An observational study in Blastocoele Fluid, sponsored by Cervesi Hospital, Cattolica, Italy. Status unknown at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-09.
Sponsored by Cervesi Hospital, Cattolica, Italy · Observational
While the number of assisted reproduction cycles increases worldwide, the introduction of actual technological improvements in the ability to quickly and non-invasively identify the best embryos for transfer still represents a critical goal for reproductive medicine. Indeed, embryo assessment is currently performed through the analysis of morphology and cleavage rate. Recent studies have sought to identify a correlation between qualitative-quantitative profiles of small molecules of metabolic interest and the outcome of embryo transfer. Some of these molecules seem to be best suited for this purpose, including glucose, lactate, pyruvate or amino acid levels. Approaches relying on both optical and non-optical spectroscopy have been proposed to non-invasively monitor the embryo culture media. However, the non-invasive approach only offers an indirect strategy to monitor embryos and a turn-around solution to bypass the limits of detection of these analytical techniques. In this paper the investigators pave the way for direct assessment of embryos through the mass spectrometry-based analysis of blastocoele fluid, which is withdrawn from the blastocoele cavity prior to cryostorage of blastocysts. The investigators show how it is possible to detect most of the already documented metabolites of interest right at the very heart of the blastocyst, without disrupting the workflow of a classic laboratory pipeline.
All the patients that are unable to be subjected to embryo transfer due to her ovarian hyperstimulation. In those cases the embryos will be vitrified and during this procedure we collapse the blastocyst sucking the fluid.
Inclusion Criteria:
Only patients who achieved hyperstimulation pathology after external administration of gonadotrophin during IVF treatment
standardize the method of aspiration
The method for blastocyst micropuncturing and aspiration of blastocoel fluid is according also to the last literature about blastocyst vitrification. In brief, expanded day 5 blastocysts were removed from culture and transferred to a 30 nl droplet of pre-warmed Hepes buffer. An injection pipette was introduced avoiding contaminations through the trophectoderm, and blastocoel fluid was aspirated until the blastocyst had fully collapsed around the pipette. The retrieved fluids were expelled into new purified water drops and frozen at -80°C alongside 0.5 nl control droplets of purified water.
Time frame: 2 months
metabolite detection
metabolite detection through rapid resolution reversed phase (RR-RP) high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-mass spectrometry (MS). From sample volumes as low as 0.5 nl we could detect and quantify against external standards a group of metabolites, whose roles in blastocyst development and embryo metabolism have long been postulated. The list included i) ATP adenosine triphosphate ; ii) glucose-6-phosphate; iii) lactate; iv) NAD+ nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide+ and v) NADH and vi) NADPH nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate; vii) 6-phosphogluconic acid; viii) glutamic acid and ix) α-ketoglutarate.
Time frame: 6 months
analysis of the correlation between blastocyst morphology and metabolic profile in the blastocoele fluid
blastocyst classify according to morphological criteria in the book "Atlas of Human Blastocyst" by L. Veeck and associate, to each morphological class a characteristic metabolic profile, in order to scientifically validate the observational and objective criteria up to now used in our lab
Time frame: 1 year
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Cervesi Hospital, Cattolica, Italy