CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01526447CranioSUpdated Feb 21, 2019

Effects of Craniosacral Therapy on Chronic Neck Pain

An interventional study of Craniosacral Therapy and Sham Craniosacral Therapy in Neck Pain, sponsored by Universität Duisburg-Essen. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-21.

Sponsored by Universität Duisburg-Essen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to determinate the efficacy and safety of Craniosacral Therapy in the treatment of chronic unspecific neck pain.

Read the detailed description

Craniosacral Therapy (CST) is a variation of osteopathic manipulation with an integrative approach. By soft manual palpation of the craniosacral and fascia system sensory, motor, cognitive, and emotional processes can be influenced. In the prevention and treatment of chronic pain syndromes Craniosacral Therapy is demonstrated to be effective in clinical practice and quite a few scientific trials. But yet there are no randomized controlled studies concerning to chronic neck pain. So the aim of this study is to investigate whether a total of 8 CST units of 45 minutes will be effective in patients suffering from chronic nonspecific neck pain in contrast to sham therapy of the same extent. The prospective study design includes measurement points at baseline, post treatment, and 3 months follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Neck Pain
  • Craniosacral Manipulation
  • Complementary Therapies
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Sensory Thresholds
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,231 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 254 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Universität Duisburg-Essen is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic unspecific neck pain for at least 3 months
  • Mean neck pain of moderate intensity (>/=45mm on VAS)
  • Therapy-naive subjects

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Specific neck pain due to severe deformity of the spine, prolapse, rheumatic or neurological disorder, trauma, operation or cancer
  • other severe somatic or psychiatric comorbidity
  • pregnancy
  • regular intake of opiates, corticosteroids (>10mg prednisolon), muscle relaxants or antidepressants
  • recent invasive or manipulative treatment of the spine
  • participation in other clinical trials
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Craniosacral Therapy (CST)

    Each participant of the experimental group receives 8 Craniosacral Therapy units once a week of 45 minutes.

    Procedure: Craniosacral Therapy

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Craniosacral Therapy (SHAM)

    Each participant of the sham group receives 8 sham therapy units once a week of 45 minutes.

    Procedure: Sham Craniosacral Therapy

Interventions

  • ProcedureCraniosacral Therapy

    Standardized therapy protocol (according to Upledger): Still point technique, diaphragm release, compression-decompression and lift techniques of the cranial bones, facial balancing in the region of shoulder and pelvis and somato-emotional unwinding

  • ProcedureSham Craniosacral Therapy

    Standardized sham protocol: Placing hands on various parts of the clothed body for two minutes each time without therapeutic intention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity on a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Time frame: week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity in motion

    Pain intensity induced by flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation of the head on a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Time frame: week 8

  2. Pressure pain threshold

    Pressure pain threshold (PPT) measured with an algometer on predefined muscles and the pain maximum

    Time frame: week 8

  3. Disability

    Measured by the Neck Disability Indx (NDI)

    Time frame: week 8

  4. Quality of life

    Measured by the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12)

    Time frame: week 8

  5. Well being

    Measured by the Questionnaire for Assessing Subjective Physical Well-Being (FEW-16)

    Time frame: week 8

  6. Anxiety and depression

    Measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Time frame: week 8

  7. Stress perception

    Measured by the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ-20)

    Time frame: week 8

  8. Pain acceptance

    Measured by the Emotional and Rational Disease Acceptance Questionnaire (ERDA)

    Time frame: week 8

  9. Body awareness

    Measured by the Scale of Body Connection (SBC)

    Time frame: week 8

  10. Global Impression

    Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Questionnaire (PGI-I)

    Time frame: week 8

  11. Safety

    All adverse events are recorded

    Time frame: week 8

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kliniken Essen-Mitte
    Essen, NRW 45276, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Haller H, Ostermann T, Lauche R, Cramer H, Dobos G. Credibility of a comparative sham control intervention for Craniosacral Therapy in patients with chronic neck pain. Complement Ther Med. 2014 Dec;22(6):1053-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 6. PubMed 25453528 ↗
  • Haller H, Lauche R, Cramer H, Rampp T, Saha FJ, Ostermann T, Dobos G. Craniosacral Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Sham-controlled Trial. Clin J Pain. 2016 May;32(5):441-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000290. PubMed 26340656 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01526447
Lead sponsor
Universität Duisburg-Essen
Responsible party
Heidemarie Haller (Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Universität Duisburg-Essen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 3, 2012
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2012
Completion
Apr 2013
Last update
Feb 21, 2019

Study contacts

Gustav Dobos, Prof. MD
study director · Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion