CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01356602Updated Jan 29, 2014Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of Canakinumab Prefilled Syringes in Frequently Flaring Acute Gouty Arthritis Patients

A Phase 3 interventional study of Canakinumab pre-filled syringe and Canakinumab lyophilized powder in Acute Gouty Arthritis, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 99 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-01-29.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
397
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study assessed the safety and efficacy of canakinumab pre-filled syringes in comparison to triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg and canakinumab lyophilizate in patients that have frequent flares of acute gouty arthritis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Gouty Arthritis

Keywords

  • Gout
  • arthritis
  • gout flare
  • acute gout
  • gouty
  • rheumatic disease
  • uric acid
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 397 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,673 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 576 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 431 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 3 or more gout flares within last year
  • Contraindication, intolerance or lack of efficacy for NSAIDs and/or colchicine
  • Body mass index of less than or equal to 45 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Use of the following therapies (within varying protocol defined timeframes): corticosteroids, narcotics, topical ice/cold packs, chronic opiate treatment, NSAIDs (such as aspirin), colchicine.
  • Hemodialysis
  • Live vaccine within 3 months before first dose
  • Donation or loss of 400 mL or more within 3 months before first dose
  • Gout brought on by other factors such as chemotherapy, lead, transplant, etc.
  • Presence of other acute inflammatory arthritis such as Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Any conditions or significant medical problems that puts the patient at an unacceptable immunological risk to receive this type of therapy such as HIV, Hepatitis, Tuberculosis and other infections/conditions
  • Significant cardiovascular conditions such as uncontrolled hypertension
  • Significant medical diseases such as uncontrolled diabetes, thyroid disease
  • History of malignancy of any organ system within the past 5 years
  • Women who are pregnant or nursing
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
397 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Canakinumab, pre-filled syringes (PFS)

    Patients on this arm received 150 mg subcutaneously (s.c.) at randomization and upon new flare. The doses were provided as pre-filled syringes. The patients were given 3 injections: two placebo and one active drug.

    Drug: Canakinumab pre-filled syringe · Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Canakinumab, lyophilizate (LYO)

    The patients on this arm received 150 mg s.c. at randomization and upon new flare. The doses were provided as lyophilized powder and had to be reconstituted with water for injection before application. The patients were given 3 injections: two placebo and one active drug.

    Drug: Canakinumab lyophilized powder · Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Triamcinolone Acetonide

    The patients on this arm received 40 mg intramuscular (i.m.) at randomization and upon new flare. The patients were given 3 injections: two placebo and one active drug.

    Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugCanakinumab pre-filled syringe

    Canakinumab pre-filled syringe

  • DrugCanakinumab lyophilized powder

    Canakinumab lyophilized powder

  • DrugTriamcinolone Acetonide

    Triamcinolone Acetonide

  • DrugPlacebo

    Matching placebo to Canakinumab (PFS), Canakinumab (LYO) and Triamcinolone Acetonide

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity on a 0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Between the Canakinumab 150 mg PFS and Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mg Groups

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is an instrument used to measure a person's subjective quantitative evaluation of an item such as pain intensity. The VAS contains a continuous line between two end points whereby the respondent places a mark on the line to indicate his or her response. In this study, patients scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 0 100 mm VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Missing pain intensity data at 72 hours was imputed using the Last-Observation-Carried-Forward (LOCF) method.

    Time frame: 72 hours post dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity on a 0 - 100 mm VAS Between the Canakinumab 150 mg PFS and Canakinumab 150 mg LYO Groups

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is an instrument used to measure a person's subjective quantitative evaluation of an item such as pain intensity. The VAS contains a continuous line between two end points whereby the respondent places a mark on the line to indicate his or her response. In this study, patients scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 0 100 mm VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Missing pain intensity data at 72 hours was imputed using the Last-Observation-Carried-Forward (LOCF) method.

    Time frame: 72 hours post dose

  2. Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity on a 0-100mm VAS

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is an instrument used to measure a person's subjective quantitative evaluation of an item such as pain intensity. The VAS contains a continuous line between two end points whereby the respondent places a mark on the line to indicate his or her response. In this study, patients scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 0 100 mm VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The LOCF method was used to impute post-dose pain intensity VAS measurements up to 14 days.

    Time frame: 14 days

  3. Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity on a 5-point Likert Scale

    A Likert scale is a type of scale with a range of responses corresponding to an item such as pain. The respondent selects the best response that indicates the respondent's subjective evaluation of the item. Patients scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The LOCF method was used to impute post-dose pain intensity Likert measurements up to 14 days.

    Time frame: 72 hours

  4. Number of Patients With at Least One New Gouty Arthritis Flare After Baseline

    Patients met the definition of a new flare if they had: a flare in a joint, which was not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during the study), or a flare in a joint previously affected (at baseline or during the study) after the previous flare in that joint had resolved completely according to the patient's perception. Patients did NOT meet the criterion of having a new gout flare if they had increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare had resolved completely.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Time to the First New Gouty Arthritis Flare

    Patients met the definition of a new flare if they had: a flare in a joint, which was not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during the study), or a flare in a joint previously affected (at baseline or during the study) after the previous flare in that joint had resolved completely according to the patient's perception. Patients did NOT meet the criterion of having a new gout flare if they had increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare had resolved completely. Less than 50% of patients had new flares. Therefore, the median time to new flare could not be calculated.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Time to 50% Reduction in Baseline Pain on a 0 - 100 VAS

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is an instrument used to measure a person's subjective quantitative evaluation of an item such as pain intensity. The VAS contains a continuous line between two end points whereby the respondent places a mark on the line to indicate his or her response. In this study, patients scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 0 100 mm VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Kaplan Meier estimate of time to 50% reduction in baseline pain, along with associated 95% confidence interval, were reported.

    Time frame: 14 days

  7. Time to Resolution of Gouty Arthritis Flare as Reported by Patient

    Patients completed diary entries at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours post dose and then daily up to 7 days post-dose and/or daily until resolution of the flare. Kaplan Meier estimate of time to resolution of gouty flare as reported by patient, along with associated 95% confiedence interval, were reported.

    Time frame: 14 days

  8. Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment on a 5-point Likert Scale

    A Likert scale is a type of scale with a range of responses corresponding to an item such as pain. The respondent selects the best response that indicates the respondent's subjective evaluation of the item. Patients scored their response to treatment on a 5-point Likert scale (excellent, good, acceptable, slight, poor). This outcome measure shows the number of patients indicating each score on the scale.

    Time frame: 72 hours

  9. Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment on a 5 Point Likert Scale

    A Likert scale is a type of scale with a range of responses corresponding to an item such as pain. The respondent selects the best response that indicates the respondent's subjective evaluation of the item. Study physicians scored their assessment of the patients' response to treatment on a 5-point Likert scale (very good, good, fair, poor, very poor).

    Time frame: 72 hours

  10. Physician's Assessment of Tenderness

    The study physician assessed the most affected joint for tenderness. Tenderness was measured on a 0 - 3 point scale as follows: 0 = no pain, 1 = patient states that "there is pain", 2 = patient states "there is pain and winces" and 3 = patient states "there is pain, winces and withdraws" on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint.

    Time frame: 72 hours

  11. Physician's Assessment of Swelling

    The study physician assessed the most affected joint for swelling. Swelling was measured on a 0 - 3 point scale as follows: 0 = no swelling, 1 = palpable, 2= visible and 3 = bulging beyond the joint margins.

    Time frame: 72 hours

  12. Physician's Assessment of Erythema

    The study physician assessed the most affected joint for erythema. Erythema was assessed as present, absent or not assessable.

    Time frame: 72 hours

  13. Physician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint

    The study physician assessed the patient's range of motion of the most affected joint on a 5 point Likert scale (normal, mildly restricted, moderately restricted, severely restricted and immobilized).

    Time frame: 72 hours

  14. Proportion of Patients With Rescue Medication Intake

    Patients used a diary to record the time of intake of rescue medication and the amount taken.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  15. Time to First Rescue Medication Intake

    Patients used a diary to record the time of intake of rescue medication and the amount taken.

    Time frame: 14 days

  16. Amount of Rescue Medication Taken (mg)

    Patients used a diary to record the time of intake of rescue medication and the amount taken.

    Time frame: 14 days

  17. C-reactive Protein Level

    A central laboratory was used for analysis of all blood samples collected.

    Time frame: 72 hours

07

Results

Posted Jan 29, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Started133132132
Safety set133133133
Full analysis set131129129
Completed124117108
Not completed91524
Withdrew: Protocol deviation011
Withdrew: Administrative problems145
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up456
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject437
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy014
Withdrew: Adverse event011

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Intensity on a 0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Between the Canakinumab 150 mg PFS and Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mg Groups

The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is an instrument used to measure a person's subjective quantitative evaluation of an item such as pain intensity. The VAS contains a continuous line between two end points whereby the respondent places a mark on the line to indicate his or her response. In this study, patients scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 0 100 mm VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Missing pain intensity data at 72 hours was imputed using the Last-Observation-Carried-Forward (LOCF) method.

Time frame:
72 hours post dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Millimeters
Pain Intensity on a 0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Between the Canakinumab 150 mg PFS and Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mg Groups
MillimetersCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Pain Intensity on a 0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Between the Canakinumab 150 mg PFS and Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mg Groups17.1 ± 2.04—32 ± 2.08
SecondaryPain Intensity on a 0 - 100 mm VAS Between the Canakinumab 150 mg PFS and Canakinumab 150 mg LYO Groups

The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is an instrument used to measure a person's subjective quantitative evaluation of an item such as pain intensity. The VAS contains a continuous line between two end points whereby the respondent places a mark on the line to indicate his or her response. In this study, patients scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 0 100 mm VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Missing pain intensity data at 72 hours was imputed using the Last-Observation-Carried-Forward (LOCF) method.

Time frame:
72 hours post dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Millimeters
Pain Intensity on a 0 - 100 mm VAS Between the Canakinumab 150 mg PFS and Canakinumab 150 mg LYO Groups
MillimetersCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Pain Intensity on a 0 - 100 mm VAS Between the Canakinumab 150 mg PFS and Canakinumab 150 mg LYO Groups17.1 ± 2.0419.7 ± 2.05—
SecondaryPatient's Assessment of Pain Intensity on a 0-100mm VAS

The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is an instrument used to measure a person's subjective quantitative evaluation of an item such as pain intensity. The VAS contains a continuous line between two end points whereby the respondent places a mark on the line to indicate his or her response. In this study, patients scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 0 100 mm VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The LOCF method was used to impute post-dose pain intensity VAS measurements up to 14 days.

Time frame:
14 days
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Millimeters
Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity on a 0-100mm VAS
MillimetersCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity on a 0-100mm VAS7.9 ± 1.698.2 ± 1.714.8 ± 1.72
SecondaryPatient's Assessment of Pain Intensity on a 5-point Likert Scale

A Likert scale is a type of scale with a range of responses corresponding to an item such as pain. The respondent selects the best response that indicates the respondent's subjective evaluation of the item. Patients scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The LOCF method was used to impute post-dose pain intensity Likert measurements up to 14 days.

Time frame:
72 hours
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Patients
Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity on a 5-point Likert Scale
Percentage of PatientsCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
None35.932.623.4
Mild45.844.236.7
Moderate15.321.721.9
Severe2.31.614.1
Extreme0.803.9
SecondaryNumber of Patients With at Least One New Gouty Arthritis Flare After Baseline

Patients met the definition of a new flare if they had: a flare in a joint, which was not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during the study), or a flare in a joint previously affected (at baseline or during the study) after the previous flare in that joint had resolved completely according to the patient's perception. Patients did NOT meet the criterion of having a new gout flare if they had increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare had resolved completely.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Particpants
Number of Patients With at Least One New Gouty Arthritis Flare After Baseline
ParticpantsCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Number of Patients With at Least One New Gouty Arthritis Flare After Baseline121252
SecondaryTime to the First New Gouty Arthritis Flare

Patients met the definition of a new flare if they had: a flare in a joint, which was not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during the study), or a flare in a joint previously affected (at baseline or during the study) after the previous flare in that joint had resolved completely according to the patient's perception. Patients did NOT meet the criterion of having a new gout flare if they had increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare had resolved completely. Less than 50% of patients had new flares. Therefore, the median time to new flare could not be calculated.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to the First New Gouty Arthritis Flare
DaysCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Time to the First New Gouty Arthritis FlareNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryTime to 50% Reduction in Baseline Pain on a 0 - 100 VAS

The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is an instrument used to measure a person's subjective quantitative evaluation of an item such as pain intensity. The VAS contains a continuous line between two end points whereby the respondent places a mark on the line to indicate his or her response. In this study, patients scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 0 100 mm VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Kaplan Meier estimate of time to 50% reduction in baseline pain, along with associated 95% confidence interval, were reported.

Time frame:
14 days
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Time to 50% Reduction in Baseline Pain on a 0 - 100 VAS
HoursCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Time to 50% Reduction in Baseline Pain on a 0 - 100 VAS24 (22 to 25)25 (24 to 48)48 (25 to 54)
SecondaryTime to Resolution of Gouty Arthritis Flare as Reported by Patient

Patients completed diary entries at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours post dose and then daily up to 7 days post-dose and/or daily until resolution of the flare. Kaplan Meier estimate of time to resolution of gouty flare as reported by patient, along with associated 95% confiedence interval, were reported.

Time frame:
14 days
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Time to Resolution of Gouty Arthritis Flare as Reported by Patient
HoursCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Time to Resolution of Gouty Arthritis Flare as Reported by Patient142 (96 to 168)120 (96 to 145)170 (144 to 216)
SecondaryPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment on a 5-point Likert Scale

A Likert scale is a type of scale with a range of responses corresponding to an item such as pain. The respondent selects the best response that indicates the respondent's subjective evaluation of the item. Patients scored their response to treatment on a 5-point Likert scale (excellent, good, acceptable, slight, poor). This outcome measure shows the number of patients indicating each score on the scale.

Time frame:
72 hours
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment on a 5-point Likert Scale
Percentage of ParticipantsCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Excellent36.034.820.4
Good43.236.531.9
Acceptable10.420.021.2
Slight6.47.814.2
Poor4.00.912.4
SecondaryPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment on a 5 Point Likert Scale

A Likert scale is a type of scale with a range of responses corresponding to an item such as pain. The respondent selects the best response that indicates the respondent's subjective evaluation of the item. Study physicians scored their assessment of the patients' response to treatment on a 5-point Likert scale (very good, good, fair, poor, very poor).

Time frame:
72 hours
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment on a 5 Point Likert Scale
Percentage of ParticipantsCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Very good46.233.621.5
Good35.448.833.9
Fair15.416.023.1
Poor1.51.614.0
Very poor1.50.07.4
SecondaryPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness

The study physician assessed the most affected joint for tenderness. Tenderness was measured on a 0 - 3 point scale as follows: 0 = no pain, 1 = patient states that "there is pain", 2 = patient states "there is pain and winces" and 3 = patient states "there is pain, winces and withdraws" on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint.

Time frame:
72 hours
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Physician's Assessment of Tenderness
Percentage of ParticipantsCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
No pain50.040.029.8
There is pain43.152.847.1
There is pain and winces5.46.414.0
There is pain, winces and withdraws1.50.89.1
SecondaryPhysician's Assessment of Swelling

The study physician assessed the most affected joint for swelling. Swelling was measured on a 0 - 3 point scale as follows: 0 = no swelling, 1 = palpable, 2= visible and 3 = bulging beyond the joint margins.

Time frame:
72 hours
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Partipants
Physician's Assessment of Swelling
Percentage of PartipantsCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
No swelling60.855.251.2
Palpable26.925.615.7
Visible10.817.624.8
Bulging beyond the joint margins1.51.68.3
SecondaryPhysician's Assessment of Erythema

The study physician assessed the most affected joint for erythema. Erythema was assessed as present, absent or not assessable.

Time frame:
72 hours
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Physician's Assessment of Erythema
Percentage of ParticipantsCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Absent88.382.968.6
Present11.717.131.4
SecondaryPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint

The study physician assessed the patient's range of motion of the most affected joint on a 5 point Likert scale (normal, mildly restricted, moderately restricted, severely restricted and immobilized).

Time frame:
72 hours
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Physician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint
Percentage of ParticipantsCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Normal50.044.835.5
Mildly restricted37.740.837.2
Moderately restricted11.512.014.0
Severely restricted0.82.412.4
Immobilized0.00.00.8
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Rescue Medication Intake

Patients used a diary to record the time of intake of rescue medication and the amount taken.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Particpants
Proportion of Patients With Rescue Medication Intake
Percentage of ParticpantsCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Proportion of Patients With Rescue Medication Intake29.031.845.7
SecondaryTime to First Rescue Medication Intake

Patients used a diary to record the time of intake of rescue medication and the amount taken.

Time frame:
14 days
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Time to First Rescue Medication Intake
HoursCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Time to First Rescue Medication Intake11 ± 61.877.5 ± 31.5911 ± 39.06
SecondaryAmount of Rescue Medication Taken (mg)

Patients used a diary to record the time of intake of rescue medication and the amount taken.

Time frame:
14 days
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams (mg)
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken (mg)
milligrams (mg)Canakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Acetaminophen609.2 ± 1800.061108.3 ± 2821.542323.1 ± 5580.82
Codeine12.7 ± 55.3023.9 ± 124.5660.8 ± 191.2
Prednisolone / Prednisone5.8 ± 23.136.7 ± 25.0924.7 ± 53.20
SecondaryC-reactive Protein Level

A central laboratory was used for analysis of all blood samples collected.

Time frame:
72 hours
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg / L
C-reactive Protein Level
mg / LCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
C-reactive Protein Level3.65 (3.11 to 4.29)3.37 (2.86 to 3.96)5.2 (4.41 to 6.13)

Adverse events

Collected over 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Canakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)—6/133 (4.5%)0/133 (0%)
Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)—6/133 (4.5%)0/133 (0%)
Triamcinolone Acetonide—5/133 (3.8%)0/133 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent serious events
EventCanakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone Acetonide
Angina unstableCardiac disorders0/1331/1330/133
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders0/1331/1330/133
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders0/1331/1330/133
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/1330/1331/133
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/1330/1331/133
Chest painGeneral disorders0/1330/1331/133
Drug ineffectiveGeneral disorders0/1330/1331/133
Respiratory tract infection viralInfections and infestations0/1331/1330/133
Staphylococcal bacteraemiaInfections and infestations0/1331/1330/133
Viral infectionInfections and infestations1/1330/1330/133

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Canakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone AcetonideTotal
Mean53.4 ± 11.2153 ± 11.8453.7 ± 11.3353.5 ± 11.44
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Canakinumab, Pre-filled Syringes (PFS)Canakinumab, Lyophilizate (LYO)Triamcinolone AcetonideTotal
Female1591135
Male118124122364
08

Study locations

99 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Anniston, Alabama 36207-5710, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Gulf Shores, Alabama 36547, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85013, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85251, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Buena Park, California 90620, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fair Oaks, California 95628, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Norwalk, California 90650, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Orangevale, California 95662, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pasadena, California 91105, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Westlake Village, California 91361, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Jupiter, Florida 33458, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Largo, Florida 33773, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    South Miami, Florida 33143, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Augusta, Georgia 30904, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Decatur, Georgia 30035, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Meridian, Idaho 83642, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Overland Park, Kansas 66215, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Topeka, Kansas 66606, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Louisville, Kentucky 40217, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Owensboro, Kentucky 42303, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Metairie, Louisiana 70006, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Troy, Michigan 48085, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Belzoni, Mississippi 39038, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Jackson, Mississippi 39202, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Jackson, Mississippi 39209, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Picayune, Mississippi 39466, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Missoula, Montana 59804, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68516, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68114, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68134, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Freehold, New Jersey 07728, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mineola, New York 11501, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    New Hyde Park, New York 11042, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Roslyn, New York 11576, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Asheville, North Carolina 28801, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cary, North Carolina 27518, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28209, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27401, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27408, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Salisbury, North Carolina 28144, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shelby, North Carolina 28152, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28401, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fargo, North Dakota 58103, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mogadore, Ohio 44260, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73109, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Charleston, South Carolina 29412, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Columbia, South Carolina 29204, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Greer, South Carolina 29651, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Murrells Inlet, South Carolina 29576, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ninety Six, South Carolina 29666, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Varnville, South Carolina 29944, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bristol, Tennessee 37620, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fayetteville, Tennessee 33734, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Johnson City, Tennessee 37601, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Memphis, Tennessee 38125, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bedford, Texas 76021, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Houston, Texas 77034, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bountiful, Utah 84010, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22911, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Danville, Virginia 24541, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Midlothian, Virginia 23114, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Newport News, Virginia 23606, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bellevue, Washington 98004, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    St-John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1E 2C2, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    St. John, Newfoundland and Labrador A1B 5E8, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Toronto, Ontario M9W 4L6, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sainte-Foy, Quebec G1v 3M7, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 0H6, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bad Doberan, 18209, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bayreuth, 95445, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Berlin, 13125, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Loehne, 32584, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Magdeburg, 39110, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Messkirch, 88605, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Regensburg, 93053, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Weener, 26826, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Zwiesel, 94227, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bekescsaba, H-5600, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Budapest, 1023, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Budapest, 1027, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Eger, 3300, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Gyula, 5703, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kistarcsa, 2143, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Szikszo, 3800, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Szolnok, 5000, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Veszprem, H-8200, Hungary
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kaunas, LT 50128, Lithuania
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kaunas, LT 51349, Lithuania
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vilnius, LT 01117, Lithuania
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Klaipeda, 92288, Lithuania
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vilnius, 09020, Lithuania
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vilnius, LT-08661, Lithuania
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01356602
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 19, 2011
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
Sep 2012
Completion
Sep 2012
Results posted
Jan 29, 2014
Last update
Jan 29, 2014

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion