CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01466829PAATHUpdated Jun 2, 2014

Treatment With PTH After Sternotomy in Cardiac Surgery Patients

A Phase 3 interventional study of Parathyroid hormone and Placebo in Disruption or Dehiscence of Closure of Sternum or Sternotomy, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to male participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-02.

Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The aims of this study is to compare healing time and quality of newly formed bone in cardiac surgery patients treated with PTH post-surgically and a control group treated with saline.

Read the detailed description

Heart surgery is most commonly performed through a central division of the sternum, a sternotomy. This procedure provides full overview of the thoracic cavity and access to the organs within. At the department of Cardiothoracic \& Vascular Surgery at Skejby Hospital alone, over 1000 sternotomies are performed each year. When closing the sternum, the normal procedure is to use steel wires to hold the two sternal halves together. The patient receives no additional medical treatment to improve bone healing. Following surgery, sufficient healing of the sternum is important to prevent complications and to ensure a high level of life-quality for the patient. It has been shown that forces, equally to those produced during a normal cough, can displace the wire-fixated sternum by more than 2 mm. Reduced stability of the sternum has a negative impact on the healing process and increases the risk of infections. Another known complication to sternotomy is pseudoarthrosis (nonunion), which is caused by insufficient healing of the sternum and may result in instability, chronic pain and reduced quality of life. These complications result in prolonged admittance time, increased mortality and morbidity and from a financial point of view, increased treatment-costs for each patient.

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is a well known anabolic drug and has been used to treat osteoporosis in post-menopausal women with great effect. A continuous high level of PTH decreases bone density and induces hypercalcemia, but if given once daily PTH has an anabolic effect on bone. It is being investigated if it is possible to use PTH in the treatment of other conditions, for example in the treatment of bone fractures.

Several studies, both clinical and experimental, show that PTH advances healing time and increases the quality of newly formed bone. It has also been shown to enable healing in sternal nonunion in one case-study. A recent human study of 102 osteoporotic women, with fractures of their radial bone, showed that daily injection with 20µg of the PTH-analog PTH1-34 (Teriparatide) reduces the fracture healing time. The effect of PTH on bone healing in sternum after a sternotomy has not previously been investigated.

In this study, we aim to investigate the effect of PTH on sternal healing in a clinical setup.

02

Conditions studied

  • Disruption or Dehiscence of Closure of Sternum or Sternotomy

Keywords

  • sternotomy
  • parathyroid hormone
  • bone healing
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,274 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Full sternotomy
  • Not in chronic, systemic corticosteroid treatment.
  • No Plavix treatment 5 days prior to surgery
  • No known bone metabolic diseases.
  • Replete vitamin D status (plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D >50 nmol/l)
  • Normal serum levels of Calcium, Phosphate, inorganic, alkaline phosphatase (within reference interval).
  • No known risk of osteosarcoma.
  • Ability to understand and cooperate with the planned examinations.
  • Ability to speak and understand Danish.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Re-operation
  • Use of bone wax during surgery
  • Prior radiation therapy involving the skeleton
  • Severely impaired renal function.
  • Known allergic reactions to any of the compounds in the trial medication.
  • Current treatment with digoxin
  • Major medical or social problems that will be likely to preclude participation
  • Severely impaired lever function
  • Unknown raised levels of bone specific alkaline phosphatase.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    Control patients treated with placebo.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Intervention

    Daily injection with Parathyroid hormone

    Drug: Parathyroid hormone

Interventions

  • DrugParathyroid hormone

    100 microgram daily. S.c

    Also known as: Preotact®

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo; saline injection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Computer Tomography

    Change in density of the fracture in the sternum at different time frames compared with baseline at 6 weeks.

    Time frame: 6 weeks (± 1 week), 3 months (± 2 weeks) and 6 months (± 2 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Questionnaires

    Change of quality of life at different time frames compared with baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (± 1 week), 3 months (± 2 weeks), 6 months (± 2 weeks)

  2. Journal parameters

    Admission time, blood tests, cross-clamp time, bypass time, time of mechanical ventilation, duration of surgery, pacingwires, type of operation, treatment with bisphosphonates, treatment with steroids, COLD, use of analgetics.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (± 1 week), 3 months (± 2 weeks), 6 months (± 2 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dept. of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, AArhus University Hospital, Skejby
    Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01466829
Lead sponsor
University of Aarhus
Collaborators
Takeda, Aarhus University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 8, 2011
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Mar 2014
Completion
Mar 2014
Last update
Jun 2, 2014

Study contacts

Per Nielsen, MD
principal investigator · Dept. of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion