CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01409070H-1012-015-342Updated Oct 16, 2012

Head to Head Comparison of Azacitidine and Decitabine in Myelodysplastic Syndrome

An observational study in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-10-16.

Sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In Myelodysplastic syndrome, epigenetic treatments such as Azacitidine and Decitabine have been highlighted in phase 3 studies. However, as the 1st line treatment, it has not been evaluated the head to head comparison of two drugs. This study is a retrospective study to compare the efficacy of two drugs.

Read the detailed description

Among 300 MDS patient, 200 of them have been taking Azacitidine and 100 of them have been taking Decitabine. Medical chart of these patients will be reviewed to assess the efficacy and safety between two agents.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

  • MDS
03

In context

Preleukemia

1,317 studies on the registry are indexed under Preleukemia; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 300 is above the median of 114 across 116 observational studies indexed under Preleukemia.

Browse Preleukemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,860 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

MDS patients who are diagnosed at SNUH

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed MDS by bone marrow examination
  • Receiving azacitidine and decitabine as a first line chemotherapy
  • Adequate hepatic, cardiac, and renal function

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously treated with another anti-cancer therapy due to MDS
  • Not available for clinical information
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
300 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Azacitidine

    200 MDS patients taking Azacitidine will be assessed

  • Decitabine

    100 MDS patients taking Decitabine will be assessed

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Response rate

    Compare Azacitidine and Decitabine's treatment response rate in MDS patients

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy

    To compare hematologic improvement between Azacitidine and decitabine

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Survival rate

    To compare survival rate between Azacitidine and decitabine

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Number of participants with non-hematologic toxicities

    To compare toxicity between Azacitidine and decitabine

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. infection rate

    To compare infection rate between Azacitidine and decitabine

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • SNUH
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee YG, Kim I, Yoon SS, Park S, Cheong JW, Min YH, Lee JO, Bang SM, Yi HG, Kim CS, Park Y, Kim BS, Mun YC, Seong CM, Park J, Lee JH, Kim SY, Lee HG, Kim YK, Kim HJ; Korean Society of Haematology AML/MDS working party. Comparative analysis between azacitidine and decitabine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 2013 May;161(3):339-47. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12256. Epub 2013 Feb 21. PubMed 23432512 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01409070
Lead sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Responsible party
Inho Kim (Professor, Seoul National University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 3, 2011
Start date
Jan 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2011
Completion
Dec 2011
Last update
Oct 16, 2012
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion