ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01452529Updated Mar 10, 2020Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate (HYD) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain

A Phase 3 interventional study of Hydrocodone bitartrate q24h film-coated tablets and Placebo to match hydrocodone bitartrate q24h tablets in Chronic Low Back Pain, sponsored by Purdue Pharma LP. Completed at 102 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-10.

Sponsored by Purdue Pharma LP (part of Knoa Pharma) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
905
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of HYD tablets 20 to 120 mg once-daily dose compared to placebo in subjects with moderate to severe chronic low back pain uncontrolled by their current stable analgesic regimen

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Opioid
03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 905 is above the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Purdue Pharma LP is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Purdue Pharma LP became part of Knoa Pharma.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female subjects ≥ 18 years of age with moderate to severe, chronic low back pain (lasting several hours daily) as their predominant pain condition for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit;
  • Subjects whose low back pain is not adequately treated prior to the screening visit with their stable incoming analgesic regimen;
  • Subjects deemed by the investigator/medically qualified designee (must be MD or DO) to be appropriate candidates for the protocol specified, around the clock HYD therapeutic regimen;
  • Female subjects who are premenopausal or less than 1 year and who have not had surgical sterilization (ie, tubal ligation, partial or complete hysterectomy) must have a negative serum pregnancy test, be nonlactating, and willing to use adequate and reliable throughout the study (eg, barrier with additional spermicidal foam or jelly, intra-uterine device, hormonal contraception).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria include:

  • Subjects taking > 100 mg/day oxycodone or equivalent during last 14 days prior to screening visit;
  • Subjects who cannot or will not agree to completely stop all incoming opioid and nonopioid analgesic medications and other medications used for chronic pain, excluding herbal and nutraceutical medications;
  • Subjects who cannot or will not agree to stop local regional pain treatments during the study (nerve/plexus blocks or ablation, neurosurgical procedures for pain control, botulinum toxin injections for control of chronic low back pain, injections in the lower back or inhalation analgesia). The subject must not have had a nerve/plexus block within 4 weeks of the screening visit, neuroablation within 6 months of the screening visit, a botulinum toxin injection in the low back region within 3 months of the screening visit, steroid injections in the lower back within 6 weeks of the screening visit, or intravenous or intramuscular steroid injections within 4 weeks of the screening visit;
  • Subjects who have used any medication within 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication;
  • Subjects with any history of seizures (subjects with history of pediatric febrile seizures may participate in the study) or increase in intracranial pressure;
  • Subjects with current uncontrolled depression or other uncontrolled psychiatric disorder (subjects with controlled depression or other psychiatric disorder must be on a stable medication for ≥ 1 month prior to the screening visit to participate in the study);
  • Subjects with a history of alcohol, medication, or illicit drug abuse or addiction and/or history of opioid abuse or addiction at any time;
  • Subjects with clinically unstable cardiac disease, including: unstable atrial fibrillation, symptomatic bradycardia, unstable congestive heart failure, active myocardial ischemia, or indwelling pacemaker;
  • Subjects with unstable respiratory disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes entry into this study;
  • Subjects with evidence of impaired liver function upon entry into the study (laboratory test values ≥ 3 times the upper limit of the laboratory reference (normal) range () for [AST/SGOT] or alanine transaminase [ALT/SGPT], or values > 2 times the ULN for alkaline phosphatase), or total level > 1.5 times the ULN or, in the opinion of the investigator/medically qualified designee (must be MD or DO), liver function impairment to the extent that the subject should not participate in this study;
  • Subjects with evidence of impaired kidney function upon entry into the study (ie, serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dL);
  • Subjects with biliary tract disease, hypothyroidism, adrenal cortical insufficiency, or any other medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, is inadequately treated and precludes entry into the study;
  • Subjects who had surgical procedures directed towards the source of chronic low back pain within 6 months of the screening visit or scheduled for surgery of the lower back or any other major surgery during the study conduct period;
  • Subjects with history of within past 2 years, with exception of basal cell carcinoma that has been successfully treated;
  • Subjects with any condition in which opioids are , eg, severe respiratory depression with hypoxia and/or hypercapnia, severe chronic obstructive lung disease, cor pulmonale, severe bronchial asthma, or paralytic ileus;
  • Subjects who are allergic to hydrocodone or who have a history of allergies to other opioids. This does not include subjects who have experienced common opioid side effects (eg, nausea, constipation);
  • Subjects receiving monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or who have been taking MAOIs within 2 weeks of the screening visit.

Other protocol-specific inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
905 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hydrocodone bitartrate

    Hydrocodone bitartrate (HYD) once daily (q24h) tablets

    Drug: Hydrocodone bitartrate q24h film-coated tablets

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo to match hydrocodone bitartrate once daily tablets

    Drug: Placebo to match hydrocodone bitartrate q24h tablets

Interventions

  • DrugHydrocodone bitartrate q24h film-coated tablets

    Hydrocodone bitartrate q24h film-coated tablets 20 - 120 mg once daily

    Also known as: Hysingla ER

  • DrugPlacebo to match hydrocodone bitartrate q24h tablets

    Placebo to match hydrocodone bitartrate q24h film coated tablets 20 - 120 mg once daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Pain Intensity for "Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours" Score

    Mean pain intensity for "average pain over the last 24 hours" score (on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine).

    Time frame: Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance Subscale

    The MOS Sleep-R is a brief, self-administered 12-item assessment designed to measure key aspects of sleep. It includes a sleep problems index and 6 subscales - sleep disturbance, sleep adequacy, daytime somnolence, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, and quantity of sleep. The sleep disturbance subscale comprised the responses to questions 1, 3, 7, and 8 on the assessment. The individual responses for each question were recorded on a 5-point scale with options ranging from 1 - "all of the time" to 5 - "none of the time". Sleep disturbance scores were transformed linearly on a scale of 0-100. A higher value indicates a better score; therefore, a higher score indicates a better sleep pattern.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12

  2. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    The PGIC is an ordinal scale which assesses the change in overall status relative to the start of the study. The scale has only 1 item, which measures global change of overall status by the subject on a 7-point scale (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse), where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. The proportion of subjects responding "very much improved" and "much improved" was summarized by treatment group.

    Time frame: Week 12

  3. Responder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain Compared to Baseline

    A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the screening mean pain score to the mean pain intensity at week 12 of the double-blind period.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

  4. Responder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Compared to Baseline

    A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the screening mean pain score to the mean pain intensity at week 12 of the double-blind period.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

07

Results

Posted Dec 4, 2014

Participant flow

First subject first visit: 23-March-2012; Last subject last visit: 03-September-2013. The study was conducted at medical/research sites in the United States.

Run-in Period
Participant flow — Run-in Period
MilestoneOpen-label Run-in Dose-titration Period Hydrocodone BitartrateHydrocodone BitartratePlacebo
Started90500
Completed59200
Not completed31300
Withdrew: Adverse event9600
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject4900
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1900
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy4600
Withdrew: Confirmed or suspected diversion2300
Withdrew: Administrative2100
Withdrew: Did not qualify for double-blind phase5900
Double-blind (DB) Period
Participant flow — Double-blind (DB) Period
MilestoneOpen-label Run-in Dose-titration Period Hydrocodone BitartrateHydrocodone BitartratePlacebo
Started0296292
Completed0229210
Not completed06782
Withdrew: Adverse event01811
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01514
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up053
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy01644
Withdrew: Confirmed or suspected diversion023
Withdrew: Administrative0117

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Pain Intensity for "Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours" Score

Mean pain intensity for "average pain over the last 24 hours" score (on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine).

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Pain Intensity for "Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours" Score
units on a scaleHydrocodone BitartratePlacebo
Mean Pain Intensity for "Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours" Score3.7 ± 0.134.2 ± 0.13
SecondaryMedical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance Subscale

The MOS Sleep-R is a brief, self-administered 12-item assessment designed to measure key aspects of sleep. It includes a sleep problems index and 6 subscales - sleep disturbance, sleep adequacy, daytime somnolence, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, and quantity of sleep. The sleep disturbance subscale comprised the responses to questions 1, 3, 7, and 8 on the assessment. The individual responses for each question were recorded on a 5-point scale with options ranging from 1 - "all of the time" to 5 - "none of the time". Sleep disturbance scores were transformed linearly on a scale of 0-100. A higher value indicates a better score; therefore, a higher score indicates a better sleep pattern.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale - Revised (MOS Sleep-R) - Sleep Disturbance Subscale
units on a scaleHydrocodone BitartratePlacebo
Screening44.38 ± 9.26244.72 ± 9.871
Week 450.38 ± 8.85150.51 ± 9.156
Week 850.16 ± 8.87951.16 ± 8.781
Week 1251.57 ± 8.57652.12 ± 8.779
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The PGIC is an ordinal scale which assesses the change in overall status relative to the start of the study. The scale has only 1 item, which measures global change of overall status by the subject on a 7-point scale (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse), where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. The proportion of subjects responding "very much improved" and "much improved" was summarized by treatment group.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
ParticipantsHydrocodone BitartratePlacebo
Total Subjects Completing PGIC283267
Subjects Responding Very Much or Much Improved173130
SecondaryResponder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain Compared to Baseline

A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the screening mean pain score to the mean pain intensity at week 12 of the double-blind period.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 12
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Responder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain Compared to Baseline
ParticipantsHydrocodone BitartratePlacebo
Number of Subjects Responding285280
Number of Subjects with ≥ 30% Reduction in Pain184147
SecondaryResponder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Compared to Baseline

A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the screening mean pain score to the mean pain intensity at week 12 of the double-blind period.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 12
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Responder Analysis for Subjects With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Compared to Baseline
ParticipantsHydrocodone BitartratePlacebo
Number of Subjects Responding285280
Number of Subjects with ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain137109

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs) were reported from start of study participation through the period beyond study completion.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Open-label Run-in Dose-titration Period Hydrocodone Bitartrate—7/905 (0.8%)265/905 (29.3%)
Hydrocodone Bitartrate—2/296 (0.7%)52/296 (17.6%)
Placebo—4/292 (1.4%)30/292 (10.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 21
Most frequent serious events
EventOpen-label Run-in Dose-titration Period Hydrocodone BitartrateHydrocodone BitartratePlacebo
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/9050/2961/292
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders0/9050/2961/292
Lobar pneumoniaInfections and infestations0/9050/2961/292
ConcussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/9050/2961/292
Musculoskeletal chest painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/9050/2961/292
Squamous cell carcinoma of lungNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/9050/2961/292
EmphysemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/9050/2961/292
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/9050/2961/292
HypothyroidismEndocrine disorders0/9051/2960/292
Chest painGeneral disorders0/9051/2960/292
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventOpen-label Run-in Dose-titration Period Hydrocodone BitartrateHydrocodone BitartratePlacebo
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders144/90524/29616/292
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders85/90510/2967/292
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders65/90518/2969/292
DizzinessNervous system disorders64/9059/2965/292
HeadacheNervous system disorders59/9056/2965/292

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Hydrocodone BitartratePlaceboTotal
Mean49.2 ± 13.5147.9 ± 13.2348.6 ± 13.38
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Hydrocodone BitartratePlaceboTotal
Female172166338
Male124126250
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Hydrocodone BitartratePlaceboTotal
White195207402
Black or African American6751118
Asian252954
American Indian or Alaska Native213
Other7411
Screening Baseline Pain Over the Last 24 Hours
Screening Baseline Pain Over the Last 24 Hours(units on a scale)Hydrocodone BitartratePlaceboTotal
Mean7.4 ± 1.137.4 ± 1.197.4 ± 1.16
08

Study locations

102 sites
  • Alliance Clinical Research
    Birmingham, Alabama 35213, United States
  • Coastal Clinical Research, Inc.
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Arizona Research Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85023, United States
  • Redpoint Research
    Phoenix, Arizona 85029, United States
  • Genova Clinical Research
    Tucson, Arizona 85704, United States
  • Quality of Life Medical & Research Center, LLC
    Tucson, Arizona 85712, United States
  • Redpoint Research
    Tucson, Arizona 85712, United States
  • ACRI-Phase 1, LLC
    Anaheim, California 92801-2417, United States
  • Orange County Research Institute
    Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • United Clinical Research Center, Inc.
    Anaheim, California 92804, United States
  • Research Center of Fresno, Inc.
    Fresno, California 93726, United States
  • TriWest Research Associates
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • Torrance Clinical Research Institute Inc.
    Lomita, California 90717, United States
  • Skyline Research, LLC
    Long Beach, California 90806, United States
  • Center for Clinical Research, Inc.
    Richmond, California 94806, United States
  • Northern California Research
    Sacramento, California 95821, United States
  • Encompass Clinical Research
    Spring Valley, California 91978, United States
  • Chase Medical Research, LLC
    Waterbury, Connecticut 06708, United States
  • Orthopedic Research Institute
    Boynton Beach, Florida 33472, United States
  • Meridien Research
    Bradenton, Florida 34208, United States
  • Innovative Research of West Florida, Inc.
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Avail Clinical Research, LLC
    DeLand, Florida 32720, United States
  • Florida Health Center
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312, United States
  • Clinical Physiology Associates
    Fort Myers, Florida 33916, United States
  • AGA Clinical Trials
    Hialeah, Florida 33012, United States
  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Health Awareness, Inc.
    Jupiter, Florida 33458, United States
  • Fidelity Clinical Research, Inc.
    Lauderhill, Florida 33319, United States
  • Neuroscience Consultants LLC
    Miami, Florida 33176, United States
  • International Research Associates, LLC
    Miami, Florida 33183, United States
  • Journey Research, Inc
    Oldsmar, Florida 34677, United States
  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Compass Research, LLC
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Peninsula Research Inc.
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • Advent Clinical Research Centers, Inc.
    Pinellas Park, Florida 33781, United States
  • Gold Coast Research, LLC
    Plantation, Florida 33317, United States
  • Sarasota Research, LLC
    Sarasota, Florida 34243, United States
  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
    Tampa, Florida 33603, United States
  • Southeast Regional Research Group
    Columbus, Georgia 31904, United States
  • Georgia Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Taylor Research, LLC
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Better Health Clinical Research, Inc.
    Newnan, Georgia 30265, United States
  • Atlanta Knee and Shoulder Clinic, PC
    Stockbridge, Georgia 30281, United States
  • Illinois Center for Clinical Research
    Chicago, Illinois 60622, United States
  • Rehabilitation Associates of Indiana
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, United States
  • Northwest Indiana Center for Clinical Research
    Valparaiso, Indiana 46383, United States
  • Integrated Clinical Trial Services, Inc.
    West Des Moines, Iowa 50265, United States
  • ICRI
    Overland Park, Kansas 66210, United States
  • Community Research
    Crestview Hills, Kentucky 41017, United States
  • Commonwealth Biomedical Research, LLC
    Madisonville, Kentucky 42431, United States
  • Louisiana Research Associates, Inc.
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70114, United States
  • IRC Clinics, Inc.
    Towson, Maryland 21204, United States
  • Beacon Clinical Research, LLC
    Brockton, Massachusetts 02301, United States
  • MedVadis Research Corporation
    Watertown, Massachusetts 02472-3930, United States
  • QUEST Research Institute
    Bingham Farms, Michigan 48025, United States
  • Medical Research Associates, Inc.
    Traverse City, Michigan 49684, United States
  • Healthcare Research Network
    Hazelwood, Missouri 63042, United States
  • Medex Healthcare Research, Inc.
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63117, United States
  • Advance Clinical Research
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63128, United States
  • Mercy Health Research
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Sundance Clinical Research, LLC
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Quality Clinical Research
    Omaha, Nebraska 68114, United States
  • Advanced Biomedical Research of America
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89123, United States
  • Research Facility
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89144, United States
  • Comprehensive Clinical Research
    Berlin, New Jersey 08009, United States
  • CRI Worldwide LLC
    Willingboro, New Jersey 08046, United States
  • Albuquerque Clinical Trials, Inc.
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, United States
  • Lovelace Scientific Resources
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108, United States
  • Drug Trials America
    Hartsdale, New York 10530, United States
  • The Medical Research Network, LLC
    New York, New York 10128, United States
  • Finger Lakes Clinical Research
    Rochester, New York 14618, United States
  • Upstate Clinical Research Associates
    Williamsville, New York 14221, United States
  • PMG Research of Charlotte, LLC
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28209, United States
  • PMG Research of Wilmington LLC
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28401, United States
  • Clinical Trials of America, Inc.
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • The Center for Clinical Research
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Daystar Clinical Research, Inc.
    Akron, Ohio 44313, United States
  • IVA Research
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45245, United States
  • Community Research
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45255, United States
  • Bone Joint and Spine Surgeons, Inc.
    Toledo, Ohio 43623, United States
  • Cutting Edge Research Group
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73116, United States
  • Allegheny Pain Management, P.C.
    Altoona, Pennsylvania 16602, United States
  • CRI Worldwide, LLC
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19139, United States
  • Founders Research Corporation
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19152, United States
  • Tipton Medical & Diagnostic Center
    Tipton, Pennsylvania 16684, United States
  • Hartwell Research Group
    Anderson, South Carolina 29621, United States
  • Radiant Research, Inc.
    Greer, South Carolina 29651, United States
  • Health Concepts
    Rapid City, South Dakota 57702, United States
  • Comprehensive Pain Specialists, LLC
    Hendersonville, Tennessee 37075, United States
  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
    Memphis, Tennessee 38119, United States
  • Heartland Medical, PC
    New Tazewell, Tennessee 37825, United States
  • HCCA Clinical Research Solutions
    Smyrna, Tennessee 37167, United States
  • FutureSearch Trials of Neurology
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • KRK Medical Research
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Heights Doctor's Clinic
    Houston, Texas 77008, United States
  • R/D Clinical Research, Inc.
    Lake Jackson, Texas 77566, United States
  • Sun Research Institute
    San Antonio, Texas 78215, United States
  • Aspen Clinical Research
    Orem, Utah 84058, United States
  • Advanced Clinical Research
    West Jordan, Utah 84088, United States
  • HypotheTest, LLC
    Roanoke, Virginia 24018, United States

Showing the first 100 of 102 sites. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wen W, Sitar S, Lynch SY, He E, Ripa SR. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of single-entity, once-daily hydrocodone tablets in patients with uncontrolled moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16(11):1593-606. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1060221. Epub 2015 Jun 26. PubMed 26111544 ↗
  • Campbell K, Kutz JW Jr, Shoup A, Wen W, Lynch SY, He E, Ripa SR. Evaluation of the Ototoxicity Potential of Once-Daily, Single-Entity Hydrocodone in Patients with Chronic Pain: Results of Two Phase-3 Clinical Studies. Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E183-E193. PubMed 28072811 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2011, a primary completion of Sep 2013 and a completion of Oct 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Dec 2014, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 12, 2011
First posted
Oct 17, 2011
Start
Oct 2011
Primary completionActual
Sep 2013
CompletionActual
Oct 2013
Results first posted
Dec 4, 2014
Last update
Mar 10, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01452529
Lead sponsor
Purdue Pharma LP
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 17, 2011
Start date
Oct 2011
Primary completion
Sep 2013
Completion
Oct 2013
Results posted
Dec 4, 2014
Last update
Mar 10, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion