CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01486615Updated Oct 5, 2012Results posted

Premedication With Melatonin and Alprazolam Combination Versus Alprazolam or Melatonin Alone

A Phase 4 interventional study of meloset (melatonin) and stresnil ( melatonin and alprazolam) in Anxiety, sponsored by B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences. Completed at 2 sites in Nepal. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-10-05.

Sponsored by B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Benzodiazepine, a common premedicant, suppresses endogenous melatonin levels and thus paradoxically increases episodes of arousal during sleep and thus causes restlessness and hangs over effects. Adding melatonin to it may decrease nocturnal arousal and promote the perception of sound sleep in the perioperative period.

Methods: Eighty patients (ASA 1\&2) with anxiety VAS ≥ 2 posted for general anaesthesia will be randomly assigned to receive 0.5 mg alprazolam (Group A), 3 mg melatonin, a combination of 0.5 mg alprazolam and 3 mg melatonin (Group AM), or a similar looking placebo (Group P), approximately 90 minutes before surgery.

Read the detailed description

Review of literature:

Benzodiazepines are among the most popular drugs used for preoperative medication to produce anxiolysis, amnesia, and sedation. However, they negatively influence sleep quality by decreasing the duration of REM sleep and slow wave sleep.

Alprazolam is more anxioselective than the more commonly used ones like midazolam, lorazepam and diazepam.Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) is an emerging premedicant as it possesses anxiolytic and sedative properties without impairing cognitive or psychomotor skills.5 Moreover, it has an excellent safety profile.

We designed this prospective randomized double blind placebo controlled study to assess whether addition of melatonin to alprazolam has any benefit over alprazolam, melatonin or placebo alone as a premedication agent.

Rationale of the study Melatonin facilitates sleep onset and improves the quality of sleep. On the other hand, benzodiazepines suppress endogenous melatonin levels and thus paradoxically increase episodes of arousal during sleep causing restlessness and hang over effects (fatigue).

Hence, the rationale of using melatonin alprazolam combination is melatonin may decrease nocturnal arousal and promote the perception of sound sleep and thus reverse this unwanted side effect of alprazolam. Melatonin does not produce amnesia and adding a benzodiazepine to it may be desirable to achieve this desirable premedication effect.

Research design and methodology:

After getting approval from the institutional research ethics committee and written informed consent, we will study eighty patients. With the help of computer generated random numbers, patients will be assigned to one of the four groups (n=20) to receive vitamin B (Group P), 0.5 mg alprazolam (Group A), 3mg melatonin (Group M) or a combination of 0.5 mg alprazolam and 3 mg melatonin (Group AM) approximately 90 minutes before surgery. In addition to the study drugs, Groups A and AM will also receive vitamin B.

On the preanaesthetic visit one day prior to surgery, the patients will be explained about the nature of the study and the various scales to be used. A 10 cm linear Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as well as Nepali version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) will be used to assess their anxiety level. The extremes of the VAS anxiety scale will be marked as 'no anxiety' at the 0 end and 'anxiety as bad as ever can be' at the 10 cm end. Sedation will be assessed with a 5 point scale (0=alert, 1=arouses to voice, 2=arouses with gentle tactile stimulation, 3=arouses with vigorous tactile stimulation, 4=lack of responsiveness) and orientation, with a 3 point scale (0=none, 1=orientation in either time or place, 2=orientation in both). To test for the memory, recall of 5 different simple pictures and 2 events will be assessed. Pictures to be used will be sequentially numbered on the back and their names printed on the front.

Approximately 2 hours prior to surgery, each patient will be taken to a quiet room. Non invasive blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and SpO2 will be monitored. Then picture 1 (cup on a plate) and 2 (fruits) will be shown at 10 min before and just prior to the drug administration respectively. Patients will be asked to take the study medication orally with 15 ml of plain water according to the group assignment by an investigator not involved in the patient management and data collection thereafter. Then anxiety, sedation and orientation will be assessed at 15 min, 30 min and 1 hour after the drug administration. At these time points pictures 3 (bird), 4 (hare) and 5 (car) will also be shown respectively.

In the operating room, intravenous access will be secured and pethidine 1 mg/kg administered. Then intravenous lidocaine 20 mg bolus will be administered followed by propofol with infusion pump at 100 ml per hour till responses to verbal command and eyelash reflex are lost. Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg and isoflurane in oxygen will be administered to maintain the adequate depth of anaesthesia. After intubation, ventilation will be adjusted to maintain normocapnia. Incremental doses of pethidine and vecuronium will be administered as needed on the discretion of the investigator blinded to the patient's group assignment. No other analgesics will be administered. After completion of surgery, intravenous neostigmine 50 microgram/kg and glycopyrrolate 10 microgram/kg will be given to reverse muscle paralysis. Anaesthesia time (induction to emergence) will be noted.

In the recovery room, patients will receive the standard postoperative care; including oxygen administration via face mask 6 L/min and monitoring of heart rate, respiratory rate, non invasive blood pressure and SpO2. Modified Aldrete score and sedation score will be assessed at 10 min and 30 min after extubation. Also the occurrence of nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache and restlessness will be recorded till 24 hours. Vomiting will be managed with ondansetron 4 mg intravenously.

The next day, the patients will be asked if they recalled the two events; being transported to operating room and intravenous cannula being inserted. They will also be asked to have a free recall of the five pictures they were shown and the score will represent the numbers of pictures they recalled. Then the first five pictures that they were shown will be mixed with next 5 new pictures (of a horse, shoe, bicycle, elephant and tiger) and they will be asked to recognize those they had already seen. The score will represent the number of pictures correctly identified. They will also be asked whether they felt that premedication drug is required to relieve anxiety and also whether they would like to receive the same premedication drug in the future.

Statistical analysis: Data will be tested for normal distribution using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To identify differences between groups, one-way ANOVA will be used for normally distributed continuing data and chi square tests for categorical data. If the data is found to be not normally distributed; they will be analyzed with nonparametric statistical methods. Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance followed by Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction will be used for within-group comparison of values between different time points. Kruskal Wallis tests with post hoc multiple comparisons by Mann Whitney U test will be used for the comparison of values between the groups at each time points. Parametric data will be expressed as the mean±SD and nonparametric data as median (interquartile range). A p value \<0.05 will be considered significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety

Keywords

  • premedication
  • premedicants
  • preoperative anxiety
  • melatonin
  • alprazolam
03

In context

Lead sponsor

B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • (ASA 1\&2),
  • aging 18 to 65 years
  • having anxiety VAS score of more than 2
  • posted for general anaesthesia with estimated duration of \< 3 hours.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients taking analgesics, sedatives, antiepileptics or antidepressants,
  • suffering from obesity (BMI ≥ 28) or neuropsychiatric disease,
  • having allergy to the study drugs
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Melatonin

    Premedication with 3 mg melatonin (Meloset) tablet orally 1-2 hour prior to anesthesia

    Drug: meloset (melatonin)

  • Placebo comparator
    melatonin and alprazolam premedication

    Premedication with 3 mg melatonin and 0.5 mg alprazolam (Stresnil) tablet orally 1-2 hrs prior to anesthesia

    Drug: stresnil ( melatonin and alprazolam)

  • Placebo comparator
    alprazolam premedication

    Premedication with 0.5 mg alprazolam (Alprax) tablet orally 1-2 hr prior to anesthesia

    Drug: (alprax) alprazolam

  • Active comparator
    placebo premedication

    Premedication with a similar looking placebo tablet orally 1-2 hr prior to anesthesia

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Drugmeloset (melatonin)

    3 mg melatonin tablet 1-2 hour prior surgery

  • Drugstresnil ( melatonin and alprazolam)

    3 mg melatonin and 0.5 mg alprazolam 1-2 hr before anesthesia

  • Drug(alprax) alprazolam

    0.5 mg alprazolam

  • Drugplacebo

    similar looking placebo tablet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline After Premedication

    VAS (Visual Analogue Score) Anxiety Scale is a 10 cm long scale with two sides, the patient side (front) and the clinicians side (back). The extremes of the front are colored as white and black with a gradual darkening of color from white to black. The back is marked in centimeter from 0 to 10 and 0 correlates with white color (no anxiety at all) and 10 correlates to black color (anxiety as bad as ever can be) on the front. As anxiety is worsened, the color is darker and score is more. The maximum score is 10 and minimum 0. The patient is asked to point on the scale according to his anxiety level. The anxiety score is the correlating number on the clinicians side. The more the reduction in anxiety from baseline, the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in VAS anxiety score at 15 minutes after premedication

  2. Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline at 30 Minutes After Premedication

    VAS (Visual Analogue Score) Anxiety Scale is a 10 cm long scale with two sides, the patient side (front) and the clinicians side (back). The extremes of the front are colored as white and black with a gradual darkening of color from white to black. The back is marked in centimeter from 0 to 10 and 0 correlates with white color (no anxiety at all) and 10 correlates to black color (anxiety as bad as ever can be) on the front. As anxiety is worsened, the color is darker and score is more. The maximum score is 10 and minimum 0. The patient is asked to point on the scale according to his anxiety level. The anxiety score is the correlating number on the clinicians side. The more the reduction in anxiety from baseline, the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline in VAS anxiety score at 30 minutes after premedication

  3. Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline at One Hour After Premedication

    VAS (Visual Analogue Score) Anxiety Scale is a 10 cm long scale with two sides, the patient side (front) and the clinicians side (back). The extremes of the front are colored as white and black with a gradual darkening of color from white to black. The back is marked in centimeter from 0 to 10 and 0 correlates with white color (no anxiety at all) and 10 correlates to black color (anxiety as bad as ever can be) on the front. As anxiety is worsened, the color is darker and score is more. The maximum score is 10 and minimum 0. The patient is asked to point on the scale according to his anxiety level. The anxiety score is the correlating number on the clinicians side. The more the reduction in anxiety from baseline, the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline in VAS anxiety score at one hour after premedication

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sedation Score at One Hour After Premedication

    Sedation level was assessed with a 5 point scale (0=alert, 1=arouses to voice, 2=arouses with gentle tactile stimulation, 3=arouses with vigorous tactile stimulation, 4=lack of responsiveness). Minimum score is 0 and Maximum is 4. The lesser the score, the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Sedation score at 1 hour after the premedication

  2. Orientation Score

    Orientation was assessed with a 3 point scale (0=none, 1=orientation in either time or place, 2=orientation in both). Minimum score is 0 and maximum is 2. The lesser the score, the lesser the effect on patients cognition and the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Orientation score at one hour after premedication

  3. Number of Patients With Intact Memory

    Number of patients who recalled or recognized the picture number five shown one hour after premedication. The more the number of patients with intact memory, the better the outcome.

    Time frame: 24 hour after surgery

  4. Amount of Propofol Consumption

    Dose of propofol needed for loss of response to verbal command was noted at the time of induction of general anesthesia. The lesser the propofol needed for the loss of response to verbal command, the better the outcome.

    Time frame: 1 - 2 hour after premedication

  5. Number of Patients With Loss of Memory for Being Transferred to Operating Room.

    Patients were asked whether they recalled the event of being transferred to the operating room before anaesthesia. The lesser the number of patients with amnesia, the better the outcome.

    Time frame: 24 hour after surgery

07

Results

Posted Oct 5, 2012
Limitations and caveats
The study was not designed to measure drug plasma concentrations. We did not perform a battery of tests to evaluate psychomotor and amnesic performances. We only did an orientation score and assessed delayed visual episodic memory.

Participant flow

Recruitment period was of three months. Approximately 90 minutes prior to surgery, each patient was taken to a quiet room inside the operation theater complex.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlacebo
Started20202020
Completed20191818
Not completed0122

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline After Premedication

VAS (Visual Analogue Score) Anxiety Scale is a 10 cm long scale with two sides, the patient side (front) and the clinicians side (back). The extremes of the front are colored as white and black with a gradual darkening of color from white to black. The back is marked in centimeter from 0 to 10 and 0 correlates with white color (no anxiety at all) and 10 correlates to black color (anxiety as bad as ever can be) on the front. As anxiety is worsened, the color is darker and score is more. The maximum score is 10 and minimum 0. The patient is asked to point on the scale according to his anxiety level. The anxiety score is the correlating number on the clinicians side. The more the reduction in anxiety from baseline, the better the outcome.

Time frame:
Change from baseline in VAS anxiety score at 15 minutes after premedication
Reported as:
Mean · Centimeter
Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline After Premedication
CentimeterMelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlacebo
Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline After Premedication0.35 ± 0.80.70 ± 1.60.65 ± 1.20.25 ± 0.8
SecondarySedation Score at One Hour After Premedication

Sedation level was assessed with a 5 point scale (0=alert, 1=arouses to voice, 2=arouses with gentle tactile stimulation, 3=arouses with vigorous tactile stimulation, 4=lack of responsiveness). Minimum score is 0 and Maximum is 4. The lesser the score, the better the outcome.

Time frame:
Sedation score at 1 hour after the premedication
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Sedation Score at One Hour After Premedication
units on a scaleMelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlacebo
Sedation Score at One Hour After Premedication0.5 (0 to 1)1 (1 to 2.75)1 (0 to 1.75)0 (0 to 1)
SecondaryOrientation Score

Orientation was assessed with a 3 point scale (0=none, 1=orientation in either time or place, 2=orientation in both). Minimum score is 0 and maximum is 2. The lesser the score, the lesser the effect on patients cognition and the better the outcome.

Time frame:
Orientation score at one hour after premedication
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Orientation Score
units on a scaleMelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlacebo
Orientation Score2 (2 to 2)2 (2 to 2)2 (2 to 2)2 (2 to 2)
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Intact Memory

Number of patients who recalled or recognized the picture number five shown one hour after premedication. The more the number of patients with intact memory, the better the outcome.

Time frame:
24 hour after surgery
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Patients With Intact Memory
ParticipantsMelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlacebo
Number of Patients With Intact Memory134514
SecondaryAmount of Propofol Consumption

Dose of propofol needed for loss of response to verbal command was noted at the time of induction of general anesthesia. The lesser the propofol needed for the loss of response to verbal command, the better the outcome.

Time frame:
1 - 2 hour after premedication
Reported as:
Mean · mg
Amount of Propofol Consumption
mgMelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlacebo
Amount of Propofol Consumption79.2 ± 465.5 ± 2159.0 ± 2175.8 ± 25
PrimaryChange in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline at 30 Minutes After Premedication

VAS (Visual Analogue Score) Anxiety Scale is a 10 cm long scale with two sides, the patient side (front) and the clinicians side (back). The extremes of the front are colored as white and black with a gradual darkening of color from white to black. The back is marked in centimeter from 0 to 10 and 0 correlates with white color (no anxiety at all) and 10 correlates to black color (anxiety as bad as ever can be) on the front. As anxiety is worsened, the color is darker and score is more. The maximum score is 10 and minimum 0. The patient is asked to point on the scale according to his anxiety level. The anxiety score is the correlating number on the clinicians side. The more the reduction in anxiety from baseline, the better the outcome.

Time frame:
Changes from baseline in VAS anxiety score at 30 minutes after premedication
Reported as:
Mean · centimeter
Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline at 30 Minutes After Premedication
centimeterMelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlacebo
Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline at 30 Minutes After Premedication1.15 ± 1.41.72 ± 2.21.62 ± 1.60.82 ± 1.6
PrimaryChange in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline at One Hour After Premedication

VAS (Visual Analogue Score) Anxiety Scale is a 10 cm long scale with two sides, the patient side (front) and the clinicians side (back). The extremes of the front are colored as white and black with a gradual darkening of color from white to black. The back is marked in centimeter from 0 to 10 and 0 correlates with white color (no anxiety at all) and 10 correlates to black color (anxiety as bad as ever can be) on the front. As anxiety is worsened, the color is darker and score is more. The maximum score is 10 and minimum 0. The patient is asked to point on the scale according to his anxiety level. The anxiety score is the correlating number on the clinicians side. The more the reduction in anxiety from baseline, the better the outcome.

Time frame:
Changes from baseline in VAS anxiety score at one hour after premedication
Reported as:
Mean · Centimeter
Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline at One Hour After Premedication
CentimeterMelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlacebo
Change in VAS Anxiety Score Relative to Baseline at One Hour After Premedication1.80 ± 1.72.92 ± 2.32.35 ± 2.10.85 ± 1.9
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Loss of Memory for Being Transferred to Operating Room.

Patients were asked whether they recalled the event of being transferred to the operating room before anaesthesia. The lesser the number of patients with amnesia, the better the outcome.

Time frame:
24 hour after surgery
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Patients With Loss of Memory for Being Transferred to Operating Room.
ParticipantsMelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlacebo
Number of Patients With Loss of Memory for Being Transferred to Operating Room.1540

Adverse events

Collected over 24 hours after premedication. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Melatonin—0/20 (0%)13/20 (65%)
Melatonin and Alprazolam—0/19 (0%)12/19 (63.2%)
Alprazolam—0/18 (0%)14/18 (77.8%)
Placebo—0/18 (0%)16/18 (88.9%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlacebo
RestlessnessGeneral disorders6/207/199/188/18
Nausea and VomitingGastrointestinal disorders6/207/198/189/18
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/204/193/185/18
DizzinessNervous system disorders5/203/192/184/18

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)MelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlaceboTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years2020202080
>=65 years00000
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)MelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlaceboTotal
Mean33.8 ± 10.938.0 ± 13.536.9 ± 10.036.2 ± 12.936 ± 12
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlaceboTotal
Female1614161561
Male464519
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)MelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlaceboTotal
Nepal2020202080
Vas baseline (cm)
Vas baseline (cm)(centimeters)MelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlaceboTotal
Median5 (4 to 6)5 (3.6 to 6)5 (4.2 to 7)5 (4 to 6)5 (4 to 6)
Anaesthesia time
Anaesthesia time(minutes)MelatoninMelatonin and AlprazolamAlprazolamPlaceboTotal
Mean65.8 ± 18.177.2 ± 34.373.7 ± 21.071.7 ± 17.671.6 ± 23.7
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
    Dharan, Koshi 56700, Nepal
  • Dr Krishna Pokharel
    Dharan, Koshi 56700, Nepal
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Naguib M, Samarkandi AH, Moniem MA, Mansour Eel-D, Alshaer AA, Al-Ayyaf HA, Fadin A, Alharby SW. The effects of melatonin premedication on propofol and thiopental induction dose-response curves: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2006 Dec;103(6):1448-52. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000244534.24216.3a. PubMed 17122221 ↗
  • Naguib M, Samarkandi AH. The comparative dose-response effects of melatonin and midazolam for premedication of adult patients: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2000 Aug;91(2):473-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200008000-00046. PubMed 10910871 ↗
  • Naguib M, Samarkandi AH. Premedication with melatonin: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with midazolam. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Jun;82(6):875-80. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.6.875. PubMed 10562782 ↗
  • De Witte JL, Alegret C, Sessler DI, Cammu G. Preoperative alprazolam reduces anxiety in ambulatory surgery patients: a comparison with oral midazolam. Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1601-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00024. PubMed 12456424 ↗
  • Seabra ML, Bignotto M, Pinto LR Jr, Tufik S. Randomized, double-blind clinical trial, controlled with placebo, of the toxicology of chronic melatonin treatment. J Pineal Res. 2000 Nov;29(4):193-200. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0633.2002.290401.x. PubMed 11068941 ↗
  • Wade AG, Ford I, Crawford G, McMahon AD, Nir T, Laudon M, Zisapel N. Efficacy of prolonged release melatonin in insomnia patients aged 55-80 years: quality of sleep and next-day alertness outcomes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Oct;23(10):2597-605. doi: 10.1185/030079907X233098. PubMed 17875243 ↗
  • Wurtman RJ, Zhdanova I. Improvement of sleep quality by melatonin. Lancet. 1995 Dec 2;346(8988):1491. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92509-0. No abstract available. PubMed 7491013 ↗
  • Pokharel K, Tripathi M, Gupta PK, Bhattarai B, Khatiwada S, Subedi A. Premedication with oral alprazolam and melatonin combination: a comparison with either alone--a randomized controlled factorial trial. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:356964. doi: 10.1155/2014/356964. Epub 2014 Jan 12. PubMed 24527443 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 5, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01486615
Lead sponsor
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
Responsible party
Krishna Pokharel (Associate Professor, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 6, 2011
Start date
Oct 2011
Primary completion
Jan 2012
Completion
Jan 2012
Results posted
Oct 5, 2012
Last update
Oct 5, 2012

Study contacts

Krishna Pokharel, MD
principal investigator · B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
Balkrishna Bhattarai, MD
study director · B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion