CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01421953PULMOTEPUpdated May 29, 2026

Assessment of 4D 18F-FDG PET-CT in Radiotherapy for Non Small Cell Lung Cancers

An interventional study of CT-simulation and 4D PET-CT in Lung Cancer and Non-small-cell Lung Carcinoma, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-29.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Computed tomography (CT) images, used for radiotherapy planning, are often caught out in lung target volumes delineation because of their inability to differentiate between neoplasia, inflammation and atelectasia. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a new functional imaging modality and is currently used in the diagnosis and the staging of lung cancers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of 4D 18F-FDG-PET-CT on radiotherapy planning for lung cancers.

Read the detailed description

Many PET studies have been interested in lung radiotherapy volumes definition, however lacking any standardisation. Effectively, the use of PET images is difficult because of the poor image quality resulting from noise and partial volume effects induced blurring. Moreover, due to the long duration of PET acquisitions, respiratory motions are inevitable and result in artifacts in the PET images affecting the volumes and contrast of the tumour: tumours may appear larger while their activity can be lower. To overcome these limitations, we propose to use a 4D PET-CT, ie a PET-CT acquisition system synchronized with respiration in order to compare CT-simulation target volumes and PET target volumes after application of different approaches for partial volume effect correction, respiratory motion correction and automatic segmentation method of functional volumes. For this purpose, patients with a non small cell lung cancer and having to be treated with radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy underwent CT-simulation and 4D PET-CT in radiotherapy treatment position. The target volumes and the dosimetries obtained with both modalities were compared.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer
  • Non-small-cell Lung Carcinoma

Keywords

  • Positron Emission Tomography
  • Computed Tomography
  • Lung cancer
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 7 is below the median of 60 across 5,295 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥ 18 years old
  • patients with unresectable non small cell lung cancer having to be treated with radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neo-adjuvant treatment
  • patient treated previously with thoracic radiation
  • patient unable to support 4D PET-CT
  • pregnant or breast-feeding woman
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients

    Device: CT-simulation and 4D PET-CT

Interventions

  • DeviceCT-simulation and 4D PET-CT

    Patients will do a CT-simulation and 4D PET-CT in radiotherapy treatment position. The target volumes and the dosimetries obtained with both modalities will be compared.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantitative and qualitative differences between CT-simulation and 4D PET-CT volumes

    Quantitative and qualitative differences between the radiotherapy target volumes obtained from CT-simulation and from 4D-PET-CT. The quantitative difference is expressed as a percentage of the total volume defined on CT simulation. The qualitative difference is defined as the volumes defined only on CT-simulation or only on 4D-PET-CT, expressed as a percentage of the total volume defined on CT-simulation.

    Time frame: between day 7 and day 21 after inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dosimetrics differences between the dosimetries obtained from CT-simulation or from 4D-PET-CT.

    Time frame: between day 7 and day 21 after inclusion

  2. Search of predictive criteria (histology, tumour localization, TNM staging) for 4D-PET-CT impact on the radiotherapy target volumes and on the dosimetries.

    Time frame: between day 7 and day 21 after inclusion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU Bordeaux - hôpital Pellegrin
    Bordeaux, 33000, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01421953
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 23, 2011
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Nov 2012
Completion
Nov 2012
Last update
May 29, 2026

Study contacts

Philippe FERNANDEZ, Pr
principal investigator · University Hospital, Bordeaux, France

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion