A Phase 3 interventional study of Cinitapride and domperidone in Dyspepsia, sponsored by Eisai China Inc.. Completed at 13 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-11-30.
Sponsored by Eisai China Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to compare Cinitapride tablets with domperidone tablets (motilium), and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cinitapride tablets in the treatment of mild to moderate functional dyspepsia.
363 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspepsia; 51 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 400 is above the median of 87 across 297 interventional studies indexed under Dyspepsia.
Browse Dyspepsia studies →Eisai China Inc. is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion criteria
Drug: Cinitapride
Drug: domperidone
cinitapride 1 mg for each dose, 3 mg/daily, for 4 weeks
10 mg for each dose ,30 mg/daily, for 4 weeks
Response rate of overall symptom improvement after 4-weeks treatment
Time frame: 4 weeks
Percentage change of overall symptom score of functional dyspepsia from baseline after 2 and 4 weeks treatment
Time frame: 2 and 4 weeks
Response rate after 2 weeks treatment
Time frame: 2 weeks
Percentage change of individual symptom score (early satiety, discomfort with fullness after meal, flatulence, epigastric pain, epigastric burning, nausea, vomiting and belching) after 2 and 4 weeks treatment compared with the baseline
Time frame: 2 and 4 weeks
Changes of gastric emptying in some patients after 4-week treatment
Time frame: 4 weeks
Patient's global subjective assessment (Likert scale score) after 2 and 4 weeks treatment
Time frame: 2 and 4 weeks
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Eisai China Inc.