CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01357551MAINTAINUpdated Nov 2, 2016Results posted

Maintenance After Initiation of Nutrition TrAINing

An interventional study of Maintenance intervention in Obesity, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 74 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-02.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
222
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 74 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obesity is the second leading cause of preventable deaths in the United States and is associated with a wide range of diseases. In people who are obese, weight loss improves blood pressure, dyslipidemia, glycemia, and arthritis symptoms; reduces medication use for several disease processes; increases physical functioning; and enhances health-related quality of life. The current study evaluated a theoretically informed maintenance intervention. If effective, this intervention could reduce the need for future clinic visits to treat obesity and its many associated illnesses.

Read the detailed description

Obesity is the second leading cause of preventable deaths in the United States and is associated with a wide range of diseases. In people who are obese, weight loss improves blood pressure, dyslipidemia, glycemia, and arthritis symptoms; reduces medication use for several disease processes; increases physical functioning; and enhances health-related quality of life. Despite these benefits, most patients who achieve weight loss regain much of this weight within a year, and few effective behavioral weight maintenance interventions have been identified. Thus, there is a dire need for effective interventions that can promote weight loss maintenance. Theoretical and empirical studies indicate that behavior maintenance is a distinct state that involves different psychological processes and behavioral skills than initial behavior change. The few trials that have tested weight loss maintenance interventions have not taken this distinction into account, which may partially explain their modest findings. The current study evaluated the efficacy of a theoretically informed maintenance intervention compared to usual care. If efficacious, this intervention could reduce the need for future clinic visits to treat obesity and its many associated illnesses and could serve as a model for redesigning the MOVE! program. This 3.5-year study involved a two-arm, randomized, controlled trial. During the run-in phase, Veterans with BMI 30 kg/m2 participated in a 4-month, intensive, group-based weight loss program. Participants who lost at least 4 kg by the end of 4 months (n=222) were randomized to receive (a) usual care (n=112) for 56 weeks or (b) a theoretically-informed maintenance intervention (n=110) for 42 weeks months, followed by 14 weeks of no intervention contact to examine sustainability. The maintenance intervention involved in-person group visits that transition to individualized telephone calls, and the frequency of contact with the interventionist gradually tapered over time. Outcomes were assessed at randomization and at weeks 14, 26, 42, and 56 post-randomization. The hypotheses are that the maintenance intervention will result in at least 3.5 kg greater weight loss and greater improvements in caloric intake and physical activity over the study period, and that it will be cost-effective, compared to usual care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • obesity
  • intervention studies
  • patient adherence
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,692 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 222 is above the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • BMI >= 30 kg/m2
  • Desire to lose weight
  • Agrees to attend regular visits per study protocol
  • Has a provider at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age >= 75 years old,
  • Most recent serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL in men, >1.7 mg/dL in women),
  • Liver disease (cirrhosis, jaundice, or other stigmata of advanced liver disease),
  • Type 1 diabetes,
  • Hemoglobin A1c >= 12% in past 6 months
  • unstable angina or coronary ischemia workup in past 3 months
  • Female: pregnancy, breastfeeding, or lack of birth control if premenopausal
  • Transplant recipient
  • Pacemaker or defibrillator (bioelectric impedance assessment might interfere with these)
  • Average systolic blood pressure in the past year >= 160 mmHg AND most recent BP >=160 mmHg
  • Dementia, severe psychiatric illness (e.g., major depression), alcohol problem, or illicit substance abuse
  • Weight loss of at least 10 lb in previous 3 months
  • Enrollment in a weight loss program
  • Unable to stand for study measurements
  • history of weight loss surgery
  • cancer not in remission
  • current use of appetite suppressants or weight loss medication
  • lack of reliable transportation or telephone
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
222 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Maintenance intervention

    Participants receive a theoretically-informed maintenance intervention for 42 weeks, followed by 14 weeks of no intervention contact to examine sustainability. The maintenance intervention involves in-person group visits that transition to individualized telephone calls, and the frequency of contact gradually decreases over time.

    Behavioral: Maintenance intervention

  • No intervention
    Usual care

    Participants receive usual care for 56 weeks

Interventions

  • BehavioralMaintenance intervention

    Theoretically-informed maintenance intervention that involves in-person group visits that transition to individualized telephone calls, and the frequency of contact gradually decreases over time.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Weight

    Time frame: 56 weeks post-randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Estimated Daily Caloric Intake

    Based on self-report using Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire

    Time frame: 56 weeks

  2. Estimated Metabolic Minutes of Walking Per Week

    self-reported based on short form of International Physical Activity Questionnaire

    Time frame: 56 weeks

  3. Estimated Metabolic Minutes of Moderate Physical Activity Per Week

    self-reported based on short form of International Physical Activity Questionnaire

    Time frame: 56 weeks

07

Results

Posted Nov 2, 2016
Limitations and caveats
May not generalize to other populations; relatively short length of follow-up; use of self-reported secondary outcome measures

Participant flow

573 people were consented. Of those, 69 did not return to provide a weight at study entry. Of the 504 who provided a weight at study entry, 200 dropped out, 82 lost \< 4 kg, and 222 lost at least 4 kg and thus were eligible for randomization in the maintenance phase.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMaintenance InterventionUsual Care
Started110112
Completed88101
Not completed2211
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject64
Withdrew: Death01
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up166

Outcome measures

PrimaryWeight
Time frame:
56 weeks post-randomization
Reported as:
Mean · kilograms
Weight
kilogramsMaintenance InterventionUsual Care
Weight99.2 ± 17.7105.7 ± 20.1
Statistical analysis
  • Maintenance Intervention vs Usual Care · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .04 (A priori threshold was p\<.05) · Mean difference (final values): 1.61 · 95% CI .07 to 3.13Parameters included common intercept, initial weight loss stratum, dummy-coded time, and indicators for the maintenance X each follow-up time point
SecondaryEstimated Daily Caloric Intake

Based on self-report using Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire

Time frame:
56 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · kcal per day
Estimated Daily Caloric Intake
kcal per dayMaintenance InterventionUsual Care
Estimated Daily Caloric Intake1207.5 ± 548.31339.1 ± 750.5
Statistical analysis
  • Maintenance Intervention vs Usual Care · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .11 · Mean difference (net): -125.49 · 95% CI -280.71 to 29.72Common intercept, initial weight loss stratum, indicators for week 26 \& 56, group X time interaction
SecondaryEstimated Metabolic Minutes of Walking Per Week

self-reported based on short form of International Physical Activity Questionnaire

Time frame:
56 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · metabolic minutes per week
Estimated Metabolic Minutes of Walking Per Week
metabolic minutes per weekMaintenance InterventionUsual Care
Estimated Metabolic Minutes of Walking Per Week680.72 ± 721.23665.43 ± 822.30
Statistical analysis
  • Maintenance Intervention vs Usual Care · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .91 · Incidence rate ratio: 1.03 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.68Common intercept, initial weight loss stratum, indicators for week 26 \& 56, group X time interaction; negative binomial distribution with log link
SecondaryEstimated Metabolic Minutes of Moderate Physical Activity Per Week

self-reported based on short form of International Physical Activity Questionnaire

Time frame:
56 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · metabolic minutes per week
Estimated Metabolic Minutes of Moderate Physical Activity Per Week
metabolic minutes per weekMaintenance InterventionUsual Care
Estimated Metabolic Minutes of Moderate Physical Activity Per Week783.40 ± 1175.57810.25 ± 1215.14
Statistical analysis
  • Maintenance Intervention vs Usual Care · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .83 · Incidence rate ratio: 1.07 · 95% CI 0.57 to 2.03Common intercept, initial weight loss stratum, indicators for week 26 \& 56, group X time interaction; negative binomial distribution with log link

Adverse events

Collected over 56-week study period. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Maintenance Intervention—4/110 (3.6%)0/110 (0%)
Usual Care—1/112 (0.9%)0/112 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventMaintenance InterventionUsual Care
Emergency room visit due to high blood pressureCardiac disorders1/1100/112
DeathGeneral disorders1/1101/112
emergency room visit due to knee painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1100/112
Emergency room visit due to anxietyPsychiatric disorders1/1100/112

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Maintenance InterventionUsual CareTotal
Mean61.5 ± 8.362.0 ± 8.361.8 ± 8.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Maintenance InterventionUsual CareTotal
Female171734
Male9395188
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Maintenance InterventionUsual CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino112
Not Hispanic or Latino105111216
Unknown or Not Reported404
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Maintenance InterventionUsual CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American384583
White6762129
More than one race314
Unknown or Not Reported235
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Maintenance InterventionUsual CareTotal
United States110112222
Weight loss during initiation phase
Weight loss during initiation phase(kilograms)Maintenance InterventionUsual CareTotal
Mean7.2 ± 2.87.2 ± 3.47.2 ± 3.1
Weight
Weight(kilograms)Maintenance InterventionUsual CareTotal
Mean102.1 ± 19.8105.0 ± 21.0103.6 ± 20.4
Body mass index
Body mass index(kilograms per meter squared)Maintenance InterventionUsual CareTotal
Mean33.3 ± 5.734.6 ± 6.434.0 ± 6.1

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Voils CI, Gierisch JM, Yancy WS Jr, Sandelowski M, Smith R, Bolton J, Strauss JL. Differentiating Behavior Initiation and Maintenance: Theoretical Framework and Proof of Concept. Health Educ Behav. 2014 Jun;41(3):325-36. doi: 10.1177/1090198113515242. Epub 2013 Dec 16. PubMed 24347145 ↗
  • Voils CI, Gierisch JM, Olsen MK, Maciejewski ML, Grubber J, McVay MA, Strauss JL, Bolton J, Gaillard L, Strawbridge E, Yancy WS Jr. Study design and protocol for a theory-based behavioral intervention focusing on maintenance of weight loss: the Maintenance After Initiation of Nutrition TrAINing (MAINTAIN) study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Sep;39(1):95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 10. PubMed 25117805 ↗
  • Funk LM, Grubber JM, McVay MA, Olsen MK, Yancy WS, Voils CI. Patient predictors of weight loss following a behavioral weight management intervention among US Veterans with severe obesity. Eat Weight Disord. 2018 Oct;23(5):587-595. doi: 10.1007/s40519-017-0425-6. Epub 2017 Aug 29. PubMed 28853051 ↗
  • Voils CI, Olsen MK, Gierisch JM, McVay MA, Grubber JM, Gaillard L, Bolton J, Maciejewski ML, Strawbridge E, Yancy WS Jr. Maintenance of Weight Loss After Initiation of Nutrition Training: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):463-471. doi: 10.7326/M16-2160. Epub 2017 Feb 21. PubMed 28241185 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 2, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01357551
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 20, 2011
Start date
Aug 2012
Primary completion
Nov 2015
Completion
Nov 2015
Results posted
Nov 2, 2016
Last update
Nov 2, 2016

Study contacts

Corrine I Voils, PhD
principal investigator · Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion