CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01476475Updated Feb 10, 2017Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Combination Versus Insulin Glargine Alone on Top of Metformin in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

A Phase 2 interventional study of Insulin glargine /lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination and Insulin glargine in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Sanofi. Completed at 70 sites in 13 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-10.

Sponsored by Sanofi · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
323
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Objective:

  • The purpose of this study was to compare insulin glargine/ lixisenatide fixed ratio combination (FRC) versus insulin glargine on glycemic control over 24 weeks, as evaluated by glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction in type 2 diabetic participants treated with metformin.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To compare insulin glargine/lixisenatide FRC versus insulin glargine over 24 weeks on:

    • Glycemic control in relation to a meal as evaluated by post-prandial plasma glucose and glucose excursions during a standardized meal test;
    • Percentage of participants reaching HbA1c \<7% or ≤6.5%;
    • 7-point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) profile;
    • Body weight;
    • Insulin glargine dose
    • Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG);
    • Percentage of participants requiring rescue therapy during the 24-week open label treatment period;
  • To assess safety and tolerability of insulin glargine/lixisenatide FRC.
Read the detailed description

Approximately 27 weeks including a 24-week treatment period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,359 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 323 is above the median of 80 across 7,525 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanofi is the lead sponsor of 1,508 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 198 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed for at least 1 year.
  • Metformin treatment at a stable dose of at least 1.5 g/day for at least 3 months prior to screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Age \< legal age of adulthood (18 years).
  • Screening HbA1c \<7% or >10%.
  • Screening FPG >250 mg/dL (>13.9 mmol/L).
  • Pregnancy or lactation, women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method.
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus.
  • Treatment with glucose-lowering agent(s) other than metformin in a period of 3 months prior to screening.
  • Use of insulin within the last 6 months.
  • Previous use of insulin, except for episode(s) of short-term treatment (≤15 consecutive days) due to intercurrent illness.
  • Amylase and/or lipase >3 times the upper limit of the normal laboratory range (ULN) at screening.
  • Calcitonin ≥20 pg/ml (5.9 pmol/l) at screening.
  • Alanine Transferase (ALT) >3 ULN at screening.
  • History of unexplained pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy.
  • Personal or immediate family history of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) or genetic conditions that predisposes to MTC (e.g. multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes).
  • Uncontrolled or inadequately controlled hypertension at the time of screening with a resting supine systolic or diastolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or >110 mmHg, respectively.
  • Within the last 6 months prior to screening: history of heart failure requiring hospitalization, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation procedures.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤20 or >40 kg/m\^2.
  • Any previous treatment with lixisenatide

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
323 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Insulin glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)

    FRC injected once daily (QD) for 24 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.

    Drug: Insulin glargine /lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination · Drug: Metformin (Background drug)

  • Active comparator
    Insulin glargine

    Insulin glargine QD for 24 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.

    Drug: Insulin glargine · Drug: Metformin (Background drug)

Interventions

  • DrugInsulin glargine /lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination

    FRC was self-administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection within 1 hour before breakfast using pen-type injector (Tactipen®): 100 U/ml insulin glargine and 50 mcg Lixisenatide (ratio of 2 U/1 mcg). The initial dose was 10 U/5 mcg and then dose was adjusted weekly to reach and maintain fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) of 80 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL (4.4 mmol/L to 5.6 mmol/L.

    Also known as: (HOE901/AVE0010)

  • DrugInsulin glargine

    Insulin glargine (100 U/ml) was self-administered by SC injection before breakfast using pen-type injector (Lantus® Solostar®). The initial daily dose of insulin glargine was 10 U and then dose was adjusted weekly to reach and maintain fasting SMPG of 80 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL (4.4 mmol/L to 5.6 mmol/L).

    Also known as: Lantus

  • DrugMetformin (Background drug)

    Pharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: oral administration. To be kept at stable dose (≥1.5 g/day) throughout the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24

    Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 14 days after the last injection of investigational medicinal product (IMP).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) From Baseline to Week 24

    The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  2. Change in 2-hour Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 24

    2-hour plasma glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of the meal and before IMP administration. Change in plasma glucose excursion was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  3. Change in Average 7-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles From Baseline to Week 24

    Participants recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2-hours after each meal and at bedtime, over a single day, once in a week before baseline, before visit Week 12 and before visit Week 24 and the average value across the profiles performed in the week before a visit for the 7-time points was calculated. Change in average 7-point SMPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  4. Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24

    Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 3 days after the last injection of IMP.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  5. Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Week 24

    Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

    Time frame: Week 24

  6. Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 24

    Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 1 day after the last injection of IMP.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  7. Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During 24-week Treatment Period

    Routine fasting SMPG and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceed the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) were performed. Threshold values from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG \>240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 30: fasting SMPG/FPG \>200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c \>8%.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

  8. Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤6.5 % or <7.0 % at Week 24

    On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 14 days after the last injection of IMP.

    Time frame: Week 24

  9. Change in 30-minute and 1-hour PPG From Baseline to Week 24

    The 30 minute and 1-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 30 minutes and 1-hour after eating a standardized meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  10. Change in 30 Minute and 1-hour Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 24

    30-minute and 1-hour plasma glucose excursion = 30-minute and 1-hour PPG minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of the meal and before IMP administration. Change in plasma glucose excursion was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  11. Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% at Week 24 With no Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During 24-week Treatment Period

    Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). Participants without any post-baseline on-treatment value for HbA1c were counted as non-responders if they experienced at least one documented symptomatic hypoglycemia before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 1 day after the last injection of IMP. Otherwise, they were counted as missing data. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 14 days after the last injection of IMP.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

  12. Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% With no Body Weight Gain at Week 24

    Participants without any post-baseline on-treatment values (for HbA1c and body weight) that were no more than 30 days apart were counted as non-responders if at least one of the components (for HbA1c and body weight) was available and showed non-response. Otherwise, they were counted as missing data.

    Time frame: Week 24

  13. Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

    Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. These episodes were associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure, unconsciousness or coma. All episodes in which neurological impairment was severe enough to prevent self-treatment and which were thought to place participants at risk for injury to themselves or others.

    Time frame: First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration (maximum of 219 days)

07

Results

Posted Feb 10, 2017

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 70 centers in 13 countries. A total of 520 participants were screened between November 21, 2011 and June 08, 2012. Out of 520 participants, 197 were screen failure; main reason for screen failure was that glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values were out of the protocol defined range.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Started161162
Completed150159
Not completed113
Withdrew: Adverse event60
Withdrew: Poor compliance to protocol11
Withdrew: Other reasons42

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24

Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 14 days after the last injection of investigational medicinal product (IMP).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of hemoglobin
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24
percentage of hemoglobinInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24-1.82 ± 0.058-1.64 ± 0.057
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · ANCOVA · Least square (ls) mean difference: -0.17 · 95% CI -0.312 to -0.037Insulin glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · ANCOVA · p = 0.0130 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Ls mean difference: -0.17 · 95% CI -0.312 to -0.037Insulin glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
SecondaryChange in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) From Baseline to Week 24

The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmol/L
Change in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) From Baseline to Week 24
mmol/LInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Change in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) From Baseline to Week 24-7.49 ± 0.283-4.33 ± 0.274
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Ls mean difference: -3.17 · 95% CI -3.832 to -2.504Insulin glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
SecondaryChange in 2-hour Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 24

2-hour plasma glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of the meal and before IMP administration. Change in plasma glucose excursion was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmol/L
Change in 2-hour Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 24
mmol/LInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Change in 2-hour Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 24-3.91 ± 0.277-0.67 ± 0.269
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Ls mean difference: -3.24 · 95% CI -3.895 to -2.592Insulin glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
SecondaryChange in Average 7-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles From Baseline to Week 24

Participants recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2-hours after each meal and at bedtime, over a single day, once in a week before baseline, before visit Week 12 and before visit Week 24 and the average value across the profiles performed in the week before a visit for the 7-time points was calculated. Change in average 7-point SMPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmol/L
Change in Average 7-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles From Baseline to Week 24
mmol/LInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Change in Average 7-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles From Baseline to Week 24-3.23 ± 0.104-2.93 ± 0.101
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · ANCOVA · p = 0.0154 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Ls mean difference: -0.30 · 95% CI -0.550 to -0.058Insulin glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
SecondaryChange in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24

Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 3 days after the last injection of IMP.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kg
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24
kgInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24-0.97 ± 0.2890.48 ± 0.282
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Ls mean difference: -1.44 · 95% CI -2.110 to -0.773Insulin glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
SecondaryAverage Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Week 24

Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units (U)
Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Week 24
Units (U)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Week 2436.08 ± 1.41539.32 ± 1.384
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · ANCOVA · p = 0.0583 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Ls mean difference: -3.24 · 95% CI -6.592 to 0.114Insulin glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
SecondaryChange in FPG From Baseline to Week 24

Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 1 day after the last injection of IMP.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmol/L
Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 24
mmol/LInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 24-3.35 ± 0.130-3.51 ± 0.128
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During 24-week Treatment Period

Routine fasting SMPG and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceed the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) were performed. Threshold values from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG \>240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 30: fasting SMPG/FPG \>200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c \>8%.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During 24-week Treatment Period
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During 24-week Treatment Period00.6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤6.5 % or <7.0 % at Week 24

On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 14 days after the last injection of IMP.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤6.5 % or <7.0 % at Week 24
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
HbA1c ≤6.5%71.964.6
HbA1c <7.0%84.478.3
SecondaryChange in 30-minute and 1-hour PPG From Baseline to Week 24

The 30 minute and 1-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 30 minutes and 1-hour after eating a standardized meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmol/L
Change in 30-minute and 1-hour PPG From Baseline to Week 24
mmol/LInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
30-minute PPG (n=151, 153)-5.01 ± 0.194-3.76 ± 0.187
1-hour PPG (n=150, 153)-5.94 ± 0.246-4.10 ± 0.239
SecondaryChange in 30 Minute and 1-hour Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 24

30-minute and 1-hour plasma glucose excursion = 30-minute and 1-hour PPG minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of the meal and before IMP administration. Change in plasma glucose excursion was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmol/L
Change in 30 Minute and 1-hour Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 24
mmol/LInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
30-minute plasma glucose excursion (n=151, 152)-1.47 ± 0.156-0.05 ± 0.151
1-hour plasma glucose excursion (n=150, 152)-2.34 ± 0.233-0.44 ± 0.226
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% at Week 24 With no Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During 24-week Treatment Period

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). Participants without any post-baseline on-treatment value for HbA1c were counted as non-responders if they experienced at least one documented symptomatic hypoglycemia before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 1 day after the last injection of IMP. Otherwise, they were counted as missing data. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 14 days after the last injection of IMP.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% at Week 24 With no Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During 24-week Treatment Period
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% at Week 24 With no Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During 24-week Treatment Period67.559.0
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% With no Body Weight Gain at Week 24

Participants without any post-baseline on-treatment values (for HbA1c and body weight) that were no more than 30 days apart were counted as non-responders if at least one of the components (for HbA1c and body weight) was available and showed non-response. Otherwise, they were counted as missing data.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% With no Body Weight Gain at Week 24
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% With no Body Weight Gain at Week 2456.337.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. These episodes were associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure, unconsciousness or coma. All episodes in which neurological impairment was severe enough to prevent self-treatment and which were thought to place participants at risk for injury to themselves or others.

Time frame:
First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration (maximum of 219 days)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine (Lantus® SoloSTAR®)
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia21.722.8
Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia0.00.0

Adverse events

Collected over All Adverse events (AEs) were collected from signature of the informed consent from up to the final visit (Week 24) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination—9/161 (5.6%)26/161 (16.1%)
Insulin Glargine—6/162 (3.7%)21/162 (13%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent serious events
EventInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/1610/162
Ovarian cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1610/162
Diabetic neuropathyNervous system disorders1/1610/162
SciaticaNervous system disorders1/1610/162
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders1/1610/162
Angina unstableCardiac disorders1/1610/162
BradycardiaCardiac disorders1/1610/162
Intervertebral disc protrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1610/162
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1610/162
Calculus uretericRenal and urinary disorders1/1610/162
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders12/1610/162
HeadacheNervous system disorders8/16112/162
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations9/1619/162

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineTotal
Mean56.9 ± 9.556.6 ± 9.456.7 ± 9.4
Gender
Gender(Participants)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineTotal
Female8177158
Male8085165
Race
Race(participants)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineTotal
Caucasian/White158160318
Black213
Asian/Oriental112
Ethnicity
Ethnicity(participants)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineTotal
Hispanic353065
Non Hispanic126132258
Screening HbA1c
Screening HbA1c(percentage of haemoglobin)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineTotal
Mean8.12 ± 0.808.08 ± 0.778.10 ± 0.78
Baseline BMI
Baseline BMI(kg/m^2)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineTotal
Mean32.24 ± 4.7532.02 ± 4.3532.13 ± 4.55
Duration of Diabetes
Duration of Diabetes(years)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineTotal
Mean6.29 ± 4.297.10 ± 5.276.69 ± 4.82
Daily Dose of Metformin
Daily Dose of Metformin(mg)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineTotal
Mean2075.8 ± 440.72093.7 ± 415.52084.8 ± 427.7

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

70 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 840408
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840412
    Paramount, California 90723, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840401
    Larenceville, Georgia 30045, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840417
    Roswell, Georgia 30076, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840403
    Lexington, Kentucky 40504, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840404
    Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840405
    Rockville, Maryland 20852, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840411
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89148, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840415
    West Seneca, New York 14224, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840402
    Norman, Oklahoma 73069, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840407
    Medford, Oregon 97504, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840413
    Durham, Pennsylvania 27713, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840410
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840414
    Renton, Washington 98055, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 152404
    Santiago, 7500347, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number 152405
    Santiago, 7500347, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number 152403
    Santiago, 7500710, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number 152401
    Santiago, 7980378, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number 152402
    Santiago, 8320000, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number 203403
    Novy Jicin, 74101, Czech Republic
  • Investigational Site Number 203401
    Plzen, 32600, Czech Republic
  • Investigational Site Number 203402
    Praha 2, 12808, Czech Republic
  • Investigational Site Number 203405
    Praha 8, 18100, Czech Republic
  • Investigational Site Number 208401
    København Nv, 2400, Denmark
  • Investigational Site Number 208404
    Køge, 4600, Denmark
  • Investigational Site Number 208402
    Slagelse, 4200, Denmark
  • Investigational Site Number 208403
    Svendborg, 5700, Denmark
  • Investigational Site Number 250402
    Narbonne, 11018, France
  • Investigational Site Number 250404
    Poitiers Cedex, 86021, France
  • Investigational Site Number 250401
    Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, 54511, France
  • Investigational Site Number 276401
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 276402
    Ludwigshafen, 67059, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 276403
    Oberhausen, 46045, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 348401
    Balatonfüred, 8230, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 348405
    Budapest, 1041, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 348406
    Budapest, 1212, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 348404
    Debrecen, 4043, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 348402
    Szeged, 6720, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 348403
    Szeged, 6722, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 440401
    Kaunas, LT-49456, Lithuania
  • Investigational Site Number 440402
    Kaunas, LT-51270, Lithuania
  • Investigational Site Number 440403
    Kedainiai, LT-57164, Lithuania
  • Investigational Site Number 440404
    Klaipeda, LT-92304, Lithuania
  • Investigational Site Number 484404
    Acapulco, 39670, Mexico
  • Investigational Site Number 484401
    Cuernavaca, 62250, Mexico
  • Investigational Site Number 484405
    Durango, 34270, Mexico
  • Investigational Site Number 484402
    Guadalajara, 44210, Mexico
  • Investigational Site Number 484403
    Guadalajara, 44656, Mexico
  • Investigational Site Number 616405
    Bialystok, 15-435, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 616406
    Gdansk, 80-847, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 616403
    Krakow, 31-548, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 616407
    Lodz, 94-074, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 616404
    Pulawy, 24-100, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 616402
    Szczecin, 70-506, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 616401
    Warszawa, 02-507, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 642402
    Brasov, 500365, Romania
  • Investigational Site Number 642403
    Bucuresti, 020475, Romania
  • Investigational Site Number 642405
    Iasi, 700547, Romania
  • Investigational Site Number 642401
    Oradea, 410169, Romania
  • Investigational Site Number 642406
    Targu Mures, 540142, Romania
  • Investigational Site Number 642404
    Timisoara, 300133, Romania
  • Investigational Site Number 703402
    Bratislava, 85101, Slovakia
  • Investigational Site Number 703403
    Kosice, 04001, Slovakia
  • Investigational Site Number 703406
    Kosice, 04013, Slovakia
  • Investigational Site Number 703404
    Moldava Nad Bodvou, 04525, Slovakia
  • Investigational Site Number 703405
    Nitra, 94911, Slovakia
  • Investigational Site Number 703401
    Zilina, 01001, Slovakia
  • Investigational Site Number 752402
    Skellefteå, 931 32, Sweden
  • Investigational Site Number 752401
    Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
  • Investigational Site Number 752403
    Växjö, 351 85, Sweden
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rosenstock J, Diamant M, Aroda VR, Silvestre L, Souhami E, Zhou T, Perfetti R, Fonseca V; LixiLan PoC Study Group. Efficacy and Safety of LixiLan, a Titratable Fixed-Ratio Combination of Lixisenatide and Insulin Glargine, Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Metformin Monotherapy: The LixiLan Proof-of-Concept Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Sep;39(9):1579-86. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0046. Epub 2016 Jun 9. PubMed 27284114 ↗

Related links

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01476475
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 22, 2011
Start date
Nov 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2012
Completion
Dec 2012
Results posted
Feb 10, 2017
Last update
Feb 10, 2017

Study contacts

Clinical Sciences & Operations
study director · Sanofi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion