ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01378637AMESUpdated Dec 8, 2016

AMES Treatment of the Impaired Leg in Chronic Stroke Patients

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of AMES- Leg treatment in Stroke, Cerebrovascular Accident and Hemiparesis, sponsored by AMES Technology. Status unknown at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-12-08.

Sponsored by AMES Technology · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2016), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this protocol is to determine if individuals who had a stroke more than one year before entering the study and whose ankles remain substantially impaired are able to sense and move the affected leg better after 9-13 weeks of treatment with a robotic therapy device (AMES).

Read the detailed description

Our research objective is to develop procedures to rehabilitate those stroke patients who, through conventional therapies, are not brought to a level of maximal recovery. The aims of the proposed project are to obtain a set of data from a total of 20 chronic stroke subjects, all with severe lower extremity disability, between the ages of 18-85, using a robotic therapeutic device placed in a rehabilitation clinic. This data will allow us to quantify the extent to which a combination of robotic-assisted exercise and tendon vibration from the AMES beta device induces secondary recovery from the effects of stroke on the lower extremity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Cerebrovascular Accident
  • Hemiparesis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Leg
  • Robotic device
  • AMES
  • Stroke
  • Cerebrovascular Accident
  • Rehabilitation
03

In context

Stroke

7,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,012 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 22 is below the median of 50 across 5,482 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

AMES Technology is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Spastic hemiparesis
  • At least 12 months post-stroke
  • Can comfortably fit foot in treatment device
  • Functioning proprioception
  • Fugl-Meyer LE score >6 and \<23
  • Minimal hemi-neglect
  • Observable volitional movement of the ankle in either plantar- or dorsi-flexion
  • Cognitively and behaviorally capable of complying with the regimen

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fractures of treated limb resulting in loss of range of motion
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Deep venous thrombosis
  • Peripheral nerve injury or neuropathy in the affected limb with motor disability
  • Osteoarthritis limiting range of motion
  • Uncontrolled high blood pressure/angina
  • Exercise intolerant
  • Skin condition not tolerant of device
  • Progressive neurodegenerative disorder
  • Uncontrolled seizure disorder
  • Botox treatment within last 5 months
  • Baclofen pump
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AMES Leg treatment

    An investigational device flexes and extends the ankle over a range of 30 degrees while vibrators stimulate the tendons attached to muscles that move the foot. The subject's task is to assist the motion of the device by pulling or pushing with the foot. Feedback of ankle torque or the electrical signal produced by the muscles (EMG) while the subject is assisting the motion is provided during the 30 treatment sessions.

    Device: AMES- Leg treatment

Interventions

  • DeviceAMES- Leg treatment

    30 minutes of treatment of the leg consisting of the AMES device passively moving the ankle between plantarflexion and dorsiflexion with vibration of the tendons being stretched, while the participant tries to assist in the movement as much as possible.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment of the Lower Affected Extremity

    Time frame: Measured three times: 1) Baseline; 2) After 30 Treatments (typically 10-13 weeks); and 3) Three Months after completing Treatments

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gait Assessment

    The gait assessment will consist of the timed 10-Meter walk and the Tinetti Gait Test.

    Time frame: Measured three times: 1) Baseline; 2) After 30 Treatments (typically 10-13 weeks); and 3) Three Months after completing Treatments

  2. Modified Ashworth Scale

    Measurement of spasticity in the ankle joint.

    Time frame: Measured three times: 1) Baseline; 2) After 30 Treatments (typically 10-13 weeks); and 3) Three Months after completing Treatments

  3. Dynamic Balance/Weight Distribution

    Measure the subject's right-left weight distribution and dynamic balance control.

    Time frame: Measured three times: 1) Baseline; 2) After 30 Treatments (typically 10-13 weeks); and 3) Three Months after completing Treatments

  4. Ankle Strength

    Measurement of three attempts of dorsiflexion and three attempts of plantarflexion.

    Time frame: Prior to each treatment session,

  5. Passive Motion Test

    Measures the peak resistance in the affected ankle.

    Time frame: Prior to each treatment session

  6. Active Range of Motion Test

    A joint tracking task guided by visual feedback on a computer screen.

    Time frame: Prior to each treatment session

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Northwestern University/Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Oregon Health and Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97006, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 8, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01378637
Lead sponsor
AMES Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 22, 2011
Start date
Jan 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Jul 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 8, 2016

Study contacts

Barry Oken, MD
principal investigator · Oregon Health and Science University
Elliot Roth, MD
principal investigator · Northwestern University/Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion