CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01379664Updated Apr 10, 2017Results posted

Volatile Anesthetic Choice and Duration of Hospitalization: A Quality Improvement and Cost-control Project

An interventional study of Isoflurane and Sevoflurane in Duration of Hospitalization, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-10.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,584
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Preliminary retrospective data suggest that the relatively soluble but inexpensive volatile anesthesia isoflurane prolongs the duration of hospitalization compared to the less soluble but more expensive anesthetic sevoflurane. Even a small reduction in the duration of hospitalization would easily compensate for the modest additional cost of sevoflurane. The investigators therefore propose to test the primary hypothesis that duration of hospitalization is longer with isoflurane than sevoflurane.

The investigators will also test the secondary hypotheses that: 1) pain scores are greater in patients recovering from isoflurane than sevoflurane anesthesia; and, 2) opioid consumption is greater after isoflurane than sevoflurane anesthesia. All statistical analyses will be adjusted for age, gender, race, baseline risk, 9 and procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Duration of Hospitalization

Keywords

  • Sevoflurane
  • Isoflurane
  • volatile anesthetic
  • duration of hospitalization
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 818 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 89 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must have surgery in G operating room suite
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,584 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Isoflurane

    Isoflurane is to be administered to patients in this arm during surgery

    Drug: Isoflurane

  • Experimental
    Sevoflurane

    Sevoflurane is to be administered to patients in this arm during surgery

    Drug: Sevoflurane

Interventions

  • DrugIsoflurane

    Isoflurane is administered to patient during surgery as it would normally be administered by the attending anesthesiologist

  • DrugSevoflurane

    Sevoflurane is administered to patient during surgery as it would normally be administered by the attending anesthesiologist

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hospital Length of Stay

    Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time-weighted Average Verbal Rating Pain Score

    Time-weighted average VRS (Verbal Rating Scale) pain score over the first 72 h after surgery as recorded by nurses at approximately 4-h intervals. The VRS pain score is from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: up to 72 hours after surgery

  2. Total Intraoperative Opioid Consumption

    Total amount of opioid in IV morphine equivalents used during surgeyr

    Time frame: intraoperative

07

Results

Posted Apr 10, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIsofluraneSevoflurane
Started714870
Completed714870
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryHospital Length of Stay
Time frame:
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 days
Reported as:
Median · Days
Hospital Length of Stay
DaysIsofluraneSevoflurane
Hospital Length of Stay4.9 (2.0 to 8.4)4.4 (1.5 to 7.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Isoflurane vs Sevoflurane · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.24 · Ratio of geometric means: 1.06 · 95% CI 0.97 to 1.16
SecondaryTime-weighted Average Verbal Rating Pain Score

Time-weighted average VRS (Verbal Rating Scale) pain score over the first 72 h after surgery as recorded by nurses at approximately 4-h intervals. The VRS pain score is from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Time frame:
up to 72 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Time-weighted Average Verbal Rating Pain Score
units on a scaleIsofluraneSevoflurane
Time-weighted Average Verbal Rating Pain Score3.6 ± 1.93.6 ± 1.8
Statistical analysis
  • Isoflurane vs Sevoflurane · Generalized estimating equation model · p = 0.87 · Mean difference (final values): -0.02 · 95% CI -0.23 to 0.19Generalized estimating equation model weighted by inverse propensity score
SecondaryTotal Intraoperative Opioid Consumption

Total amount of opioid in IV morphine equivalents used during surgeyr

Time frame:
intraoperative
Reported as:
Mean · mg
Total Intraoperative Opioid Consumption
mgIsofluraneSevoflurane
Total Intraoperative Opioid Consumption32 ± 1.333 ± 1.6
Statistical analysis
  • Isoflurane vs Sevoflurane · Generalized estimating equation model · p = 0.74 · Mean difference (final values): -0.69 · 95% CI -4.7 to 3.3Generalized estimating equation model weighted by propensity score

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Isoflurane—0/701 (0%)0/701 (0%)
Sevoflurane—0/870 (0%)0/870 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)IsofluraneSevofluraneTotal
Mean53.4 ± 16.553.6 ± 16.653.5 ± 16.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)IsofluraneSevofluraneTotal
Female408502910
Male306368674
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01379664
Lead sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Responsible party
d sessler (Professor & Chair, The Cleveland Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 23, 2011
Start date
Jul 2011
Primary completion
Apr 2013
Completion
Apr 2013
Results posted
Apr 10, 2017
Last update
Apr 10, 2017

Study contacts

Daniel I Sessler, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion