CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01472354LEAP-CUpdated May 30, 2013

Feasibility of a Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Decision-Making Intervention Among HIV-infected Adults

An interventional study of Leap-c group intervention in Hepatitis c, sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-05-30.

Sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the LEAP-C (learning, experiencing and preparing for hepatitis C treatment) study is to see if a brief (4-week) small group intervention will help people with HIV/HCV co-infection make an informed decision about Hepatitis C treatment.

Read the detailed description

Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection is a major problem for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-infected patients. Without HCV treatment, increasing numbers of HIV positive patients will die either from end stage liver disease or from HIV-related complications because of the inability to use antiretroviral agents due their hepatotoxicity. Major advances in understanding HCV treatment in this population have occurred within the past several years. Yet, only a small proportion of co-infected patients receive HCV treatment (approximately 15%). Moreover, few studies have explored patient decision-making related to HCV treatment in HIV co-infected patients. The major gap in our knowledge is how best to support patients as they engage in the HCV treatment decision making process with their health care provider. Therefore, the purpose of this phase II study is to test the feasibility of conducting a theoretically-derived group intervention with HIV/HCV co-infected adults to support active engagement in HCV treatment decision-making. The primary aims are to: (1) determine the feasibility of recruiting and retaining a sample of HIV/HCV co-infected adults to complete a protocol that involves randomization into the 4-week HCV Positive Life Skills group intervention or usual care and completion of two data collection interviews (at baseline and week 12), (2) establish the preliminary effect size of the HCV Positive Life Skills group intervention on HCV knowledge, decisional conflict, patient-provider communication, health-related quality of life, symptom experience and engagement with health care providers, (3) explore the capacity of the group intervention to influence HCV knowledge, decisional conflict, patient-provider communication, engagement with health care providers, health related quality of life and symptom experience and (4) describe the components of the intervention and usual care (through qualitative interviews) that are most useful for helping HIV/HCV co-infected patients engage in decision-making about HCV treatment. A mixed method approach will be used. 50 HIV/HCV co-infected participants will be randomized equally to receive either the group intervention or usual care. Then qualitative interviews, using qualitative descriptive methods, will be conducted with 10-12 participants to identify the most salient parts of the intervention and usual care that support effective decision-making about HCV treatment. The investigators will also compare the time spent with both groups, identify variability in the control condition, describe the number of subjects who start HCV treatment and further refine the intervention manual and intervention fidelity procedures in preparation for a full scale multi-site randomized clinical trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatitis c

Keywords

  • HIV
  • Hepatitis C
  • Decision-Making
  • chronic
03

In context

Hepatitis A

2,709 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis A; 142 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 100 across 1,886 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis A.

Browse Hepatitis A studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Massachusetts, Worcester is the lead sponsor of 288 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Men and Women (18 years of age or older) who have both HIV and chronic Hepatitis C (they need to have a detectable Hepatitis C viral load)

HIV/HCV co-infected adults who have NEVER started treatment

HIV/HCV co-infected adults who DO NOT have a MEDICAL reason that would make it dangerous to treat their hepatitis C (for example, severe cirrhosis already)

HIV/HCV co-infected adults who would be willing to be RANDOMIZED into a group session or standard of care (one on one care with a HCV provider)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Non-English Speaking

Children under age 18

HCV mono-infected adults

HIV/HCV co-infected adults who have received any HCV treatment

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of care referral to specialist

    Subjects are referred for education, counseling and evaluation for HCV treatment to a specialty health care provider

  • Experimental
    LEAP-C Group Intervention

    4-week group intervention to help HIV/HCV co-infected patients reframe negative appraisals associated with HCV treatment to decrease decisional conflict, increase HCV knowledge, improve communication

    Behavioral: Leap-c group intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralLeap-c group intervention

    4-week group intervention to help HIV/HCV co-infected patients reframe negative appraisals associated with hCV treatment, increase HCV knowledge, increase skills related to working with health care providers

    Also known as: LEAP-C

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Decrease in decisional conflict related to HCV treatment 12 weeks post treatment

    Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention decreased decisional conflict.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of subjects electing HCV treatment 6 months after enrollment in the feasibility study.

    Collect data on the study sample to determine the proportion of subjects who began HCV treatment 6 months after enrollment in the study.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Increase in knowledge related to HCV treatment 12 weeks post treatment

    Collect data at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention improved HCV-related knowledge.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

  3. Increase in communication between subject and health care provider from baseline to week 12.

    Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has improved the subjects' perception of communication with their health care provider.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

  4. Increase in subjects' health related quality of life from baseline to 12 weeks after study enrollment

    Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has improved subjects' perception of health related quality of life.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

  5. Number of symptoms experienced by HCV infected subjects from baseline to week 12

    Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has decreased the number of symptoms experienced by the research subjects.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

  6. Severity of symptoms experienced by HCV infected subjects from baseline to week 12

    Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has decreased the severity of symptoms experienced by the research subjects.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Massachusetts Graduate School of Nursing
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01472354
Lead sponsor
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Collaborators
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Responsible party
Carol Bova (Associate Professor, University of Massachusetts, Worcester) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 16, 2011
Start date
Oct 2010
Primary completion
Nov 2012
Completion
Nov 2012
Last update
May 30, 2013

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion