ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01390233Updated May 30, 2014Results posted

Comparison of Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening

An interventional study of Prepidil Gel and Urinary Balloon Catheter in Failed Labour, sponsored by University of South Carolina. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-05-30.

Sponsored by University of South Carolina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study is designed to assess the effectiveness of a combination method of induction of labor using a urinary balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel.

The vaginal delivery rate for medical induction of labor is lower than the vaginal delivery rate for spontaneous labor. As a consequence, the frequency of cesarean section for failed induction in the United States is rising. This has led to a renewed effort to examine the effectiveness of the varied methods of induction.

The study is a randomized, unblinded trial of urinary balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel for induction of labor in term pregnant patients. Pregnant women presenting to the Palmetto Health Richland for a scheduled induction of labor will be offered enrollment in the trial. Patients who enroll in the study will be randomized into one of 3 study arms: urinary balloon catheter only, prostaglandin gel only and combination urinary balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel. Randomization will be per sealed envelope from the locked nurse medication storage area (Pyxis) located in Labor and Delivery at Palmetto Health Richland. The investigator will be given the next sequentially numbered study randomization envelope by the patient's nurse. The randomization assignment will be unblinded to the patient and her physicians. If the patient is not in active labor 6 hours after initiation of the intervention, a standardized protocol of oxytocin will commence. Labor management will be at the discretion of the physician.

Read the detailed description

Title: Comparison of pre-induction cervical ripening using Prepidil gel administered through a urinary balloon catheter

Precis- This study is designed to assess the effectiveness of a combination method of induction of labor using a urinary balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel.

Background

Induction of labor is a common intervention during pregnancy1. The frequency of hospital admissions for induction of labor is increasing in the United States. Indications for induction of labor include maternal disease, fetal complications and social/geographical issues. Obstetricians may also choose elective induction, to facilitate delivery at term for the physician or patient who does not have a medical indication for delivery.

The vaginal delivery rate for medical induction of labor is lower than the vaginal delivery rate for spontaneous labor. As a consequence, the frequency of cesarean section for failed induction in the United States is rising2. This has led to a renewed effort to examine the effectiveness of the varied methods of induction3-5.

The vaginal delivery rate for induction of labor can be predicted by assessing the patient's cervical examination prior to induction. The Bishop Score uses the cervical examination components to predict the vaginal delivery rate for a particular patient. A low or poor Bishop score predicts a low success rate for vaginal delivery.

There are 3 common methods used to induce labor. The first are physiological methods such as breaking the patient's water or causing contractions by nipple stimulation. Breaking the patient's water requires a high (favorable) Bishop Score and cannot be safely performed with a low (poor) Bishop score. This method has a higher success rate in patients who have had a prior vaginal delivery. Nipple stimulation has been associated with an increased risk of tachysystole (too frequent contractions) and non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns. It is not considered an acceptable method of induction in the United States.

Physical methods include pre-induction cervical ripening with laminaria or urinary balloon catheter6. Both of these methods are designed to force the cervix to open mechanically. Laminaria are small sticks of dehydrated seaweed which are placed in the cervical canal. As the sticks hydrate, the cervical canal dilates. Balloon urinary catheters are inserted into the cervical canal. The balloon is inflated in the lower uterine segment. A weight is placed on the catheter to apply traction which forces the fluid-filled balloon to dilate the cervical canal. Urinary balloon catheters have been used alone7,8, with saline infusion9-11 or with prostaglandin infusion12-16.

Pharmacological methods include ergot alkaloids, prostaglandin E and F series and oxytocin. Ergot alkaloids cause forceful uterine contractions and have been used to treat postpartum hemorrhage. Ergot alkaloids may cause severe hypertension during induction of labor and are not used in the United States. Prostaglandin E and F series cause increased uterine muscle tone (tonic contractions). They are used for pre-induction cervical ripening. The different prostaglandins have varying complications which may include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and fever. Use of misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening has been associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture both in normal patients and in patients who have had previous cesarean sections17. The method of drug delivery for prostaglandin medications has varied. It can be administered as an oral tablet, a vaginal suppository, a vaginal gel, or by infusion into the lower uterine segment via a urinary balloon catheter. It is unclear, based on evidence-based medicine, whether any particular method of delivery is superior to another. The Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA) has approved the use of Prepidil gel (prostaglandin E2) for pre-induction cervical ripening18,19. Prepidil gel is administered as a gel into the vaginal fornix using a syringe. Oxytocin is a pituitary hormone which can be used to augment spontaneous labor or to induce labor. It results in both increased uterine tone (tonic contractions) and increased contraction frequency (clonic contractions). It is considered the most physiologic method of pre-induction cervical ripening. Oxytocin is administered by intravenous infusion.

Methods of induction can be used individually or in combination. The most common combination method for induction of labor is the use of prostaglandin for pre-induction cervical ripening followed by oxytocin.

Objectives-

The current study is a randomized, unblinded trial of urinary balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel for induction of labor in term pregnant patients. The primary outcome to be studied is vaginal delivery rate for urinary balloon catheter alone, prostaglandin gel alone and a combination of urinary balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel. Secondary outcomes to be studied include the safety of the method, composite maternal morbidity and composite neonatal morbidity.

The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the vaginal delivery rate between the three study protocols.

Study Design and Methods-

Pregnant women presenting to the Palmetto Health Richland for a scheduled induction of labor will be offered enrollment in the trial.

Eligible patients will undergo an interview with the investigator. Enrollment pre-requisites and exclusions will be reviewed with the patient. The patient will also be provided with written information regarding the safety of prepidil as an pre-induction cervical ripening agent and the safety of urinary balloon catheters as a pre-induction cervical ripening agent. The investigator will review general information on the trial and an informed consent. Patients who decline enrollment in the trial will have the method of pre-induction cervical ripening chosen by their physician.

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Single, live fetus
  2. Cephalic (head-first) presentation
  3. Reassuring fetal health assessment
  4. Gestational age between 26 and 42 weeks
  5. Maternal age 18 and above
  6. Bishop score less than 5

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Multiple Gestation (twins, triplets, quadruplets)
  2. Fetal demise
  3. Fetal malpresentation
  4. Estimated fetal weight less than 500 grams or more than 4000 grams
  5. Placenta previa
  6. Non-reassuring fetal health assessment
  7. Maternal asthma
  8. Latex allergy
  9. Spontaneous labor
  10. Other contraindication to vaginal delivery

Patients who enroll in the study will be randomized into 3 study arms: urinary balloon catheter only, prostaglandin gel only and combination urinary balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel. Randomization will be made by choosing a sealed envelope from the locked nurse medication storage area (Pyxis) located on Labor and Delivery at Palmetto Health Richland. Randomization will be 1:1:1 with randomization envelopes prepared by statisticians at the University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health. The investigator will be given the next sequentially numbered study envelope by the patient's nurse. The randomization included will be unblinded to the patient and her physicians.

URINARY BALLLOON CATHETER ONLY ARM

The patient will be placed in the lithotomy position, either in the bed or in stirrups. A baseline digital exam of the cervix will be performed by the physician and a Bishop score recorded. A urinary balloon catheter will be placed through the cervix into the lower uterine segment, either digitally or with the aid of a speculum. Once the catheter is properly positioned, the bulb will be inflated with 40ml of normal saline. The urinary balloon catheter will then be secured to the patient's thigh using tape. The catheter will then be placed under traction by attaching it to a liter bag of saline.

The catheter will be deflated and removed after 6 hours, with the time of removal recorded in the medical record. If the catheter is spontaneously expelled from the uterus, the time of expulsion will be noted by the nurse. Six (6) hours after insertion of the catheter, the physician will perform a digital cervical exam and a Bishop score recorded.

If the patient is not in active labor at the time of catheter removal or expulsion, a standardized protocol of oxytocin will commence. Labor management will be at the discretion of the physician. Artificial rupture of membranes may also be carried out at the physician's discretion.

PREPIDIL ONLY ARM

The patient will be placed in the lithotomy position, either in the bed or in stirrups. A baseline digital exam of the cervix will be performed by the physician and a Bishop score recorded in the medical record.

Prepidil gel will be inserted into the vaginal fornix according to the manufacturer's direction. No oxytocin or other intervention will commence until 6 hours after insertion of the gel. Six (6) hours after insertion of the gel, the physician will perform a digital cervical exam and a Bishop score recorded.

If the patient is not in active labor 6 hours after the administration of Prepidil gel, a standardized protocol of oxytocin will commence. Labor management will be at the discretion of the physician. Artificial rupture of membranes may also be carried out at the physician's discretion.

COMBINED URINARY BALLOON CATHETER AND PREPIDIL GEL ARM

The patient will be placed in the lithotomy position, either in the bed or in stirrups. A baseline digital exam of the cervix will be performed by the physician and a Bishop score recorded. A urinary balloon catheter will be placed through the cervix into the lower uterine segment, either digitally or with the aid of a speculum. Once the catheter is properly positioned, the bulb will be inflated with 40ml of normal saline. The urinary balloon catheter will then be secured to the patient's thigh using tape. The catheter will then be placed under traction by attaching it to a liter bag of saline.

Prepidil gel will be inserted through the urinary balloon catheter into the lower uterine segment, in a dose equivalent to the manufacturer's recommendation. No oxytocin or other intervention will commence until 6 hours after insertion of the catheter and prepidil gel (even if the catheter is spontaneously expelled prior to that time). Six (6) hours after insertion of the catheter and gel, the physician will perform a digital cervical exam and a Bishop score recorded.

The catheter will be deflated and removed after 6 hours, with the time of removal noted by the nurse. If the catheter is spontaneously expelled from the uterus, the time of expulsion will be noted by the nurse. If the patient is not in active labor 6 hours after insertion of prepidil gel, a standardized protocol of oxytocin will commence. Labor management will be at the discretion of the physician. Artificial rupture of membranes may also be carried out at the physician's discretion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Failed Labour

Keywords

  • Labor, obstetric
  • Labor, induced
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 196 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Single, live fetus
  2. Cephalic (head-first) presentation
  3. Reassuring fetal health assessment
  4. Gestational age between 26 and 42 weeks
  5. Maternal age 18 and above
  6. Bishop score less than 5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Multiple Gestation (twins, triplets, quadruplets)
  2. Fetal demise
  3. Fetal malpresentation
  4. Estimated fetal weight less than 500 grams or more than 4000 grams
  5. Placenta previa
  6. Non-reassuring fetal health assessment
  7. Maternal asthma
  8. Latex allergy
  9. Spontaneous labor
  10. Other contraindication to vaginal delivery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Urinary Balloon Catheter Only

    A urinary balloon catheter will be placed through the cervix into the lower uterine segment and the bulb inflated with 40ml of saline. The catheter will be taped to the patient's thigh and placed under traction using a liter bag of saline. The catheter will be deflated and removed after 6 hours. If spontaneously expelled from the uterus, time of expulsion will be noted. Six hours after insertion of catheter, a digital exam will be performed and Bishop score recorded. If no active labor at time of catheter removal or expulsion, standardized protocol of oxytocin will commence. Labor management will be at the discretion of the physician.

    Device: Urinary Balloon Catheter

  • Active comparator
    Prepadil Only

    Prepidil Only : Prepidil gel will be inserted into the vaginal fornix according to manufacturer's direction. No oxytocin or other intervention will commence until 6 hours after insertion of gel. Six hours after insertion of gel, digital exam will be performed and Bishop score recorded. If no active labor 6 hours after the administration of gel, standardized protocol of oxytocin will commence. Labor management will be at the discretion of the physician.

    Drug: Prepidil Gel

  • Experimental
    Combined Urinary Catheter & Prepidil Gel

    A urinary balloon catheter will be placed through the cervix into the lower uterine segment and the bulb inflated with 40ml of saline. The catheter will be taped to the patient's thigh and placed under traction using a liter bag of saline. Prepidil gel will be inserted through the catheter into the lower uterine segment, in a dose equivalent to manufacturer's recommendation. No oxytocin or other intervention will commence until 6 hours after insertion of the catheter and administration of prepidil gel (even if catheter is spontaneously expelled). After 6 hours, digital exam will be performed and Bishop score recorded. If no active labor, standardized protocol of oxytocin will commence.

    Other: Combined Urinary Catheter & Prepidil Gel

Interventions

  • Pre-induction cervical ripening using dinoprostone gel in the vagina.

  • DeviceUrinary Balloon Catheter

    Pre-induction cervical ripening using a urinary balloon catheter device.

    Also known as: Foley Catheter

  • OtherCombined Urinary Catheter & Prepidil Gel

    Pre-induction cervical ripening using dinoprostone gel injected through a urinary balloon catheter placed in the lower uterine segment.

    Also known as: Foley catheter, Prepidil Gel

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vaginal Delivery

    The primary outcome of this study is vaginal delivery of a liveborn singleton pregnancy. The outcome is considered a vaginal delivery if accomplished by spontaneous vaginal delivery, operative forceps or vacuum forceps. The alternate outcome is delivery by cesarean section.

    Time frame: Gestational age 26-42 weeks

07

Results

Posted May 30, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Limits included: patients enrolled who did not meet inclusion criteria (Bishop score too favorable, but recruited by clinician), patients who were enrolled but catheter could not be placed, patient enrolled who ultimately decided to undergo cesarean.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneUrinary Balloon Catheter OnlyPrepadil OnlyCombined Urinary Catheter & Prepadil Gel
Started353136
Completed302930
Not completed526

Outcome measures

PrimaryVaginal Delivery

The primary outcome of this study is vaginal delivery of a liveborn singleton pregnancy. The outcome is considered a vaginal delivery if accomplished by spontaneous vaginal delivery, operative forceps or vacuum forceps. The alternate outcome is delivery by cesarean section.

Time frame:
Gestational age 26-42 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Vaginal Delivery
participantsUrinary Balloon Catheter OnlyPrepadil OnlyCombined Urinary Catheter & Prepadil Gel
Vaginal Delivery202120

Adverse events

Collected over Entire enrollment period (July 2010 to February 2013). Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Urinary Balloon Catheter Only—0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)
Prepadil Only—0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)
Combined Urinary Catheter & Prepadil Gel—1/36 (2.8%)0/36 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventUrinary Balloon Catheter OnlyPrepadil OnlyCombined Urinary Catheter & Prepadil Gel
Placental AbruptionPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/350/311/36

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Urinary Balloon Catheter OnlyPrepadil OnlyCombined Urinary Catheter & Prepadil GelTotal
Mean25 (18 to 37)25 (18 to 38)26 (18 to 44)25 (18 to 44)
Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Urinary Balloon Catheter OnlyPrepadil OnlyCombined Urinary Catheter & Prepadil GelTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years343136101
>=65 years0000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Urinary Balloon Catheter OnlyPrepadil OnlyCombined Urinary Catheter & Prepadil GelTotal
Female343136101
Male0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Urinary Balloon Catheter OnlyPrepadil OnlyCombined Urinary Catheter & Prepadil GelTotal
United States343136101
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Palmetto Health Richland Hospital
    Columbia, South Carolina 29203, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. 2010 Mar;(35):1-8. PubMed 20334736 ↗
  • Greybush M, Singleton C, Atlas RO, Balducci J, Rust OA. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared. J Reprod Med. 2001 Jan;46(1):11-7. PubMed 11209625 ↗
  • Matonhodze BB, Hofmeyr GJ, Levin J. Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone. S Afr Med J. 2003 May;93(5):375-9. PubMed 12830603 ↗
  • Kelly AJ, Malik S, Smith L, Kavanagh J, Thomas J. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD003101. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003101.pub2. PubMed 19821301 ↗
  • ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):386-397. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5. No abstract available. PubMed 19623003 ↗
  • Heinemann J, Gillen G, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;199(2):177-87; discussion 187-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.05.005. PubMed 18674661 ↗
  • James C, Peedicayil A, Seshadri L. Use of the Foley catheter as a cervical ripening agent prior to induction of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994 Dec;47(3):229-32. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(94)90566-5. PubMed 7705527 ↗
  • Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Tomera S, Uccella S, Lischetti B, Bolis PF. Cervical ripening with the Foley catheter. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 May;97(2):105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.10.014. Epub 2007 Feb 20. PubMed 17316649 ↗
  • Saunders JR. Foley-catheter induction of labour. Br Med J. 1972 Oct 28;4(5834):237. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5834.237-a. No abstract available. PubMed 5082574 ↗
  • Hemlin J, Moller B. Extraamniotic saline infusion is promising in preparing the cervix for induction of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Jan;77(1):45-9. PubMed 9492717 ↗
  • Karjane NW, Brock EL, Walsh SW. Induction of labor using a foley balloon, with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;107(2 Pt 1):234-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000198629.44186.c8. PubMed 16449106 ↗
  • Wagman H, Usherwood M. Intrauterine death treated with intrauterine extra-amniotic prostaglandin E2. Br J Clin Pract. 1974 Sep;28(9):318. PubMed 4464977 ↗
  • Luengo J, Keirse MJ, Bennebroek Gravenhorst J. Extraamniotic prostaglandin F2 alpha for intrauterine death and fetal abnormality. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1977;7(5):325-9. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(77)90017-x. PubMed 299460 ↗
  • Fuchs AR, Goeschen K, Rasmussen AB, Rehnstrom JV. Cervical ripening and plasma prostaglandin levels. Comparison of endocervical and extra-amniotic PGE2. Prostaglandins. 1984 Aug;28(2):217-27. doi: 10.1016/0090-6980(84)90058-3. PubMed 6594722 ↗
  • Liu HS, Chang YK, Chu TY, Yu MH, Chen WH. Extra-amniotic balloon with PGE2 versus extra-ovular Foley catheter with PGF2alpha in mid-trimester pregnancy termination. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Oct;63(1):51-4. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00114-3. PubMed 9849711 ↗
  • Sherman DJ, Frenkel E, Pansky M, Caspi E, Bukovsky I, Langer R. Balloon cervical ripening with extra-amniotic infusion of saline or prostaglandin E2: a double-blind, randomized controlled study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Mar;97(3):375-80. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01168-6. PubMed 11239640 ↗
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 342: induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;108(2):465-8. doi: 10.1097/00006250-200608000-00045. PubMed 16880321 ↗
  • ACOG Committee Opinion. American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologist. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 283, May 2003. New U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling on Cytotec (misoprostol) use and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;101(5 Pt 1):1049-50. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00396-x. PubMed 12738178 ↗
  • Thomas IL, Chenoweth JN, Tronc GN, Johnson IR. Preparation for induction of labour of the unfavourable cervix with Foley catheter compared with vaginal prostaglandin. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Feb;26(1):30-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1986.tb01524.x. PubMed 3524549 ↗
  • St Onge RD, Connors GT. Preinduction cervical ripening: a comparison of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel versus the Foley catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Feb;172(2 Pt 1):687-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90594-4. PubMed 7856707 ↗
  • Orhue AA. Induction of labour at term in primigravidae with low Bishop's score: a comparison of three methods. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995 Feb;58(2):119-25. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(94)01963-0. PubMed 7774736 ↗
  • Ghezzi F, Massimo F, Raio L, Di Naro E, Balestreri D, Bolis P. Extra-amniotic Foley catheter and prostaglandin E(2) gel for cervical ripening at term gestation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Aug;97(2):183-7. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00544-3. PubMed 11451546 ↗
  • Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, Pollock M, Maas B, Colmorgen G. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;97(4):603-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01186-8. PubMed 11275035 ↗
  • Chung JH, Huang WH, Rumney PJ, Garite TJ, Nageotte MP. A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;189(4):1031-5. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00842-1. PubMed 14586350 ↗
  • Niromanesh S, Mosavi-Jarrahi A, Samkhaniani F. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Apr;81(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00392-2. PubMed 12676389 ↗
  • Al-Taani MI. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas. East Mediterr Health J. 2004 Jul-Sep;10(4-5):547-53. PubMed 16335645 ↗
  • Afolabi BB, Oyeneyin OL, Ogedengbe OK. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;89(3):263-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.02.010. Epub 2005 Apr 2. PubMed 15919393 ↗
  • Dalui R, Suri V, Ray P, Gupta I. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Apr;84(4):362-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00662.x. PubMed 15762966 ↗
  • Owolabi AT, Kuti O, Ogunlola IO. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Aug;25(6):565-8. doi: 10.1080/01443610500231450. PubMed 16234141 ↗
  • Adeniji AO, Olayemi O, Odukogbe AA. Intravaginal misoprostol versus transcervical Foley catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Feb;92(2):130-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.10.010. Epub 2005 Dec 2. No abstract available. PubMed 16325816 ↗
  • Saleem S. Efficacy of dinoprostone, intracervical foleys and misoprostol in labor induction. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006 Apr;16(4):276-9. PubMed 16624192 ↗
  • de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4. PubMed 36996264 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01390233
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 8, 2011
Start date
Jul 2010
Primary completion
Feb 2013
Completion
May 2013
Results posted
May 30, 2014
Last update
May 30, 2014

Study contacts

Paul C Browne, MD
principal investigator · University of South Carolina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion