CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01539096Updated Jul 16, 2020

Brain Stimulation-aided Stroke Rehabilitation: Neural Mechanisms of Recovery

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of tDCS: noninvasive brain stimulation and Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) in Stroke, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-16.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2011, registered Feb 2012).
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
67
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether benefits of training the affected hand in patients with stroke can be improved by combining training with a painless, noninvasive technique called Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS). TDCS will be applied over the part of the brain responsible for movements of the affected hand. Also, the investigators will study the changes in the brain that favor recovery of hand function following combination of training and tDCS.

Read the detailed description

The overall goal of this study is to develop a novel rehabilitative method, in chronic stroke, which minimizes residual deficits by maximally utilizing the potential for cortical plasticity.

Despite extensive rehabilitation, approximately 60-80% of patients with stroke experience residual dysfunction of the upper limb. Deficits are believed to linger due to neurophysiologic imbalance between the ipsilesional (stroke-affected) and contralesional (intact) motor cortices. Specifically, the ipsilesional motor cortex loses its normal inhibitory control over the contralesional areas, which, in return, intensify their inhibitory influence upon the former. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) represents a family of techniques that alleviates residual deficits by rectifying these neurophysiologic imbalances. By reinforcing use of the paretic upper limb in daily life during restraint of the non-paretic limb, CIMT initiates use-dependent neuroplastic reorganization implicating the ipsilesional motor areas, which demonstrate return-of-activity and regain territory in the surviving regions, mitigating the exaggerated inhibitory influence exerted by the contralesional areas.

Despite promising evidence, however, clinical utility of CIMT is limited due to its labor-intensive protocols and inadequate gains. Our objective is to address gaps in existing clinical rehabilitative research. The investigators propose to 1) combine CIMT with targeted stimulation of the ipsilesional motor cortices, 2) Use a novel, noninvasive method of stimulation, called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), 3) Use multimodal imaging to determine comprehensive mechanisms of recovery in patients. Our central hypotheses are 1) ipsilesional motor cortices would be an ideal site for delivering stimulation during CIMT, 2) tDCS will be easy, safe and inexpensive to apply and will target multiple maps concurrently during rehabilitation as demonstrated in our elemental research. 3) structural and functional imaging methods will demonstrate complementary cortical, corticospinal and cortico-muscular markers of recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Rehabilitation
  • Paresis
  • Paralysis
  • Recovery
  • tDCS
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
  • CIMT
  • Constraint Induced Movement Therapy
  • Stroke therapy
  • MRI
  • Hand
  • CVA
  • Cerebrovascular accident
03

In context

Stroke

7,287 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,006 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 67 is above the median of 50 across 5,370 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 819 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 89 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with stroke that occurred at least 6 months ago

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Ongoing use of Central Nervous System activating medications
  • Presence of an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implant, including cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant
  • Metal in the head
  • A history of medication-resistant epilepsy in the family
  • Past history of seizures or unexplained spells of loss of consciousness
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
67 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Sham tDCS plus CIMT

    Subjects in this group will be trained on Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) for the hand while concurrently receiving placebo noninvasive brain stimulation (tDCS). They will be receiving Sham tDCS: placebo noninvasive brain stimulation. They will be provided treatment for 3 days a week for 5 weeks for 1 hr each day at the Cleveland Clinic. They would be asked to use affected hand in daily activities for 5 hrs everyday at home while wearing a mitt on their unaffected hand.

    Behavioral: Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) · Procedure: Sham tDCS: placebo noninvasive brain stimulation

  • Experimental
    tDCS plus CIMT

    Patients with stroke affecting the hand will receive Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) concurrent with tDCS: noninvasive brain stimulation. TDCS will be applied to areas of the brain responsible for movement of the affected hand. This combination of tDCS and CIMT will be delivered for 1 hr each day for 3 days a week for 5 weeks. Patients will also be asked to use their affected hand in daily activities at home for 5 hrs a day while wearing a mitt on the unaffected hand.

    Procedure: tDCS: noninvasive brain stimulation · Behavioral: Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT)

Interventions

  • ProceduretDCS: noninvasive brain stimulation

    TDCS is a method of noninvasive stimulation of the brain. Using electrodes placed in saline-soaked sponges, low level of direct current (1mA) is delivered over the scalp. This intervention is considered safe and noninvasive because it does not involve implantation or injection or any skin penetration. In the present study, tDCS will be delivered for 1 hr each day for 3 days a week for 5 weeks in conjunction with constraint-induced movement therapy for the affected hand.

    Also known as: tDCS, noninvasive brain stimulation, neuromodulation, transcranial stimulation, TCS

  • BehavioralConstraint induced movement therapy (CIMT)

    Patients with stroke affecting the hand will receive constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) to re-train movements of the affected hand. Training will involve practicing tasks of daily living with qualified personnel. Training will be delivered for 1 hr each day for 3 days a week for 5 weeks. Patients will also be asked to use their affected hand in daily activities at home for 5 hrs a day while wearing a mitt on the unaffected hand.

    Also known as: hand therapy, CIMT, forced use therapy, constraint induced movement therapy, stroke therapy, stroke rehabilitation

  • ProcedureSham tDCS: placebo noninvasive brain stimulation

    Placebo set-up for noninvasive brain stimulation will be similar to that for the active tDCS; sponge electrodes would be placed on the scalp and connected to a batter-operated device. Patients will not receive the effective level of direct current as would delivered in active tDCS intervention. But patients will not be able to decipher whether they are receiving active or placebo tDCS.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Upper limb function following combination of tDCS with CIMT

    To address the functional advantage of combining tDCS and CIMT tests that evaluate impairments of the hand will be utilized. Also, change in ability to carry out activities of daily living will be measured.

    Time frame: Each patient will be given the assessment tests at 3 points during the study, at baseline, interim test (an average of 2.5 weeks from baseline) and at posttest (an average of 5 weeks from baseline).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Study of change in neural mechanisms that underlie the complementary association of cortical stimulation and CIMT

    To identify the underlying neural mechanisms in the association of cortical stimulation and CIMT, the patient will undergo structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and tests of neurophysiology.

    Time frame: Each patient will be given the assessment tests at 3 points during the study, at baseline, interim test (an average of 2.5 weeks from baseline) and at posttest (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Plow EB, Cunningham DA, Beall E, Jones S, Wyant A, Bonnett C, Yue GH, Lowe M, Wang XF, Sakaie K, Machado A. Effectiveness and neural mechanisms associated with tDCS delivered to premotor cortex in stroke rehabilitation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Oct 12;14:331. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-331. PubMed 24119615 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The Investigators will not be sharing or releasing any study data to third parties outside the Cleveland Clinic.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01539096
Lead sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Responsible party
Ela B. Plow (Principal Investigator, Staff, Neural Control Lab, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, The Cleveland Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 27, 2012
Start date
Jul 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2019
Completion
Dec 2019
Last update
Jul 16, 2020

Study contacts

Ela B Plow, PhD PT
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion