CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01534429Updated Jul 11, 2016

Quantitative Sensory Testing and Analysis of Post Inguinal Hernia Surgery Pain

An observational study in Hernia, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-11.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Increasing experience has identified post-herniorraphy chronic pain as an under-recognized and important complication. Nerve entrapment and injury are recognized as causes of such pain. Operative treatment for selected patients with this condition includes surgical exploration of the affected groin, identification and removal of involved nerves, and removal of meshoma. This procedure has been highly effective in treatment of chronic pain. This study will attempt to subjectively and objectively evaluate the patient's chronic groin pain using quantitative sensory testing (QST) and validated pain scales and questionnaires. Quantitative sensory testing is a method used to assess damage to the small and large nerve fibers. It is used to diagnose and assess the severity of nerve damage, and can also help to determine if a neuropathy is responding to treatment. QST uses a computer testing system to measure how nerves react to vibration and changes in temperature. The procedure is non-invasive and the patient will feel minimal to no discomfort during testing. The hypothesis is that any decrease in subjective pain scores would be accompanied by improved QST results.

Read the detailed description

Background: Chronic postherniorrhaphy inguinal pain is a complex, major health problem. In the absence of recurrence or meshoma, laparoscopic retroperitoneal triple neurectomy has emerged as an effective surgical treatment of postherniorrhaphy inguinal pain. Methods: This prospective pilot study evaluated the neurophysiological and clinical effects of laparoscopic retroperitoneal triple neurectomy. Ten consecutive adult with chronic postherniorrhaphy inguinal pain and unilateral predominantly neuropathic inguinodynia underwent three comprehensive quantitative sensory testing assessments (preoperative, immediate postoperative, and late postoperative). Pain severity, health-related function, and sleep quality were assessed over the course of a 6-month follow-up period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hernia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pain
03

In context

Hernia

1,096 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia; 132 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 120 across 327 observational studies indexed under Hernia.

Browse Hernia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,142 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with chronic pain occuring after groin hernia repair who are surgical candidates for mesh removal and triple neurectomy.

Inclusion criteria

  • patient with chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia surgery and are candidates for triple neurectomy with mesh removal

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-English speaking patients
  • significant psychiatric or medical disease
  • bilateral groin pain
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • chronic post-herniorraphy pain

    patients with severe chronic post-herniorraphy pain

    Procedure: Quantitative Sensory Testing

Interventions

  • ProcedureQuantitative Sensory Testing

    Quantitative Sensory Testing and Neurophysiologic Testing to be done Pre-operatively and at 3 and 6 months post-operatively.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. changes in quantitative sensory testing and neurophysiologic testing pre-operatively, and at 3-month and 6-month intervals post-operatively

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. changes in Visual Nociceptive Pain Scores, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Activity Assessment Scale, and SF-36 scale pre-operatively and 3-month, 6-month, and 9-months post-operatively

    Time frame: 9 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UCLA Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01534429
Lead sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 16, 2012
Start date
Feb 2011
Primary completion
Jan 2016
Completion
Jun 2016
Last update
Jul 11, 2016

Study contacts

Andrea L Nicol, M.D.
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion