CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01436305Updated Sep 24, 2026Results posted

Optimization of NULOJIX® Usage As A Means of Avoiding CNI and Steroids in Renal Transplantation

A Phase 2 interventional study of Alemtuzumab and MMF in Kidney Transplantation and Renal Transplantation, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Terminated at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Secondary to safety concerns plus change in Campath® (alemtuzumab) availability.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to assess whether a new drug, Nulojix® (belatacept), would minimize serious long term side effects associated with anti-rejection medications while still protecting the new kidney from damage. The researchers also wanted to learn more about the safety of this treatment and long term health of the transplanted kidney.

Read the detailed description

Dialysis or kidney transplant are the two ways to treat kidney failure. Transplant recipients have to take anti-rejection medications to prevent their immune system (the body's natural defense system against illness) from rejecting their new kidney. Most patients who undergo a kidney transplant must take these anti-rejection medications for the rest of their lives. Taking standard anti-rejection medications for a long time can cause serious side effects, including kidney damage. There would be a benefit to finding new anti-rejection medications that work just as well, but don't damage the kidney.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Transplantation
  • Renal Transplantation

Keywords

  • immunosuppressive (IS) regimens
  • long-term graft function
  • CNI (calcineurin Inhibitor )-free IS regimen
  • CNI (calcineurin Inhibitor ) IS regimen
  • corticosteroids
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,401 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Of its 396 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 294 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or Female, 18-65 years of age at the time of enrollment;
  • Ability to understand and provide written informed consent;
  • Candidate for primary renal allograft from either a living or deceased-donor;
  • No known contraindications to study therapy using NULOJIX® (belatacept);
  • Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test upon study entry;
  • Female and male participants with reproductive potential must agree to use FDA approved methods of birth control during participation in the study and for 4 months following completion of the study;
  • Flow-based PRA within last 12 months (in absence of a sensitizing event) of \< 30% as determined by each participating study center. If the subject experienced a sensitizing event after the PRA test date, then the PRA must be repeated and confirmed \<30%;
  • Negative crossmatch or a PRA of 0% on historic and admission sera as determined by each participating study center.
  • A documented negative TB test within the 12 months prior to transplant. If documentation is not present at the time of transplantation, and the subject does not have any risk factors for TB, a TB-specific interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) may be performed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need for multi-organ transplant;
  • Recipient of previous organ transplant;
  • EBV sero-negative (or unknown) recipients;
  • Active infection including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV;
  • Individuals who have required treatment with prednisone or other immunosuppressive drugs within 1 year prior to transplant;
  • Individuals undergoing transplant using organs from extended criteria donor (ECD) or donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors;
  • HLA identical living donors;
  • Individuals at significant risk of early recurrence of the primary renal disease including FSGS and MPGN type 2 or any other disease that in the opinion of the investigator is at increased likelihood of recurrence and which may result in rapid decline in renal function;
  • Individuals previously treated with NULOJIX® (belatacept);
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the participant's ability to comply with study requirements;
  • Use of investigational drugs within 4 weeks of enrollment;
  • Known hypersensitivity to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or any of the drug's components;
  • Administration of live attenuated vaccine(s) within 8 weeks of enrollment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Tac maintenance

    Group 1 Study Therapy Regimen:Induction with alemtuzumab and maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Campath® (alemtuzumab); long-term Prograf® (tacrolimus), or equivalent ; CellCept® (mycophenolate mofetil- MMF), or equivalent , and 4 day course of MEDROL® (methylprednisolone)

    Drug: Alemtuzumab · Drug: MMF · Drug: tacrolimus · Drug: methylprednisolone

  • Experimental
    Belatacept maintenance

    Group 2 Study Therapy Regimen: Induction with alemtuzumab and maintenance with Nulojix® (belatacept) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Campath® (alemtuzumab); Nulojix® (belatacept); CellCept® (mycophenolate mofetil- MMF), or equivalent, and 4 day course of MEDROL®(Methylprednisolone)

    Drug: Alemtuzumab · Drug: MMF · Biological: Belatacept · Drug: methylprednisolone

  • Experimental
    Basiliximab induction/Short-term Tac

    Short term = 3 months Group 3 Study Therapy Regimen: Induction with 2 doses of basiliximab and tacrolimus for 84 days and maintenance with Nulojix® (belatacept) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Simulect® (basiliximab); Nulojix® (belatacept); short-term course of Prograf® (tacrolimus), or equivalent; CellCept® (mycophenolate mofetil- MMF), or equivalent, and 4 day course of MEDROL® (methylprednisolone)

    Drug: MMF · Biological: Basiliximab · Drug: Short-term Tac · Biological: Belatacept · Drug: methylprednisolone

Interventions

  • DrugAlemtuzumab

    Induction therapy. Group 1 and 2 study therapy regimens include induction with alemtuzumab, administered as a single intravenous dose intra-operatively over a period of 2 hours.

    Also known as: Campath®

  • DrugMMF

    All treatment groups (e.g., Group 1, 2 and 3): Administered at a target dose of 1000 mg by mouth twice daily beginning on the day of surgery or post operative day 1 and adjusted as clinically warranted. Note: Myfortic® (mycophenolate sodium) may be used as a replacement for MMF, at a dose of 720 mg taken by mouth twice daily.

    Also known as: mycophenolate mofetil, CellCept®

  • BiologicalBasiliximab

    Induction therapy. Group 3 study therapy regimen includes induction with basiliximab, administered in two doses: 1 dose administered within 2 hours prior to transplantation surgery and the 2nd dose 4 days after transplantation (unless held due to contraindication\[s\])

    Also known as: Simulect®

  • DrugShort-term Tac

    Short-term (3 months)

    Also known as: tacrolimus, Prograf®

  • Drugtacrolimus

    maintenance

    Also known as: Prograf®

  • BiologicalBelatacept

    maintenance

    Also known as: Nulojix®

  • Drugmethylprednisolone

    All study treatment groups: administration started on the day of transplant and tapered over a 4 day course.

    Also known as: MEDROL®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52

    GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥ 90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.

    Time frame: Week 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant

    Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as histologic evidence of borderline or higher cellular rejection per local pathologist.

    Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

  2. Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI

    GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. This measure specifically looked at participants with scores less than 60.

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

  3. Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant

    The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below: Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if GFR value is ≥60 and \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤GFR \< 30;l Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A and 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure.

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

  4. Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5

    The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below. Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if 60 ≤ GFR \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤ GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤ GFR \< 30; Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A abd 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure.

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

  5. Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model

    The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (MDRD). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

  6. The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine

    The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. An estimate of the slope, or change over time, in eGFR was produced using standard statistical linear modeling procedures. The estimate was then re-scaled so that it can be interpreted as a change in eGFR per month. Positive numbers indicate increasing kidney function. Larger numbers indicate greater change in kidney function.

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

  7. Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant

    Delayed graft function is defined as dialysis in the first week on one or more occasions for any indication other than the treatment of acute hyperkalemia in the setting of otherwise acceptable renal function

    Time frame: Any time within the first week post-transplant

  8. An Increase of One or More Grades of CAN/IFTA When Comparing the Implantation and Subsequent Protocol Biopsies

    CAN/IFTA grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue. The aim of this measure was to compare central lab reviewed pre-implantation biopsies to post-transplant biopsies, as pre-specified per protocol; however, the central lab had an inadequate set of biopsies to proceed with evaluation.

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

  9. Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant

    CAN/IFTA grades were determined per local pathology interpretations of biopsy tissue. These grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue.

    Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

  10. Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria

    Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria.

    Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

  11. Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52

    Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Originally, this endpoint was worded as "The severity of first and highest acute cellular rejection within the first 52 weeks." But since the highest grade for each subject coincided with the first ACR episode for each subject, only a summary of severity of the first episode is presented here.

    Time frame: Transplantation through Week 52

  12. Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection

    Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is defined as diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury.

    Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

  13. Type of Treatment of Rejection

    Upon having a biopsy performed, persons often receive treatment for rejection based on the results of the biopsy, which may or may not have shown signs of rejection. Details of biopsy findings and corresponding treatment are presented here for each instance of treatment for rejection. Acronyms and abbreviations are defined below. ACR=Acute Cellular Rejection ATG=Anti-thymocyte globulin therapy Chr. AMR=Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection Gd.=Grade IFTA=Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy IVIG=Intravenous Immunoglobulin therapy. Only 'for cause' biopsies were performed post-transplant; thus, it is possible for a participant to be included in the analysis population and not have a biopsy for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

  14. Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52

    The presence of antibodies reactive to Histocompatibility Antigen (HLA) molecules expressed on the renal allograft have been associated with both acute and chronic injury to the transplanted kidney. The development of de novo anti- donor HLA antibodies may mean a person is more likely to reject the graft.

    Time frame: Week 52

  15. Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO

    New onset diabetes is the development of diabetes post-kidney transplant. It was identified by the clinical sites caring for each participant and reported directly in the clinical database. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is a determination made by referencing glucose measurements obtained from a standard chemistry panel. Any fasting glucose measure that is between 110 and 125 mg/dL is classified as IFG. Acronyms: American Diabetes Association (ADA); World Health Organization (WHO).

    Time frame: Week 52

  16. Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52

    Treated diabetes is defined as the receipt of oral medication or insulin for \>14 days between 14 days and 52 weeks post-transplant

    Time frame: Day 14 to Week 52

  17. HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156

    Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average blood glucose levels over 8-12 weeks, thus acting as a useful long-term gauge of blood glucose control. A value below 6.0% reflects normal levels, 6.0% to 6.4% reflects prediabetes, and a value of ≥ 6.5% reflects diabetes.

    Time frame: Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156

  18. Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52

    A blood pressure measurement consists of two numbers: the systolic and diastolic pressures. Systolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels when the heart beats. Diastolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels between beats of the heart. Systolic measures of \<120 and diastolic measures of \<80 are considered normal. Systolic measures of 120-139 and diastolic measures of 80-89 are considered at risk (or pre-hypertension). Systolic measures of ≥140 and diastolic measures of ≥90 are considered high.

    Time frame: Week 52

  19. Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52

    Anti-hypertensive medications are a class of drugs that are used to treat hypertension. The medications seek to prevent the complications of high blood pressure, such as stoke and myocardial infarction.

    Time frame: Week 52

  20. Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156

    A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are detailed below. Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤ 20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease LDL cholesterol: \<70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; \<100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; \<130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease Triglycerides: \<150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156

  21. Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156

    Lipid lowering medications are used in the treatment of high levels of fats (lipids), such as cholesterol in blood

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156

  22. Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156

    This is a measure of the total number of pills a participant was prescribed on a given day

    Time frame: Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156

  23. Number of Events of Death or Graft Loss

    This measure counts deaths and graft loss occurring at any point post transplantation. Graft loss is defined as need for dialysis for greater than 30 days duration, allograft nephrectomy, or retransplantation.

    Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

  24. Count of Participants With Rejection

    The number of participants who were treated by their local physician for any type of rejection including, but not limited to cellular rejection and antibody- mediated rejection of the transplanted kidney regardless of the presence of a biopsy.

    Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

  25. Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Adverse events were collected systematically from enrollment through last study visit. Displayed below are counts of all adverse events per treatment group (including both serious and non-serious adverse events). Separately counts of all adverse events determined to be serious are displayed per treatment group. More detail about adverse events for this trial is displayed in the 'Adverse Event' section.

    Time frame: Enrollment through last study visit (up to week 156)

  26. Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events

    Infections of certain types (i.e., excluding those identified in the protocol as occurring commonly in this study population) were required to be reported as a serious adverse event if they required either inpatient hospitalization of prolongation of a current hospitalization.

    Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

  27. Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events

    Viral infections following renal transplantation is significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronyms: BK Polyoma Virus (BKV); Cytomegalovirus (CMV).

    Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

  28. Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events

    Viral infections following renal transplantation is a significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronym: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)

    Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

  29. Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure

    Temperature of \>39 degrees Celsius would be an indication of fever most often in response to an infection or illness. Systolic blood pressure \<90mm Hg would be an indication of low blood pressure.

    Time frame: 24 hours after transplantation

07

Results

Posted Aug 30, 2017
Limitations and caveats
Enrollment of 210 participants was planned, but study was stopped after 19 participants enrolled due to safety concerns and change in alemtuzumab availability. Enrolled participants continued follow-up after enrollment ended.

Participant flow

Three sites in the United States enrolled a total of 19 participants in the study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Started667
Completed427
Not completed240
Withdrew: Death100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up010
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject130

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52

GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥ 90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/1.73m^2
Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52
mL/min/1.73m^2Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 5255.9 ± 8.951.6 ± 23.558.3 ± 12.2
SecondaryCount of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant

Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as histologic evidence of borderline or higher cellular rejection per local pathologist.

Time frame:
Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant325
SecondaryCount of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI

GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. This measure specifically looked at participants with scores less than 60.

Time frame:
Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Week 52324
Week 104213
Week 156212
SecondaryCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant

The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below: Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if GFR value is ≥60 and \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤GFR \< 30;l Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A and 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure.

Time frame:
Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Week 52 - Stage 1000
Week 52 - Stage 2113
Week 52 - Stage 3A313
Week 52 - Stage 3B001
Week 52 - Stage 4010
Week 104 - Stage 1011
Week 104 - Stage 2103
Week 104 - Stage 3A112
Week 104 - Stage 3B101
Week 104 - Stage 4000
Week 156 - Stage 1000
Week 156 - Stage 2115
Week 156 - Stage 3A111
Week 156 - Stage 3B101
Week 156 - Stage 4000
SecondaryCount of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5

The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below. Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if 60 ≤ GFR \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤ GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤ GFR \< 30; Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A abd 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure.

Time frame:
Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Week 52010
Week 104000
Week 156000
SecondaryMean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model

The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (MDRD). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.

Time frame:
Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/1.73m^2
Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model
mL/min/1.73m^2Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Week 5252.4 ± 8.347.8 ± 22.355.7 ± 11.0
Week 10454.2 ± 13.169.3 ± 27.360.4 ± 16.8
Week 15649.0 ± 16.365.5 ± 20.261.5 ± 13.9
SecondaryThe Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine

The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. An estimate of the slope, or change over time, in eGFR was produced using standard statistical linear modeling procedures. The estimate was then re-scaled so that it can be interpreted as a change in eGFR per month. Positive numbers indicate increasing kidney function. Larger numbers indicate greater change in kidney function.

Time frame:
Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156
Reported as:
Mean · Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by month
The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine
Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by monthInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Week 521.29 ± 1.850.62 ± 0.991.07 ± 1.16
Week 1041.27 ± 1.860.62 ± 1.180.68 ± 0.83
Week 1561.33 ± 1.820.69 ± 1.140.48 ± 0.48
SecondaryCount of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant

Delayed graft function is defined as dialysis in the first week on one or more occasions for any indication other than the treatment of acute hyperkalemia in the setting of otherwise acceptable renal function

Time frame:
Any time within the first week post-transplant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant020
SecondaryAn Increase of One or More Grades of CAN/IFTA When Comparing the Implantation and Subsequent Protocol Biopsies

CAN/IFTA grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue. The aim of this measure was to compare central lab reviewed pre-implantation biopsies to post-transplant biopsies, as pre-specified per protocol; however, the central lab had an inadequate set of biopsies to proceed with evaluation.

Time frame:
Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryCount of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant

CAN/IFTA grades were determined per local pathology interpretations of biopsy tissue. These grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue.

Time frame:
Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant135
SecondaryCount of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria

Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria.

Time frame:
Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria024
SecondaryCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52

Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Originally, this endpoint was worded as "The severity of first and highest acute cellular rejection within the first 52 weeks." But since the highest grade for each subject coincided with the first ACR episode for each subject, only a summary of severity of the first episode is presented here.

Time frame:
Transplantation through Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Grade IA011
Grade IB000
Grade IIA002
Grade IIB011
Grade III000
SecondaryCount of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is defined as diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury.

Time frame:
Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection010
SecondaryType of Treatment of Rejection

Upon having a biopsy performed, persons often receive treatment for rejection based on the results of the biopsy, which may or may not have shown signs of rejection. Details of biopsy findings and corresponding treatment are presented here for each instance of treatment for rejection. Acronyms and abbreviations are defined below. ACR=Acute Cellular Rejection ATG=Anti-thymocyte globulin therapy Chr. AMR=Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection Gd.=Grade IFTA=Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy IVIG=Intravenous Immunoglobulin therapy. Only 'for cause' biopsies were performed post-transplant; thus, it is possible for a participant to be included in the analysis population and not have a biopsy for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Reported as:
Number · Biopsy
Type of Treatment of Rejection
BiopsyInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Borderline rejection; IVIG and plasmapheresis100
ACR Gd. IA + Chr. AMR + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids010
ACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. II; Pulse Steroids010
ACR Gd. IIB; ATG and Pulse Steroids010
Borderline + IFTA Gd. I; with Pulse Steroids001
ACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids001
ACR Gd. IIA; Pulse Steroids001
ACR Gd. IIA + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids002
ACR Gd. IIB + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids001
SecondaryCount of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52

The presence of antibodies reactive to Histocompatibility Antigen (HLA) molecules expressed on the renal allograft have been associated with both acute and chronic injury to the transplanted kidney. The development of de novo anti- donor HLA antibodies may mean a person is more likely to reject the graft.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52000
SecondaryCount of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO

New onset diabetes is the development of diabetes post-kidney transplant. It was identified by the clinical sites caring for each participant and reported directly in the clinical database. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is a determination made by referencing glucose measurements obtained from a standard chemistry panel. Any fasting glucose measure that is between 110 and 125 mg/dL is classified as IFG. Acronyms: American Diabetes Association (ADA); World Health Organization (WHO).

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
New onset diabetes during first 52 weeks000
Impaired fasting glucose at week 52100
SecondaryCount of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52

Treated diabetes is defined as the receipt of oral medication or insulin for \>14 days between 14 days and 52 weeks post-transplant

Time frame:
Day 14 to Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52101
SecondaryHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average blood glucose levels over 8-12 weeks, thus acting as a useful long-term gauge of blood glucose control. A value below 6.0% reflects normal levels, 6.0% to 6.4% reflects prediabetes, and a value of ≥ 6.5% reflects diabetes.

Time frame:
Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156
Reported as:
Mean · percent
HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156
percentInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Day 285.3 ± 1.15.1 ± 0.55.8 ± 0.2
Day 845.7 ± 1.45.0 ± 0.65.9 ± 0.8
Week 246.9 ± 1.85.1 ± 0.36.5 ± 1.0
Week 366.7 ± 1.55.3 ± 0.47.2 ± 2.6
Week 527.0 ± 2.94.8 ± 0.77.6
Week 72——8.1
Week 1045.7 ± 0.45.2 ± 0.16.6 ± 1.8
Week 1565.6 ± 0.15.2 ± 0.17.8 ± 2.5
SecondaryStandardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52

A blood pressure measurement consists of two numbers: the systolic and diastolic pressures. Systolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels when the heart beats. Diastolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels between beats of the heart. Systolic measures of \<120 and diastolic measures of \<80 are considered normal. Systolic measures of 120-139 and diastolic measures of 80-89 are considered at risk (or pre-hypertension). Systolic measures of ≥140 and diastolic measures of ≥90 are considered high.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52
mmHgInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52147.5 ± 18.7146.7 ± 5.1139.9 ± 18.1
Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 5280.8 ± 12.892.7 ± 9.879.3 ± 8.5
SecondaryCount of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52

Anti-hypertensive medications are a class of drugs that are used to treat hypertension. The medications seek to prevent the complications of high blood pressure, such as stoke and myocardial infarction.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52337
SecondaryFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156

A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are detailed below. Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤ 20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease LDL cholesterol: \<70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; \<100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; \<130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease Triglycerides: \<150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156
mg/dLInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Tot. Chol. Baseline141.2 ± 28.8160.2 ± 37.8165.6 ± 37.4
Tot. Chol. W24171.6 ± 44.0159.0 ± 11.1185.6 ± 40.1
Tot. Chol. W52156.0 ± 30.7187.0157.5 ± 53.0
Tot. Chol. W104170.5 ± 2.1142.5 ± 3.5189.0 ± 49.9
Tot. Chol. W156183.5 ± 3.5133.5 ± 7.8181.7 ± 60.6
Non-HDL Baseline108.2 ± 22.0118.8 ± 19.0122.3 ± 44.9
Non-HDL W24128.0 ± 38.0129.3 ± 10.0129.0 ± 35.3
Non-HDL W52117.5 ± 23.4151.061.0
Non-HDL W104129.5 ± 0.7110.5 ± 3.5135.6 ± 42.4
Non-HDL W156138.5 ± 2.1102.5 ± 2.1136.0 ± 58.0
LDL Baseline76.7 ± 22.086.6 ± 29.883.4 ± 41.4
LDL W2476.7 ± 22.086.6 ± 29.883.4 ± 41.4
LDL W5269.5 ± 38.0114.049.0
LDL W104100.5 ± 0.758.0 ± 18.4101.4 ± 42.3
LDL W156116.0 ± 2.855.5 ± 19.1106.0 ± 46.3
HDL Baseline33.0 ± 10.441.3 ± 22.843.3 ± 10.7
HDL W2443.6 ± 8.229.7 ± 2.156.6 ± 19.6
HDL W5238.5 ± 12.336.059.0
HDL W10441.0 ± 2.832.0 ± 7.153.4 ± 16.6
HDL W15645.0 ± 1.431.0 ± 5.745.7 ± 14.6
Triglyc. Baseline158.7 ± 92.4307.8 ± 350.1206.9 ± 148.5
Triglyc. W24161.0 ± 53.9249.7 ± 172.4115.9 ± 68.1
Triglyc. W52319.3 ± 294.0187.058.0
Triglyc. W104146.0 ± 1.4220.0 ± 168.3172.8 ± 130.0
Triglyc. W156115.0 ± 4.2228.0 ± 93.3156.5 ± 75.6
SecondaryCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156

Lipid lowering medications are used in the treatment of high levels of fats (lipids), such as cholesterol in blood

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Baseline512
Week 24412
Week 52312
Week 104313
Week 156313
SecondaryTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156

This is a measure of the total number of pills a participant was prescribed on a given day

Time frame:
Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156
Reported as:
Mean · Number of pills
Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156
Number of pillsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Day 2828.8 ± 12.315.8 ± 6.327.3 ± 7.6
Day 8422.2 ± 6.613.5 ± 4.421.3 ± 7.5
Week 2414.8 ± 3.88.3 ± 4.016.6 ± 5.7
Week 3613.0 ± 2.014.0 ± 1.017.0 ± 5.1
Week 5214.6 ± 5.014.3 ± 1.517.8 ± 3.5
Week 72——16.0 ± 4.4
Week 10415.3 ± 5.715.5 ± 2.114.8 ± 5.3
Week 15614.0 ± 6.215.0 ± 1.412.7 ± 6.2
SecondaryNumber of Events of Death or Graft Loss

This measure counts deaths and graft loss occurring at any point post transplantation. Graft loss is defined as need for dialysis for greater than 30 days duration, allograft nephrectomy, or retransplantation.

Time frame:
Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Reported as:
Number · Events
Number of Events of Death or Graft Loss
EventsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Number of Events of Death or Graft Loss230
SecondaryCount of Participants With Rejection

The number of participants who were treated by their local physician for any type of rejection including, but not limited to cellular rejection and antibody- mediated rejection of the transplanted kidney regardless of the presence of a biopsy.

Time frame:
Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Rejection
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Count of Participants With Rejection135
SecondaryNumber of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Adverse events were collected systematically from enrollment through last study visit. Displayed below are counts of all adverse events per treatment group (including both serious and non-serious adverse events). Separately counts of all adverse events determined to be serious are displayed per treatment group. More detail about adverse events for this trial is displayed in the 'Adverse Event' section.

Time frame:
Enrollment through last study visit (up to week 156)
Reported as:
Number · Events
Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
EventsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
All Adverse Events212540
Serious Adverse Events6117
SecondaryCount of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events

Infections of certain types (i.e., excluding those identified in the protocol as occurring commonly in this study population) were required to be reported as a serious adverse event if they required either inpatient hospitalization of prolongation of a current hospitalization.

Time frame:
Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events221
SecondaryCount of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events

Viral infections following renal transplantation is significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronyms: BK Polyoma Virus (BKV); Cytomegalovirus (CMV).

Time frame:
Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
BKV002
CMV100
SecondaryCount of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events

Viral infections following renal transplantation is a significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronym: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)

Time frame:
Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events000
SecondaryCount of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure

Temperature of \>39 degrees Celsius would be an indication of fever most often in response to an infection or illness. Systolic blood pressure \<90mm Hg would be an indication of low blood pressure.

Time frame:
24 hours after transplantation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure
ParticipantsInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Fever >39 degrees000
Systolic BP <90010

Adverse events

Collected over Enrollment through study completion, up to 3 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus1/6 (16.7%)3/6 (50%)6/6 (100%)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept0/6 (0%)5/6 (83.3%)4/6 (66.7%)
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac0/7 (0%)5/7 (71.4%)7/7 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent serious events
EventInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Transplant rejectionImmune system disorders0/61/63/7
Renal failure acuteRenal and urinary disorders0/60/62/7
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/61/60/7
Gastrooesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disorders0/61/60/7
PyrexiaGeneral disorders and administration site conditions0/61/60/7
Suprapubic painGeneral disorders and administration site conditions0/61/60/7
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders1/60/60/7
Cytomegalovirus infectionInfections and infestations1/60/60/7
Endocarditis staphylococcalInfections and infestations1/60/60/7
Infected skin ulcerInfections and infestations0/61/60/7
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
EventInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations2/60/62/7
TremorNervous system disorders2/61/60/7
HypotensionVascular disorders0/62/60/7
Type IV hypersensitivity reactionImmune system disorders0/61/62/7
Polyomavirus test positiveInvestigations0/60/62/7
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/61/61/7
TachycardiaCardiac disorders0/61/60/7
Transplant rejectionImmune system disorders0/61/60/7
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations1/60/60/7
Urinary tract infection bacterialInfections and infestations0/61/60/7

Baseline characteristics

Randomized participants

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal
Mean46.8 ± 13.143.3 ± 9.549.1 ± 9.046.6 ± 10.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal
Female2316
Male43613
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal
Hispanic or Latino0000
Not Hispanic or Latino66416
Unknown or Not Reported0033
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American2158
White44210
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal
United States66719
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • University of Alabama
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • University of California San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Emory University
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Newell KA, Mehta AK, Larsen CP, Stock PG, Farris AB, Mehta SG, Ikle D, Armstrong B, Morrison Y, Bridges N, Robien M, Mannon RB. Lessons Learned: Early Termination of a Randomized Trial of Calcineurin Inhibitor and Corticosteroid Avoidance Using Belatacept. Am J Transplant. 2017 Oct;17(10):2712-2719. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14377. Epub 2017 Jul 3. PubMed 28556519 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01436305
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Collaborators
Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2011
Start date
Sep 2011
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Apr 2015
Results posted
Aug 30, 2017
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Kenneth Newell, MD, PhD
study chair · Emory University
Christian P. Larsen, MD, DPhil
principal investigator · Emory University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion