ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01344915Updated May 2, 2011

Restricted vs. Free Knee Range Of Motion For Primary Traumatic Patellar Dislocation

An interventional study of Locked knee brace and Locked knee brace in Patellar Dislocation, sponsored by Tampere University Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-05-02.

Sponsored by Tampere University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2005), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Knee immobilization in near extension has been proposed as a nonoperative treatment for primary traumatic patellar dislocation, although there exist no prospective studies regarding the method of immobilization. The objective of this prospective randomized study was to compare the clinical outcome after nonoperative treatment with restricted vs. free range of motion (ROM) for primary traumatic patellar dislocation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Patellar Dislocation

Keywords

  • Patella
  • Knee
  • Brace
03

In context

Patellar Dislocation

41 studies on the registry are indexed under Patellar Dislocation; 9 are open to participants now.

Browse Patellar Dislocation studies →

Lead sponsor

Tampere University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A primary (first-time) patellar dislocation verified by clinical examination
  • Signs of patellar dislocation in MRI

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • anyone with previous patellar instability
  • osteochondral fracture requiring surgery
  • associated knee injuries
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Knee brace

    Procedure: Locked knee brace

  • Active comparator
    Locked knee brace

    Procedure: Locked knee brace

Interventions

  • ProcedureLocked knee brace
  • ProcedureLocked knee brace
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patellar redislocation

    The number of patients with patellar redislocation after initial treatment.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tampere University Hospital
    Tampere, 33521, Finland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Honkonen EE, Sillanpaa PJ, Reito A, Maenpaa H, Mattila VM. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Patella-Stabilizing, Motion-Restricting Knee Brace Versus a Neoprene Nonhinged Knee Brace After a First-Time Traumatic Patellar Dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jun;50(7):1867-1875. doi: 10.1177/03635465221090644. Epub 2022 Apr 19. PubMed 35438588 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 2, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01344915
First posted
Apr 29, 2011
Start date
Dec 2005
Primary completion
Jan 2007
Completion
Jun 2011 (estimated)
Last update
May 2, 2011

Study contacts

Petri J Sillanpää, MD PhD
principal investigator · Tampere University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2005. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion