CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01343056PRISMUpdated Jun 2, 2017Results posted

Program Reinforcement Impacts Self Management (PRISM)

An interventional study of Office Staff Support and Peer Support in Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-02.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
141
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients who receive DSME (Diabetes Self Management Education) will be enrolled in a 4 arm, randomized study with each group receiving a different method of follow up. The 4 arms will be evaluated based on clinical indicators, goal achievement and patient satisfaction.

Read the detailed description

As the diabetes burden worsens, the need for people to become more involved in self-management will increase. Research has demonstrated that diabetes self-management education (DSME) can improve HbA1C levels by 0.76%. While the rates of diabetes are increasing, the numbers of educators available are shrinking. This is a particular hardship in underserved and military communities where the supply of health care providers is already scarce. Our investigative team has led efforts in supporting DSME in the PA state-wide deployment of the Chronic Care Model (CCM) and reported findings nationally on innovative ways to increase the pool of education services by integrating educators into primary care, establishing nurse clinics in underserved communities and demonstrating that an educator position could be sustained by reimbursement. A 0.76% reduction associated to DSME can be considered an enormous benefit and is equivalent to the impact of most pharmacologic treatments for diabetes. Unfortunately, however the benefits of DSME decrease over time. This suggests that sustained improvements require contact and follow-up. SMS is defined as the process of ongoing support of patient self-care, to sustain the gains following DSME. There is often confusion among the terms self-management education (DSME) and self-management support (SMS). DSME is associated with the provision of knowledge and skills training delivered by a health care professional, e.g. nurses, dietitians, etc. SMS is defined as the process of making and refining changes in health care systems (and the community) to support patient self-care and maintain the gains made following DSME. We know that SMS is currently provided by diabetes educators, but only one 3-6 month follow up is usual care. It has been suggested that SMS can be provided by community workers, peers with diabetes, and office staff within community sites, like PCP offices, and wellness centers, etc. The National Standards for DSME and American Diabetes Association (ADA) Education Recognition Program (ERP) require that SMS approaches be delivered and documented, yet no evidence has been provided to define who should deliver it and how often. This uncertainty has led to many programs delivering SMS in an unstructured, non-standardized and at times haphazard fashion. Practical approaches designed for providing SMS have the potential to sustain improvements. The objective of this study is to compare Self-Management Support (SMS) interventions following Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) and determine which will be more likely to maintain improvements in behavioral and clinical outcomes following DSME while achieving patient satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Diabetes Self Management Education (DSME)
  • Diabetes
  • Self Management Support (SMS)
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 141 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A person with diabetes referred for diabetes education

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gestational diabetes and pregnancy
  • If a person has recently had diabetes education, they will not be enrolled in the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
141 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Office Staff follow up education

    A designee in the office staff shall be assigned to follow up with the patient for for behavioral goal setting attainment. The office staff will call patients monthly to monitor goal attainment. It will be suggested that they phone the participant monthly but researchers will observe how and if they provide follow up. The intervention is the follow up goal attainment and office staff have been trained on elements of goal attainment.

    Behavioral: Office Staff Support

  • Active comparator
    Peer follow up education

    A person with diabetes trained as a "peer" shall meet the participant at their 6 week follow up visit and then call the participant monthly to monitor behavioral goal attainment.The intervention is the follow up goal attainment and peers have been trained on elements of goal attainment.

    Behavioral: Peer Support

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    ADA Recognition maintains the standard that a follow up to diabetes education must occur from 3-6 month post education. This one phone call will be made by the diabetes educator. The intervention is the diabetes educator making a phone call to the patient to ask how they are doing.

    Behavioral: Usual Care Support

  • Active comparator
    Educator support follow up

    A diabetes educator will provide follow up support and make monthly call to the patient to ascertain behavioral goal setting attainment. The diabetes educator uses behavioral goal setting as an education intervention. The educator calls patient to determine goal attainment. That is the intervention.

    Behavioral: Educator Support

Interventions

  • BehavioralOffice Staff Support

    The intervention includes the Office staff of primary care practices trained to provide diabetes support for behavioral goal setting were tasked to follow up with patients via phone following completion of diabetes self-management education.

  • BehavioralPeer Support

    Community peers trained to provide diabetes support for behavioral goal setting were tasked to follow up with patients via phone following completion of diabetes self-management education.

  • BehavioralUsual Care Support

    Diabetes educators provided patient follow up for behavioral goal setting support according to traditional clinical guidelines following completion of diabetes self-management.

  • BehavioralEducator Support

    Diabetes educators provided patient follow up for behavioral goal setting support that was problem-focused and patient centered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C, %)

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. High Density Lipoprotein (HDL, mg/dL)

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL, mg/dL)

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Change in Diabetes Empowerment Scale- Short Form (DES-SF) Scores

    The DES-SF is a validated, 8 item scale that measures the self-efficacy of patients with diabetes. Responses are selected from a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly Disagree (1), Somewhat Disagree (2), Neutral (3), Somewhat Agree (4), Strongly Agree (5)). The scale is scored by averaging the scores of all completed items (sum of scores divided by 8). A positive number represents an improvement in overall patient self-efficacy (empowerment) from the baseline score and 6 month follow up time point.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Body Mass Index

    Body Mass Index is a weight-to-height ratio, calculated by dividing one's weight in kilograms by the square of one's height in meters and used as an indicator of obesity and underweight.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Diastolic blood pressure is the pressure when the heart is at rest between beats.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Systolic Blood Pressure

    Systolic blood pressure is the pressure when the heart beats while pumping blood.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Apr 18, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOffice Staff Follow up of Diabetes EducationPeer Follow up of Diabetes EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow up
Started35363238
Completed28312929
Not completed7539
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up7539

Outcome measures

PrimaryHemoglobin A1C (HbA1C, %)
Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · percentage of glycosolated hemoglobin
Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C, %)
percentage of glycosolated hemoglobinOffice Staff Follow up of Diabetes EducationPeer Follow up of Diabetes EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow up
Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C, %)6.8 (5.2 to 9.6)7.6 (5.4 to 11.6)6.8 (5.0 to 8.8)7.1 (5.9 to 10.2)
SecondaryTotal Cholesterol (mg/dL)
Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · mg/dL
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)
mg/dLOffice Staff Follow up EducationPeer Follow up EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow up
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)169 (100 to 205)159 (121 to 369)175 (129 to 321)150 (27 to 210)
SecondaryHigh Density Lipoprotein (HDL, mg/dL)
Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · mg/dL
High Density Lipoprotein (HDL, mg/dL)
mg/dLOffice Staff Follow up of Diabetes EducationPeer Follow up of Diabetes EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow up
High Density Lipoprotein (HDL, mg/dL)46 (29 to 70)46 (35 to 67)39 (32 to 53)39 (23 to 84)
SecondaryLow Density Lipoprotein (LDL, mg/dL)
Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · mg/dL
Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL, mg/dL)
mg/dLOffice Staff Follow up of Diabetes EducationPeer Follow up of Diabetes EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow up
Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL, mg/dL)86 (36 to 139)81 (59 to 274)103 (38 to 203)39 (23 to 84)
SecondaryChange in Diabetes Empowerment Scale- Short Form (DES-SF) Scores

The DES-SF is a validated, 8 item scale that measures the self-efficacy of patients with diabetes. Responses are selected from a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly Disagree (1), Somewhat Disagree (2), Neutral (3), Somewhat Agree (4), Strongly Agree (5)). The scale is scored by averaging the scores of all completed items (sum of scores divided by 8). A positive number represents an improvement in overall patient self-efficacy (empowerment) from the baseline score and 6 month follow up time point.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Diabetes Empowerment Scale- Short Form (DES-SF) Scores
units on a scaleOffice Staff Follow up of Diabetes EducationPeer Follow up of Diabetes EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow up
Change in Diabetes Empowerment Scale- Short Form (DES-SF) Scores3.9 ± .84.1 ± .74.0 ± .94.5 ± .4
SecondaryBody Mass Index

Body Mass Index is a weight-to-height ratio, calculated by dividing one's weight in kilograms by the square of one's height in meters and used as an indicator of obesity and underweight.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · kg/m^2
Body Mass Index
kg/m^2Office Staff Follow up EducationPeer Follow up EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow up
Body Mass Index35.1 (23.5 to 57)31.8 (23.2 to 47.1)32.3 (23.8 to 48)33.9 (24.9 to 50.2)
SecondaryDiastolic Blood Pressure

Diastolic blood pressure is the pressure when the heart is at rest between beats.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · mmHg
Diastolic Blood Pressure
mmHgOffice Staff Follow up of Diabetes EducationPeer Follow up of Diabetes EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow up
Diastolic Blood Pressure78 (50 to 109)78 (60 to 92)78 (58 to 90)75 (60 to 92)
SecondarySystolic Blood Pressure

Systolic blood pressure is the pressure when the heart beats while pumping blood.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · mmHg
Systolic Blood Pressure
mmHgOffice Staff Follow up EducationPeer Follow up EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow up
Systolic Blood Pressure129 (108 to 155)130 (112 to 156)132 (102 to 150)132 (110 to 158)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Office Staff Follow up of Diabetes Education—0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)
Peer Follow up of Diabetes Education—0/36 (0%)0/36 (0%)
Usual Care—0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)
Educator Support Follow up—0/38 (0%)0/38 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

recruited type 2 diabetes patients who were referred for diabetes education

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Office Staff Follow up of Diabetes EducationPeer Follow up of Diabetes EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow upTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years35363238141
>=65 years00000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Office Staff Follow up of Diabetes EducationPeer Follow up of Diabetes EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow upTotal
Mean60 ± 13.464 ± 1060 ± 1260 ± 1060 ± 10
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Office Staff Follow up of Diabetes EducationPeer Follow up of Diabetes EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow upTotal
Female2519162080
Male1017161861
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Office Staff Follow up of Diabetes EducationPeer Follow up of Diabetes EducationUsual CareEducator Support Follow upTotal
United States35363238141
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Pennsylvania State University
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Siminerio L, Ruppert KM, Gabbay RA. Who can provide diabetes self-management support in primary care? Findings from a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Educ. 2013 Sep-Oct;39(5):705-13. doi: 10.1177/0145721713492570. Epub 2013 Jun 19. PubMed 23782622 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01343056
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
Penn State University
Responsible party
Linda Siminerio (Linda Siminerio, RN, PhD, CDE, Executive Director, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 27, 2011
Start date
Apr 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2012
Completion
Oct 2013
Results posted
Apr 18, 2017
Last update
Jun 2, 2017

Study contacts

Linda Siminerio, RN, PhD, CDE
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh
Robert Gabbay, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Penn State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion