CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01522235Updated Jul 2, 2017Results posted

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Autoimmune Autonomic Ganglionopathy

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Double blinded IVIg and Double blinded Placebo in Autoimmune Autonomic Ganglionopathy (AAG), sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Completed at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-02.

Sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to see if administering intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) (putting immune globulin directly into your blood) helps to improve the symptoms of orthostatic hypotension (sudden fall in blood pressure when a person stands up) and quality of life in men and women who have autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG).

Read the detailed description

Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG) is a rare disease that results in severe dysautonomia (disorder of autonomic nervous system function). Many patients are unable to carry out activities of daily living due to autonomic symptoms that do not respond well to therapy (such as drops in blood pressure while standing). The recent discovery of antibodies that cause AAG has stimulated interest in immunomodulatory therapy (therapies that modify the functioning of the immune system). Studies in which a positive clinical response to these therapies have been reported in patients with AAG using immunomodulatory therapy as a treatment.

The investigators plan to carry out a blinded, randomized trial using IVIG. There have been no reported randomized clinical trials with any immunosuppressive agent in AAG. The proposed studies, if successful, will provide the first reliable clinical evidence, that therapy with IVIG is an effective treatment of AAG.

Treatment for the symptoms of autonomic failure is only effective in mild cases. Most patients require therapy that would change the course of the disease, but at present there is no established therapeutic regimen. The natural course of untreated AAG is not known.

To address these unresolved issues, this clinical trial has the following goals:

  1. To measure the effect of IVIG treatment on orthostatic hypotension, autonomic symptoms and quality of life scores in patient participants with AAG.
  2. To determine the durability of IVIG (how long the treatment is effective) on orthostatic hypotension, autonomic symptoms and quality of life scores in patient participants with AAG.

Participants enrolled in the study will receive two courses of intravenous immunoglobulin or placebo separated by 3 weeks. During the First Observation Period, participants will be evaluated after 6 weeks to determine the clinical response and natural history of the disorder.

All the participants will then move to a single blinded second observation period.

All patients enrolled in the study (IVIG group and placebo group) will receive two infusions of intravenous immunoglobulin, i.e., both cohorts will receive IVIG (although participants will not know this, and physicians will not be aware if this treatment is to IVIG naïve or IVIG continued participants).

02

Conditions studied

  • Autoimmune Autonomic Ganglionopathy (AAG)

Keywords

  • Autoimmune autonomic neuropathy
  • Orthostatic hypotension
  • Dysautonomia
  • Autonomic failure
  • Peripheral autonomic neuropathy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 560 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Of its 75 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 61 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participants aged 18 to 85
  2. Participants have neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (fall in systolic blood pressure > 30 mmHg).
  3. Symptoms of orthostatic intolerance.
  4. Antibodies to the neuronal AChR of the autonomic ganglia of >0.2nmol/l. Results must be within 6 months of the screening visit and there may not have been any immunomodulatory interventions since the time of the antibody measurement or the sample will need to be reconfirmed at screening.
  5. Participants must be willing to withdraw from medications that affect vasoactive and autonomic function for 5 half-lives during testing (with the exception of stable doses of fludrocortisone up to 0.2 mg/day) and adhere to a regular diet

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women of childbearing potential (WOCP) who are not using a medically accepted contraception
  2. Pregnant or lactating females- if participants become pregnant during the trial they will no longer receive IVIG, but will be followed as part of the intention to treat protocol.
  3. Severe depression and/or anxiety (score of > 29 on the Beck Depression Inventory or score on the Beck Anxiety Inventory of ≥ 36)
  4. Active psychosis is ineligible, history of psychosis will be eligible, but only after review with the patients PCP and/or treating mental health provider.
  5. History of asthma
  6. Other causes of autonomic failure (e.g., diabetes, amyloidosis)
  7. History of allergic or anaphylactic reaction to humanized or murine antibodies.
  8. History or presence of recurrent or chronic infection (recurrent infections defined as >4 times per year).
  9. History of cancer, including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies (except fully resolved and resected cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin)
  10. History or presence of vascular disease potentially affecting brain or spinal cord (e.g., stroke, transient ischemic attack, carotid stenosis (greater than 80%), aortic aneurysm, intracranial aneurysm, hemorrhage, arteriovenous malformation)
  11. History of severe, clinically significant central nervous system trauma (e.g., cerebral contusion, spinal cord compression)
  12. History or presence of infectious causes of encephalopathy or myelopathy (e.g., syphilis, Lyme disease, human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 [HTLV-1], herpes zoster myelopathy)
  13. History of thromboembolic events or deep vein thrombosis
  14. Platelet count \<100,000/mL, Hemoglobin \<8.5 g/dL, Neutrophils \<1.5 x 103/mL.
  15. Serum IgA deficiency: Immunoglobulin A (IgA) level \< 7 mg/dL.
  16. History of immunosuppression or HIV/AIDS
  17. History of cardiac arrhythmia or angina, electrocardiogram (ECG) showing significant abnormality that the treating investigator determines may jeopardize the participant's health (i.e., acute ischemia, left bundle branch, or bifascicular block)
  18. History of renal failure or creatinine >2.0
  19. History of previous allergic response to albumin.
  20. Treatment with IVIG or plasma exchange within 6 weeks of study enrollment.
  21. Active adjustments of other immunomodulatory treatments. Patients that are on stable doses of immunomodulatory medications (no dose changes within 4 months -including, but not limited to prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine) but still have elevated antibody titers and meet criteria for inclusion will be allowed to participate in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    IVIg group

    Double blinded IVIg and single blinded IVIg

    Drug: Double blinded IVIg · Other: Single Blinded IVIg

  • Other
    Placebo Group

    Double blinded Placebo and single blinded IVIg

    Other: Double blinded Placebo · Other: Single Blinded IVIg

Interventions

  • DrugDouble blinded IVIg

    Participants will receive study treatment with IVIg, at 2.0 gm/kg over 2-4 consecutive days. A maintenance study treatment IVIg, at 1.0 gm/kg, over 1-2 consecutive days will occur three weeks later. All participants will proceed to the single blind Second Observation Period.

    Also known as: Gammagard

  • OtherDouble blinded Placebo

    Participants will receive placebo (5% albumin) at 2.0 gm/kg over 2-4 consecutive days. A maintenance treatment with placebo (5% albumin) at 1.0 gm/kg, over 1-2 consecutive days will occur three weeks later. All participants will proceed to the single blind Second Observation Period.

  • OtherSingle Blinded IVIg

    This is the single blind Second Observation Period. All participants will receive study treatment with IVIg, at 2.0 gm/kg over 2-4 consecutive days. A maintenance study treatment at 1.0 gm/kg, over 1-2 consecutive days will occur three weeks later.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure During 60° Tilt (ΔSBP)

    The primary outcome, the change in systolic blood pressure during 60 degree tilt (ΔSBP), will be assessed in all study participants at baseline and at 6 weeks.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure During 60° Tilt (ΔSBP)

    To compare the change in systolic blood pressure during 60 degree head up tilt table test after 6 and 12 weeks of IVIG (the within-patient difference in ΔSBP at 12 and 6 weeks among treated patients).

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks

  2. Composite Autonomic Symptom Score [COMPASS] Questionnaire

    To determine the change in autonomic symptoms (measured by the composite autonomic symptom score \[COMPASS\] questionnaire) measured at baseline and 6 weeks. Minimum and maximum score possible: 0-100. We have reported the Total score. Higher values represent worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

  3. Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS) Questionnaire.

    To determine the change in autonomic symptoms (measured by the composite autonomic severity score \[CASS\]) measured at baseline and 6 weeks in individuals receiving IVIg. Is a 10-point composite autonomic scoring scale of autonomic function. This scale allots 4 points for adrenergic and 3 points each for sudomotor and cardiovagal failure. Subjects with a score of 3 or less on have a mild autonomic failure, 4-6 have moderate autonomic failure and those with scores of 7 to 10 have severe failure. The minimum score possible is 3 and maximum is 10.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

  4. EuroQol [EQ-5D] Questionnaire.

    To determine the change in quality of life (measured by the EuroQol \[EQ-5D\]) measured at baseline and 6 weeks in individuals receiving IVIg. We have reported the subscale (EQ-VAS). The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100. (0) corresponds to " the worst health you can imagine", and the highest rate (100) corresponds to "the best health you can imagine".

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

  5. Orthostatic Hypotension Symptom Assessment Questionnaire

    To determine the change in orthostatic Hypotension symptom (measured by the orthostatic hypotension symptom assessment questionnaire) measured at baseline and 6 weeks in individuals receiving IVIG. This is a 60 point orthostatic hypotenstion symptom assessment questionnaire. The minimum score possible is 0 and maximum is 60. Higher values represent worse outcome. We are reporting the total score.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 2, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIVIG GroupPlacebo Group
Started33
Randomized23
Completed22
Not completed11
Withdrew: Physician decision11

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Systolic Blood Pressure During 60° Tilt (ΔSBP)

The primary outcome, the change in systolic blood pressure during 60 degree tilt (ΔSBP), will be assessed in all study participants at baseline and at 6 weeks.

Time frame:
Baseline and 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure During 60° Tilt (ΔSBP)
mmHgIVIg GroupPlacebo Group
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure During 60° Tilt (ΔSBP)42.5 ± 54.4-12.3 ± 38.0
SecondaryChange in Systolic Blood Pressure During 60° Tilt (ΔSBP)

To compare the change in systolic blood pressure during 60 degree head up tilt table test after 6 and 12 weeks of IVIG (the within-patient difference in ΔSBP at 12 and 6 weeks among treated patients).

Time frame:
6 weeks and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure During 60° Tilt (ΔSBP)
mmHgIVIG GroupPlacebo Group
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure During 60° Tilt (ΔSBP)-26 ± 43.8-7.6 ± 7.09
SecondaryComposite Autonomic Symptom Score [COMPASS] Questionnaire

To determine the change in autonomic symptoms (measured by the composite autonomic symptom score \[COMPASS\] questionnaire) measured at baseline and 6 weeks. Minimum and maximum score possible: 0-100. We have reported the Total score. Higher values represent worse outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score [COMPASS] Questionnaire
unitsIVIg GroupPlacebo Group
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score [COMPASS] Questionnaire-5 ± 2.8-0.33 ± 5.13
SecondaryComposite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS) Questionnaire.

To determine the change in autonomic symptoms (measured by the composite autonomic severity score \[CASS\]) measured at baseline and 6 weeks in individuals receiving IVIg. Is a 10-point composite autonomic scoring scale of autonomic function. This scale allots 4 points for adrenergic and 3 points each for sudomotor and cardiovagal failure. Subjects with a score of 3 or less on have a mild autonomic failure, 4-6 have moderate autonomic failure and those with scores of 7 to 10 have severe failure. The minimum score possible is 3 and maximum is 10.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units
Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS) Questionnaire.
unitsIVIg GroupPlacebo Group
Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS) Questionnaire.0.5 ± 0.70 ± 0
SecondaryEuroQol [EQ-5D] Questionnaire.

To determine the change in quality of life (measured by the EuroQol \[EQ-5D\]) measured at baseline and 6 weeks in individuals receiving IVIg. We have reported the subscale (EQ-VAS). The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100. (0) corresponds to " the worst health you can imagine", and the highest rate (100) corresponds to "the best health you can imagine".

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units
EuroQol [EQ-5D] Questionnaire.
unitsIVIg GroupPlacebo Group
EuroQol [EQ-5D] Questionnaire.15 ± 21.29.3 ± 22.8
SecondaryOrthostatic Hypotension Symptom Assessment Questionnaire

To determine the change in orthostatic Hypotension symptom (measured by the orthostatic hypotension symptom assessment questionnaire) measured at baseline and 6 weeks in individuals receiving IVIG. This is a 60 point orthostatic hypotenstion symptom assessment questionnaire. The minimum score possible is 0 and maximum is 60. Higher values represent worse outcome. We are reporting the total score.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units
Orthostatic Hypotension Symptom Assessment Questionnaire
unitsGroup AGroup B
Orthostatic Hypotension Symptom Assessment Questionnaire-9 ± 2.812 ± 9.5

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
IVIg Group0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)1/2 (50%)
Placebo Group0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)3/3 (100%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIVIg GroupPlacebo Group
ArthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/20/3
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders0/21/3
painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/21/3
nauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/21/3
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/21/3
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/21/3

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Group AGroup BTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years336
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group AGroup BTotal
Female134
Male202
08

Study locations

6 sites
  • Nih Ninds
    Bethesda, Maryland 20895, United States
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • NYU Medical Center
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Vanderbilt University
    Nashville, Tennessee 37215, United States
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Vernino S, Sandroni P, Singer W, Low PA. Invited Article: Autonomic ganglia: target and novel therapeutic tool. Neurology. 2008 May 13;70(20):1926-32. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000312280.44805.5d. PubMed 18474849 ↗
  • Vernino S, Low PA, Fealey RD, Stewart JD, Farrugia G, Lennon VA. Autoantibodies to ganglionic acetylcholine receptors in autoimmune autonomic neuropathies. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 21;343(12):847-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009213431204. PubMed 10995864 ↗
  • Gibbons CH, Freeman R. Antibody titers predict clinical features of autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy. Auton Neurosci. 2009 Mar 12;146(1-2):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2008.11.013. Epub 2009 Jan 13. PubMed 19144572 ↗
  • Klein CM, Vernino S, Lennon VA, Sandroni P, Fealey RD, Benrud-Larson L, Sletten D, Low PA. The spectrum of autoimmune autonomic neuropathies. Ann Neurol. 2003 Jun;53(6):752-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.10556. PubMed 12783421 ↗
  • Gibbons CH, Vernino SA, Kaufmann H, Freeman R. L-DOPS therapy for refractory orthostatic hypotension in autoimmune autonomic neuropathy. Neurology. 2005 Oct 11;65(7):1104-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000178980.83477.14. PubMed 16217067 ↗
  • Gibbons CH, Vernino SA, Freeman R. Combined immunomodulatory therapy in autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy. Arch Neurol. 2008 Feb;65(2):213-7. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2007.60. PubMed 18268189 ↗
  • Iodice V, Kimpinski K, Vernino S, Sandroni P, Fealey RD, Low PA. Efficacy of immunotherapy in seropositive and seronegative putative autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy. Neurology. 2009 Jun 9;72(23):2002-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a92b52. PubMed 19506222 ↗
  • Modoni A, Mirabella M, Madia F, Sanna T, Lanza G, Tonali PA, Silvestri G. Chronic autoimmune autonomic neuropathy responsive to immunosuppressive therapy. Neurology. 2007 Jan 9;68(2):161-2. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000251194.82212.75. No abstract available. PubMed 17210903 ↗
  • Young RR, Asbury AK, Adams RD, Corbett JL. Pure pan-dysautonomia with recovery. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1969;94:355-7. No abstract available. PubMed 5374487 ↗
  • Vernino S, Ermilov LG, Sha L, Szurszewski JH, Low PA, Lennon VA. Passive transfer of autoimmune autonomic neuropathy to mice. J Neurosci. 2004 Aug 11;24(32):7037-42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1485-04.2004. PubMed 15306637 ↗
  • Malik U, Oleksowicz L, Latov N, Cardo LJ. Intravenous gamma-globulin inhibits binding of anti-GM1 to its target antigen. Ann Neurol. 1996 Jan;39(1):136-9. doi: 10.1002/ana.410390121. PubMed 8572660 ↗
  • Kazatchkine MD, Kaveri SV. Immunomodulation of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases with intravenous immune globulin. N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 6;345(10):747-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra993360. No abstract available. PubMed 11547745 ↗
  • Dalakas MC. Intravenous immunoglobulin in autoimmune neuromuscular diseases. JAMA. 2004 May 19;291(19):2367-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.19.2367. PubMed 15150209 ↗
  • Samuelsson A, Towers TL, Ravetch JV. Anti-inflammatory activity of IVIG mediated through the inhibitory Fc receptor. Science. 2001 Jan 19;291(5503):484-6. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5503.484. PubMed 11161202 ↗
  • Dalakas MC. Blockade of blocking antibodies in Guillain-Barre syndromes: "unblocking" the mystery of action of intravenous immunoglobulin. Ann Neurol. 2002 Jun;51(6):667-9. doi: 10.1002/ana.10259. No abstract available. PubMed 12112069 ↗
  • Hughes RA, Cornblath DR. Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet. 2005 Nov 5;366(9497):1653-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67665-9. PubMed 16271648 ↗
  • Eftimov F, Winer JB, Vermeulen M, de Haan R, van Schaik IN. Intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 30;(12):CD001797. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001797.pub3. PubMed 24379104 ↗
  • Leger JM, Viala K, Cancalon F, Maisonobe T, Gruwez B, Waegemans T, Bouche P. Intravenous immunoglobulin as short- and long-term therapy of multifocal motor neuropathy: a retrospective study of response to IVIg and of its predictive criteria in 40 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;79(1):93-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.121756. PubMed 18079302 ↗
  • Slee M, Selvan A, Donaghy M. Multifocal motor neuropathy: the diagnostic spectrum and response to treatment. Neurology. 2007 Oct 23;69(17):1680-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000277697.55288.d0. PubMed 17954783 ↗
  • Federico P, Zochodne DW, Hahn AF, Brown WF, Feasby TE. Multifocal motor neuropathy improved by IVIg: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurology. 2000 Nov 14;55(9):1256-62. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.9.1256. PubMed 11087764 ↗
  • Gorson KC, Ropper AH, Weinberg DH, Weinstein R. Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with IgG monoclonal gammopathy and polyneuropathy. Arch Neurol. 2002 May;59(5):766-72. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.5.766. PubMed 12020258 ↗
  • Zinman L, Ng E, Bril V. IV immunoglobulin in patients with myasthenia gravis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2007 Mar 13;68(11):837-41. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000256698.69121.45. PubMed 17353471 ↗
  • Maddison P, Newsom-Davis J. Treatment for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003279.pub2. PubMed 15846654 ↗
  • Dalakas MC, Illa I, Dambrosia JM, Soueidan SA, Stein DP, Otero C, Dinsmore ST, McCrosky S. A controlled trial of high-dose intravenous immune globulin infusions as treatment for dermatomyositis. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1993-2000. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292704. PubMed 8247075 ↗
  • Gold R, Dalakas MC, Toyka KV. Immunotherapy in autoimmune neuromuscular disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2003 Jan;2(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00264-3. PubMed 12849298 ↗
  • Linker RA, Gold R. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange in neurological disease. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008 Jun;21(3):358-65. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3282ff5b8f. PubMed 18451723 ↗
  • Donofrio PD, Berger A, Brannagan TH 3rd, Bromberg MB, Howard JF, Latov N, Quick A, Tandan R. Consensus statement: the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of neuromuscular conditions report of the AANEM ad hoc committee. Muscle Nerve. 2009 Nov;40(5):890-900. doi: 10.1002/mus.21433. PubMed 19768755 ↗
  • Heafield MT, Gammage MD, Nightingale S, Williams AC. Idiopathic dysautonomia treated with intravenous gammaglobulin. Lancet. 1996 Jan 6;347(8993):28-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91559-7. PubMed 8531546 ↗
  • Mericle RA, Triggs WJ. Treatment of acute pandysautonomia with intravenous immunoglobulin. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 May;62(5):529-31. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.62.5.529. PubMed 9153616 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The investigators will adhere to the NIH Grant Policy on Sharing of Unique Research Resources including the Principles and Guidelines for Recipients of NIH Research Grants and Contracts on Obtaining and Disseminating Biomedical Research Resources.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01522235
Lead sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Collaborators
Mayo Clinic, Vanderbilt University, NYU Langone Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Responsible party
Roy Freeman, MD (Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 31, 2012
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
May 2014
Completion
Sep 2015
Results posted
Jul 2, 2017
Last update
Jul 2, 2017

Study contacts

Roy Freeman, MD
principal investigator · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion