ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01354028Updated Jun 3, 2013Results posted

Effects of Massage Therapy to Induce Sleep in Preterm Infants

An interventional study of Massage therapy in Premature Birth of Newborn, sponsored by University of Arkansas. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Days to 20 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-06-03.

Sponsored by University of Arkansas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Days to 20 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Premature infants sometimes require sedation to ensure minimal movement during diagnostic procedures such as MRIs. However, sedatives may produce adverse effects. The purpose of this two-day study is to determine whether massage therapy will promote sleep in preterm infants and also help them to stay asleep, providing a safer way to sedate infants for procedures. A small instrument called a sleep watch or actigraph will be placed around the infant's ankle to measure muscle activity and provide an indication of sleep. Infants will receive a 10- minute massage on one morning of the study and no massage on the alternate morning. Recordings from the actigraph will show whether there is difference in sleep pattern with and without massage. Infants will be monitored for any heart rate and oxygen saturation changes on both mornings of the study.

Read the detailed description

This cross-over trial pilot study will assess the effectiveness of massage therapy for inducing and maintaining sleep in preterm infants. Massage therapy promotes relaxation and lowers stress levels, evidenced by increased vagal activity and lower cortisol levels. Safer methods of inducing sleep without drugs would be beneficial for infants who require sedation for diagnostic studies. The sample will include infants over 3 days old and between 32-40 weeks adjusted gestational age in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Infants who are clinically unstable, require surgery, have major congenital anomalies or have a history of severe birth asphyxia will be excluded.

After parental consent, infants will be randomized to receive massage on study day 1 or study day 2. Standard care will be provided on the alternate study day. A minimum of 30 infants is required to complete the study. The primary outcome measure used to document the response to massage will measured by the Motionlogger® Micro Sleep Watch® Actigraph (Actigraph). The actigraph will be placed on the infant's ankle approximately following the 9 am feed and will record lower extremity activity until approximately the 12 pm feed. Massages will occur after a minimum of 30 minutes following the morning feeding when the infant is in a quiet alert state and will be approximately 10 minutes in length. Baby lotion used as standard care in the NICU will be used to facilitate ease of massage.

Primary outcome measures will include data recorded by the actigraph: (a) sleep onset following massage intervention, (b) sleep end time, (c) number of awakenings and duration of awakenings during the study interval, (d) the duration of the longest sustained sleep period, and (e) sleep efficiency. Secondary outcomes will include oxygen saturation and heart rate during massage and for 30 minutes after massage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Premature Birth of Newborn

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • premature infant
  • massage therapy
  • sleep induction
  • relaxation
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,610 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 507 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 84 across 1,722 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Arkansas is the lead sponsor of 398 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 34 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Days to 20 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • > 3 days old
  • 32-48 weeks adjusted gestational age
  • Minimum of 28 weeks gestational age at birth
  • Clinically stable as determined by an neonatologist
  • Stable respiratory status on room air or nasal cannula flow \<2 LPM
  • Not meeting exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented maternal opiate use prior to admission to Labor and Delivery (opiates administered by physicians' order during labor prior to delivery do not mandate exclusion from the study as long as the mother does not have a past history of opiate abuse or a positive drug screen at hospital admission prior to delivery).
  • Clinically unstable and/or unable to be moved from the infant warmer
  • Severe congenital anomalies likely to be associated with developmental delay
  • Apgar score of ≤ 3 at 5 minutes of age
  • Any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator might result in unnecessary or excessive risk to the subject
  • Unstable respiratory status
  • Sedation in the previous 24 hours before the infant's trial.
  • Neurological disease: grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, evidence of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy
  • Anticipated painful procedures during the study period between 9 am and 12 pm
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Massage therapy

    Massage therapy for 10 minutes during quiet alert state following 9 AM feeding. Actigraph in place to measure sleep for 3 hours.

    Other: Massage therapy

  • No intervention
    No massage therapy

    This was a crossover trial with two arms. On one day, infants received massage therapy for 10 minutes. On the other day, infants were monitored as usual with the Actigraph to measure sleep efficiency, but received no massage therapy. This was the control or no intervention arm.

Interventions

  • OtherMassage therapy

    An overall massage time of approximately 10 minutes, administered by physical therapists. Almond oil or baby lotion that is currently used in standard care in the ACH NICU will be used to assist with ease of skin to skin contact during moderate pressure massage. Infants will receive two repetitions of 5-1minute periods of 12 strokes lasting approximately 5 seconds each described in protocol. Actigraph device is on infant's ankle to measure sleep.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Sleep, Defined by Number and Duration of Awakenings, and Longest Sustained Sleep Period for the Study Interval. These Data Were Measured by the Actigraph Software and Summarized as Percentage of Time Spent Sleeping, or Sleep Efficiency

    Sleep onset following the first quiet alert state after the 9 AM feed Sleep end time Number of awakenings and duration of the awakenings during the study period Longest sustained sleep period for the study interval Percentage of time spent sleeping, or sleep efficiency, will be used to summarize the data, comparing sleep efficiency over 2 days and using each infant as his/her own control

    Time frame: Participants were followed for two days

  2. Number of Infants Sleeping at the End of the Massage Period

    Investigators compared the number of infants sleeping at the end of the massage period with the percentage of infants sleeping at the same time on the non massage day.

    Time frame: Minute massage ended

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oxygen Saturation Levels During Massage

    Infants in the NICU are routinely attached to pulse oximeter monitors that measure oxygen saturation continuously. If the infant is stressed, oxygen levels may drop. Oxygen saturation was monitored during massage therapy as a routine measure but also to ensure that infants did not become stressed during the massage.

    Time frame: During massage

  2. Heart Rate

    Heart rate during massage therapy

    Time frame: During massage therapy

07

Results

Posted Jun 3, 2013
Limitations and caveats
The sample size was small. 30 infants were enrolled, but 7 infants were discharged or became ineligible and could not start the study.

Participant flow

Infants were recruited from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at a Children's Hospital. Recruitment dates were 03/09/2011 to 05/09/2012. A total of 30 infants were enrolled.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMassage Therapy First Day, no Massage Therapy Second DayNo Massage Therapy First Day, Massage Therapy Second Day
Started1515
Completed1310
Not completed25
Withdrew: Physician decision02
Withdrew: Discharged before study start22
Withdrew: No quiet alert state01

Outcome measures

PrimaryQuality of Sleep, Defined by Number and Duration of Awakenings, and Longest Sustained Sleep Period for the Study Interval. These Data Were Measured by the Actigraph Software and Summarized as Percentage of Time Spent Sleeping, or Sleep Efficiency

Sleep onset following the first quiet alert state after the 9 AM feed Sleep end time Number of awakenings and duration of the awakenings during the study period Longest sustained sleep period for the study interval Percentage of time spent sleeping, or sleep efficiency, will be used to summarize the data, comparing sleep efficiency over 2 days and using each infant as his/her own control

Time frame:
Participants were followed for two days
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time spent sleeping
Quality of Sleep, Defined by Number and Duration of Awakenings, and Longest Sustained Sleep Period for the Study Interval. These Data Were Measured by the Actigraph Software and Summarized as Percentage of Time Spent Sleeping, or Sleep Efficiency
percentage of time spent sleepingSleep Efficiency With Massage TherapySleep Efficiency With no Massage Therapy
Quality of Sleep, Defined by Number and Duration of Awakenings, and Longest Sustained Sleep Period for the Study Interval. These Data Were Measured by the Actigraph Software and Summarized as Percentage of Time Spent Sleeping, or Sleep Efficiency78.7 ± 2077.8 ± 21.4
Statistical analysis
  • Sleep Efficiency With Massage Therapy vs Sleep Efficiency With no Massage Therapy · Chi-squared · p = 0.1303Degrees of freedom =1
SecondaryOxygen Saturation Levels During Massage

Infants in the NICU are routinely attached to pulse oximeter monitors that measure oxygen saturation continuously. If the infant is stressed, oxygen levels may drop. Oxygen saturation was monitored during massage therapy as a routine measure but also to ensure that infants did not become stressed during the massage.

Time frame:
During massage
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of oxygen saturation
Oxygen Saturation Levels During Massage
percentage of oxygen saturationOxygen Saturation During MassageOxygen Saturation Without Massage
Oxygen Saturation Levels During Massage99.7 ± 0.799.3 ± 1.18
SecondaryHeart Rate

Heart rate during massage therapy

Time frame:
During massage therapy
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
Heart Rate
beats per minuteHeart Rate During MassageHeart Rate Without Massage
Heart Rate162.5 ± 12.7169.45 ± 12.86
PrimaryNumber of Infants Sleeping at the End of the Massage Period

Investigators compared the number of infants sleeping at the end of the massage period with the percentage of infants sleeping at the same time on the non massage day.

Time frame:
Minute massage ended
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Infants Sleeping at the End of the Massage Period
participantsMassage TherapyNo Massage Therapy
Number of Infants Sleeping at the End of the Massage Period714
Statistical analysis
  • Massage Therapy vs No Massage Therapy · Chi-squared · p = 0.026 (Pearson's chi square)Degrees of freedom=1

Adverse events

Collected over Infants were enrolled in the study three hours per day for two days. They received massage therapy on one day and no massage therapy on the other day (crossover trial). Data were collected for a total period of 1 year, 2 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Massage Therapy—0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
No Massage Therapy—0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Massage Therapy
newborn infant >3 days30
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Massage Therapy
Female12
Male18
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Massage Therapy
United States30
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Arkansas Children's Hospital
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01354028
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 16, 2011
Start date
Mar 2011
Primary completion
Jun 2012
Completion
Jun 2012
Results posted
Jun 3, 2013
Last update
Jun 3, 2013

Study contacts

Richard W Hall, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Arkansas

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion