CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01540136Updated Oct 28, 2016

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Nedaplatin Versus Cisplatin in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Nedaplatin and Cisplatin in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-28.

Sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
402
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase III trial to study the effectiveness of nedaplatin versus cisplatin with IMRT chemoradiotherapy in treating patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Read the detailed description

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in Southern China and Southeast Asia. Several prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that concurrent chemoradiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locoregionally advanced NPC. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been shown to have higher response rates in NPC than noncisplatin regimens. However, the patients' compliance was unsatisfactory because the obvious gastrointestinal toxicity of cisplatin. Nedaplatin is the new second generation platinum and it has slight gastrointestinal reaction. Our trial is in order to study the effectiveness of nedaplatin or cisplatin with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) chemoradiotherapy in treating patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,738 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,159 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 402 is above the median of 45 across 5,167 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 1,644 studies on the registry; 602 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, including WHO II or III
  • Original clinical staged as T1-4N1-3 or T3-4N0(according to the 7th AJCC edition)
  • No evidence of distant metastasis (M0)
  • Male and no pregnant female
  • Age between 18-65
  • WBC ≥ 4,000/mm3 and PLT ≥ 100,000/mm3
  • With normal liver function test (ALT、AST ≤ 2.5×ULN)
  • With normal renal function test (Creatinine ≤ 1.5×ULN)
  • Satisfactory performance status: Karnofsky scale (KPS)> 70
  • Without radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Patients must give signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients have evidence of relapse or distant metastasis
  • The presence of uncontrolled life-threatening illness
  • Receiving other ways of anti-cancer therapy
  • Receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Pregnancy or lactation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
402 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nedaplatin

    Nedplatin combine with IMRT

    Drug: Nedaplatin

  • Active comparator
    Cisplatin

    Cisplatin combine with IMRT

    Drug: Cisplatin

Interventions

  • DrugNedaplatin

    Nedaplatin 100mg/m2(3 weekly),D1,D22,D43 of RT

    Also known as: NDP

  • DrugCisplatin

    Cisplatin 100mg/m2(3 weekly),D1,D22,D43 of RT

    Also known as: DDP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progress-free survival

    Progress-free survival is calculated from the date of randomization to the date of the first progress at any site.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Determine the toxic effects, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and quality of life (QoL) of these regimens in these patients.

    Administration and Monitoring Patients will be evaluated in the clinic and eligibility and informed consent obtained. Patients will be monitored for clinical toxicity by standard NIH criteria. QoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTCQLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ Head and Neck. A time period of 4 weeks will constitute the time for clinical safety monitoring.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Complete Response (CR)

    CR assessed by independent reviewers, according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Disease response evaluated after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment. Complete response defined as the complete disappearance of the target and non-target lesion(s) identified at baseline after radiological evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) only.

    Time frame: after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment (up to 9 weeks)

  3. Overall Survival(OS)

    The OS was defined as the duration from the date of random assignment to the date of death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Locoregional Relapse-Free Survival(LRRFS)

    The LRRFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first locoregional relapse or until the date of the last follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS)

    The DMFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first distant metastases or until the date of the last follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. Anti-neoplasms sensitization effects of chemotherapy to radiotherapy

    Tumor response will be evaluated by physical examination and nasopharyngoscopy when radiotherapy in 20Gy、40Gy、70Gy.

    Time frame: radiotherapy in 20Gy、40Gy、70Gy

  7. Cost-effectiveness analysis

    The determination of cost, including direct cost drug fees, inspection fees, expenses and nursing cost; cost-effectiveness analysis, such as cost-effectiveness ratio (ratio of the direct cost and short - and long-term curative effect) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (i.e., increasing costs and increase short or long-term efficacy ratio).

    Time frame: completion of chemoradiotherapy

  8. Correlate effects of CCRT with biomarkers of response and predictors of long-term outcome

    Early identification of patients who will have more aggressive disease soon after diagnosis has been a major goal, we will investigate the correlate effects of CCRT with biomarkers of response and predictors of long-term outcome in these patients.

    Time frame: before chemoradiotherapy and after chemoradiotherapy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zheng J, Wang G, Yang GY, Wang D, Luo X, Chen C, Zhang Z, Li Q, Xu W, Li Z, Wang D. Induction chemotherapy with nedaplatin with 5-FU followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 May;40(5):425-31. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyp183. Epub 2010 Jan 19. PubMed 20085903 ↗
  • Fuwa N, Kodaira T, Tachibana H, Nakamura T, Daimon T. Dose escalation study of nedaplatin with 5-fluorouracil in combination with alternating radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007 Mar;37(3):161-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyl138. Epub 2007 Mar 1. PubMed 17332057 ↗
  • Tanaka T, Yukawa K, Umesaki N. Radiation reduces carboplatin sensitivity and enhances nedaplatin sensitivity in cervical squamous cell carcinoma in vitro. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2007;28(5):352-5. PubMed 17966212 ↗
  • Chen QY, Wen YF, Guo L, Liu H, Huang PY, Mo HY, Li NW, Xiang YQ, Luo DH, Qiu F, Sun R, Deng MQ, Chen MY, Hua YJ, Guo X, Cao KJ, Hong MH, Qian CN, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Dec 7;103(23):1761-70. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr432. Epub 2011 Nov 4. PubMed 22056739 ↗
  • Chan AT, Teo PM, Ngan RK, Leung TW, Lau WH, Zee B, Leung SF, Cheung FY, Yeo W, Yiu HH, Yu KH, Chiu KW, Chan DT, Mok T, Yuen KT, Mo F, Lai M, Kwan WH, Choi P, Johnson PJ. Concurrent chemotherapy-radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: progression-free survival analysis of a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 15;20(8):2038-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.149. PubMed 11956263 ↗
  • Ma J, Mai HQ, Hong MH, Min HQ, Mao ZD, Cui NJ, Lu TX, Mo HY. Results of a prospective randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 1;19(5):1350-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.5.1350. PubMed 11230478 ↗
  • Tang QN, Liu LT, Qi B, Guo SS, Luo DH, Sun R, Sun XS, Chen DP, Guo L, Mo HY, Wang P, Liu SL, Liang YJ, Li XY, Yang ZC, Chen QY, Mai HQ, Tang LQ. Effect of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Nedaplatin vs Cisplatin on the Long-term Outcomes of Survival and Toxic Effects Among Patients With Stage II to IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A 5-Year Follow-up Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138470. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38470. PubMed 34928359 ↗
  • Tang LQ, Chen DP, Guo L, Mo HY, Huang Y, Guo SS, Qi B, Tang QN, Wang P, Li XY, Li JB, Liu Q, Gao YH, Xie FY, Liu LT, Li Y, Liu SL, Xie HJ, Liang YJ, Sun XS, Yan JJ, Wu YS, Luo DH, Huang PY, Xiang YQ, Sun R, Chen MY, Lv X, Wang L, Xia WX, Zhao C, Cao KJ, Qian CN, Guo X, Hong MH, Nie ZQ, Chen QY, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):461-473. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30104-9. Epub 2018 Feb 28. PubMed 29501366 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 28, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01540136
Lead sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University
Collaborators
Guangzhou Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Meizhou City Hospital Of Guangdong Provience
Responsible party
Hai-Qiang Mai,MD,PhD (Deputy Director of the Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 28, 2012
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
May 2014
Completion
Jul 2016
Last update
Oct 28, 2016

Study contacts

HaiQiang Mai, MD,Ph.D
principal investigator · Cancer center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion