysis
  • Walnut Protein Powder vs Oat Powder · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.001
SecondaryEvaluation of Desensitization to Walnut Protein as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 Oral Food Challenge

Determine in tree nut allergic subjects the effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy on clinical desensitization to walnut causing allergy when compared to placebo treatment, as measured by the change in cumulative dose from baseline oral food challenge (OFC) to the OFC to the walnut at approximately 38 weeks on therapy.

Time frame:
38 weeks
Reported as:
Median · grams
Evaluation of Desensitization to Walnut Protein as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 Oral Food Challenge
gramsWalnut Protein PowderOat Powder
Evaluation of Desensitization to Walnut Protein as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 Oral Food Challenge4.4 (3.1 to 4.9)0.6 (0.12 to 1.35)
Statistical analysis
  • Walnut Protein Powder vs Oat Powder · Fisher Exact · p = 0.01
SecondaryNumber (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Walnut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38

The percentage of subjects reaching a cumulative protein dose of 2000mg at the desensitization oral food challenge to walnut at week 38

Time frame:
38 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Walnut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38
ParticipantsWalnut Protein PowderOat Powder
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Walnut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 3860
Statistical analysis
  • Walnut Protein Powder vs Oat Powder · Fisher Exact · p = <0.01
SecondaryNumber (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Test Tree Nut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38

Comparison of the number and percentage of subjects in each treatment arm reaching a cumulative protein dose of 2000mg at the week 38 (desensitization) oral food challenge to test tree nut

Time frame:
38 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Test Tree Nut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38
ParticipantsWalnut Protein PowderOat Powder
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Test Tree Nut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 3860
Statistical analysis
  • Walnut Protein Powder vs Oat Powder · Fisher Exact · p = <0.01
SecondaryNumber (Percentage) of Subjects Attaining Sustained Unresponsiveness to Walnut and Test Tree Nut Proteins at Week 298 Oral Food Challenge

The percentage of subjects demonstrating sustained unresponsiveness to walnut and to the test tree nut by end of study. Analysis group combines both active and placebo-crossover participants during open-label extension arm through the end of study at week 298. Subjects were able to exit the study at assessment timepoints earlier than week 298 if they are able to pass the sustained unresponsiveness oral food challenge, thus the analysis included all subjects through week 298..

Time frame:
up to 298 weeks on active treatment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Attaining Sustained Unresponsiveness to Walnut and Test Tree Nut Proteins at Week 298 Oral Food Challenge
ParticipantsOpen-label Walnut Protein Powder
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Attaining Sustained Unresponsiveness to Walnut and Test Tree Nut Proteins at Week 298 Oral Food Challenge5
SecondaryChange in Skin Prick Test Wheal Size From Baseline to Week 142 in Active and Placebo Cross-over Subjects Receiving Active Walnut OIT

Evaluation of walnut OIT on the mast cell responses as measured through change in skin prick testing to walnut in participants who were treated with walnut OIT to week 142. Analysis group combines both active and placebo-crossover participants from baseline through open-label treatment phase until the end of study.

Time frame:
142 weeks
Reported as:
Median · mm wheal size
Change in Skin Prick Test Wheal Size From Baseline to Week 142 in Active and Placebo Cross-over Subjects Receiving Active Walnut OIT
mm wheal sizeOpen-label Walnut Protein Powder
Change in Skin Prick Test Wheal Size From Baseline to Week 142 in Active and Placebo Cross-over Subjects Receiving Active Walnut OIT3.4 (0.8 to 4)
Statistical analysis
  • Open-label Walnut Protein Powder · Fisher Exact · p = <0.001
SecondarySerious Adverse Events Related to Walnut OIT Treatment

Incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events during the study

Time frame:
298 weeks active treatment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Serious Adverse Events Related to Walnut OIT Treatment
ParticipantsWalnut Protein PowderOat PowderOpen-label Walnut Protein Powder
Serious Adverse Events Related to Walnut OIT Treatment000

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from first participant enrollment (April 2012) through last participant exit visit (May 2018). Maximum total engagement in the study for each participant was 298 weeks of active treatment (~6 years); however, study discontinuation could occur yearly depending on study outcome measures reached for each participant.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Walnut Protein Powder0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)9/10 (90%)
Oat Powder0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)1/4 (25%)
Open-Label Walnut Protein Powder0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)11/13 (84.6%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventWalnut Protein PowderOat PowderOpen-Label Walnut Protein Powder
Concurrent illness/condition - not dose-relatedInfections and infestations3/101/411/13
cough - dose-relatedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/100/41/13
abdominal pain - dose-relatedGastrointestinal disorders7/100/46/13
mouth pruritus - dose-relatedGastrointestinal disorders6/100/45/13
Throat discomfort/pruritusRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/100/47/13
nasal congestion - dose-relatedGeneral disorders4/100/41/13
rhinorrhea/sneezing - dose relatedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/100/44/13
Hives - dose-relatedSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/100/42/13
Abdominal pain - not dose-relatedGastrointestinal disorders1/101/41/13
flushing - dose relatedSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/101/43/13

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Walnut Protein PowderOat PowderTotal
Median8.7 (7.7 to 10)9.2 (8.9 to 9.8)9 (7 to 12)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Walnut Protein PowderOat PowderTotal
Female404
Male6410
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Walnut Protein PowderOat PowderTotal
Hispanic or Latino011
Not Hispanic or Latino10313
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Walnut Protein PowderOat PowderTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White10212
More than one race011
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Walnut Protein PowderOat PowderTotal
United States10414
subjects with asthma
subjects with asthma(participants)Walnut Protein PowderOat PowderTotal
Number336
subjects with atopic dermatitis
subjects with atopic dermatitis(participants)Walnut Protein PowderOat PowderTotal
Number6410
subjects with allergic rhinitis
subjects with allergic rhinitis(participants)Walnut Protein PowderOat PowderTotal
Number639
07

Study locations

1 site
  • Arkansas Children's Hospital
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jones SM, Pons L, Roberts JL, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kulis M, Shreffler WG, Steele P, Henry KA, Adair M, Francis JM, Durham S, Vickery BP, Zhong X, Burks AW. Clinical efficacy and immune regulation with peanut oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):292-300, 300.e1-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.022. Epub 2009 Jul 3. PubMed 19577283 ↗
  • Hofmann AM, Scurlock AM, Jones SM, Palmer KP, Lokhnygina Y, Steele PH, Kamilaris J, Burks AW. Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):286-91, 291.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.045. Epub 2009 May 27. PubMed 19477496 ↗
  • Kulis M, Li Y, Lane H, Pons L, Burks W. Single-tree nut immunotherapy attenuates allergic reactions in mice with hypersensitivity to multiple tree nuts. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Nov 18. PubMed 21093029 ↗
  • Varshney P, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kemper A, Steele P, Hiegel A, Kamilaris J, Carlisle S, Yue X, Kulis M, Pons L, Vickery B, Burks AW. A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):654-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1111. PubMed 21377034 ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01546753
Lead sponsor
University of Arkansas
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 7, 2012
Start date
Apr 27, 2012
Primary completion
Jul 2, 2015
Completion
Jul 2, 2020
Results posted
May 12, 2023
Last update
May 12, 2023

Study contacts

Stacie M Jones, MD
principal investigator · University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences / Arkansas Children's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion